Forum Topics

Back from Ukraine in one piece

Didn't see a single drone but more and more vehicle owners are investing in drone jammers - a big square box on the roof with lots of electrics in it.And we think we've got problems!A huge thank you, by the way, to those who have supported Medical Life Lines Ukraine, including the very generous "Anonymous".  Thanks to some of you I have raised over £12,000 since June.Here is an extract of my email to as many donors as I have email addresses for:Our journey was long and tiring – about 1,250 miles – but that was as nothing to the emotions we felt when handing our four ambulances over to the hospitals and search & rescue teams who will be using them.  Each recipient sent a small deputation to show appreciation and to give them a day of R&R.  There was a formal dinner (including salo but not much vodka) and of course many speeches.One team had come straight from the front line, picked up their 4WD search & rescue vehicle (which came with hydraulic cutting tools used to extract people from damaged buildings) and drove it straight back after one of the first responders had told us of what they had to deal with virtually every day.  As they see it their front lines are not only Ukraine’s but those of Europe too. The ambulance I drove will be used by a rehabilitation centre for wounded veterans and at the dinner we heard harrowing testimony from the man who now runs the centre, an ex-POW who spent two years in Russian captivity.  How he was treated was appalling and degrading.  Almost literally inhuman.One of the other vehicles will go to a hospital that specialises in treating limb loss injuries.  This hospital alone has treated over 18,000 victims to date.We started out with five ambulances but one, a mobile treatment centre, sadly broke down en route in Belgium.  Once it is fixed it will be delivered separately.  For those still keen to support MLLU, the repairs for this vehicle will cost around £2,000 and that needs funding.  Once again, here is the funding link: https://www.justgiving.com/page/jonathan-callaway-1Each of the drivers raised well over their £7,000 target and our Ukrainian friends were especially touched that on average each of us had found over 100 donors.  Just knowing that we had such a lot of support behind us was a lift to their morale.  It really was an emotional evening.Before the handovers we had a few hours downtime and managed a trip into the beautiful and historic centre of Lviv.  A visit to the “Church of Tears”, where hundreds of fallen soldiers and civilians were commemorated, was a vivid reminder of the seemingly never-ending toll this war is taking on the country and its people. There is a Church of Tears in every town and village.  Seeing the pictures of some of the children who had lost their fathers – and the messages they left for them – was especially heart-breaking.It seemed unreal to us but life in Lviv goes on pretty much as normal (even the air raid sirens are often ignored).  Kids playing in the fountains, people walking around with ice-creams, bars and cafés full of people, everyone making the best of things.  However, a couple of things stood out – there were very few young men around, some buildings had been boarded up as a protective measure and – unlike two years ago – a lot of vehicles now have rooftop drone jammers.This was a physically tiring but emotionally powerful experience for all of us drivers.I will end by mentioning that the charity is still looking for a couple of drivers for the next convoy in November ... please consider this especially if you still have a C1 licence.Thanks again to all of you

Jonathan Callaway ● 35d15 Comments ● 30d

Why More Students Are Searching for “Take My Online Class” Support

Over the past decade, online education has transformed from a convenient option into a mainstream path for students worldwide. With the flexibility to learn from anywhere, online courses allow learners to balance education with part-time jobs, internships, and family responsibilities. Yet, the convenience comes with its own set of challenges, including tight deadlines, complex assignments, and endless virtual discussions. These pressures have led many students to seek guidance and support to stay on track and succeed academically.What Does It Mean When Students Say “Take My Online Class”?When students type phrases like take my online class into search engines, they are often overwhelmed by their workload. Many are juggling multiple courses while also managing real-world commitments. That’s where academic platforms like https://myassignmenthelp.com/take-my-online-class.html come into play, offering reliable guidance for assignments, tutoring, and subject-specific assistance. Instead of struggling alone, students can collaborate with experts who simplify complicated concepts and provide step-by-step help.Why Online Classes Feel OverwhelmingOnline learning demands more than simply logging in and reading through modules. It often includes video lectures, group projects, quizzes, weekly submissions, and participation in discussion boards. The self-paced model is also a double-edged sword. On one hand, it offers freedom; on the other hand, it requires self-discipline and consistent time management. Without proper planning, students may feel buried under tasks, resulting in stress and lower grades.

Peter Jones ● 30d0 Comments ● 30d

Drumfire for Starmer. Allies  plaintively whinge.

15 September 2025 BBC"Paul Ovenden, a senior aide to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, has resigned after offensive and sexual text messages came to light in which he recounted a conversation about veteran MP Diane Abbott.The messages were reported in the Daily Mail, and are understood to have been made eight years ago, as part of an online private conversation.In a statement to ITV News, Mr Ovenden said he was "truly, deeply sorry for it and the hurt it will cause".A spokesperson for the prime minister called the messages "appalling and unacceptable", saying: "As the first black woman to be elected to Parliament, Diane Abbott is a trailblazer who has faced horrendous abuse throughout her political career."They added: "These kinds of comments have no place in our politics."Abbott has declined to comment on Mr Ovenden's resignation.Mr Ovenden was Sir Keir's director of political strategy and the messages are understood to have been made when he was a press officer for the Labour party.In the messages, he recounted colleagues' comments made during a more explicit version of the game Snog, Marry, Avoid with graphic sexual imagery relating to Abbott.Abbott is the longest-serving female MP in Parliament, having represented the Hackney North and Stoke Newington constituency since 1987.For much of her parliamentary career she has been a Labour MP, but earlier this year was suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party for comments she made about racism.Mr Ovenden in his statement: "I am accused of eight years ago as a junior press officer sharing with a female colleague the details of a silly conversation that I was party to with other female staff members."Before summer, I had announced to some of my colleagues my intention to leave government."Though the messages long pre-date my current employment and relationship with the prime minister, I've brought forward my resignation to avoid distracting from the vital work this government is doing to positively change people's lives."As an advisor, my duty is to protect the reputation of the prime minister and his government."While it is chilling that a private conversation from nearly a decade ago can do this sort of damage, I am also truly, deeply sorry for it and the hurt it will cause."His resignation comes just a few days after the prime minister sacked Peter Mandelson as his ambassador to the US and less than two weeks after Angela Rayner resigned as deputy prime minister.Asked if the Downing Street operation was "a shambles", a No 10 spokesman replied: "The PM's focus is on delivering practical change to make a difference to people's lives."The spokesman would not say if Sir Keir had contacted Abbott about the messages.One senior ally of Mr Ovenden in government said: "It's a factional hit to expose Keir and Morgan [McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief of staff]. Pathetic."And it raises a massive question about how we judge ourselves. Someone's private messages get hacked, held for eight years on someone's laptop, briefed to a journalist... and they [Ovenden] are the one who has to resign."Labour MP Nadia Whittome said the "misogynistic comments...recounted with glee by Paul Ovenden are utterly despicable"."Ovenden:- "While it is chilling that a private conversation from nearly a decade ago can do this sort of damage, I am also truly, deeply sorry for it and the hurt it will cause.""One senior ally of Mr Ovenden in government said: "It's a factional hit to expose Keir and Morgan [McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief of staff]. Pathetic."And it raises a massive question about how we judge ourselves. Someone's private messages get hacked, held for eight years on someone's laptop, briefed to a journalist... and they [Ovenden] are the one who has to resign.""If you can't catch, don't throw.How sad that there could be a "factional hit to expose Morgan McSweeney", so undeserved. Now perhaps they start to realise what they did and how it felt for Corbyn and his supporters.

