Forum Topics

Assisted Dying Bill

Lord Falconer, who introduced the Assisted Dying Bill to the Lords, has accused objectors in the House of filibustering. He has even threatened to invoke the Parliament Act and force the Lords to accept the Commons Bill unamended. In fact he has no power to do this. It is not a government measure but a private member's bill. The government cannot force the measure through without breaking its declared neutrality and adopting the Bill as Labour policy, which it has no mandate to do.Charles Moore in today's 'Telegraph' lists some of the objections to the Bill which have been raised by peers:how to judge the mental capacity of each candidate for assisted suicide, including people with learning difficulties, Down's syndrome and autismhow to detect coercion by greedy relatives or over-zealous doctors;how the doctors deciding on the panel, who would not be familiar with the candidates, could judge their state of mind;who should sit on any review panels (at present the proposal is to include a KC, so Keir could have a go):the uncertainty of a prognosis and sometimes even the diagnosis of a terminal disease leading to death within six months;the cost to the NHS of finding the professionals to deal with an expected number of at least 6000 applications each year;the question of whether a pregnant woman should be allowed to apply;the problem of language and literacy difficulties with certain candidates.I think peers are right to raise these issues and they should not be accused of filibustering.

Steven Rose ● 7h0 Comments ● 7h

Cuts to ODA budget

As a Borgen Project Ambassador and Putney constituent, I am writing to express my concern and repulsion at Labour’s announcement to slash the ODA’s foreign aid budget nearly in half (from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3%). The latest round of cuts threatens to strip an estimated £150 million from programmes fighting tuberculosis, AIDS, and malaria—diseases that continue to kill millions and disproportionately affect the world’s poorest communities. These abhorrent cuts follow the dark path set out by Boris Johnson and Donald Trump, who’s governments slashed the ODA and USAID budgets, also resulting in massive global deaths from disease and hunger. I think it’s important to clear up a few common misconceptions around foreign aid spending. Surveys show that Britons routinely overestimate how much we spend on foreign aid, with many believing it accounts for 10% of national spending when, even at 0.7% (now 0.3%), it was less than a penny in the pound. In addition, there’s often a notion that foreign aid is a leftwing or progressive concept, in truth, both Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher strengthened development efforts, recognizing that stability abroad furthers security and prosperity at home. Wandsworth is proudly “the Brighter Borough” and “the Borough of Culture,” these slogans reflect our shared values of compassion, openness, and outward-looking values. Standing up for foreign aid means standing up for who we are. I’d like to commend my local MP, Fleur Anderson, for upholding these values through her work opposing these cuts and championing effective, life-saving development assistance. I encourage her to continue and urge her colleges to join in her courageous efforts.The Borgen Project works to ensure communities like ours speak up for smart, humane foreign policy. Wandsworth should continue to lead that effort.Oliver Lefferts

Oliver Lefferts ● 8d10 Comments ● 1d