Forum Topics

Very deserving refugees - but not thought so then, when it mattered

"Repelling refugees, 2020 / 1938"by Becky Taylor"This seems a good moment to remember Britain’s well-established tradition of repelling refugees from its shores.As the persecution of Jews and dissidents in Nazi-controlled Germany and Austria intensified in the summer of 1938, and as the liberal democracies which surrounded its territories imposed more and tougher visa restrictions and hardened their borders against refugees, those seeking refuge started to look for other means to enter safe countries. Those who had reached France, but feared that the country might soon be in line for invasion, or who already had relatives in Britain, started to enter the country illegally.By definition, we have no means of knowing how many people did so successfully. If there are traces of these movements, they will lie in family memory, diaries and personal accounts and not public record. What we do have are accounts from newspapers, which over the summer and autumn of 1938 frequently carried stories of desperate attempts by refugees without the correct documentation to enter or remain in Britain. Reporters covered deportations of refugees landing at Croydon airport or Harwich port only to be turned back by immigration officers. They also wrote of refugees paying to cross the Channel in motor boats, landing at night or swimming ashore to circumvent immigration restrictions. They penned lurid reports of prosecutions for bigamous marriages, where German Jewish women were alleged to have offered money and other inducements to British men in exchange for marriage and the prospect of British nationality it offered. Alongside these stories, the newspapers devoted growing numbers of column inches to prosecutions of aliens who had successfully entered the country without the consent of an immigration official but had subsequently been caught. The aim here was to emphasise that the British state remained in control of the situation, even where its borders had been breached. Considering the case of an illegal Polish immigrant, the presiding magistrate at Old Street Police, Herbert Metcalfe, declared that immigration law, which at that time made distinction between refugees and other immigrants, ‘should be sternly enforced, and it ought to go forth as a general warning that people who disobeyed the aliens’ law and disregarded the whole thing generally would have “a rough time”’. Two months later, Metcalfe sentenced three aliens who had entered Britain without the permission of an immigration officer, stating: ‘it was becoming an outrage the way in which stateless Jews were pouring in from every port of this country. As far as he was concerned, he intended to enforce the law to the fullest extent’. Although the occasional newspaper report suggested that some magistrates dealt with illegal immigration with a degree of leniency in the months following Germany’s annexation of Austria, overall the tone of reported judgements suggests that deportation was the default option for anyone seen to be contravening immigration law.The penalties could be significant. Those landing illegally faced deportation. In July 1938 two foreign seamen were sentenced to three months in prison with hard labour for helping a German Jewish refugee to land illegally in Britain. Reporting on this case on 2nd August, the Daily Mail was keen both to make the most of the Home Office’s alarm at the increase in illegal landings and to stress the government’s proficiency in tracking down offenders:Never before has it been more difficult for an alien to land unlawfully and remain out of police hands for more than a few hours. The favourite method is to come ashore in a rowing boat with the appearance of having been out for a short sea-trip. Despite coastal watch it is possible for an alien to escape notice in this way, but his inevitable struggle for existence is almost certain to lead him before long into police hands.Warming to its theme, the article went on to discuss other means by which aliens were attempting to enter the country, before reassuring readers that ‘Immigration authorities now have a secret and scientific method’ for detecting the ploys of illegal aliens, so that ‘the offender soon finds himself trapped’. A week later, the Mail was again reporting on the Home Office’s ‘new drive to keep aliens out’, this time flagging up the ‘Eire dodge’, in which refugees were landing ‘from a fishing or small trading vessel at out-of-the-way places on the coast of Eire’, from whence they came to Britain: ‘Our ports are so keenly watched by Scotland Yard and immigration officers, that it is not worth any foreigner’s while trying to “gate-crash” into this country’.Clandestine entry, desperation, prosecution, deportation, a hysterical press: it is hard not to draw parallels with the present, even as these facts sit uncomfortably with Britain’s persistent sense of itself as having a ‘tradition of welcome’ towards vulnerable strangers. Seeing how refugees from Nazism – now held up as the emblematic refugees of the twentieth century – were treated when they attempted to reach Britain’s shores pushes us to acknowledge how history can be distorted for the purposes of the present. Alongside the welcome given to the Kindertransportees, we need to set the histories of those kept out and turned back from Britain’s shores. Both are part of Britain’s long and ambivalent relationship with refugees.Revisiting this history also reminds us that the agency of desperate people also has a history, and one that highlights how, if one can both be a ‘real refugee’ and enter a country illegally, then the problem lies not with the people landing but with the law."     https://refugeehistory.org/blog/2020/8/12/repelling-refugees-2020-1938London, UK. 30th Mar, 1939. Oskar Goldberg, a refugee from German-occupied Czechoslovakia, being forcibly deported from Croydon airport:-https://ehri-visualisations.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/original/78c401dd98aaf123e2fa4aca4d985802.jpgHe was lucky, and so was his group. His attempts to stop the deportation succeeded.