David Ainsworth ● 33d1 Comments ● 33d

Every time they’re making progress, it seems like he bombs someone

TOI 12/9/25"US President Donald Trump’s administration is reportedly growing frustrated with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, after Israel bombed a meeting of Hamas leaders in Qatar on Tuesday while they were reportedly gathered to discuss a US-proposed framework for a hostage-ceasefire deal.Trump has made it clear that he was displeased by Israel’s strike — in no small part because it targeted Hamas leaders inside Qatar, a close US ally — saying in its wake that it did not “advance Israel or America’s goals.” But he also stressed publicly that he believed “eliminating Hamas” was a “worthy goal.”Yet a report by Politico on Thursday suggested that the Trump administration was more frustrated by the situation than it has publicly let on.“Every time they’re making progress, it seems like he bombs someone,” a person close to Trump’s national security team told Politico. “That’s why the president and his aides are so frustrated with Netanyahu.”It was unclear whether the strike would impact efforts to reach a hostage release and ceasefire deal, but Hamas official Fawzi Barhoum said on Thursday that the assassination attempt on the group’s senior leadership was “an assassination of the entire negotiation process.”Asked how the strike would affect the negotiation efforts, Trump told Israel’s Channel 14 at a press gaggle Thursday: “Hopefully, it won’t affect it at all.”“We want the hostages out, and we want them out soon. Hopefully it won’t affect it,” the president repeated.Meanwhile, Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani told the UN Security Council on Thursday that his country “will continue [its] humanitarian and diplomatic role without any hesitation in order to stop the bloodshed.”An Arab diplomat involved in mediation efforts had told The Times of Israel earlier Thursday, however, that all mediation efforts, previously led primarily by Qatar and Egypt, had halted since the Tuesday strike.“When one party chooses to bomb the mediator and one of the negotiating delegations, what kind of talks can be considered valid?” the official said."

David Ainsworth ● 37d9 Comments ● 34d

An ageing student writes

Gdn today:-"Starmer defends engaging with Israel, saying refusing to do so would be student politicsStephen Flynn (SNP) asked why the Israeli president was being invited to Downing Street. He said Isaac Herzog was someone who “called for the collective punishment of the Palestinian people and who signed the artillery shells that destroyed their homes, their families and their friends”.Starmer replied:We have suspended arms that could be used in Gaza. We have sanctioned extremists. We suspended trade talks.But the point he raised is a very serious one. We all want an outcome that ensures peace, that the hostages get out, that aid gets in under a two-state outcome. It is the only way we will get peace in a region that has suffered conflict for a very, very long time. I will not give up on diplomacy – that is the politics of students.""--------------------------------Peter Oborne:-"In October 2023 he [Herzog] claimed that all Palestinians in Gaza were "unequivocally" responsible for the 7 October Hamas attack on southern Israel."It is not true this rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved," he said in remarks that South Africa submitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) during its genocide case against Israel."---------------------"The Netanyahu government’s handling of the war in Gaza is “leading Israel to pariah status,” Health Secretary Wes Streeting warned Tuesday, ahead of Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s visit to the U.K.Herzog is set to visit Britain this week “to show solidarity with the Jewish community, which is under severe attack and facing a wave of antisemitism,” according to his office.But, Streeting, who narrowly held his north London constituency last year against a challenge from a pro-Palestinian candidate, said the Israeli president must be held accountable for the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza.“He needs to answer the allegations of war crimes, of ethnic cleansing and of genocide that are being levelled at the government of Israel,” Streeting told Times Radio on Tuesday. “He needs to explain how, when we have seen so much evidence of the atrocities being perpetrated by the Israeli army, how he can possibly claim that the IDF is the most moral army in the world.”The health secretary stressed while Hamas’ attacks against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 “united the world in condemnation,” they could not “be answered with a level of civilian innocent loss and suffering that we’re seeing in Gaza.”Streeting added: “This Israeli government is leading Israel to pariah status and finding itself increasingly isolated on the international stage.”" (Politico 9/9/25)

David Ainsworth ● 39d42 Comments ● 35d

US killer now in police hands

From first news it sounds more like a lone gunman (with leftwing views) than a conspiracy. However the signs are that is not how the killing is going be treated.Revenge will be widespread. "President Donald Trump, following the death of GOP activist and close friend Charlie Kirk, vowed to unleash the weight of his administration onto those he said contributed to an environment of “radical left political violence.”How that might translate into policy has remained unclear, as the president and his aides have spent part of the last two days grieving while strategizing their next steps.Trump invoked Kirk’s memory to urge supporters to refrain from retaliatory violence. But he also indicated a desire to not just punish the killer, but also to tackle what the president and his staff described as a movement bent on the destruction of the American way of life.“The radicals on the left are the problem, and they’re vicious and they’re horrible and they’re politically savvy,” Trump said Friday morning on Fox News."White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller called out “people in positions of institutional authority,” noting the social media posts of “educators, health care workers, therapists, government employees” who he said had cheered Kirk’s death.“There is an ideology that has steadily been growing in this country which hates everything that is good, righteous and beautiful and celebrates everything that is warped, twisted and depraved,” Miller wrote Thursday on X. “It is an ideology at war with family and nature. It is envious, malicious, and soulless.”""“We are working, we were actually already working, spurred as much by the Ukrainian woman who was killed on the train as by Charlie’s tragic passing, [on] a more comprehensive plan on violence in America, the importance of free speech and civil speech, the ways that you can address these, they can only be called hate groups, that may breed this kind of behavior,” White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles told radio host Scott Jennings on his show Thursday.“So in the coming days, the president will be telling the American people about what we plan to do,” she continued. “It will not be easy. There’s layer upon layer upon layer, and some of this hate-filled rhetoric is multigenerational, but you’ve got to start somewhere.”Wiles stressed that the administration intends to protect free speech as it continues to develop its plans.Trump told reporters on the South Lawn on Thursday that he had “an indication” of the shooter’s motive and would say more later. He also called Kirk “an advocate of nonviolence” and said, “That’s the way I like to see people respond.”The previous day, Trump had said from the Oval Office that his administration “will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity, and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it.”In that speech, Trump blamed the “radical left” for rhetoric that he said was “directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now.”A senior White House official declined to comment when asked to elaborate on what Trump meant when he promised to find those responsible for political violence."https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/09/11/trump-kirk-consequences-gop-conservative/So political assassination is not a great idea. As Gavrilo Princip surely found out.

David Ainsworth ● 36d3 Comments ● 36d

But should Starmer have appointed and still defend such a gullible person?

Youtube:-"A few months ago:Peter Mandelson told a reporter to “f**k off” when asked about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein."BBC today:-"The UK's ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson, has said he believes further "embarrassing" correspondence between himself and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein will be published.On Tuesday, US lawmakers released a number of documents which included a letter from Lord Mandelson in which he called Epstein his "best pal".Speaking to the You Tube channel Harry Cole Saves the West, the diplomat said it was "very embarrassing" to see the words published but added they were written "over 20 years ago".Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Lord Mandelson was "mired in scandal," raising questions over Sir Keir Starmer's "bad judgement".In his interview, Lord Mandelson said he felt "a tremendous sense of regret" over his friendship with Epstein, and a "tremendous sense of sympathy" for his victims.He likened his association with Epstein to "an albatross around my neck", adding he felt "profoundly upset that I was taken in" by a "charismatic criminal liar"."I regret very, very deeply indeed carrying on that association with him for far longer than I should have done.""Yesterday's Daily Mail has much Mandelson/Epstein material, not just one letter:-https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15080217/Relaxing-bathrobe-best-pal-Jeffrey-Epstein-Britains-ambassador-Washington-Lord-Mandelson-youve-never-seen-before.html

