Forum Topics

Martin Hewitt UK Border Chief Quits

The head of the UK's border security command will step down at the end of March after failing to stem the surge in crossings. The Home Office confirmed Martin Hewitt would leave the post of border security commander after 18 months in the job.Since his appointment in September 2024, crossings have continued at sky-high levels - with 58,910 people making the journey in that time.His tenure also saw the second-highest annual total of people crossing the Channel, with 41,472 people arriving in the UK by small boat last year.It is understood he will leave at the end of the month, with an interim replacement appointed 'in due course'.   Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the continuing small boats crisis was down to the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary. 'The Government's complete failure on small boats isn't down to Martin Hewitt,' he said. 'It's because Keir Starmer and Shabana Mahmood are too weak to take the necessary action - such as coming out of the European Convention on Human Rights and deporting all illegal immigrants within a week of arrival.'Labour's decision to cancel the Rwanda removals plan was a disaster - since the election 67,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the channel - an increase of 45 per cent compared to the same period before.Martin Hewitt isn't to blame for this - it's down to Shabana Mahmood and Keir Starmer's failings.'So another of Starmer’s stooges has failed!  I wonder how much his pay-off will cost us,  the tax payers?  Whoever gets appointed next is already doomed to failure because unless the illegals are detained on arrival and swiftly deported, they will not stop coming.   Starmer must leave the ECHR to enable this but he is too weak.

Sue Hammond ● 3h3 Comments ● 2h

Gerry Adams

A short while after the High Court in London upheld the decision to throw out the case against Kneecap rapper Mo Chara, now the civil case against Gerry Adams has been withdrawn.In a statement, he said he "welcomed the decision" and attended the case "out of respect" for the claimants. Adams' lawyers had argued the case was based on "an assortment of hearsay" and that it had been brought several decades too late.They also suggested it had been taken as an abuse of legal process, and that the civil action was not about trying to prove liability for the three bomb attacks, but to try to establish a much wider process which "the court is not intended to perform or is equipped to perform".Adams added; "I contested this case and defended myself against the smears and false accusations being levelled against me. I asserted the legitimacy of the Republican cause and the right of the people of Ireland to freedom and self-determination. I do so again."It seems like another case of British justice making the right decision in the end, but surely this should never have gone to court? Adams has been charged with IRA membership several times in the past but without legal success. This case boiled down to little more than hearsay and  speculation from many years ago. The defence also said this case should be dismissed for being brought too late, they questioned why the three accusers waited decades to bring their case. In the end, I feel for ALL the victims of the Troubles, including all those that suffered by the actions if the IRA, The British Army, the UDA etc. This is not a day for celebration or victory speeches; it is more appropriate to remember the victims and appreciate how much has been gained by leaving the past behind and taking the hard road to peace.

Gerry Boyce ● 9h0 Comments ● 9h