Forum Topics

New Party - Free sign up but are they members?

It seems Corbyn has finally given up on getting back into Labour and is forming a new party - after a helpful shove from Zara Sultana.Personally I think we need more parties.Although some large numbers have been mentioned these numbers are more akin to a mailing list not membership.Looking at the website it appears that a limited company is the legal entity. I'm not sure what the nonsense about Reform using one was.Anyway good luck to this party. Hopefully some more parties will emerge in the future as the use of IT enables administration costs to be reduced."It’s time to build a new kind of political party - one that belongs to you.Sign up to build this party, together. Soon, we'll host an inaugural founding conference so you can help shape how your party works, what it stands for, and how we organise to win. Fill in this form so that Your Party - and the new party that develops from it - can update you on news, activities and ways to get involved. First NameRequiredLast NameRequiredEmailRequiredOpt-in to email updates on news, activities and ways to get involved with the founding process and the new party that forms out of itRequiredPhoneAlso opt-in to updates by text messagesPostal CodeRequiredBy clicking the submit button below, I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy PolicyTerms of ServicePrivacy PolicyFeedbackPowered BySecondStreet.com×Your Party Terms of ServiceLast updated: 10/07/2025Welcome to yourparty.uk, the website operated by Peace and Justice Project Ltd, a company limited by guarantee (registered number 12945855).By using this website and submitting your personal information (such as signing up for updates or registering for events), you agree to the following Terms of Service. If you do not agree, please do not use the website.1. Use of the Websiteyourparty.uk is a political project run by Peace & Justice Project Ltd to build a new kind of political party rooted in community and collective action. We provide information, collect sign-ups, and invite people to participate in campaigns and events.You agree to use this site only for lawful purposes and in a way that does not infringe the rights of, restrict or inhibit anyone else's use of the site.2. Sign-Up and CommunicationsBy submitting your details via forms on this site, you consent to us contacting you with updates about Your Party by the methods you select (e.g. email, SMS). You may unsubscribe at any time via the links in our messages or by contacting us at herewego@yourparty.uk3. Events and ActivitiesIf you register for an event, we may share your name and contact information with relevant organisers to facilitate your participation (e.g. to send you a location or follow-up materials).We reserve the right to cancel or reschedule events or to remove individuals who violate community guidelines or behave disruptively.4. Intellectual PropertyAll content on this site, including text, images, videos, graphics, and branding, is either owned by or licensed to Peace & Justice Project. You may share or reference our materials for non-commercial, campaign-related use as long as you credit us and do not alter the content.For any other use, please contact us for permission.5. External Links and Embedded ContentThis site may include links to third-party websites or embedded content (e.g. YouTube videos). We are not responsible for the content, policies, or practices of external sites. Please refer to their terms and privacy policies for details.6. Limitation of LiabilityThis website is provided “as is.” While we do our best to keep the information accurate and up to date, Peace and Justice Project makes no warranties about the site’s availability, completeness, or suitability for any particular purpose.We are not liable for any loss or damage arising from use of this site, except where such liability cannot be excluded under UK law.7. Changes to These TermsWe may update these Terms from time to time. If we do, we’ll update the "Last updated" date at the top of this page. Your continued use of the site constitutes acceptance of the new Terms.8. Governing LawThese Terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales, and any disputes will be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts.Contact UsIf you have any questions about these Terms, please contact us at:info@thecorbynproject.comPeace & Justice Project, London Fashion Centre, London, N4 3JH

Ed Robinson ● 36d9 Comments ● 35d

🎼🎶"The working class can kiss my *rse, I've got a private jet at last"