David Ainsworth ● 39d1 Comments ● 39d

Rise in antisemitism in the UK

It would seem that the antisemitic posters continually attacking Israel on this Forum are part of a growing movement and seem especially effective in influencing the young."Bombshell antisemitism poll shows UK at 'tipping point'Anti-Jewish hatred is now running at the highest level on record, new polling reveals"By Giles Sheldrick Daily Express09:22, Sun, Sep 7, 2025 Updated: 09:24, Sun, Sep 7, 2025'Campaign Against Antisemitism commissioned YouGov to survey British adults’ attitudes with “alarming” findings showing antisemitism has doubled in less than five years.The charity claims the results show the number of people in Britain holding what it considers to be entrenched antisemitic views now covers more than one fifth of the British population.Some 45% – almost half of the population – believes Israel treats the Palestinians like the Nazis treated the Jews, a record figure and an increase from last year’s prior record of 33%.Almost half 18-24-year-olds are uncomfortable spending time with people who openly support Israel while only 18% are comfortable while only 31% of young voters agree Israel has a right to exist as a homeland for the Jewish people and 20% of them say that it does not'.I do love the comment that - 'Almost half 18-24-year-olds are uncomfortable spending time with people who openly support Israel'.Not perhaps quite as 'uncomfortable', as those of a similar age killed in Palestinian Hamas' genocidal attack on Jewish youth in October 2023. And like many 'adults' on this Forum - 'only 31% of young voters agree Israel has a right to exist as a homeland for the Jewish people and 20% of them say that it does not.'Again, like many antisemitic posters on this Forum they seem to have no idea how Israel would be made to disappear and what would happen to its Jewish citizens.One has to concede with fear and trepidation that the antisemites seem to be gaining the upper hand in terms of public opinion, much I am sure to the gratification of the West Putney Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

John Hawkes ● 42d23 Comments ● 39d

That funny Mr T, friend of Farage

"Trump directs ire at Tom Hanks for being ‘destructive’ and ‘woke’US president applauded West Point alumni for abruptly calling off a ceremony honoring the actorMarina DunbarGdn 8 Sep 2025Donald Trump launched a vitriolic attack against Tom Hanks for supposedly being “destructive” and “woke” after one of America’s most beloved actors was snubbed without much explanation by West Point last week.On his social media site on Monday, the US president applauded the alumni association of the US Military Academy (or West Point) for abruptly calling off a ceremony honoring Hanks, twice an Academy award winner who has played numerous military characters and also has a long history of advocating for veterans.Trump wrote: “Our great West Point (getting greater all the time!) has smartly cancelled the Award Ceremony for actor Tom Hanks. Important move! We don’t need destructive, WOKE recipients getting our cherished American Awards!!! Hopefully the Academy Awards, and other Fake Award Shows, will review their Standards and Practices in the name of Fairness and Justice. Watch their DEAD RATINGS SURGE!”Hanks had been scheduled to receive the 2025 Sylvanus Thayer Award later this month for his “service and accomplishments in the national interest”.In a message to faculty, retired Col Mark Bieger declared the cancellation would allow the institution to “continue its focus on its core mission of preparing cadets to lead, fight and win as officers in the world’s most lethal force, the United States Army”, without elaborating how the two are connected.Hanks has previously endorsed Democratic candidates including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.He has been deeply involved in veterans’ causes. He was the national spokesperson for the World War II Memorial in Washington DC. He also supported Bob Dole’s fundraising campaign for the Dwight D Eisenhower Memorial, according to the alumni association’s own original statement.He has already been inducted as an honorary member into the US Army’s Ranger Hall of Fame. In 2016, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom.Among his military portrayals are Capt John Miller in Saving Private Ryan, the Vietnam war soldier Forrest Gump (for which he won the Oscar for best actor), and Cmdr Ernie Krause in Greyhound, for which he also wrote the screenplay. He also portrayed the title role in 2013’s Captain Phillips and appeared in the cold war film Bridge of Spies.His work has made him one of the US’s most decorated actors, with seven Emmy awards to go alongside the five Academy award nominations for best actor, which he won twice in a row.Trump, who has dabbled in acting including a cameo in Home Alone 2, has regularly complained about never winning an Emmy for his reality television show The Apprentice, lamenting that he “should have gotten it”, that he “got screwed out of an Emmy” and that “the Emmys are all politics”."https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/08/trump-tom-hanks-woke

David Ainsworth ● 40d1 Comments ● 40d

Rise in support for Palestine

"As of mid-to-late 2025, recent surveys indicate a continued shift in global attitudes towards the Israel-Palestine conflict, with public sympathy for Palestinians increasing in the U.S., Europe, and the Middle East following the war in Gaza. The war has also led to growing pessimism about a peaceful resolution among Israelis. United StatesRecent U.S. surveys show a significant and growing partisan divide, with overall public support for Israel declining:Approval of Israel's military action: A July 2025 Gallup poll found that only 32% of Americans approved of Israel's military action in Gaza, a 10-point drop from September 2024. In the same survey, 60% disapproved.Partisan divide: The Gallup poll also revealed a stark partisan gap in attitudes, with 71% of Republicans approving of Israel's conduct, compared to just 8% of Democrats.Sympathy: A March 2025 Gallup poll found American sympathy for Israelis at its lowest level in 25 years (46%), while sympathy for Palestinians reached a new high (33%).Two-state solution: Support for a two-state solution among Americans remains consistent, at 55% in a March 2025 Gallup poll. However, a Pew Research Center poll in April 2025 found that fewer than half (46%) now believe peaceful coexistence is possible, a decline from 52% in late 2023.Excessive force: An August 2025 Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that 59% of Americans believe Israel's military response in Gaza has been excessive, an increase from 53% in February 2024. IsraelAmong the Israeli public, recent surveys show increasing pessimism regarding the conflict's outcome:Potential for peace: A June 2025 Pew Research Center survey found that only 21% of Israelis believe a peaceful coexistence with an independent Palestinian state is possible. This figure is the lowest since 2013 and has been declining for over a decade.Obstacles to peace: Jewish Israelis largely view a lack of trust as the main obstacle to peace, while Arab Israelis are more likely to cite Israeli settlements and the division between Hamas and Fatah. United KingdomBritish attitudes have also shifted, with support for Palestinians and for recognizing Palestinian statehood gaining ground:Sympathy: In a July 2025 YouGov poll, 29% of Britons sympathized more with Palestinians, compared to 15% with Israelis. Sympathy with Palestinians is higher than before the conflict started in 2023.Palestinian statehood: A July 2025 YouGov survey found that 45% of the British public support the recognition of a Palestinian state, compared to only 14% who oppose it.Justification of Israeli actions: A slim majority of Britons (51%) in a July 2025 YouGov poll consider Israel's actions in Gaza unjustified, while 21% believe they are justified. Arab WorldSurveys conducted in the Middle East and North Africa reveal that the war has significantly impacted public opinion:Decline in normalization support: According to a June 2025 Arab Barometer and Foreign Affairs report, public backing for normalizing relations with Israel has plummeted across the region following the war.Growing support for Palestinians: Commitment to the Palestinian cause has deepened among citizens in countries across the Middle East and North Africa.Persistent support for two-state solution: Despite widespread condemnation of Israel's actions, majorities in many Arab countries continue to support a two-state solution.EuropeEuropean attitudes reflect a growing division over the conflict:EU policy division: In late August 2025, EU foreign ministers were reportedly divided on how to pressure Israel regarding the war in Gaza.Criticism of Israel: A Pew Research Center poll from June 2025 noted that majorities in most surveyed European countries hold an unfavorable view of Israel.Government stances: Individual European governments have been split, with some, such as Ireland, Norway, and Spain, moving to recognize a Palestinian state." (AI)

David Ainsworth ● 42d2 Comments ● 41d

Trump to rebrand "Pentagon" as "Penthouse"

