Forum Topics

Manoeuvres Begin

The gobby one’s opening salvo:Rayner has made her opening pitch with a statement basically challenging Starmer.  She has just issued this very lengthy statement:“Our party has suffered a historic defeat. Many good Labour colleagues have lost their seats despite working hard for those they represented. We have lost good Labour administrations and lost the chance for more.What we are doing isn't working, and it needs to change. This may be our last chance.The Labour Party must now live up to our name: we must be the party of working people.We've heard the same on the doorstep as we've seen in the polls - the cost of living is the top issue for voters of all parties. People have turned to populists and nationalists because we have not done enough to fix it.Living standards are barely higher than they were a decade and a half ago. People feel hopeless - that the cost of living crisis will never end, and now they see oil and gas companies use global instability to post record profits.Once again, ordinary people are paying the price for decisions they didn't make. It's no wonder that across the UK, working people feel the system is rigged against them.Things can be so much better than this. Countries including Spain and Canada have shown that economies can grow and people can thrive when governments stay true to labour and social democratic values and put people first. We need to learn from that.In London, we lost young people who fear they will never afford a home. In my patch and across the north, we lost working people whose wages are too low and costs too high. In Scotland and Wales, people do not currently see Labour as the answer.We need immediate action to cut costs for households and put money back into the everyday economy. This can be done within the current fiscal rules, by ensuring those who benefit from the crisis contribute more so that everyone can thrive.Our Employment Rights Act was just the first step in our plan to Make Work Pay. Now is the time to take the next steps, starting with a Fair Pay Agreement in social care - but not ending there. A rising minimum wage must go alongside our programme to get young people into work.The investment we secured in social and affordable housing should now unleash a building boom that benefits British business and workers. We must double down on renters' reform and show leaseholders our action on tackling ground rents and charges was just a first step to ending freehold for good.Our devolution revolution has begun, but is nowhere near done.Giving mayors powers to transform planning and licensing can boost local business and good growth, in the interests of local people. They must go alongside economic powers and public services.Boosting community ownership and stopping the sell-off of local assets from pubs to playgrounds will put power back in local hands, helping restore the pride they feel in the places they live.We must go further on planning reforms, to build the schools, hospitals, roads and infrastructure the country needs to grow.We should be unafraid to promote new forms of public, community and cooperative ownership across the board. Buses and trains being brought back into public hands can now operate for the public good, at prices passengers can afford.Thames Water is an iconic failure of privatisation, which resonates for the same reasons. People are rightly sick of bonuses for bosses who deliver nothing but higher bills. We must face down demands that the public pay the price of private failure.We must create good jobs that pay decent wages by ensuring defence investment includes a secure manufacturing base. Use our house building programme to boost construction, invest in the green economy, backing SMEs by reforming business rates and increasing support to revive our high streets and local economies, raise the minimum wage and get young people into work.And then there is politics itself, putting power back into people's hands so that they are shaping the decisions that impact them. We must tackle the inflow of dodgy money in our politics - something that Nigel Farage, who took 5 million pounds in a secret personal gift from an offshore crypto baron, will never do. We must make politics work for ordinary people.We can only prove we mean it by putting the common interest ahead of factionalism.This is bigger than personalities, but it is time to acknowledge that blocking Andy Burnham was a mistake. We must show we understand the scale of change the moment calls for - that means bringing our best players into Parliament - and embracing the type of agenda that has been successful at a local level, rather than reaching back to an agenda and politics that has failed people.These are the fights we need to have, and the change in direction we need to see. Policy tweaks will not fix the fundamental challenges facing our country. This government needs, at pace, to put measures in place that make people's lives tangibly better, while fixing the foundations of a system rigged against them.The prime minister must now meet the moment and set out the change our country needs.Change our economic agenda to prioritise making people better off, change how we run our party so that all voices are listened to, and change how we do politics.Labour exists to make working people better off. That is not happening fast enough, and it needs to change - now.”Over to you Streeting …

Sue Hammond ● 11d5 Comments ● 11d

Hammersmith Bridge - yet again

I had looked forward to Fleur Anderson’s opening speech in the debate on the bridge that she had organised (https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-04-21/debates/5ECDA129-8BFA-423F-853B-4B36F0114E7C/details), but it wasn’t very impressive: full of completely over-the-top hyperbole: “seven years of disruption, frustration and avoidable hardship …. profound and far-reaching consequences …. The impact on daily life has been severe, sustained and deeply felt …. a fundamental barrier to daily life” – for goodness’ sake, that’s all rather a lot for what is actually only a genuine nuisance for some, don’t you think? There were also some very dodgy figures to support the lack of evidence for her claims (quite apart from their muddling in the effects of the much more significant remodelling of the Putney Bridge junction). To take just three of these:
·       “Before the closure, around 22,000 vehicles crossed the bridge each day. Those journeys have not disappeared; they have simply been forced on to other routes.” Not true: as Freedom of information request FOI-1103-1920  has shown, the 25,000 daily crossings of Hammersmith Bridge before (partial) closure were replaced by an increase of only15,500 on neighbouring bridges after the closure. In other words, 9,500 river crossings evaporated and were not “forced on to other routes.”·       “Cyclists are put off cycling through Putney because of the higher congestion and heavier traffic, making it feel more unsafe.” In fact cycling across Putney Bridge increased by 27% between 2017 and 2023. ·       “The latest snapshot data from the Department for Transport shows that, between 2020 and 2023, the overall number of motor vehicles on Putney bridge increased by 16%.”  This is an embarrassingly and shamefully bogus claim on two counts: firstly, the because the 2020 figure came from the height of the covid shutdown when travel was artificially reduced so of course there was an increase on that, and secondly, by using those two figures, she was claiming the bridge closure caused problems by comparing traffic after the bridge was closed (2020) with traffic after the bridge was closed (2023). On both counts, 2018 would have been the appropriate initial data point. The interruption to bus routes could have been a problem, but it surely isn't beyond the wit of TfL to arrange for buses on one side to drop passengers so people can walk (or, if of restricted mobility, be carried) across in sustainable transport to the bus on the other side. And all this doesn’t even begin to deal with the huge cost (£300 million at the latest count) and length of time (at least a decade) before completion, by which time attitudes to the car are likely to have been significantly affect by the growing effects of climate change. Altogether, not a very impressive set of arguments