BBC News"Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds"'Former Unite boss Len McCluskey enjoyed private jet flights and football tickets arranged by the firm building a multi-million pound hotel for the union, according to an internal report.Flanagan Group, which is run by friends of Mr McCluskey, overcharged Unite by at least £30m for the Birmingham hotel and conference centre project, the Unite report says.It also found Mr McCluskey "overruled" advice from staff and the union's lawyers in signing the construction contract with Flanagan Group.Unite's report said the private jet flights and football tickets were "consistently organised and paid for by" the Flanagan Group and there is "no indication" Mr McCluskey later reimbursed them'.Before he retired in 2021, Mr McCluskey was one of the most powerful figures in the trade union movement and a leading backer of Jeremy Corbyn, during his time as Labour leader. He remains an influential figure on the left of British politics.He was an enthusiastic supporter of the Unite hotel project, which was meant to be a financial investment for the union's members, as well as a venue for its meetings.But it ran massively over budget and has been mired in controversy, with the Serious Fraud Office last year launching an investigation into it.When Sharon Graham took over from Mr McCluskey as Unite's general secretary, she launched a series of internal inquiries after discovering apparent discrepancies in the union's accounts.Unite's auditors found the union spent as much as £125m on the hotel and conference centre development, which has since been valued at just £38m'.Another Labour black hole !

John Hawkes ● 38d0 Comments ● 38d

Benefit payments

Is the UK economy strong enough to bear the costs of the Benefits system and are such benefits being given only to those that genuinely need them  and deserve them because they are making or have in the past made contributions to fund the system ?Starmer and Reeves say the economy is booming so we should be alright, but 8 million on the dole......?https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/foreign-national-benefits-figures-are-absolute-insanity-fumes-lowe/'The Department for Work and Pensions revealed on Tuesday that the number of people receiving Universal Credit has soared within Labour’s first year by over a million.The DWP also acknowledged that over a million recipients are foreign nationals – in the first time the immigration status of benefit claimants has been published.7.9 million people are currently on the dole. That’s a 16 per cent increase from the 6.8 million in the dying days of the last government, with the vast majority (6.6 million) British and Irish nationals. But that’s not all: Liz Kendall’s department also acknowledged that over a million of those recipients are foreign nationals. This marks the first time the government has published figures on the immigration status of benefit claimants, which onetime Reform MP Rupert Lowe has insisted the development is a ‘huge win’ after having pushed for the move.Now that they have been revealed, Lowe described the numbers as ‘absolute insanity’ – while his new political group, Restore Britain, slammed the revelation as ‘unaffordable, unsustainable, unacceptable’. His comments come as support for his tough talk on illegal migration picks up, with a 17th MP – Tory politician Sir John Hayes – having added his name to Lowe’s motion for the mass deportation of illegal migrants from Britain'.

John Hawkes ● 45d12 Comments ● 41d

100's Of Asylum Seekers Charged With Serious Crimes

Reported in The Sun today: Hundreds of asylum seekers living in tax-funded hotels have been charged with crimes such as rape, robbery & GBHIt is the first time the scale of criminal activity committed by those living in the controversial hotels has been brought to light. We monitored courts across the country for the first six months of the year and noted defendants who gave their address as one of 105 known asylum hotels. The true number of crimes could be even higher as the Home Office has refused to publish a list of all 210 in the UK currently being used to house 32,000 asylum seekers. Of the court cases we monitored, 29 related to sexual crimes — including seven alleged rapes, one proven incident of exposure and one of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child. A further 64 violence-related offences were recorded, including common assault, GBH, ABH, ­possessing a knife and possessing an imitation firearm. Yesterday at least five asylum seekers who had been staying at hotels appeared in court on charges including sexual assault, assault by beating and theft. And a Libyan asylum-seeker ­living at a Home Office hotel yesterday admitted threatening a member of staff with a knife, at Bournemouth crown court.https://apple.news/AoUWmfDboS_yLcfpIXMbB0AIf found guilty two things MUST happen - Detain and Deport!  Immediately!!No excuses from Starmer's slimy human rights pals who will invent all kinds of spurious claims to keep the gravy-train rolling!  End of!