No, not really.But:-"Trump faces criticism over to order to rebrand Pentagon as ‘Department of War’Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of US politics where opponents have criticised Donald Trump’s expected move to rebrand the Department of Defense as the “department of war”.The president is expected to sign an executive order on Friday authorizing the rebrand, the White House said, as part of an attempt to formalize the name change without an act of Congress.The order will designate “department of war” as a “secondary title”, an administration official said, as a way to get around the need for congressional approval to formally rename a federal agency.But the order will instruct the rest of the executive branch to use the “department of war” name in internal and external communications, and allows the defense secretary Pete Hegseth and other officials to use “secretary of war” as official titles.Trump and Hegseth have been publicly pushing for the rebrand for weeks, claiming the change would present the US military as more aggressive to the world by reverting to the name that was used when the US was victorious in the first and second world wars.“Everybody likes that we had an unbelievable history of victory when it was the Department of War,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office last week. “Then we changed it to Department of Defense.”The move could cost tens of millions of dollars, with letterheads and signs on buildings in the US and at bases worldwide possibly needing to be changed.But there has been criticism over the move. Democratic senator Tammy Duckworth – a war veteran who lost both her legs serving in Afghanistan and who is now a member of the armed services committee – said:'Why not put this money toward supporting military families or toward employing diplomats that help prevent conflicts from starting in the first place?Because Trump would rather use our military to score political points than to strengthen our national security and support our brave service members and their families - that’s why'"Strange. What does Trump think that the "D" stands for in IDF?

David Ainsworth ● 43d3 Comments ● 43d

That's why you shouldn't ask the victims

"Inquiry finds British committed genocide on Indigenous Australians""British colonists committed genocide against Australia's Indigenous population in Victoria, a landmark Aboriginal-led inquiry has found.The Yoorrook Justice Commission found violence and disease reduced the local Indigenous population by three quarters in the 20 years after the state was colonised, in the early 1830s.Its report included 100 recommendations to "redress" harm caused by "invasion and occupation" - though several of the authors disagreed with unspecified "key findings".The Commission was set up in 2021 as Australia's first formal "truth-telling" inquiry, and tasked with examining past and ongoing "systemic injustices" suffered by the Indigenous people in the state.It is part of a wider national push for Australia to engage in a reconciliation process with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which community leaders say should include inquiries into the nation's history, treaty-making, and granting First Nations people greater political say.Held over four years, The Yoorrook Justice Commission gave Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people the opportunity to formally share their stories and experiences.The commission's brief covered a wide gamut of issues including land and water rights, cultural violations, killing and genocide, health, education and housing.The inquiry found Victoria's Indigenous population dropped dramatically after colonisationThe report found that from 1834, "mass killings, disease, sexual violence, exclusion, linguicide, cultural erasure, environmental degradation, child removal" as well as assimilation contributed to the "near-complete physical destruction" of Victoria's Indigenous community.The population dropped from 60,000 to 15,000 by 1851."This was genocide," the report said.The report, which drew from more than two months of public hearings and over 1,300 submissions, called for "redress" to acknowledge a range of human rights violations, which could include reparations.Among its other recommendations were a significant overhaul of the education system to include greater input from Indigenous people, and a government apology for Aboriginal soldiers who served during the world wars and were excluded from a scheme gifting diggers land when they returned from the battlefields.On the state's health system, the report found that racism was "endemic" and called for more funding for Indigenous health services and policies to get more Aboriginal staff in the system.Three of the five commissioners - Sue-Anne Hunter, Maggie Walter and Anthony North - "did not approve of the inclusion of the key findings in the final report", however no further detail was provided.In response to the report, Victoria's Labor government said it would "carefully consider" the findings, with Premier Jacinta Allan saying they "shine a light on hard truths".Jill Gallagher, head of Victoria's peak body for Aboriginal health and wellbeing, said the genocide finding was "indisputable". "We don't blame anyone alive today for these atrocities," she told the ABC, "but it is the responsibility of those of us alive today to accept that truth - and all Victorians today must accept, recognise and reconcile with these factual findings."The commission's report is the first of its kind in Australia, though similar inquiries are happening in other states and territories with varying degrees of progress, depending on which party is in government.For example, in Queensland, a truth-telling inquiry was cancelled after the Labor government was replaced by a new Liberal-National government.[What a surprise!]In recent years, the national dialogue on how to recognise the traditional owners of Australia at all levels of governments has prompted heated debate.Australians voted against a historic referendum in October 2023, rejecting a change to the constitution that would have created an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, a national body for Indigenous people to give advice on laws."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn413zlld4mo