David Ainsworth ● 16d6 Comments ● 16d

A year later this Palestinian writer was killed

+972 MagazineNewsletterIn Umm al-Khair, the occupation is damning us to multigenerational traumaI saw the first bulldozers arrive in my village 17 years ago. Now, after the most brutal weeks in our history, my son will carry similarly painful memories.By Awdah Hathaleen July 22, 2024The demolition forces enter the village. All the children run to their mothers, who scramble to salvage whatever they can from their homes before it’s too late. Everyone watches on anxiously to see who will be made homeless today. The bulldozers gather in the center of the village and then stop. Soldiers disembark. The villagers look each other in the eye, searching for words of comfort, but there are none. Our children ask us why this is happening, but we have no answers.This was the scene on June 26 in my village of Umm al-Khair in the occupied West Bank, when Israeli forces demolished 11 homes, leaving families without shelter in the heat of summer. The demolitions were just the beginning of what became one of the most violent weeks in the history of our small agricultural community: we have since faced a sharp escalation in settler violence, with subsequent attacks seeing settlers shoot live ammunition in the village and destroy our water system during a severe heat wave.On the morning of the demolitions, we got word that officials from the Israeli Civil Administration — which administers the lives of Palestinians under occupation — were gathered on the highway near our village together with Border Police officers and demolition equipment. We have become accustomed to experiencing major demolition operations here in the South Hebron Hills, under the pretext that the structures were built without permits. Yet we have no other choice: Israel routinely denies permits to Palestinians in Area C of the West Bank as a method to expel us from our lands.Since October 7, the situation in Umm Al-Khair has been even more difficult than usual. And that morning, we quickly realized that we were about to witness another major demolition operation. My cousin, Eid al-Hathaleen, an artist and community leader, was one of the villagers whose world was turned upside down. “As activists who regularly document demolitions, we immediately started monitoring what was happening,” he said. “After a while, a military convoy accompanied by three bulldozers moved toward our village, closed off all the entrances, and barred the media and activists from entering.”Upon entering the village, the demolition forces went straight to one of the oldest tents in Umm al-Khair: the tent of the martyr Suleiman al-Hathaleen, a monumental figure who led the community for years and was crushed to death two years ago by an Israeli police truck that raided the village. The soldiers formed a line to prevent residents from reaching the tent before bulldozing it to the ground. In our state of shock, we thought maybe that would be the only tent demolished that day. Instead, the occupation forces continued to the main electricity room in our village, to Eid’s home, and then to one of the largest families in Umm al-Khair to destroy all of their homes and everything they owned.In total, 10 houses were demolished that morning, along with the village council tent and the solar electricity room. Thirty-eight residents are now homeless — including my sister, whose house was destroyed along with all her possessions. What was particularly shocking was that these were among the oldest homes in the village, with some having received demolition orders all the way back in 2008. Now we are worried about every single house here in Umm al-Khair.During a demolition, there is the immediate pain and horror of losing your home. But perhaps the hardest moment is the first night without it. In the hours after the demolition, you will be surrounded by your friends from the community and those who have come from elsewhere to offer solidarity. But at the end of that evening, all of them will go back to their homes — while you and your family are left to sleep outside among the rubble of your memories.“I never imagined sleeping in the open that night,” Eid said. “I cannot describe that situation — how much I wanted to express what was inside me, and what my family, who are now homeless, was facing. How can I reduce their fear and anxiety, their feeling of having no safe place?”For my sister, it took a few days to begin to process the tragedy. “During the nights, we usually make dinner for everyone and sit together,” she told me. “Then my children go to hang out with their friends in the community, the young ones go to sleep, and we plan for the following morning. But in one moment, we found ourselves in an unsteady tent which cannot protect us from anything. So in these moments, we understood what had actually happened to us.”Here in Umm al-Khair, the threat of home demolitions has hovered over every resident since we first received demolition orders 17 years ago. When I was young, my parents did everything to try to shield my siblings and I from this reality, but there are some memories that stuck with me. I was only 13 years old during the first demolitions in 2007, but I still remember that day so clearly: I walked to school with two of my cousins, then sat at my desk which was next to the window, giving me a clear view of the village. Suddenly, we started to see bulldozers and people moving around; we tried to go out, but the teachers wouldn’t let us.I remember my mother’s tears when I arrived back in the village, the women shouting, and the anger in the men’s faces. I remember the activists who stood with us, the soldiers and Border Police officers throwing tear gas, and the men being arrested. It’s a painful memory, yet I can’t help but remember.Now a parent myself, I’ve tried to shield my 4-year-old son from this harsh reality as much as possible, so that he will not have to carry the same memories that I did. But sometimes, no matter how good a father you are, there are things you cannot control. And the past weeks have been some of the worst we’ve ever experienced.In the afternoon of July 1, five days after the demolitions, a group of settlers from the illegal Israeli outpost of Havat Shorashim entered our village where a group of elderly women were feeding their sheep. They came into the home of my mother, the village elder Hajja Khadra al-Hathaleen, demanding that she make them coffee. When the women told the settlers to leave, one of them began shooting live fire into the air, beating the women with sticks, and spraying pepper spray in their eyes. In a panic, we called for the police and army to come, not knowing how else to protect our families from the settlers. But when the army arrived, instead of making the settlers leave our land, they started to shout at the village residents and push us out of our homes. In total, six residents were wounded by the settlers: four women, a 5-year-old girl, and a 17-year-old boy. We called ambulances to take the wounded to the hospital, but when they reached the village, the settlers blocked the road, delaying the injured from getting urgent medical treatment.  My son witnessed these attacks — he was playing in the area where the settlers arrived — and has been deeply affected by them. Understandably, he wants to know what is happening, and why. “Every time a settler sees me, will they use pepper spray?” he now asks. “Why did grandma go to the hospital?” He even knows some of the settlers by name. Sometimes I tell him that they went to jail; I’m lying, but I want to make him feel safe. But he still sees his grandmothers, his cousins, and his aunts collapsing on the ground in front of him. It’s a tough memory, and I know that it will stick with him. Since the attacks, my son has started stuttering — an entirely new symptom, and one that terrifies me. The doctor told us that the best treatment for stuttering is a safe environment. But this is what we cannot guarantee for our children: in Umm al-Khair, no one is in a safe place. The following day, the same settlers returned to the village; after pitching a tent in my neighbor’s yard, over 20 of them gathered to say the Jewish evening prayers together. The next morning, while grazing their sheep in our private agricultural lands, they severed the pipe that is Umm al-Khair’s only connection to running water. Amid all of this injustice, we often feel forgotten, lost, or hopeless. Sometimes we wonder: why do Israelis see us as terrorists and enemies? Why is the world not acting to achieve justice for Palestinians? But most of the time, we feel tired. The attacks, the raids, the demolitions: we think about them all the time. I always say that I wish fate hadn’t brought us to this point. But now we are stuck here; there’s no way to leave."Awdah Hathaleen is an activist and collective member of Umm al-Khair in the South Hebron Hills. He is an English teacher in his village, having studied English teaching at Hebron University.Hamdan Ballal Al-Huraini also contributed to this article.https://www.972mag.com/umm-al-khair-multigenerational-trauma/------------------See the settlers and their IDF "protectors":-https://static.972mag.com/www/uploads/2024/07/July-2-Shimon-and-army-and-sheep-3-1280x720.jpg------------------And now:-"On 28 July this year [2025], Yinon Levi [a radical Zionist settler] fired a bullet that killed Odeh [Awdah] Hathaleen, a Palestinian activist and journalist, during a disturbance in the West Bank village of Umm al-Khair. Levi pleaded self-defence and was released after three days of house arrest.""His [Awdah's] brother, Khalil, told me the dead man was holding his five-year-old son, Watan, and filming the violent scenes on his phone when he was killed."

