Forum Topics

Grooming Gang Rapist Defies Deportation

Unbelievable!!🤬How has this been allowed to happen?  Qari Abdul Rauf has been represented by tax-funded human rights lawyers (that we all pay for) who subsequently took the case to the ECHR.His lawyers argued that Rauf is stateless' having renounced his Pakistani citizenship and deportation would breach his right to private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.'Rochdale rape gang ringleader's VERY comfortable life in Britain a decade after he was released and told he'd be deportedThe ringleader of an Asian grooming gang is still living in the town where he committed his horrific crimes - almost a decade after he was released from jail and told he would be deported.MailOnline can reveal the 55-year-old has been working for a takeaway delivery app, prompting fears he might meet one of his victims during the course of his work.He is among nine members of the Rochdale grooming gang who were jailed for raping and trafficking young children across England in 2012.Rauf was told he would be deported to Pakistan in 2014 after serving two and half years of a six-year prison sentence.The presence of the former taxi driver adds fuel to the fire over demands that the Government hold a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal.Rauf, who was stripped of his UK citizenship, was told he would be sent back to Pakistan following his release in November 2014.Immigration Tribunal judges have twice rejected his appeal against deportation in 2020 and 2022.However his lawyers argued Rauf is 'stateless' after him having renounced his Pakistani citizenship (crafty and effective), and deportation would breach his right to private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.'https://mol.im/a/14258565

Sue Hammond ● 668d7 Comments ● 668d

Genuine? Jenrick!

"Jenrick shape-shifts on air with reality-bending Today interviewJohn Crace (Gdn, yesterday)Shadow justice secretary makes case for second child sexual abuse inquiry, despite ignoring the last one.Robert Jenrick brushed off the observation that he had never before even mentioned the subject in parliament.""You can tell that Elon Musk must have overstepped the mark when even Kemi Badenoch has taken a break from tweeting her support for the ketamine-riddled world’s richest man. The Tory leader’s reality is largely shaped by what she reads on social media, so unless she’s taken time out to help the Muskster find a drug counsellor, she’s decided that she’d be better off keeping quiet for a while. Quite the concession for a politician who never knowingly avoids the chance to make a bad situation worse.But you can always rely on Robert Jenrick to step into any vacuum. It’s hard to know who the real Honest Bob really is. Is it the fresh-faced David Cameron wannabe who was first elected in 2014? The soft-hearted liberal who was totally in favour of remaining in the EU. Is it the minister with no moral compass who was happy to expedite a planning permission for an erstwhile pornographer and Tory donor? Or is it the politician of the far right? The man who has never yet met an immigrant he didn’t want to deport?Not even Honest Bob really knows. There is so little to him that he can only approximate to what he thinks best serves his interests at any given time. And right now he has somehow got it into his head that he should be the next leader of the Tory party.What the Conservatives have done to deserve him is hard to fathom, but that doesn’t worry our Bob. He’s always led a gilded life. Assumes that people must always be thrilled to see him. Just by breathing he is doing us all a favour. And he’s come to the conclusion that his best chance of fulfilling his destiny is to shape-shift to the right. So that’s who he now is.Along the way, Jenrick has also become a useful idiot to people like Musk. While Elon works his way through his stash, Honest Bob is on hand to pick up the pieces of his increasingly deranged tweets. It’s win-win for both of them. Musk gets to feel as if he is as important as his ego demands while Honest Bob gets to kickstart another culture war. Along the way, reality has long since left the building. Not that either of them have noticed.With Musk’s tweets about child grooming gangs still dominating the news, it was inevitable that sooner or later Bob would turn up on the radio to be unpleasant and make a fool of himself. And sure enough, he was granted the prime 8.10am slot on the Today programme. Presenter Nick Robinson couldn’t believe his luck. It wasn’t a fair fight.Robinson began with a reminder that it wasn’t Elon Musk’s tweets that really mattered; it was getting justice for the girls and young women who were victims of sex abuse. A caveat that was wasted on Honest Bob as, like in all things, this was all about him and his ambitions.“We need a national inquiry,” Bob demanded. Labour were trying to cover up a scandal. Robbo looked at Jenrick as if he was a halfwit. Um … He was aware that there had already been an inquiry conducted by Prof Alexis Jay, wasn’t he? And that Jay had said there was no need for another one. What would really help was for its recommendations to be implemented.Honest Bob wasn’t to be distracted. The first inquiry had achieved nothing. Jay hadn’t really known what she was doing. Only he was in possession of the real facts. Except, as you will have guessed, he wasn’t. Robbo had to spell it out as simply as possible for him.Let’s get this straight, said Robbo. You are saying that child sexual abuse is still going on all over the place. Yes. So why didn’t you do anything about it when you were in power? You could have set up any number of inquiries if you thought the Jay inquiry wasn’t sufficiently wide-ranging. And why are you only talking about child grooming gangs now and not when you were a Home Office minister? You didn’t mention it once in parliament (he had checked Hansard). You’re just an opportunist.All this rather confused Bob. Logic has a habit of doing that to him. So he went back to the beginning. Could he have another inquiry please? For the first time, Robinson was taken aback. There was simple and then there was Jenrick. To recap. Inquiries took an age. Some had never reported after 10 years or more. Was that what he really wanted? For justice to be further delayed?“Absolutely,” said Jenrick. There was no arguing with him. And he wanted to correct one statement. The Tories may not have implemented any of the Jay recommendations but they had carried forward two of them. And how did that help the victims? Aha! Honest Bob wasn’t to be distracted. Carrying forward was a necessary first step. It was far too easy to get hung up on implementation.Robinson chose to move on. So had Bob had a chance to reflect on his remarks that Pakistani men were from an alien culture with medieval attitudes? It hadn’t gone down well with Samuel Kasumu, a former race adviser to the Tories.I stand by every word, Jenrick declared. So Sajid Javid had medieval attitudes? Well, maybe not him. Though he couldn’t rule it out. How about Sadiq Khan? Almost certainly. The thing was to keep the hate going. None of this was about achieving justice for the victims. Just a reminder to observe the two-minute hate. War is peace.Over on LBC radio, Nigel Farage was bewildered to yet again find himself to the centre of the Tory party on L’Affaire Musk. He tried to rectify the situation. He wouldn’t personally call Jess Phillips a rape-genocide apologist but he was happy for Elon to do so. Nige wasn’t going to let go of a multimillion-dollar potential donation that easily.“I too want an inquiry,” Farage said. “And if Labour won’t give me one, I will have one myself. We could get it up and running in a couple of weeks or so.” That’s £100m and the next 10 years taken care of."Good 'un from the Gdn.

