Forum Topics

Ransom pic + reply to Mr Hawkes - 8 October 2026

I think this robotic dog is showing off ... http://flic.kr/p/2sCFU2g••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Mr Hawkes. I think that's what I did initially when I started posting pics during the pandemic. For some reason I changed to posting them individually - perhaps because a lot more people were posting to the forum then and they didn't seem so obtrusive?Anyway, it's irrelevant at the moment; I've just done a test and the new, recently updated, GUI interface still gives me a "Failed to create Post" message when I do a reply to an existing thread rather than create a new thread - it also says it's been reported to the Neighbournet Support Team, so perhaps we can expect a fix soon ... anyway, that's the reason I'm replying to you as part of this new post rather than your original reply on my post!The old text version allows replies but is messy to use from a phone (which I'm currently using on a train), and doesn't follow links to Flickr properly; also, the text interface isn't very secure - I suspect that's why someone broke the law and hacked your account a while ago?I'll reconsider your suggestion when there's an update to the GUI version that fixes the "reply posting" bug. For the time being, I'll keep posting them as I can see from the Flickr statistics people are still viewing them - often more than are posting to the forum - so I know other like viewing them :-) I suppose the more threads there are, the better it looks from an advertising view point so it's less likely the forum will close through lack of income? I'd note, the Random pics are clearly marked and easier to avoid than some of the long, rambling replies that go off topic on some threads?If you have a problem with my response, don't bother replying to me. Instead, hassle the Forum owners to fix their software. It irritates me that after my 4+ decades in IT, I encounter software updates that contain basic bugs that any half decent test strategy would eliminate.

Michael Ixer ● 8d0 Comments ● 8d

Proposals for massive increases in Council Tax

I don't think this issue has been raised here before (if I've missed it, my apologies). The 100% increase for Wandsworth is very worrying, and now Hammersmith and Fulham are proposing a 150% hike. Increases on this scale are of great concern, and I can't help thinking that there is a fairer way of implementing them (I'm considering this quite apart from the decision of the government that has led to these increases as that's a wider issue).In the 1970s it became clear that the distribution of spending in the NHS was wildly out of kilter, which led to the setting up of the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) in 1975. RAWP confirmed the disparities and suggested a new formula, using (amongst other things) the use of standardised mortality rates as a proxy measure. Obviously the regions gaining on the formula were pleased and those losing, less so, and to alleviate the possible changes it was agreed that to go immediately to the new formula would be a disaster. So, as I recall (I was working at DHSS at the time, though not on health spending) it was agreed that the formula would be introduced gradually, with well-provided regions’ spending remaining static and extra resources over time allocated to the less well-provided, which helped to reduce the pain of the reallocation.Sorry about the history lesson, but it is useful in suggesting that the pain of changes in council tax would be considerably reduced by a similar process to that used in implementing RAWP rather than doing it in one go.

Richard Carter ● 11d13 Comments ● 11d