David Ainsworth ● 23d10 Comments ● 17d

"Double tap" 15 minutes later

"Israel bombed the main hospital in southern Gaza on Monday and then struck the same spot again as rescuers and journalists rushed to help the wounded, killing at least 20 people including five journalists, health officials said.The first strike hit the top floor of a building at the Nasser hospital, killing the Reuters journalist Hussam al-Masri and others. Journalists and rescuers then rushed to the scene to help the wounded, when a second bomb struck the same spot 15 minutes later.A live video from AlGhad TV captured the moments of their killings, showing civil defence workers wearing bright orange vests and journalists raising their hands to shield themselves seconds before the second bomb kills them. A second video showed the aftermath of the bombings, with the bodies of the first responders and journalists lying on top of one another, bloody and covered in dust.The “double tap” strike and killing of journalists prompted a wave of international condemnation, including from the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy. “Horrified by Israel’s attack on Nasser hospital. Civilians, healthcare workers and journalists must be protected. We need an immediate ceasefire,” Lammy wrote on X.The US president, Donald Trump, told reporters “I’m not happy about it” when asked about the attack, while the French president, Emmanuel Macron, described it as “intolerable”." (Gdn 25/8/25)https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/25/journalists-among-people-killed-by-israeli-strike-on-gaza-hospital-----------------------"In a statement, the Israeli military said its troops on Monday "carried out a strike in the area of Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis"."The Chief of the General Staff instructed to conduct an initial inquiry as soon as possible," it said, adding it "regrets any harm to uninvolved individuals and does not target journalists as such".""uninvolved individuals" and "journalists as such". "initial inquiry as soon as possible".Of course.https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/four-journalists-among-15-killed-101221836.html