David Ainsworth ● 44d1 Comments ● 44d

Farage the Failed Distraction from Trump’s All-Out Assault on Free Speech

Washington, D.C. (September 3, 2025)—Today, Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, delivered opening remarks at the full committee hearing examining how Republicans are obsessing about a so-called free speech crisis in Europe to distract from President Trump’s unprecedented assault on the First Amendment rights of all Americans.Hearing on “Europe’s Threat to American Speech and Innovation”September 3, 2025"I imagine that in a hearing about threats to freedom of speech abroad we might hear from a Russian dissident about Putin’s massive violations of political freedom. Or the death of Alexei Navalny in prison. Or perhaps from a Chinese pro-democracy activist about President Xi’s attacks on free speech in Hong Kong, Tibet, Xinjiang or the persecution and trial of Jimmy Lai. Or maybe from a journalist about the Saudi Crown Prince’s brutal assassination of Jamal Kashoggi, the Washington Post writer who demanded freedom from the reign of religious repression and persecution in Saudi Arabia. But no, the dictators of the world have nothing to fear from this hearing. The Republicans called it to attack our democratic allies in Europe. The star witness is not a human rights leader like Navalny, but a far-right, pro-Putin politician who leads the UK Reform Party, a party that is 4 members out of 650 members in the Parliament. He calls England an “authoritarian regime” while saying that Vladimir Putin is the world leader he admires the most. Well, this hearing mimics Vice President JD Vance, who went to the Munich Security Conference in February and in the first two minutes of his speech, whitewashed the world’s leading autocratic regimes proclaiming that the threat that worries him is “Not Russia, it’s not China,” but rather it’s our European allies. Amazing. Republicans are promoting far-right and neo-fascist parties in Europe like Alternative für Deutschland, Reform UK and Rassemblement National Français, and ignoring massive repression in Russia, China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and among all the autocrats of the world. The Republicans are vilifying robust European liberal democracies simply for engaging in the kind of line-drawing exercises that we engage in under our First Amendment with respect to the epidemic of child pornography, protecting children from other harmful content, defamatory speech, online scams and false advertising, and speech inciting riots and imminent lawless action—all forms of speech that the First Amendment does not protect and whose tricky contours must still be drawn by law.We could have a meaningful hearing on this complicated subject, but this hearing is just a drive-by hit against a strong democratic ally to benefit a Donald Trump sycophant and wannabe.But it’s even worse than this. Not only are our Republican colleagues ignoring intensifying repression in the world’s dictatorships, but they are also trying to distract the world from the attack on freedom taking place right here in America every day.Americans are not worried about the European Union or the Online Safety Act in the UK. We’re not worried about white nationalists and not having enough license to incite lynch mobs to set immigrants on fire in their bedrooms.Americans are worried that Donald Trump is working to rewrite and whitewash our history in our museums, our textbooks and our national parks, to destroy PBS, NPR, and public broadcasting, to ban books in our libraries, and to censor news stories critical of him by installing political henchmen in private broadcast rooms.We fear that academic freedom at colleges and universities is in danger when the Administration cancels and withholds billions of dollars in scientific and medical research funding from American universities, even for urgent and life-saving studies about breast cancer or heart attacks, as a way to force schools to impose a government orthodoxy on curriculum, hiring, admissions, and any student and faculty speech that MAGA considers politically incorrect.Americans see Trump trying to harass, intimidate, control or shut down the press, like ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR and PBS. The Republican-controlled FCC essentially blackmailed media companies Skydance and Paramount into agreeing to install a spy, a monitor, a “minder,” I think the Brits might say, to police CBS news programs—to make sure they are being sufficiently “Trumpy” in giving us the news—in order to get approval of a merger from FCC. Meanwhile, Trump sued 60 Minutes and CBS personally for $20 billion for the frivolous cause of action that he thought an interview with Kamala Harris was edited—in Trump’s view—too favorably, and walked away with a cool $16 million in a shakedown settlement for his library, all part of now a familiar pattern. When Trump doesn’t like the news, he sues the broadcaster and unleashes the FCC on them until they pay up and agree to a government spy stationed in their office. Free speech is so much in danger in the U.S. that if the government tries to violate our rights, we might not even be able to find a lawyer to defend ourselves because Trump is systematically exacting retribution against law firms that represent anyone on the other side of the case against him. Our country loves free speech—we fight for free speech, we fought for free speech—and we know it’s in danger when students who are lawfully in the United States are taken off the street and arrested without warrants by masked federal agents in unmarked cars for writing an article or attending a rally that Stephen Miller doesn’t like. Free speech is in danger when visitors to our country have their social media accounts screened at the border for criticism of Donald Trump. Free speech is in danger when To Kill a Mockingbird, The Handmaid’s Tale, 1984 and The Kite Runner are banned from our schools and libraries across the country, and even families defending our freedom abroad have to fight for their kids’ right to read freely in public schools run by the Department of Defense.Freedom is in danger when the administration tramples the Civil Service rights of hundreds of thousands of nonpartisan, expert civil servants. Civil servants who have been protected from political discrimination for more than a century to maintain the excellence and independence of our federal workforce, but are now being fired simply for doing their jobs, like prosecuting violent criminals and insurrectionists who tried to overthrow our government and attack our police officers, or because they honestly gave honest economic information and labor statistics to the public. These honorable civil servants are being fired because they won’t be the political hacks Trump demands them to be.When private comments made by federal employees are scrutinized for “anti-Trump bias,” and they can lose their jobs because of it, then we have entered the realm not just of Vladimir Putin but of Joseph Stalin.Mr. Trump and Mr. Farage both claim they are protectors of free speech, but they only want to protect speech they agree with. In the UK, Mr. Farage is promoting the abolition of the Human Rights Act of 1998, to be replaced with a “British Bill of Rights” that limits the right of free speech to British citizens and legally sanctioned residents. He complains that racist threats against immigrants are not protected free speech, while he proposes to strip migrants, tourists and perhaps even visiting American Congresspeople of any free-speech rights at all. I had my own close encounter with that when Mr. Farage and his team presented for more than an hour in a conversation we had about free speech, and after three minutes of talking, he cut me off and terminated the meeting because he didn’t like what I was saying. That’s the kind of free speech he’s committed to.There is a free speech crisis in America, but there is no free speech crisis in Britain. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has not shut down GB News, where Mr. Farage has his own show, just because Mr. Farage has used his airtime to call for banning peaceful protests he disagrees with. No one has stopped him from going on Russian TV 17 times and saying also and repeating that the one world political leader he most admired was Vladimir Putin, even though Vladimir Putin is a war criminal, and a dictator who has regularly interfered in other countries’ democratic elections.No one has stopped Mr. Farage from parroting Putin’s absurd talking points, like when Farage claimed that NATO, the United States and Britain “provoked this war” in Ukraine.For a man who fashions himself as some kind of free speech martyr, Mr. Farage seems most at home with all the autocrats and dictators of the world who are crushing freedom on earth.Mr. Farage wants to get rid of the Online Safety Act in his country, a law shepherded by the Conservative Party and implemented by the Labour Party, which bans child pornography online, protects children from harmful content, forbids nonconsensual pornography and other unlawful content. He should go and advance that position in Parliament, which is meeting today, if he’s serious about it. To the people of UK who think this Putin-loving free speech impostor and Trump sycophant will protect freedom in your country, come on over to America and see what Trump and MAGA are doing to destroy our freedom, kidnap college students off the street, ban books from our libraries, militarize our police and unleash them against our communities, take over our universities, wreck our professional civil service and turn the government into a money-making machine for Trump and his family. You might think twice before you let Mr. Farage “Make Britain Great Again.”" https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/ranking-member-raskin-s-opening-statement-at-hearing-on-republicans-failed-distraction-from-trump-s-all-out-assault-on-free-speech

David Ainsworth ● 44d7 Comments ● 44d

Very deserving refugees - but not thought so then, when it mattered

"Repelling refugees, 2020 / 1938"by Becky Taylor"This seems a good moment to remember Britain’s well-established tradition of repelling refugees from its shores.As the persecution of Jews and dissidents in Nazi-controlled Germany and Austria intensified in the summer of 1938, and as the liberal democracies which surrounded its territories imposed more and tougher visa restrictions and hardened their borders against refugees, those seeking refuge started to look for other means to enter safe countries. Those who had reached France, but feared that the country might soon be in line for invasion, or who already had relatives in Britain, started to enter the country illegally.By definition, we have no means of knowing how many people did so successfully. If there are traces of these movements, they will lie in family memory, diaries and personal accounts and not public record. What we do have are accounts from newspapers, which over the summer and autumn of 1938 frequently carried stories of desperate attempts by refugees without the correct documentation to enter or remain in Britain. Reporters covered deportations of refugees landing at Croydon airport or Harwich port only to be turned back by immigration officers. They also wrote of refugees paying to cross the Channel in motor boats, landing at night or swimming ashore to circumvent immigration restrictions. They penned lurid reports of prosecutions for bigamous marriages, where German Jewish women were alleged to have offered money and other inducements to British men in exchange for marriage and the prospect of British nationality it offered. Alongside these stories, the newspapers devoted growing numbers of column inches to prosecutions of aliens who had successfully entered the country without the consent of an immigration official but had subsequently been caught. The aim here was to emphasise that the British state remained in control of the situation, even where its borders had been breached. Considering the case of an illegal Polish immigrant, the presiding magistrate at Old Street Police, Herbert Metcalfe, declared that immigration law, which at that time made distinction between refugees and other immigrants, ‘should be sternly enforced, and it ought to go forth as a general warning that people who disobeyed the aliens’ law and disregarded the whole thing generally would have “a rough time”’. Two months later, Metcalfe sentenced three aliens who had entered Britain without the permission of an immigration officer, stating: ‘it was becoming an outrage the way in which stateless Jews were pouring in from every port of this country. As far as he was concerned, he intended to enforce the law to the fullest extent’. Although the occasional newspaper report suggested that some magistrates dealt with illegal immigration with a degree of leniency in the months following Germany’s annexation of Austria, overall the tone of reported judgements suggests that deportation was the default option for anyone seen to be contravening immigration law.The penalties could be significant. Those landing illegally faced deportation. In July 1938 two foreign seamen were sentenced to three months in prison with hard labour for helping a German Jewish refugee to land illegally in Britain. Reporting on this case on 2nd August, the Daily Mail was keen both to make the most of the Home Office’s alarm at the increase in illegal landings and to stress the government’s proficiency in tracking down offenders:Never before has it been more difficult for an alien to land unlawfully and remain out of police hands for more than a few hours. The favourite method is to come ashore in a rowing boat with the appearance of having been out for a short sea-trip. Despite coastal watch it is possible for an alien to escape notice in this way, but his inevitable struggle for existence is almost certain to lead him before long into police hands.Warming to its theme, the article went on to discuss other means by which aliens were attempting to enter the country, before reassuring readers that ‘Immigration authorities now have a secret and scientific method’ for detecting the ploys of illegal aliens, so that ‘the offender soon finds himself trapped’. A week later, the Mail was again reporting on the Home Office’s ‘new drive to keep aliens out’, this time flagging up the ‘Eire dodge’, in which refugees were landing ‘from a fishing or small trading vessel at out-of-the-way places on the coast of Eire’, from whence they came to Britain: ‘Our ports are so keenly watched by Scotland Yard and immigration officers, that it is not worth any foreigner’s while trying to “gate-crash” into this country’.Clandestine entry, desperation, prosecution, deportation, a hysterical press: it is hard not to draw parallels with the present, even as these facts sit uncomfortably with Britain’s persistent sense of itself as having a ‘tradition of welcome’ towards vulnerable strangers. Seeing how refugees from Nazism – now held up as the emblematic refugees of the twentieth century – were treated when they attempted to reach Britain’s shores pushes us to acknowledge how history can be distorted for the purposes of the present. Alongside the welcome given to the Kindertransportees, we need to set the histories of those kept out and turned back from Britain’s shores. Both are part of Britain’s long and ambivalent relationship with refugees.Revisiting this history also reminds us that the agency of desperate people also has a history, and one that highlights how, if one can both be a ‘real refugee’ and enter a country illegally, then the problem lies not with the people landing but with the law."     https://refugeehistory.org/blog/2020/8/12/repelling-refugees-2020-1938London, UK. 30th Mar, 1939. Oskar Goldberg, a refugee from German-occupied Czechoslovakia, being forcibly deported from Croydon airport:-https://ehri-visualisations.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/original/78c401dd98aaf123e2fa4aca4d985802.jpgHe was lucky, and so was his group. His attempts to stop the deportation succeeded.