Sue Hammond ● 44d2 Comments ● 44d

Anti Semitism is normalised in middle class Britain

Telegraph article that I doubt will be published in the Guardian.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/07/12/anti-semitism-normalised-britain-british-board-jews-israel/Two politicians from opposite sides ends of the political spectrum just completed a six month investigation into U.K. antisemitism. They were stunned by what they found. This is the full text from their piece which accompanies a report in The Telegraph: if people don’t take note I fear for the future of my community in this country. Neither Dame Penny Mordaunt nor Lord John Mann are Jewish, by the way.'We are hard-nosed politicians. We are not shrinking violets who run around being easily offended and we are used to dealing with the extremes of human emotions and catastrophe through our parliamentary case work in the past.Even with decades of these experiences, we were still stunned into silence by the evidence that we received as independent chairs of the Board of Deputies Commission on Anti-Semitism, particularly from young people in the Jewish community.We spent months hearing evidence from the community, professionals and students about their experiences of anti-Semitism and were alarmed by the combination of the rawness of the impact of people’s everyday experiences intertwined with the extraordinary routines and normality within which this is occurring.We are two non-Jews from opposite sides of the political spectrum and we have both come to realise that if our Jewish community is facing discrimination, this is a failure of our society. We must ensure that everyone enjoys the rights and protections that we have worked so hard to develop over many years.What are we meant to say as hardened politicians to a young Jewish female performer who told us that following October 7 venues and promoters, who the artist had worked with for years, no longer wanted to engage with her? Or to students who saw their research staff members coming from an encampment with a megaphone, and disabilities liaison staff members who Jewish student’s trust with their health records shouting for an Intifada?We were told about the experience of a Jewish member of a professional body describe that body as taking years to investigate incidents of anti-Semitism, and heavily editing articles about anti-Semitism and the Jewish experience so as not to cause “offence” to its to broader membership.We heard about the noisy demonstrations and how intimidating people find the current environment, but as we dug deeper what really scared us was the increasing normalisation of far more extreme, personalised and sometimes life changing impact directed at individuals purely and simply because they are Jewish. Worrying dilemmas of where Jewish professionals believed that their professional body was actively discriminating against them but where they required membership from this body to be able to work and acquire the necessary protections.One of our 10 recommendations is that anti-Semitism cannot simply be sidelined as an issue of religious difference, allowing organisations to pretend to themselves that they don’t have to deal with the thornier issue of racism directed against individual human beings.This is an urgent issue not just for the Jewish community but for the United Kingdom as a whole. Jews have lived in this country for centuries and they have contributed greatly to our country. Any attempt to marginalise British Jews in our professions, cultural life, public services or any other arena harm us all.We are all harmed if we tolerate the abuse of some of our fellow citizens by those who hold warped or extreme views. All we are trying is achieve is to add value to what others are already doing.Typically with reports, we send a list of recommendations to government and this report certainly will be placed on the table of the Prime Minister and his Ministers and that of every political party leader.But there is a wider responsibility that we are concerned about. All our institutions, public sector and private sector have a responsibility to their Jewish employees, customers, neighbours and partners, to ensure that they are treated with equal respect and are able to get on with their lives with no negatives.Our recommendations are intended to help everybody to step up to the mark and play their small role in ensuring that we can each say to our Jewish friends, whoever they are and wherever they are, that you are not alone in our country.'