David Ainsworth ● 24d2 Comments ● 18d

All good friends and jolly good company

UK still sharing intelligence with Israel as surveillance flights over Gaza continueBy Imran MullaNiddle East Eye. Published date: 6 August 2025 09:43 BST | Last update: 2 weeks 5 days agoDespite escalating diplomatic tensions between the two countries, the UK has continued to assist Israel militarily. On Tuesday, government sources confirmed that Britain continues to fly spy planes over Gaza and share intelligence with Israel, according to The Times.For months, British politicians have questioned the government about the role played by a Royal Air Force base on the island of Cyprus, RAF Akrotiri, just a 40-minute flight from Tel Aviv.From there, RAF aircraft have conducted hundreds of surveillance flights over Gaza throughout Israel's war on the besieged enclave.In response to questions about these flights, the UK's Ministry of Defence (MoD) has repeatedly insisted it is in support of "hostage rescue".The MoD confirmed this week that surveillance flights were "still ongoing" over Gaza, The Times reported.According to flight tracking data, Shadow R1s, RAF specialist planes, have not flown over Gaza in the past month. The MoD has refused to disclose which aircraft are currently being deployed over Gaza. 'A bird's-eye view of the genocide'A source with knowledge of British surveillance capabilities in the Middle East told MEE earlier this year that the surveillance flights give Britain "a bird's-eye view of the genocide".The source noted that the UK, a partner in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance that also includes the US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, is the "number one gatherer of intelligence" in the Middle East."Britain knows exactly what is happening because of those flights. They have a better view than any journalist."Former Major General Charlie Herbert, who served in the British Army for 35 years, told The Times: “It’s all good and proper saying they are handing over intelligence for the purposes for locating hostages, but in reality that intelligence is just as likely to be used [to target] Hamas and others.”The MoD said last year that it "would consider any formal request from the International Criminal Court to provide information relating to investigations into war crimes".There is significant secrecy surrounding much of what the RAF Akrotiri airbase in Cyprus is used for.Earlier this year, MEE reported that the UK government blocked Labour MP Kim Johnson from asking about Israeli bombers using the Cyprus airbase.Diplomatic ties between the UK and Israel have frayed in the past few months, culminating in the British government's announcement last week that it intends to recognise Palestinian statehood in September.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office responded by saying on X: "Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims. A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW."But despite the diplomatic fireworks, questions and scrutiny over the exact nature of Britain's military cooperation with Israel are sure to continue."

David Ainsworth ● 24d4 Comments ● 23d

To the victors the spoils?