Richard Carter ● 29d1 Comments ● 20d

The horrendous consequence of DEI

A sickening report but this is what DEI and 'gender equality' can lead to.Note that  the accused perverts have not been found not-guilty, only that the trial has been postponed to be restarted at a later date.https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15758847/Jury-discharged-trial-baby-allegedly-sexually-abused-murdered-teacher-process-adopting-boyfriend.html"Jury discharged in trial of baby allegedly sexually abused and murdered by teacher in process of adopting him with his boyfriend"'The jury in the case of a baby boy allegedly sexually abused and murdered by a teacher who was in the process of adopting him with his boyfriend was today formally discharged.Jamie Varley, 37, and John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, were on trial at Preston Crown Court accused of sexually abusing Preston Davey, aged 13 months.Varley was also accused of murdering the tot, who was suffocated and died four months after being placed in the couple’s care.The pair applied and underwent a ‘robust’ vetting process via Oldham Council to adopt a baby and social workers expressed ‘no concerns’ about their suitability as parents.But over the course of the following four months Preston was ‘routinely ill-treated, sexually abused and physically assaulted,’ Peter Wright KC, prosecuting, said.He was taken to hospital by the pair on three separate occasions before he died, including once with a fractured arm.But each time the couple explained away suspicious bruises to doctors, who failed to raise any safeguarding concerns.A post-mortem found the tot had suffered 40 internal and external injuries – including severe bruising to the back of his throat. A pathologist concluded he had been smothered and had died of an ‘acute upper airway obstruction.’Varley and McGowan-Fazakerley were arrested later that day on suspicion of neglect. Varley claimed he had been bathing Preston when he nipped away for a short time and returned to find him drowning.But Mr Wright said the pathology evidence did not support that and it was the prosecution case that, earlier that day, Preston had been subjected to two serious sexual assaults by Varley which caused his death.Varley denies murder, sexual assault, assault by penetration, inflicting GBH, four counts of child cruelty, 14 counts of making and taking indecent images of a child, and one charge of distributing an indecent image of a child.McGowan-Fazakerley, a sales rep, denies causing or allowing the death of a child and two counts of child cruelty.The pair face two further joint charges of sexual assault and child cruelty.(Note the description of some of the acts using the baby's mouth).The trial, expected to last six to eight weeks, is expected to start again with a fresh jury panel on Monday.'How these men were given custody of the child is not explained.But the real issue is that any man or male couple should want to and can be given such a responsibility under any circumstances.In my view it displays freakish desire and behaviour.What is their real motive ?As commented in the Spectator -"But in Britain, since 2019, single men have also been allowed to buy babies. In that time 170 men have applied for parental orders.This is even worse than allowing men to work in nurseries. We know that men are vastly more likely to abuse unrelated children than women are. We know that 91.3 per cent of child sexual abusers are male. And we know that paedophiles relentlessly seek out opportunities to access victims. The chance of single parent abuser being caught will be very low, given they may well be the only adult who has regular contact with the child.'The balance between 'individual rights' and 'gender equality' and ordinary common sense is totally skewed in the wrong direction.One can only hope their new friends in Wandsworth jail give them a loving and warm welcome.

John Hawkes ● 28d27 Comments ● 21d

I've been having second thoughts about Trump recently....

Until recently, I’ve thought that the best thing for the world would be for him to be carried off by the men (and women) in white coats. But since the consequence would be the installation of JD Vance as President, I’ve been having distinct second thoughts. Consider a few of the things Vance has been up to lately: Firstly, he fetched up in Budapest to interfere in the Hungarian election, explaining that he was there to condemn “one of the worst examples of foreign election interference I have ever seen or ever even read about.” It’s often said that Americans don’t do irony, but this was absolutely off the scale. Then he opted to popesplain to Leo that “I think it’s very, very important for the pope to be careful when he talks about matters of theology. If you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful.” Yes, indeedy. Finally, he addressed a young MAGA audience this week (he'd need their votes in a future presidential run) about his achievements in office. “One of the things I’m proudest that we’ve done in this administration was the decision to end US military and financial support for Ukraine in its war with Russia. “Note the language,” Gerard Baker writes in the Times today, “he chose not to frame the decision as, say, a difficult but necessary choice about the best use of American resources. For Vance, it is a source of pride — a cause for moral self-approbation — that he helped cut off assistance to a free nation fighting against its continuing rape by an international predator. It almost makes the odd stupidity seem quite appealing.” Almost? In view of all this and other pronouncements by this Titan, I’m looking forward to Putney’s very own Make American Gaga Again chapter to explain to us how such a man would make an excellent US President.

Richard Carter ● 34d33 Comments ● 29d