David Ainsworth ● 47d6 Comments ● 46d

A year later this Palestinian writer was killed

+972 MagazineNewsletterIn Umm al-Khair, the occupation is damning us to multigenerational traumaI saw the first bulldozers arrive in my village 17 years ago. Now, after the most brutal weeks in our history, my son will carry similarly painful memories.By Awdah Hathaleen July 22, 2024The demolition forces enter the village. All the children run to their mothers, who scramble to salvage whatever they can from their homes before it’s too late. Everyone watches on anxiously to see who will be made homeless today. The bulldozers gather in the center of the village and then stop. Soldiers disembark. The villagers look each other in the eye, searching for words of comfort, but there are none. Our children ask us why this is happening, but we have no answers.This was the scene on June 26 in my village of Umm al-Khair in the occupied West Bank, when Israeli forces demolished 11 homes, leaving families without shelter in the heat of summer. The demolitions were just the beginning of what became one of the most violent weeks in the history of our small agricultural community: we have since faced a sharp escalation in settler violence, with subsequent attacks seeing settlers shoot live ammunition in the village and destroy our water system during a severe heat wave.On the morning of the demolitions, we got word that officials from the Israeli Civil Administration — which administers the lives of Palestinians under occupation — were gathered on the highway near our village together with Border Police officers and demolition equipment. We have become accustomed to experiencing major demolition operations here in the South Hebron Hills, under the pretext that the structures were built without permits. Yet we have no other choice: Israel routinely denies permits to Palestinians in Area C of the West Bank as a method to expel us from our lands.Since October 7, the situation in Umm Al-Khair has been even more difficult than usual. And that morning, we quickly realized that we were about to witness another major demolition operation. My cousin, Eid al-Hathaleen, an artist and community leader, was one of the villagers whose world was turned upside down. “As activists who regularly document demolitions, we immediately started monitoring what was happening,” he said. “After a while, a military convoy accompanied by three bulldozers moved toward our village, closed off all the entrances, and barred the media and activists from entering.”Upon entering the village, the demolition forces went straight to one of the oldest tents in Umm al-Khair: the tent of the martyr Suleiman al-Hathaleen, a monumental figure who led the community for years and was crushed to death two years ago by an Israeli police truck that raided the village. The soldiers formed a line to prevent residents from reaching the tent before bulldozing it to the ground. In our state of shock, we thought maybe that would be the only tent demolished that day. Instead, the occupation forces continued to the main electricity room in our village, to Eid’s home, and then to one of the largest families in Umm al-Khair to destroy all of their homes and everything they owned.In total, 10 houses were demolished that morning, along with the village council tent and the solar electricity room. Thirty-eight residents are now homeless — including my sister, whose house was destroyed along with all her possessions. What was particularly shocking was that these were among the oldest homes in the village, with some having received demolition orders all the way back in 2008. Now we are worried about every single house here in Umm al-Khair.During a demolition, there is the immediate pain and horror of losing your home. But perhaps the hardest moment is the first night without it. In the hours after the demolition, you will be surrounded by your friends from the community and those who have come from elsewhere to offer solidarity. But at the end of that evening, all of them will go back to their homes — while you and your family are left to sleep outside among the rubble of your memories.“I never imagined sleeping in the open that night,” Eid said. “I cannot describe that situation — how much I wanted to express what was inside me, and what my family, who are now homeless, was facing. How can I reduce their fear and anxiety, their feeling of having no safe place?”For my sister, it took a few days to begin to process the tragedy. “During the nights, we usually make dinner for everyone and sit together,” she told me. “Then my children go to hang out with their friends in the community, the young ones go to sleep, and we plan for the following morning. But in one moment, we found ourselves in an unsteady tent which cannot protect us from anything. So in these moments, we understood what had actually happened to us.”Here in Umm al-Khair, the threat of home demolitions has hovered over every resident since we first received demolition orders 17 years ago. When I was young, my parents did everything to try to shield my siblings and I from this reality, but there are some memories that stuck with me. I was only 13 years old during the first demolitions in 2007, but I still remember that day so clearly: I walked to school with two of my cousins, then sat at my desk which was next to the window, giving me a clear view of the village. Suddenly, we started to see bulldozers and people moving around; we tried to go out, but the teachers wouldn’t let us.I remember my mother’s tears when I arrived back in the village, the women shouting, and the anger in the men’s faces. I remember the activists who stood with us, the soldiers and Border Police officers throwing tear gas, and the men being arrested. It’s a painful memory, yet I can’t help but remember.Now a parent myself, I’ve tried to shield my 4-year-old son from this harsh reality as much as possible, so that he will not have to carry the same memories that I did. But sometimes, no matter how good a father you are, there are things you cannot control. And the past weeks have been some of the worst we’ve ever experienced.In the afternoon of July 1, five days after the demolitions, a group of settlers from the illegal Israeli outpost of Havat Shorashim entered our village where a group of elderly women were feeding their sheep. They came into the home of my mother, the village elder Hajja Khadra al-Hathaleen, demanding that she make them coffee. When the women told the settlers to leave, one of them began shooting live fire into the air, beating the women with sticks, and spraying pepper spray in their eyes. In a panic, we called for the police and army to come, not knowing how else to protect our families from the settlers. But when the army arrived, instead of making the settlers leave our land, they started to shout at the village residents and push us out of our homes. In total, six residents were wounded by the settlers: four women, a 5-year-old girl, and a 17-year-old boy. We called ambulances to take the wounded to the hospital, but when they reached the village, the settlers blocked the road, delaying the injured from getting urgent medical treatment.  My son witnessed these attacks — he was playing in the area where the settlers arrived — and has been deeply affected by them. Understandably, he wants to know what is happening, and why. “Every time a settler sees me, will they use pepper spray?” he now asks. “Why did grandma go to the hospital?” He even knows some of the settlers by name. Sometimes I tell him that they went to jail; I’m lying, but I want to make him feel safe. But he still sees his grandmothers, his cousins, and his aunts collapsing on the ground in front of him. It’s a tough memory, and I know that it will stick with him. Since the attacks, my son has started stuttering — an entirely new symptom, and one that terrifies me. The doctor told us that the best treatment for stuttering is a safe environment. But this is what we cannot guarantee for our children: in Umm al-Khair, no one is in a safe place. The following day, the same settlers returned to the village; after pitching a tent in my neighbor’s yard, over 20 of them gathered to say the Jewish evening prayers together. The next morning, while grazing their sheep in our private agricultural lands, they severed the pipe that is Umm al-Khair’s only connection to running water. Amid all of this injustice, we often feel forgotten, lost, or hopeless. Sometimes we wonder: why do Israelis see us as terrorists and enemies? Why is the world not acting to achieve justice for Palestinians? But most of the time, we feel tired. The attacks, the raids, the demolitions: we think about them all the time. I always say that I wish fate hadn’t brought us to this point. But now we are stuck here; there’s no way to leave."Awdah Hathaleen is an activist and collective member of Umm al-Khair in the South Hebron Hills. He is an English teacher in his village, having studied English teaching at Hebron University.Hamdan Ballal Al-Huraini also contributed to this article.https://www.972mag.com/umm-al-khair-multigenerational-trauma/------------------See the settlers and their IDF "protectors":-https://static.972mag.com/www/uploads/2024/07/July-2-Shimon-and-army-and-sheep-3-1280x720.jpg------------------And now:-"On 28 July this year [2025], Yinon Levi [a radical Zionist settler] fired a bullet that killed Odeh [Awdah] Hathaleen, a Palestinian activist and journalist, during a disturbance in the West Bank village of Umm al-Khair. Levi pleaded self-defence and was released after three days of house arrest.""His [Awdah's] brother, Khalil, told me the dead man was holding his five-year-old son, Watan, and filming the violent scenes on his phone when he was killed."