Mr Rose replies yesterday to my statement ‘The Zionists returned as colonists, not as equals’.:-"Not true. The early Zionists in the nineteenth century purchased land from Turkish landowners and lived under Turkish rule just like the Arabs. After 1917 Jewish immigrants had to seek permission from the British authorities. They had no more privileges than their Arab neighbours."He must have forgotten:-"Herbert Louis Samuel, 1st Viscount Samuel (6 November 1870 – 5 February 1963) was a British Liberal politician who was the party leader from 1931 to 1935.He was the first nominally-practising Jew to serve as a Cabinet minister and to become the leader of a major British political party. Samuel had promoted Zionism within the British Cabinet, beginning with his 1915 memorandum entitled The Future of Palestine. In 1920 he was appointed as the first High Commissioner for Palestine, in charge of the administration of the territory."One month after Britain's declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire in November 1914, Samuel met Chaim Weizmann, who was to become the President of the World Zionist Organization and later the first President of Israel. According to Weizmann's memoirs, Samuel was already an avid believer in Zionism and believed that Weizmann's demands were too modest. Samuel did not want to enter into a detailed discussion of his plans but mentioned that "the Jews would have to build railways, harbours, a university, a network of schools, etc", as well as potentially a Temple in "modernised form".In January 1915, Samuel circulated a memorandum, The Future of Palestine, to his cabinet colleagues, suggesting that Britain should conquer Palestine in order to protect the Suez Canal against foreign powers, and for Palestine to become a home for the Jewish people. The memorandum stated, "I am assured that the solution of the problem of Palestine which would be much the most welcome to the leaders and supporters of the Zionist movement throughout the world would be the annexation of the country to the British Empire". In March 1915, Samuel replaced the January 1915 draft version with the final version of his memorandum, toned down from the earlier draft, explicitly ruling out any idea of immediately establishing a Jewish state and emphasizing that non-Jews must receive equal treatment under any scheme.Appointment as High CommissionerIn 1917, Britain occupied Palestine (then part of the Ottoman Empire) during the course of the First World War. Samuel lost his seat in the election of 1918 and became a candidate to represent British interests in the territory.He was appointed to the position of High Commissioner in 1920, before the Council of the League of Nations approved a British mandate for Palestine. Nonetheless, the military government withdrew to Cairo in preparation for the expected British Mandate, which was finally granted two years later by the League of Nations. He served as High Commissioner until 1925. Samuel was the first Jew to govern the historic Land of Israel in 2000 years.He recognised Hebrew as one of the three official languages of the territory. He was appointed Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire (GBE) on 11 June 1920.Samuel's appointment to High Commissioner for Palestine was controversial. While the Zionists welcomed the appointment of a Zionist Jew to the post, the military government, headed by Edmund Allenby and Louis Bols, called Samuel's appointment "highly dangerous".Technically, Allenby noted, the appointment was illegal, as a civil administration that would compel the inhabitants of an occupied country to express their allegiance to it before a formal peace treaty (with the Ottoman Empire) was signed violated both military law and the Hague Convention. Bols said the news was received with "consternation, despondency and exasperation" by the Muslims and Christians. Allenby said that the Arabs would see it "as handing country over at once to a permanent Zionist Administration" and predicted massive violence.Lord Curzon read the last message to Samuel and asked him to reconsider accepting the post. Samuel took advice from a delegation in London representing the Zionists, who told him that the "alarmist" reports were not justified. The Muslim-Christian Association had sent a telegram to Bols:Sir Herbert Samuel regarded as a Zionist leader, and his appointment as first step in formation of Zionist national home in the midst of Arab people contrary to their wishes. Inhabitants cannot recognise him, and Muslim-Christian Society cannot accept responsibility for riots or other disturbances of peace.The wisdom of appointing Samuel was debated in the House of Lords a day before he arrived in Palestine. Lord Curzon said that no "disparaging" remarks had been made during the debate but that "very grave doubts have been expressed as to the wisdom of sending a Jewish Administrator to the country at this moment".Questions in the House of Commons of the period also show much concern about the choice of Samuel: "what action has been taken to placate the Arab population... and thereby put an end to racial tension". Three months after his arrival, The Morning Post commented: "Sir Herbert Samuel's appointment as High Commissioner was regarded by everyone, except Jews, as a serious mistake."Tenure.As High Commissioner, Samuel attempted to mediate between Zionist and Arab interests, acting to slow Jewish immigration and win the confidence of the Arab population. He hoped to gain Arab participation in mandate affairs and to guard their civil and economic rights, but refused them any authority that could be used to stop Jewish immigration and land purchase. According to Wasserstein his policy was "subtly designed to reconcile Arabs to the... pro-Zionist policy" of the British.Islamic custom at the time was that the chief Islamic spiritual leader, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, was to be chosen by the temporal ruler, the Ottoman Sultan in Constantinople, from a group of clerics nominated by the indigenous clerics. After the British conquered Palestine, Samuel chose Haj Amin al Husseini, who later proved a thorn in the side of the British administration in Palestine. At the same time, he enjoyed the respect of the Jewish community, and he was honoured by being called to the Torah at the Hurva synagogue in the Old City of Jerusalem."The Palestine population at this time was:1922 Total population of Palestine  752,000Jewish population of Palestine  84,000Christian population of Palestine  71,000Muslim population of Palestine  589,000https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Samuel,_1st_Viscount_Samuel

David Ainsworth ● 25d12 Comments ● 24d

VJ Day and how our split society came about.