Lucille Grant ● 50d1 Comments ● 49d

The case for LNB's

Studies have shown and indeed we have seen locally in the case of Nick Clegg, that having a bobby on the doorstep (Local Neighbourhood Bobby - LNB) 24/7 significantly reduces crime at that location.I would like to make my doorstep a local neighborhood bobby doorstep or LNB.Why my doorstep you may ask, when crime in other areas is higher?Because people do not always obey the law!Besides there is so much crime that putting a bobby (LNB) on my doorstep will not make that much difference! It may go up slightly but that is offset by the benefits to me.Of course when I leave my doorstep (LBN), I will still expect to be protected by the police that serve the rest of the borough!Perhaps we should throw in a NHS doctor (LND) or even a dentist (LNT) and other resources meant for the general population.Or even a LTN:Studies have shown that stopping people driving on my road reduces accidents on my road.I of course will expect to be able to drive on other people's roads.I can justify it with the letters LTN!I think you get the idea.In the past, London did not have a 20 mph speed limit and blocking off speeding traffic though side roads was a safety issue. There was also the pollution issues in the past.Both these points are no longer valid if you listen to Labour supporters.Because many main roads including URR are 20 MPH because that makes them safer and they are also clean because of ULEZ, and Labour said ULEZ is the same as clean air!Those of us that live in the real world know this is just political nonsense.But more seriously people are being killed by buses and HGV's due to poor junctions and road layouts and the size (weight) of modern buses.Unfortunately more people are going to be killed due to converting mega sized buses to be electric and hence they will be heavier with faster acceleration.I'm actually a fan of electric vehicles which London has a proud history of 100 years ago.We actually need a more efficient, smaller lighter vehicles that are frequent  - not the dinosaurs from past decades with USB added.We need to ignore the nimbys and fanatics and look coldly at not just what is possible but what we can afford.

Ed Robinson ● 53d2 Comments ● 52d

A “humanitarian city” and the Trump/Netanyahu Peace Prize

"WASHINGTON — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented US President Donald Trump on Monday with a letter he sent to the Norwegian Nobel Committee nominating the latter for a Nobel Peace Prize.At the opening of their White House dinner, Netanyahu rose to his feet and surprised Trump with the letter.“It’s well deserved, and you should get it,”  Netanyahu said.“Wow,” Trump replied. “Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful.”In the letter, Netanyahu praised Trump’s “steadfast and exceptional dedication to promoting peace, security, and stability around the world.”He wrote that the Abraham Accords are “foremost” among Trump’s achievements in creating peace.“President Trump’s vision and bold leadership promoted innovative diplomacy defined not by conflict and extremism but by cooperation, dialogue, and shared prosperity,” Netanyahu continued."https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-surprises-trump-with-nobel-recommendation-as-leaders-stress-coordination/And also:-"[Israel]Defense Minister Israel Katz tells reporters in a briefing today that he instructed the IDF and the ministry to bring forward a plan to establish a new “humanitarian city” in the southern Gaza Strip, on the ruins of Rafah.The idea of the humanitarian area, according to Katz, is to accommodate initially some 600,000 Palestinians who have been living in the Mawasi area on the coast after being displaced from elsewhere in the Strip, after screening them to ensure Hamas operatives are not entering.Palestinians will not be allowed to leave the zone, he says.Eventually, the idea is to bring the entire Palestinian civilian population to the zone while the IDF secures it from a distance, as international bodies work to manage the area. An additional four aid distribution sites would be established in the area, according to Katz.Katz also emphasizes his ambition to encourage Palestinians to “voluntarily emigrate” from the Gaza Strip to other countries, saying this plan “should be fulfilled.”It’s unclear if the zone would be used as a transit point, as described in a Reuters report earlier today that detailed plans for “Humanitarian Transit Areas” where Gazans could “temporarily reside, deradicalize, re-integrate and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so.”The director general of the Defense Ministry, Amir Baram, has already begun advancing planning for the zone, which Katz stresses will not be run by the IDF, but instead by international bodies.Katz doesn’t specify which international organizations would operate the city, and other than the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, it is unlikely that any will cooperate given that the plan aims to displace the entire Palestinian population of the Strip.There are also concerns that Israel will establish settlements in the areas it forcibly evacuates. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says that is not his plan, but he is beholden to far-right coalition partners who are determined to see it through."https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/katz-calls-for-plan-to-confine-all-gazans-in-humanitarian-city-to-be-built-over-ruins-of-rafah/"I love it when a plan comes together"

