Fining motorists using CCTV evidence ruled 'illegal'
Test case finds Transport for London guilty of ‘procedural impropriety’ by relying on video evidence and not traffic wardenshttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/05/tfl-motorists-cctv-penalty-charge-notices-illegal-london/ Behind paywall but here is another Drivers could be owed MILLIONS in parking fine refunds as landmark ruling finds that Sadiq Khan's TfL 'broke the law' by using CCTV footage rather than traffic wardens to punish motoristsTfL unlawfully fined drivers parking in red route bays by using CCTV, ruling findshttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12377011/Sadiq-Khans-TfL-broke-law-using-CCTV-traffic-wardens-fine-drivers-landmark-ruling-motorists-owed-millions-pounds-refunds.htmlDoes this mean that all cameras (as in Dryburgh Road and Hartington Road in Chiswick) are illegal too? The same would apply to cameras on roads with restred hours of entry and, dare I say, LTNs??????Also, I thought cameras helped in the sense that Council's, police and I suppose TfL do not have the manpower to issue PCNs?
Ivonne Holliday ● 912d8 Comments