"How the second world war shaped the sons of its soldiers" The Spectator.https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-the-second-world-war-shaped-the-sons-of-its-soldiers/I am at 80, probably one of the oldest posters on this Forum.And many would say I am sure, one of the most reactionary.But then I was born, brought up and formed in different times and under different circumstances.And every thing in this article rings a loud bell for me.I was 'shaped' as described above.My father fought for four years against the Japanese in Malaysia.And for years after his uniform truly did hang at the back of his wardrobe.(Well the jacket did but not the trousers leading to my bad dreams as a child as to what he would wear if called up again !)And we did play 'England vs Germany' war games in the street and were proud that we were victorious in reality.The nett of this might well be that I was inculcated with patriotism and love of country.And looked back at pride on what he and his comrades did to defend us from fascist tyranny in Europe and the Far East.A country that was homogeneous in race and culture and belief and proud of its history.Now it is 'multi-racial 'and 'multi cultural'.Is this for the better ?Divided between those that for generations have sided with its history and culture and those, often newcomers born elsewhere, that criticise it.And of course our education system which often derides and downplays our beliefs, culture and achievements so that younger generations, if they know anything at all of our recent past, are often taught to mock it and find it ridiculous. Is that for the good ?A petty example. Birmingham Council (the one that never collects household waste because of strikes by bin men) tries to stop the flying of Union Jack Flags but allows Palestinian flags to fly in Muslim areas."Fury as Labour-run council tears down 'dangerous' St George's and Union Jack flags from city streets (but Palestine flags are allowed in 'Muslim areas'.)" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15003113/Fury-Labour-run-council-tears-dangerous-St-Georges-Union-Jack-flags.htmlFor those that can be bothered to read it, this Spectator article above explains some of this.

John Hawkes ● 33d71 Comments ● 24d

Ambulances to Ukraine

As some of you will remember I volunteered two years ago to drive an aid-filled ambulance to Ukraine for a remarkable undertaking known as Medical Life Lines Ukraine (MLLU).  Several of you made very generous donations at that time and in total I raised over £18,000 at the time.MLLU was set up and is being run by a small group of private citizens in Wimbledon and Putney.  They have done heroic work and have raised sufficient funds since the invasion began to deliver over 100 ambulances, medical equipment and other civilian rescue vehicles to the Ministry of Health in Lviv.  On two occasions convoys also took supplies of dog food for the rescue dogs trained to search for survivors in ruined buildings.  Photos of the very happy dogs and their handlers can be seen on the MLLU website https://www.medicallifelines.org.uk Now, I have volunteered to drive again and will be departing from Putney early on Sunday 7th September to join the other ambulances at Folkestone. From there the convoy will head across the Channel on the Euroshuttle (they transport us for free) before heading on to Lviv.Two years ago I did not think the humanitarian aid being delivered by MLLU would still be as vitally needed today as it was back then.  Tragically it looks like their work will continue to be needed for years to come given the continuing onslaught by Russian missiles and drones.  Ukraine remains a war zone and the regular air raid sirens remind any visitor that even Lviv, in the far west of the country, has been attacked.I have undertaken to raise at least an additional £7,000 to cover part of the cost of another ambulance in a future convoy and I am hoping that the spirit of generosity shown two years ago still lives on.  I would be truly grateful if you feel able to offer your support, some for a second time of course, but others for the first time.The link to my funding page is as follows https://www.justgiving.com/page/jonathan-callaway-1 where you will see I have almost reached my initial target.  I hope to raise far more of course and I can assure you every penny gets spent on humanitarian equipment.  The costs of driving the ambulances to Ukraine, about 1,200 miles, are covered by the volunteer drivers, as are their return travel costs.Donations are UK gift aid compliant as they are routed through our partner British-Ukrainian Aid, a registered UK charity.Do please also share this as widely as possible with friends and contacts so I can raise as much as I possibly can for MLLU.With many thanks in advanceJonathan

Jonathan Callaway ● 71d19 Comments ● 24d

You REALLY Couldn't Make This Up !!!

A Nigerian man who was jailed for four years for violence has won a legal battle against deportation on the basis of being gay, despite having been married to a woman and fathering a child by another.Nigerian father who was denied asylum three times is allowed to stay in Britain - after belatedly claiming he's gayThe man, who has been granted anonymity, first arrived in the UK in 1983 but overstayed and left nine years later.He returned in 1996 and made several failed asylum bids, including on the basis of political opinion and later through marriage to a Portuguese woman.He has a son from a relationship with another woman, but claimed he was 'in denial' about his sexuality at the time.The 61-year-old has a conviction for violent disorder and was jailed for four years in 2003. A deportation order was issued in 2006.But between 2010 and 2013, he said he was in a gay relationship and argued he would face persecution if removed to Nigeria, where his family said he was 'bringing the family name into ridicule and shame and that they would not hesitate to inform the security services of such practice.'The Home Office repeatedly rejected his claims, with one immigration judge describing him as not credible and dismissing evidence from witnesses, one of whom said he suspected he was gay 'because of the amount of time he spent in the bathroom and because he had found gay pornographic material'.Despite this, he has now been granted the right to remain on human rights grounds.Immigration judges have now declared: 'We consider that his account should not be rejected solely because of his immigration history or because he did not rely on his sexual orientation to remain in the UK prior to 2015.'They found him 'plausible.'Upper Tribunal judge Gemma Loughran said: 'We are satisfied to the lower standard that he is gay.'https://mol.im/a/15024237This incompetent judge should be dismissed and this criminal should be deported.   Immediately!

