Forum Topics

Martin Hewitt UK Border Chief Quits

The head of the UK's border security command will step down at the end of March after failing to stem the surge in crossings. The Home Office confirmed Martin Hewitt would leave the post of border security commander after 18 months in the job.Since his appointment in September 2024, crossings have continued at sky-high levels - with 58,910 people making the journey in that time.His tenure also saw the second-highest annual total of people crossing the Channel, with 41,472 people arriving in the UK by small boat last year.It is understood he will leave at the end of the month, with an interim replacement appointed 'in due course'.   Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the continuing small boats crisis was down to the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary. 'The Government's complete failure on small boats isn't down to Martin Hewitt,' he said. 'It's because Keir Starmer and Shabana Mahmood are too weak to take the necessary action - such as coming out of the European Convention on Human Rights and deporting all illegal immigrants within a week of arrival.'Labour's decision to cancel the Rwanda removals plan was a disaster - since the election 67,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the channel - an increase of 45 per cent compared to the same period before.Martin Hewitt isn't to blame for this - it's down to Shabana Mahmood and Keir Starmer's failings.'So another of Starmer’s stooges has failed!  I wonder how much his pay-off will cost us,  the tax payers?  Whoever gets appointed next is already doomed to failure because unless the illegals are detained on arrival and swiftly deported, they will not stop coming.   Starmer must leave the ECHR to enable this but he is too weak.

Sue Hammond ● 12d6 Comments ● 11d

Gerry Adams

A short while after the High Court in London upheld the decision to throw out the case against Kneecap rapper Mo Chara, now the civil case against Gerry Adams has been withdrawn.In a statement, he said he "welcomed the decision" and attended the case "out of respect" for the claimants. Adams' lawyers had argued the case was based on "an assortment of hearsay" and that it had been brought several decades too late.They also suggested it had been taken as an abuse of legal process, and that the civil action was not about trying to prove liability for the three bomb attacks, but to try to establish a much wider process which "the court is not intended to perform or is equipped to perform".Adams added; "I contested this case and defended myself against the smears and false accusations being levelled against me. I asserted the legitimacy of the Republican cause and the right of the people of Ireland to freedom and self-determination. I do so again."It seems like another case of British justice making the right decision in the end, but surely this should never have gone to court? Adams has been charged with IRA membership several times in the past but without legal success. This case boiled down to little more than hearsay and  speculation from many years ago. The defence also said this case should be dismissed for being brought too late, they questioned why the three accusers waited decades to bring their case. In the end, I feel for ALL the victims of the Troubles, including all those that suffered by the actions if the IRA, The British Army, the UDA etc. This is not a day for celebration or victory speeches; it is more appropriate to remember the victims and appreciate how much has been gained by leaving the past behind and taking the hard road to peace.

Gerry Boyce ● 12d0 Comments ● 12d

To help understanding, I turned to Google

"Zionism was originally a minority political belief within Jewish communities when it emerged in the late 19th century. While the idea of a spiritual return to Zion (Jerusalem) has been central to Judaism for centuries, the modern political movement to establish a secular Jewish state in Palestine faced significant opposition or indifference from a majority of Jews, particularly in Western Europe and the United States, who largely favored assimilation, as well as from many Orthodox groups who viewed it as a theological violation. Origins as a Minority Movement Late 19th-Century Context: Emerging in response to intense antisemitism in Europe (specifically Russian pogroms), Zionism was initially a minority movement of intellectuals and Eastern European "Lovers of Zion" (Ḥovevei Ẕiyyon).Opposing Views: Before the 1930s, many Jewish groups were actively anti-Zionist, promoting alternative solutions to persecution, such as socialist integration or cultural autonomy in their home countries.Early 20th Century: Prior to World War I, Zionism was largely supported by a minority, mainly consisting of activists from Russia and led by Central Europeans. Shift to DominanceZionism gained momentum as a dominant force over the next few decades due to several factors: Antisemitism & Rising Violence: Escalating anti-Semitic violence in Germany, Russia, and Eastern Europe made the Zionist goal of a safe haven more appealing.The Holocaust: The Nazi genocide destroyed the centers of European Jewish life, causing a radical shift in Jewish public opinion toward the necessity of an independent state.British Support: The 1917 Balfour Declaration, where Britain expressed support for a "national home for the Jewish people," gave the movement significant international legitimacy. Evolution of the MovementEven as late as 1939, while the Jewish population in Palestine was growing, Zionist supporters were still a minority of the world's total Jewish population. The transformation from a fringe movement into a mainstream Jewish belief took place gradually, accelerated dramatically by the Holocaust and the subsequent establishment of Israel in 1948."