David Ainsworth ● 55d4 Comments ● 53d

The most moral army in the world is creating a humanitarian city

You have to be cruel to be kind. That'll be it.Israel clearing new section of Rafahpublished at 14:07 7 July14:07 7 JulyBenedict GarmanBBC Verify senior journalistDemolition work is under way in one of the few areas in Rafah, southern Gaza, where most buildings were still standing.Satellite imagery reveals that dozens of buildings in the Saudi neighbourhood, a residential area in the city’s northwest, have been destroyed in recent days.Below is a side-by-side comparison of satellite pictures. The one on the right was taken on Saturday, with the left taken one month ago. The latest image shows rubble and dust where buildings once stood - highlighted by the white boxes.[Satellite image captured on 5 June compared to 5 July showing RafahImage source,Planet Labs PBC]These are likely to be demolitions rather than air strikes because this is an area held by the IDF for some time and in other areas where they have operational control there have frequently been videos showing controlled detonations.The pace and comprehensive nature of the destruction, as well as local, external reports, external of buildings in the neighbourhood being blown up tallies with this.The neighbourhood was built by the Saudi Rehousing Project - a partnership between the UN's Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA) and Saudi Arabia. The project's aim was to provide houses for people displaced as a result of previous conflict with Israel.It was only opened in 2015, external, and was home to around 10,000 people.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c98wejpp89pt?post=asset%3Ae370bb65-510e-4b45-b67d-0a7470534d18#postAnd today:-Israel’s Katz outlines plans for 'humanitarian city' on ruins of Rafahpublished at 10:2610:26Benedict GarmanBBC Verify senior journalistSatellite imagery showing how whole areas of Rafah has been demolishedImage source,Planet LabsIsrael's defence minister Israel Katz has described a plan he says is under way to establish a new 'humanitarian city' on the ruins of Rafah in the south of Gaza.The plan initially aims to accommodate 600,000 displaced Palestinians who are currently living in the al-Mawasi area on the Gazan coast. This is where Israeli forces have told people to go for “safety” throughout the war - though it has also been targeted by strikes more than 100 times.At least four more aid distribution sites - like the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation facilities already in operation - would be built under the Katz plan. We have already identified one new aid site under construction and can see that it has developed further in recent satellite imagery.Katz said development of this zone would happen during any potential ceasefire, assuming the current indirect ceasefire negotiations are successful. The ultimate aim would be to eventually move the entire Gazan population into the “city”.Satellite imagery, like the image above, captured on 4 July by Planet Labs, shows Rafah has been almost entirely reduced to rubble. Yesterday we reported on demolitions taking place in one of the last areas still standing.Demolitions continue elsewhere in Rafah too, with drone footage, external published on Sunday - we’ve screen-grabbed a key frame below - showing a building named as al-Shawka Girls' Secondary School in online maps being blown up in a controlled explosion.Screen grab of drone footage showing a building marked as girls' school on satellite mapping being demolishedImage source,Xhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c75rvk9pqn0tAnd the girls' school:-https://x.com/YinonMagal/status/1941831414019711113

David Ainsworth ● 54d1 Comments ● 53d

Nearly half of Israelis support army killing all Palestinians in Gaza, poll finds