Sue Hammond ● 27d3 Comments ● 27d

Yvette Cooper cannot tell you why - just trust her

"The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, told the BBC that Palestine Action “is not a non-violent organisation” and claimed that court restrictions meant people “don’t know the full nature of this organisation”.But Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, said: “Yvette Cooper and No 10’s claim that Palestine Action is a violent organisation is false and defamatory and even disproven by the government’s own intelligence assessment of Palestine Action’s activities …“It was revealed in court during my ongoing legal challenge to the ban that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre’s (JTAC’S) assessment acknowledges that ‘Palestine Action does not advocate for violence against persons’ and that the ‘majority’ of its activities ‘would not be classified as terrorism’.[Huda Ammori]:- “Spraying red paint on war planes is not terrorism. Disrupting Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer, Elbit Systems, by trespassing on their sites in Britain is not terrorism. It is the Israeli Defense Forces and all those who arm and enable their war crimes who are the terrorists.”JTAC, a government body based within MI5, produced a secret report on 7 March which was disclosed in the high court.While recommending banning Palestine Action, JTAC said the group “primarily uses direct action tactics”, which typically resulted in minor damage to property. “Common tactics include graffiti, petty vandalism, occupation and lock-ons,” it added.Defend Our Juries, which has organised multiple demonstrations, including Saturday’s, in support of Palestine Action, also highlighted Whitehall officials’ description – again in documents revealed in court – of a ban as “relatively novel” as “there was no known precedent of an organisation being proscribed on the basis that it was concerned in terrorism mainly due to its use or threat of action involving serious damage to property”.A Defend Our Juries spokesperson said: “It is despicable that under political pressure, Yvette Cooper is now actively misleading the British public about the nature of Palestine Action, knowing that if people come to their defence to counter her disinformation, she can have them jailed for 14 years [because they could be deemed to supporting a proscribed group].”https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/11/palestine-action-huda-ammori-ministers-claims

David Ainsworth ● 37d19 Comments ● 35d

Jeremy Bowen talks to a squatter/settler

"Bowen: Israeli settlers intensify campaign to drive out West Bank Palestinians"BBC 10/8/25."The conflict between Arabs and Jews for control of the land between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea started well over a century ago when Zionists from Europe began to buy land to set up communities in Palestine.It has been shaped by significant turning points.The latest has come from the deadly 7 October 2023 attacks by Hamas and Israel's devastating response.The consequences of the last 22 months of war, and however more months are left before a ceasefire, threaten to spread across years and generations, just like the Middle East war in 1967, when Israel captured Gaza from Egypt and East Jerusalem and the West Bank from Jordan.The scale of destruction and killing in the Gaza war obscures what is happening in the West Bank, which smoulders with tension and violence.Since October 2023, Israel's pressure on West Bank Palestinians has increased sharply, justified as legitimate security measures.Evidence based on statements by ministers, influential local leaders like Simcha and accounts by witnesses on the ground reveal that the pressure is part of a wider agenda, to accelerate the spread of Jewish settlements in the occupied territories and to extinguish any lingering hopes of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.Palestinians and human rights groups also accuse the Israeli security forces of failing in their legal duty as occupiers to protect Palestinians as well as their own citizens - not just turning a blind eye to settler attacks, but even joining in.Violence by ultra-nationalist Jewish settlers in the West Bank has risen sharply since 7 October 2023.Ocha, the UN's humanitarian office, estimates an average of four settler attacks every day.The International Court of Justice has issued an advisory opinion that the entire occupation of Palestinian territory captured in 1967 is illegal.Israel's rejects the ICJ's view and claims that the Geneva Conventions forbidding settlement in occupied territories do not apply - a view disputed by many of its own allies as well as international lawyers.In the shade of the fig tree, Simcha denied all suggestions he had attacked Palestinians, as he celebrated the fact that most of the Arab farmers who used to graze their animals on the hills he has SEIZED and tend their olives in the valleys had gone.He looks back to the Hamas October attacks, and Israel's response ever since, as a turning point."I think that a lot has changed, that the enemy in our land lost hope. He's beginning to understand that he's on his way out; that's what has changed in the last year or year and a half."Today you can walk around here in the land in the desert, and nobody will jump on you and try to kill you. There are still attempts to oppose our presence here in this land, but the enemy is starting to understand this slowly. They have no future here."The reality has changed. I ask you and the people of the world, why are you so interested in those Palestinians so much? Why do you care about them? It's just another small nation."The Palestinians don't interest me. I care about my people."Simcha says the Palestinians who left villages and farms near the hilltops he has claimed simply realised that God intended the land for Jews, not for them.""At a ceremony in one of them ("outposts") in the south Hebron Hills in April this year, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, whose powers over the running of the occupation also make him something like the governor of the West Bank, donated 19 all-terrain vehicles to the settlers. He praised them for "grabbing massive territories".A sharp-eyed reporter at the Times of Israel pointed out that one of the settlers at the ceremony, Yinon Levi, had been filmed harassing Palestinians from an all-terrain vehicle. Levi is sanctioned by the UK and the European Union for using violence to drive Palestinians off their land, though President Trump lifted similar sanctions imposed by Joe Biden.Levi is radical settler royalty, married to the daughter of Noam Federman - a notorious extremist. Federman is a former leader of the Kach party, which is designated as a terrorist organisation by Israel, the US, the European Union and others.On 28 July this year, Yinon Levi fired a bullet that killed Odeh Hathaleen, a Palestinian activist and journalist, during a disturbance in the West Bank village of Umm al-Khair. Levi pleaded self-defence and was released after three days of house arrest.When we went to Umm al-Khair, Hathaleen's dried blood was still at the place where he was killed.His brother, Khalil, told me the dead man was holding his five-year-old son, Watan, and filming the violent scenes on his phone when he was killed."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj4wwxz12jkoThis project has been going on for over a hundred years. It is getting ever closer to fulfilment.