David Ainsworth ● 668d1 Comments ● 668d

Could Starmer Be Any More Stupid & Insensitive? 😡

Keir Starmer's far-Right 'smear' on Rochdale rapists critics'Keir Starmer was last night accused of ‘smear tactics’ after claiming those wanting an inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal were jumping on a ‘far-Right bandwagon’.The Prime Minister triggered a furious backlash after saying Tory demands for an inquiry into the rape of thousands of white girls by gangs of predominantly Pakistani-origin men were ‘amplifying what the far-Right are saying’.Sir Keir also angrily defended his record as Director of Public Prosecutions after Tesla tycoon Elon Musk suggested he was ‘complicit’ in the failure to tackle the abuse. And he claimed Kemi Badenoch’s interventions on the issue showed she was ‘desperate for attention’.The Tory leader hit back, accusing the PM of ‘applying Labour smear tactics from 20 years ago’.She added: ‘That such a huge scandal could occur should prompt soul-searching not ranting that those of us who care about it are “the far-Right”.’ Mrs Badenoch revealed she will table a Commons amendment this week designed to force a vote on the need for an inquiry.Former police detective Maggie Oliver, who helped blow the whistle on the scandal in Rochdale, said she was ‘incandescent with rage’ at the PM’s comments.She told GB News: ‘I am no far-Right activist. I am a woman who gave 16 years of my life to the police and protecting children was No 1 priority in my life.'All the victims that I know and that we support have had their lives destroyed. To write them off as far-Right extremists is insulting in the extreme.’Former home secretary James Cleverly warned that the PM’s comments risked inflaming public anger over the issue.'Accusing those who disagree with him, or who seek legitimate answers about repeated failures of child protection, as “far-Right” is deeply insulting and counterproductive. He is the best recruiting sergeant for extremism,’ Mr Cleverly said'https://mol.im/a/14256619

Sue Hammond ● 670d10 Comments ● 668d

BBC tomorrow a.m. - Paedophile Information Exchange, or PIE - active in the 1970s and 80s