Nearly half of Israelis support army killing all Palestinians in Gaza, poll finds24 May 2025An overwhelming majority of Israeli Jews support the transfer of Palestinians from Gaza, according to a poll by Pennsylvania State University.The survey, conducted in March and published by Haaretz newspaper on Thursday, found that 82 percent of Israeli Jews support the forced expulsion of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip.Meanwhile, 47 percent of Israeli Jews answered yes to the question: "Do you support the claim that the [Israeli army] in conquering an enemy city, should act in a manner similar to the way the Israelites did when they conquered Jericho under the leadership of Joshua, ie to kill all its inhabitants?" The reference is to the biblical account of the conquest of Jericho.Earlier this month, Israel launched the "Operation Gideon's Chariots" in the besieged strip, which, according to the Israeli news outlet Ynet, is intended to advance US President Donald Trump's plan to "clean out" Gaza.Ynet reported that during the operation, the Israeli army plans to push as many Palestinians as possible towards the Rafah area in the southern Gaza Strip, where food and aid will be delivered. The new military plan is also aimed at promoting the "voluntary emigration" of Palestinians, according to Ynet.The new plan has garnered support among the majority of the Israeli public, even though the Israeli army's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, warned that it would pose a danger to the lives of the Israeli captives in Gaza.According to a separate Channel 13 poll, 44 percent of the Israeli public supports the operation while 40 percent oppose it.The same poll showed that the Israeli public also supports the continuation of the full blockade that Israel has imposed on the Gaza Strip since the beginning of March. It found that 53 percent of the Israeli public think that Israel should not allow humanitarian aid into the enclave.Earlier this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that one of Israel's war goals is to implement Trump's proposed plan to expel the Palestinians from Gaza.At a press conference, Netanyahu said that he was willing to end the war but only "under clear conditions that will ensure the safety of Israel: all the hostages come home, Hamas lays down its arms, steps down from power, its leadership is exiled from the strip"."And we carry out the Trump plan - a plan that is so correct and so revolutionary," he added.Secular public supports expulsionAccording to the Penn State poll, support for the mass expulsion of Palestinians from the enclave was also found among 70 percent of the secular Jewish public, parts of which are considered liberal. Meanwhile, support among the Masortim (traditionalists), religious, and ultra-Orthodox communities exceeds 90 percent.The sweeping and cross-political and social support for the expulsion of Palestinians does not stop at the borders of the occupied Gaza Strip. According to the poll, 56 percent of Israeli Jews support the expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel from their land.While the highest levels of support for the move were recorded amongst the Masortim, religious, and ultra-Orthodox communities, exceeding 60 percent, there was also significant backing among the secular public. Thirty-eight percent of secular Israeli Jews support the expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel from the country, the poll reported.Commenting on the results survey, Shay Hazkani, a professor of history and Jewish studies at the University of Maryland, and Tamir Sorek, a professor in the history department at Penn State University, wrote: "There are those who see the shock and anxiety that befell the Israeli public in the wake of the events of October 7th as the only explanation for this radicalization."But the massacre only seems to have unleashed demons that have been nurtured over decades in the media and in the legal and educational systems."Throughout the war, Israeli media outlets have echoed calls for the expulsion and killing of Palestinians. Recently, Israeli human rights organisations submitted a request to the Supreme Court to open an investigation against Channel 14, seen as loyal to Netanyahu, on suspicion of "incitement to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity".The education system has also played a role in shaping extremist views among young Israelis. Hazkani and Sorek say that since the early 2000s, it has undergone a process of radicalisation.According to the poll, only 9 percent of Jewish men under the age of 40, representing most of the soldiers in regular and reserve duty, were fully opposed to the ideas of expulsion and transfer.Religious languageIt was only last March that the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed a petition filed by human rights organisations seeking to compel the government to allow humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip. In the ruling, one of the justices used religious language to justify the verdict.Since the beginning of the war, religious language has been widely used in Israel to describe the war in Gaza. One frequently invoked term is “Amalek” - referring to an ancient enemy of the Israelites, against whom Jewish tradition commands an all-out war.A week after the 7 October Hamas-led attack, Netanyahu urged ground troops preparing to enter Gaza to "remember what Amalek has done to you".Religious discourse in Israel, however, is not limited to the religious public. The poll found that 65 percent of the Jewish population believes there is a modern-day "Amalek". And of those, about 93 percent think the "mitzvah" , or commandment, to “wipe out the memory of Amalek” should still apply today."Zionism, in addition to being a national movement, is also a movement of immigrant-settlers, which seeks to push the local population out," wrote Hazkani and Sorek."The aspiration for absolute and permanent security can lead to an operative plan to eliminate the opposing population, and therefore every settlement project has the potential for ethnic cleansing and genocide."https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/majority-israelis-support-expulsion-palestinians-gaza-poll