David Ainsworth ● 15d3 Comments ● 15d

Trump: Maybe we shouldn’t even be there at all. Insight?

Random Trumpings on Air Force One."The president was discussing his call for other countries to send ships to help secure the Strait of Hormuz, the vital — and currently effectively shut — waterway off Iran through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil passes.Asked how quickly those deployments would happen, Trump said it would “start immediately,” with different countries offering different forms of assistance, including minesweeper boats.He later said: “So, we need, I, I would really, I’m demanding that these countries come in and protect their own territory because it is their territory, it’s the place from which they get their energy and they should come and they should help us protect it.”Then came the line that quickly sparked reaction online:“You could make the case that maybe we shouldn’t even be there at all because we don’t need it.”“We have a lot of oil,” said Trump. “We were the number one producer anywhere in the world times two by double, at least double. Now I think it’s much higher than that. But we do it. It’s almost like we do it for habit, but we also do it for some very good allies that we have in the Middle East.”"Maybe, as Trump says US has a lot of oil, he could make up for the coming shortage of oil for other non-involved (and non-consulted) parties, who are running low as a result of the international gangsterism of Donny and Benny.

David Ainsworth ● 16d0 Comments ● 16d

Iran ‘was three days from getting a nuke' before war - Mad as a box of frogs!

"Iran ‘was three days from getting a nuke' before war as details of horror alliance emergeOne of the key goals of Donald Trump's Operation Epic Fury in Iran is to eliminate the regime's nuclear threat.Daily Express Tue, Mar 10, 2026Explosions in Tehran targeted by US-Israeli attacksOperation Epic Fury was launched in late February A former US national security advisor believes Iran would have been able to get a nuclear weapon from one of its allies within days before Donald Trump ordered the launch of Operation Epic Fury. John Bolton, the national security advisor of Mr Trump during his first term at the White House, has claimed the alliance between North Korea and Iran is strong enough that the latter could have bought a nuclear weapon from the hermit regime.The US attorney claimed a wire transfer to the Central Bank of North Korea would have been what was needed to secure the deal before the war. Following the payment, he added, Pyongyang could "put a nuclear device on an aeroplane, route it through Russia" and deliver it to the regime in Tehran within three days.This came as, on Tuesday night, North Korea issued a statement condemning the US and Israeli strikes on Iran as "acts of aggression". The statement added: "Any rhetorical threats and military action, which violate the political system and territorial integrity of the relevant country, interfere in its internal affairs and openly advocate the attempt to overthrow its social system, deserve worldwide criticism and rejection as they can never be tolerated.""Three days - three days!! Should have used Amazon. One day, tops.The Sun agreed:-"Bolton says the risk of Iran’s mad mullahs getting their hands on one of Kim Jong-un‘s nukes is reason enough to force through a regime change.“I just think it’s a convincing argument [for] why you need a normal regime in Iran.""I should think that China is going to be getting concerned about her oil supplies from Iran.I wonder if it is reason enough to force through a regime change in the US or, at least, Israel? The US already has got their hands on Venezuela's oil.

David Ainsworth ● 22d1 Comments ● 21d

Random pic 10 March 2026

Marshalsea Prison Grille. This prison grille from the former Marshalsea Debtors' Prison in Southwark represents the most influential and painful experience in the life of the young Charles Dickens. (Dickens Museum) https://flic.kr/p/2rFbVaaHis father's imprisonment and his own time working in a factory at the age of 12 left scars in Dickens's mind that deeply affected him as a person and as a writer. This episode was Dickens's best-kept secret which he only told his best friend John Forster and his wife Catherine. However, Dickens secretly shared his experience with his readers as his novels are full of scenes of prisons and debt as well as of neglected children. In David Copperfield and Little Dorrit in particular, Dickens writes in great detail about debtors' prisons. The illustration to the right from Little Dorrit shows the imagined inside of the Marshalsea Prison itself In later life Dickens recalled "It is wonderful to me how I could have been so easily cast away at such an age. It is wonderfu to me, that, even after my descent into the poor little drudge I had been since we came to London, no one had compassion enough on me a child of singular abilities, quick, eager, delicate, and soor hurt, bodily or mentally - to suggest that something might have been spared, as certainly it migh have been, to place me at any common school".
The time at the Blacking Factory changed Dickens's outlook on childhood forever. This display of the prison grille in the middle-class home marks the disturbing effect that these experiences continued to have on Dickens throughout his life.
[Text from Museum label]

Michael Ixer ● 23d0 Comments ● 23d