David Ainsworth ● 38d24 Comments ● 35d

Yet More Hypocrisy From A Labour Minister

Labour homelessness minister resigns after being called for 'extreme hypocrisy' after she 'threw out FOUR tenants then raised rent on her London home by £700 Labour's Homelessness Minister was forced to quit tonight after an embarrassing eviction row.Rushanara Ali was accused of 'staggering hypocrisy' amid claims she ejected tenants from one of her homes, before putting it back on the market for an extra £700 a month rent.Rushanara Ali was accused of 'staggering hypocrisy' amid claims she ejected tenants from one of her homes, before putting it back on the market for an extra £700 a month rent.Following mounting calls to resign, she announced she would stand down from the government to avoid becoming 'a distraction'.In a letter to the Prime Minister, there was no apology with Ms Ali insisting that she had followed 'all relevant legal requirements' and said she 'took my responsibilities and duties seriously'.Her resignation came after it emerged that she had hiked rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds just weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended.Ms Ali, 50, has repeatedly cast herself as a voice for hard-up tenants, and spoke out against private renters 'being exploited and discriminated against'. ****And she championed the Renters' Rights Bill, currently going through Parliament, which will ban landlords who evict tenants from re-listing a property for a higher rent until at least six months after the occupants have left. Her actions would have been illegal under this law.!!!!Staggering hypocrisy!!🤬https://mol.im/a/14980971

Sue Hammond ● 42d14 Comments ● 40d

US Speaker says West Bank belongs to Jews ‘by right’ in settlement visit

The Times of Israel, 4/8/25:-"US Speaker says West Bank belongs to Jews ‘by right’ in settlement visit.Speaker of the US House of Representatives Mike Johnson says that the “mountains of Judea and Samaria” belong to the Jewish people “by right,” during a visit to the West Bank settlement of Ariel, according to a statement by the settlement’s municipal authority.Johnson, who is among the most senior US officials to ever visit a West Bank settlement, speaks at a celebratory event attended by Ariel Mayor Yair Chetboun and the mayors of other West Bank settlements.“Every corner of this land is important to us. It is an integral part of our faith, and therefore the significance for us is great… We stand entirely by your side,” says Johnson, according to the statement.“Scripture teaches us that the mountains of Judea and Samaria were promised to the Jewish people, and they belong to them by right. But many people around the world do not see it like this, they label it the ‘occupied territories’ or the ‘West Bank’ or any other name,” he adds. “Every mayor here should know exactly where we stand regarding this issue — and we stand with you.”His spokesperson does not respond to a request for comment."Wikipedia:-"Ariel is an Israeli settlement organized as a city council in the central West Bank, part of the Israeli-occupied territories, approximately 20 kilometres (12 mi) east of the Green Line and 34 kilometres (21 mi) west of the Jordan border. Ariel was first established in 1978 and its population was 20,520 in 2022, composed of veteran and young Israelis, English-speaking immigrants, and immigrants from the former Soviet Union, with an additional influx of above 10,000 students from Ariel University. It is the fourth largest Israeli settlement in the West Bank, after Modi'in Illit, Beitar Illit, and Ma'ale Adumim.The international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this."Google:-"Yes, Ariel is considered an illegal Israeli settlement under international law. The international community, including the United Nations, views the establishment and expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories as a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.Article 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the transfer of a civilian population into occupied territories."

David Ainsworth ● 44d6 Comments ● 42d