David Ainsworth ● 54d10 Comments ● 48d

"Double tap" 15 minutes later

"Israel bombed the main hospital in southern Gaza on Monday and then struck the same spot again as rescuers and journalists rushed to help the wounded, killing at least 20 people including five journalists, health officials said.The first strike hit the top floor of a building at the Nasser hospital, killing the Reuters journalist Hussam al-Masri and others. Journalists and rescuers then rushed to the scene to help the wounded, when a second bomb struck the same spot 15 minutes later.A live video from AlGhad TV captured the moments of their killings, showing civil defence workers wearing bright orange vests and journalists raising their hands to shield themselves seconds before the second bomb kills them. A second video showed the aftermath of the bombings, with the bodies of the first responders and journalists lying on top of one another, bloody and covered in dust.The “double tap” strike and killing of journalists prompted a wave of international condemnation, including from the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy. “Horrified by Israel’s attack on Nasser hospital. Civilians, healthcare workers and journalists must be protected. We need an immediate ceasefire,” Lammy wrote on X.The US president, Donald Trump, told reporters “I’m not happy about it” when asked about the attack, while the French president, Emmanuel Macron, described it as “intolerable”." (Gdn 25/8/25)https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/25/journalists-among-people-killed-by-israeli-strike-on-gaza-hospital-----------------------"In a statement, the Israeli military said its troops on Monday "carried out a strike in the area of Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis"."The Chief of the General Staff instructed to conduct an initial inquiry as soon as possible," it said, adding it "regrets any harm to uninvolved individuals and does not target journalists as such".""uninvolved individuals" and "journalists as such". "initial inquiry as soon as possible".Of course.https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/four-journalists-among-15-killed-101221836.html

David Ainsworth ● 54d2 Comments ● 48d

All good friends and jolly good company

UK still sharing intelligence with Israel as surveillance flights over Gaza continueBy Imran MullaNiddle East Eye. Published date: 6 August 2025 09:43 BST | Last update: 2 weeks 5 days agoDespite escalating diplomatic tensions between the two countries, the UK has continued to assist Israel militarily. On Tuesday, government sources confirmed that Britain continues to fly spy planes over Gaza and share intelligence with Israel, according to The Times.For months, British politicians have questioned the government about the role played by a Royal Air Force base on the island of Cyprus, RAF Akrotiri, just a 40-minute flight from Tel Aviv.From there, RAF aircraft have conducted hundreds of surveillance flights over Gaza throughout Israel's war on the besieged enclave.In response to questions about these flights, the UK's Ministry of Defence (MoD) has repeatedly insisted it is in support of "hostage rescue".The MoD confirmed this week that surveillance flights were "still ongoing" over Gaza, The Times reported.According to flight tracking data, Shadow R1s, RAF specialist planes, have not flown over Gaza in the past month. The MoD has refused to disclose which aircraft are currently being deployed over Gaza. 'A bird's-eye view of the genocide'A source with knowledge of British surveillance capabilities in the Middle East told MEE earlier this year that the surveillance flights give Britain "a bird's-eye view of the genocide".The source noted that the UK, a partner in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance that also includes the US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, is the "number one gatherer of intelligence" in the Middle East."Britain knows exactly what is happening because of those flights. They have a better view than any journalist."Former Major General Charlie Herbert, who served in the British Army for 35 years, told The Times: “It’s all good and proper saying they are handing over intelligence for the purposes for locating hostages, but in reality that intelligence is just as likely to be used [to target] Hamas and others.”The MoD said last year that it "would consider any formal request from the International Criminal Court to provide information relating to investigations into war crimes".There is significant secrecy surrounding much of what the RAF Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus is used for.Earlier this year, MEE reported that the UK government blocked Labour MP Kim Johnson from asking about Israeli bombers using the Cyprus airbase.Diplomatic ties between the UK and Israel have frayed in the past few months, culminating in the British government's announcement last week that it intends to recognise Palestinian statehood in September.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office responded by saying on X: "Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims. A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW."But despite the diplomatic fireworks, questions and scrutiny over the exact nature of Britain's military cooperation with Israel are sure to continue."

David Ainsworth ● 55d4 Comments ● 54d

To the victors the spoils?

