Forum Topics

Chagos ~ Another U-turn On The Way?

Pressure grows on Starmer to ditch 'terrible' plan to hand Chagos Islands to Mauritius as Labour MPs say it should be an axed.Pressure mounted on Sir Keir Starmer to ditch his ‘terrible’ plan of surrendering the Chagos Islands amid mounting opposition from his own LabourMPs.The Prime Minister faced calls to heed the concerns of Donald Trump and scrap the plan entirely – not just pause it.Senior Labour backbench MP Dan Carden said: ‘This is not about obeying Trump - it's about using common sense and doing the right thing for the country.’The plea came after the surprise news on Friday that Sir Keir was pulling the next stage of legislation needed to ratify the controversial territory – which includes a giant joint UK/US military base – to Mauritius.The Bill was due to be discussed in the House of Lords on Monday but the draft law was withdrawn just days after the US president came out strongly against the handover.It also came after Tory peers demanded to know if the agreement complied with international law, with the Tories warned it would break a UN treaty between the UK and US in 1966 which stated: 'The territory shall remain under UK sovereignty.'But the Government insist that the deal – which critics say could eventually cost the UK £35 billion in payments to Mauritius, more than 10 times the Government’s estimate - will still go ahead.A Government spokesman said: ‘The Government remains fully committed to the deal to secure the joint UK-US base on Diego Garcia, which is vital for our national security.’This is irresponsible and reckless behaviour by peers, whose roles is to check legislation, not interfere with our national security priorities.’https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15494287/Pressure-Starmer-plan-Chagos-Islands-Mauritius-Labour-

Sue Hammond ● 1d5 Comments ● 1d

Cuts to ODA budget

As a Borgen Project Ambassador and Putney constituent, I am writing to express my concern and repulsion at Labour’s announcement to slash the ODA’s foreign aid budget nearly in half (from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3%). The latest round of cuts threatens to strip an estimated £150 million from programmes fighting tuberculosis, AIDS, and malaria—diseases that continue to kill millions and disproportionately affect the world’s poorest communities. These abhorrent cuts follow the dark path set out by Boris Johnson and Donald Trump, who’s governments slashed the ODA and USAID budgets, also resulting in massive global deaths from disease and hunger. I think it’s important to clear up a few common misconceptions around foreign aid spending. Surveys show that Britons routinely overestimate how much we spend on foreign aid, with many believing it accounts for 10% of national spending when, even at 0.7% (now 0.3%), it was less than a penny in the pound. In addition, there’s often a notion that foreign aid is a leftwing or progressive concept, in truth, both Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher strengthened development efforts, recognizing that stability abroad furthers security and prosperity at home. Wandsworth is proudly “the Brighter Borough” and “the Borough of Culture,” these slogans reflect our shared values of compassion, openness, and outward-looking values. Standing up for foreign aid means standing up for who we are. I’d like to commend my local MP, Fleur Anderson, for upholding these values through her work opposing these cuts and championing effective, life-saving development assistance. I encourage her to continue and urge her colleges to join in her courageous efforts.The Borgen Project works to ensure communities like ours speak up for smart, humane foreign policy. Wandsworth should continue to lead that effort.Oliver Lefferts

Oliver Lefferts ● 3d5 Comments ● 1d

Stayed a little back, a little off the front lines

"Donald Trump never served in Vietnam; he received five draft deferments that prevented him from being conscripted.  In an interview with Fox News in early 2026, Trump criticized the contribution of America's allies in the Afghanistan conflict, stating: "They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan… and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines".These remarks sparked widespread condemnation from British veterans and politicians, who pointed to the 457 British personnel who died in the conflict as proof that they were indeed on the front lines. Donald Trump’s Vietnam War Record Trump himself did not see combat or serve in the military during the Vietnam era: Draft Deferments: He received five deferments: four for being a college student and one for a medical diagnosis of bone spurs in his heels."Personal Vietnam": In a 1997 interview with Howard Stern, Trump controversially compared the risks of dating and avoiding sexually transmitted diseases to the dangers of the Vietnam War, calling it his "personal Vietnam" and stating he felt like a "brave soldier" for navigating the dating scene.Lottery Number: While Trump has frequently claimed his high draft lottery number (356) kept him out of the war, records show he had already received his medical exemption over a year before the 1969 lottery took place.""Casualties: Over 3,400 NATO-led coalition troops died during the conflict, including approximately 1,100 non-U.S. personnel from allies such as the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Denmark.Intense Fighting Zones: British and Canadian forces, in particular, were responsible for some of the most dangerous frontline regions, including Helmand and Kandahar provinces, which were heartlands of the Taliban insurgency.Highest Per Capita Losses: Denmark and Estonia suffered significant casualty rates, with Denmark experiencing the highest number of combat deaths per capita of any coalition member.Article 5 Invocation: The mission in Afghanistan remains the only time in history that NATO’s collective defense clause (Article 5) was invoked, specifically to support the United States following the 9/11 attacks."------------------"Research suggests that for post-9/11 veterans, the number of suicides (estimated at 30,177 between 2001–2021) is roughly four times higher than the number of personnel killed in action (7,057) during the same period."

David Ainsworth ● 3d4 Comments ● 3d