The List Episode 1 of 6In Dark Corners Series 2 Tomorrow January 8th on BBC Radio 4 at 9.30 AM."Journalist Alex Renton is shown a secret document, containing the names and addresses of people signed up to a pro-paedophile group called the Paedophile Information Exchange, or PIE, which was active in the 1970s and 80s.That’s not all: weeks after getting the membership list Alex meets a contact who gives him bags full of documents, crammed with reports, contact details, letters.As Alex starts following up on leads; detail of the criminal activities committed by some of PIE’s members, and those connected with them, begins to emerge.It’s a lot to take in. Alex is not only a journalist, he’s a survivor of child sexual abuse. All of this information about PIE; it feels like a heavy weight to carry. Are children still at risk?Alex sets off on a dizzying journey into the dark history of the Paedophile Information Exchange and uncovers abuses committed by PIE's members: teachers, clergy, social workers, government advisors.As Alex finds out more, he starts to wonder: where are all those hundreds of members now?He meets the former deputy editor of Private Eye, journalist Francis Wheen: he has a long memory for news and a nose for stories that people in power want to keep secret. What does he know about PIE?Archive credits: Newsnight, BBC, August 1983Details of organisations offering information and support for victims of child sexual abuse are available at bbc.co.uk/actionline"https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00272c5

David Ainsworth ● 669d3 Comments ● 669d

The first mention of "grooming" on the Forum?

The first mention of "grooming" on the Forum was apparently in 2014. It was by Iftikhar Ahmad whom some may remember. "Sexual Grooming Forum HomePosted by: Iftikhar AhmadDate/Time: 27/06/14 15:40:00Sexual GroomingChildren as young as 10 are being sexually exploited by organised gangs of men in cities across the UK, a leading charity says.Barnardo's says it is working with more than 1,000 children who have been groomed, abused and trafficked for money, and the problem is growing. This is sickening. It's no wonder Great Britain is in such a bad shape. Ten years old British girls are having babies out of wedlock. They are not allowed to get married but are allowed to have babies.Why don't we just report the rapes, rather than have to say MUSLIM rapes? When non Muslims commit rapes, do we say white rapists, Christian rapists etc? So why the need to label?  Or is it only when a rapist happens to be Muslim, some of us feel the need for whatever reason, to say MUSLIM rapist? When grooming paedophiles happen to be white (btw this is the MAJORITY), nobody mentions that either, or saying hmmm we need to study why so many white men take part in grooming little girls. But if it happens to be a Muslim or Asian, oh well, we must say Muslim, we must say Asian, and we must study why these things are happening amongst their community, lol, what a load of baloney. Sadly, many people don't actually care about the rapes itself, they want to politicise the rapes as a means to target specific communities, i.e. Muslims, Asians etc.Under the law of Islam, the punishment for rapist is "stoned to death" in public by public --- no matter what religion the criminal is affiliated. Rape is considered as a serious offense in Islam warranting death to offenders, more than just "illegal sexual intercourse" commonly known as adultery."There is much more, but this first part seems enough.

David Ainsworth ● 670d1 Comments ● 669d

Prosecute professionals who stay silent on child abuse claims – Starmer

"This article is more than 11 years old""Prosecute professionals who stay silent on child abuse claims – Keir StarmerFormer director of public prosecutions calls for change in law to prevent more victims slipping through netJosh HallidayMon 4 Nov 2013 00.01 GMTTeachers and health workers should be prosecuted for failing to alert the police to allegations of child abuse, according to the former director of public prosecutions, who is calling for an overhaul of the law to prevent more victims from slipping through the net.Keir Starmer QC, who left his role as Britain's top prosecutor last week, becomes the most senior official to call for the introduction of mandatory reporting following a string of high-profile cases, including the Jimmy Savile scandal, in which victims of the TV and radio star were repeatedly failed by the social care system.In an interview with BBC1's Panorama programme to be aired on Monday, Starmer says: "I think the time has come to change the law and close a gap that's been there for a very long time. I think there should be a mandatory reporting provision."Starmer says Britain should be brought into step with countries such as the US, Canada and Australia, where it is a criminal offence for care professionals not to report child abuse allegations to the authorities."The problem is, if you haven't got a central provision requiring people to report, then all you can do is fall back on other provisions that aren't really designed for that purpose and that usually means they run into difficulties. What you really need is a clear, direct law that everybody understands," he says.His intervention comes a year after it was revealed that Savile, who died in 2011, had abused hundreds of victims at schools, hospitals and BBC premises over five decades.Savile was never apprehended, despite high-level concerns over his behaviour and complaints to police and care workers."https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/nov/04/child-abuse-keir-starmer-prosecute-professionals

David Ainsworth ● 670d1 Comments ● 670d