Mr Rose replies yesterday to my statement ‘The Zionists returned as colonists, not as equals’.:-"Not true. The early Zionists in the nineteenth century purchased land from Turkish landowners and lived under Turkish rule just like the Arabs. After 1917 Jewish immigrants had to seek permission from the British authorities. They had no more privileges than their Arab neighbours."He must have forgotten:-"Herbert Louis Samuel, 1st Viscount Samuel (6 November 1870 – 5 February 1963) was a British Liberal politician who was the party leader from 1931 to 1935.He was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a Cabinet minister and to become the leader of a major British political party. Samuel had promoted Zionism within the British Cabinet, beginning with his 1915 memorandum entitled The Future of Palestine. In 1920 he was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in charge of the administration of the territory."One month after Britain's declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire in November 1914, Samuel met Chaim Weizmann, who was to become the President of the World Zionist Organization and later the first President of Israel. According to Weizmann's memoirs, Samuel was already an avid believer in Zionism and believed that Weizmann's demands were too modest. Samuel did not want to enter into a detailed discussion of his plans but mentioned that "the Jews would have to build railways, harbours, a university, a network of schools, etc", as well as potentially a Temple in "modernised form".In January 1915, Samuel circulated a memorandum, The Future of Palestine, to his cabinet colleagues, suggesting that Britain should conquer Palestine in order to protect the Suez Canal against foreign powers, and for Palestine to become a home for the Jewish people. The memorandum stated, "I am assured that the solution of the problem of Palestine which would be much the most welcome to the leaders and supporters of the Zionist movement throughout the world would be the annexation of the country to the British Empire". In March 1915, Samuel replaced the January 1915 draft version with the final version of his memorandum, toned down from the earlier draft, explicitly ruling out any idea of immediately establishing a Jewish state and emphasizing that non-Jews must receive equal treatment under any scheme.Appointment as High CommissionerIn 1917, Britain occupied Palestine (then part of the Ottoman Empire) during the course of the First World War. Samuel lost his seat in the election of 1918 and became a candidate to represent British interests in the territory.He was appointed to the position of High Commissioner in 1920, before the Council of the League of Nations approved a British mandate for Palestine. Nonetheless, the military government withdrew to Cairo in preparation for the expected British Mandate, which was finally granted two years later by the League of Nations. He served as High Commissioner until 1925. Samuel was the first Jew to govern the historic Land of Israel in 2000 years.He recognised Hebrew as one of the three official languages of the territory. He was appointed Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire (GBE) on 11 June 1920.Samuel's appointment to High Commissioner for Palestine was controversial. While the Zionists welcomed the appointment of a Zionist Jew to the post, the military government, headed by Edmund Allenby and Louis Bols, called Samuel's appointment "highly dangerous".Technically, Allenby noted, the appointment was illegal, as a civil administration that would compel the inhabitants of an occupied country to express their allegiance to it before a formal peace treaty (with the Ottoman Empire) was signed violated both military law and the Hague Convention. Bols said the news was received with "consternation, despondency and exasperation" by the Muslims and Christians. Allenby said that the Arabs would see it "as handing country over at once to a permanent Zionist Administration" and predicted massive violence.Lord Curzon read the last message to Samuel and asked him to reconsider accepting the post. Samuel took advice from a delegation in London representing the Zionists, who told him that the "alarmist" reports were not justified. The Muslim-Christian Association had sent a telegram to Bols:Sir Herbert Samuel regarded as a Zionist leader, and his appointment as first step in formation of Zionist national home in the midst of Arab people contrary to their wishes. Inhabitants cannot recognise him, and Muslim-Christian Society cannot accept responsibility for riots or other disturbances of peace.The wisdom of appointing Samuel was debated in the House of Lords a day before he arrived in Palestine. Lord Curzon said that no "disparaging" remarks had been made during the debate but that "very grave doubts have been expressed as to the wisdom of sending a Jewish Administrator to the country at this moment".Questions in the House of Commons of the period also show much concern about the choice of Samuel: "what action has been taken to placate the Arab population... and thereby put an end to racial tension". Three months after his arrival, The Morning Post commented: "Sir Herbert Samuel's appointment as High Commissioner was regarded by everyone, except Jews, as a serious mistake."Tenure.As High Commissioner, Samuel attempted to mediate between Zionist and Arab interests, acting to slow Jewish immigration and win the confidence of the Arab population. He hoped to gain Arab participation in mandate affairs and to guard their civil and economic rights, but refused them any authority that could be used to stop Jewish immigration and land purchase. According to Wasserstein his policy was "subtly designed to reconcile Arabs to the... pro-Zionist policy" of the British.Islamic custom at the time was that the chief Islamic spiritual leader, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, was to be chosen by the temporal ruler, the Ottoman Sultan in Constantinople, from a group of clerics nominated by the indigenous clerics. After the British conquered Palestine, Samuel chose Haj Amin al Husseini, who later proved a thorn in the side of the British administration in Palestine. At the same time, he enjoyed the respect of the Jewish community, and he was honoured by being called to the Torah at the Hurva synagogue in the Old City of Jerusalem."The Palestine population at this time was:1922 Total population of Palestine  752,000Jewish population of Palestine  84,000Christian population of Palestine  71,000Muslim population of Palestine  589,000https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Samuel,_1st_Viscount_Samuel

David Ainsworth ● 56d12 Comments ● 54d

VJ Day and how our split society came about.

"How the second world war shaped the sons of its soldiers" The Spectator.https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-the-second-world-war-shaped-the-sons-of-its-soldiers/I am at 80, probably one of the oldest posters on this Forum.And many would say I am sure, one of the most reactionary.But then I was born, brought up and formed in different times and under different circumstances.And every thing in this article rings a loud bell for me.I was 'shaped' as described above.My father fought for four years against the Japanese in Malaysia.And for years after his uniform truly did hang at the back of his wardrobe.(Well the jacket did but not the trousers leading to my bad dreams as a child as to what he would wear if called up again !)And we did play 'England vs Germany' war games in the street and were proud that we were victorious in reality.The nett of this might well be that I was inculcated with patriotism and love of country.And looked back at pride on what he and his comrades did to defend us from fascist tyranny in Europe and the Far East.A country that was homogeneous in race and culture and belief and proud of its history.Now it is 'multi-racial 'and 'multi cultural'.Is this for the better ?Divided between those that for generations have sided with its history and culture and those, often newcomers born elsewhere, that criticise it.And of course our education system which often derides and downplays our beliefs, culture and achievements so that younger generations, if they know anything at all of our recent past, are often taught to mock it and find it ridiculous. Is that for the good ?A petty example. Birmingham Council (the one that never collects household waste because of strikes by bin men) tries to stop the flying of Union Jack Flags but allows Palestinian flags to fly in Muslim areas."Fury as Labour-run council tears down 'dangerous' St George's and Union Jack flags from city streets (but Palestine flags are allowed in 'Muslim areas'.)" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15003113/Fury-Labour-run-council-tears-dangerous-St-Georges-Union-Jack-flags.htmlFor those that can be bothered to read it, this Spectator article above explains some of this.

John Hawkes ● 64d71 Comments ● 55d

Ambulances to Ukraine

As some of you will remember I volunteered two years ago to drive an aid-filled ambulance to Ukraine for a remarkable undertaking known as Medical Life Lines Ukraine (MLLU).  Several of you made very generous donations at that time and in total I raised over £18,000 at the time.MLLU was set up and is being run by a small group of private citizens in Wimbledon and Putney.  They have done heroic work and have raised sufficient funds since the invasion began to deliver over 100 ambulances, medical equipment and other civilian rescue vehicles to the Ministry of Health in Lviv.  On two occasions convoys also took supplies of dog food for the rescue dogs trained to search for survivors in ruined buildings.  Photos of the very happy dogs and their handlers can be seen on the MLLU website https://www.medicallifelines.org.uk Now, I have volunteered to drive again and will be departing from Putney early on Sunday 7th September to join the other ambulances at Folkestone. From there the convoy will head across the Channel on the Euroshuttle (they transport us for free) before heading on to Lviv.Two years ago I did not think the humanitarian aid being delivered by MLLU would still be as vitally needed today as it was back then.  Tragically it looks like their work will continue to be needed for years to come given the continuing onslaught by Russian missiles and drones.  Ukraine remains a war zone and the regular air raid sirens remind any visitor that even Lviv, in the far west of the country, has been attacked.I have undertaken to raise at least an additional £7,000 to cover part of the cost of another ambulance in a future convoy and I am hoping that the spirit of generosity shown two years ago still lives on.  I would be truly grateful if you feel able to offer your support, some for a second time of course, but others for the first time.The link to my funding page is as follows https://www.justgiving.com/page/jonathan-callaway-1 where you will see I have almost reached my initial target.  I hope to raise far more of course and I can assure you every penny gets spent on humanitarian equipment.  The costs of driving the ambulances to Ukraine, about 1,200 miles, are covered by the volunteer drivers, as are their return travel costs.Donations are UK gift aid compliant as they are routed through our partner British-Ukrainian Aid, a registered UK charity.Do please also share this as widely as possible with friends and contacts so I can raise as much as I possibly can for MLLU.With many thanks in advanceJonathan

Jonathan Callaway ● 102d19 Comments ● 55d