David Ainsworth ● 55d11 Comments ● 54d

Glastonbury ~ Mr Vylan😡

Will he be arrested and charged and jailed for inciting violence like Lucy Connolly? Or will the Two-TierKeir justice system kick in? Rupert Lowe on FB this morning:“I heard you want your country back. Ha. Shut the f*** up” angrily yells Vylan, fresh from calling for “death to the IDF”, to a chanting crowd of white middle-class British liberals excitedly waving their foreign flags. All rather depressing, isn’t it?I note the intense border security at Glastonbury, which far outstrips that of Dover’s. Build bridges, not walls, they cry - apart from around their own filthy little sanctuary.How so very progressive of them, flying their Palestinian flags - they must all feel so very proud of themselves. Sipping their £8 iced lattes, posting on tiktok from the newest iphone. Really revolutionary stuff.A fatal blow struck against the capitalist system. Well done, everyone.All broadcast live on the BBC, our ‘national’ broadcaster. Fantastic work from them, as usual.None of this is Britain. Real Britain. Actual Britain. Decent Britain.Not the Britain built by generations of hardworking, patriotic British men and women.Who quite frankly, have had enough. I know I have.We will all be closely watching, as Lucy Connolly rots in jail, what action the police will take against this revolting man - the precedent has been set.So, yes Mr Vylan. You heard correctly, we do want our country back.But no. We will definitely not "shut the fuck up".Learn how to sing, take a shower and sod off.Watch the cretinous half-wit here:https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1APMABcqjF/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Sue Hammond ● 64d136 Comments ● 56d

Is a Glastonbury chant the real problem?

"On Sunday, the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire grilled Starmer’s health secretary, Wes Streeting, on remarks from the Israeli embassy in London condemning what it termed “the normalisation of extremist language” and the “glorification of violence” at Glastonbury.Unexpectedly, Streeting avoided jumping whole-heartedly on the media outrage band-wagon, led by the Mail on Sunday, whose front page demanded the arrest of the two band members for what the paper wrongly described as a chant demanding “Death to Israelis”. The Mail, apparently, believes that all Israelis, presumably including the country’s children, are currently serving in the Israeli military.There are four important points to make about the interview between Derbyshire and Streeting:1. The Israeli embassy in London, like the Israeli government it represents, has precisely no concerns about the “glorification of violence” when Israel is doing either the glorifying or the violence. Israel is currently celebrating its “success” in slaughtering and maiming hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza, including huge numbers of children; attacks by its soldiers and state-backed Jewish settler militias on Palestinian civilians in the West Bank; its eradication of whole communities in Lebanon; and its bombing of residential tower blocks across Tehran, killing many hundreds.Violence has been Israel’s signature policy for the past 21 months – and long before that. Israel has revelled in the carnage it has inflicted on populations across the region.In a post on social media, the Israeli embassy additionally argued of Bob Vylan’s chant: “When speech crosses into incitement, hatred, and advocacy of ethnic cleansing, it must be called out – especially when amplified by public figures on prominent platforms.”And yet public figures from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to British prime minister Keir Starmer have incited against the Palestinians, with Netanyahu comparing them to “Amalek”, a people the Israelites were commanded by God to exterminate, and Starmer terming the wholesale starvation of the people of Gaza “self-defence”.Israeli officials from Netanyahu down have advocated the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. And, even more seriously, Israel has not just threatened but repeatedly carried out the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians under its belligerent rule.2. It is beyond ridiculous for the BBC to echo the Israeli government in prioritising a harsh crackdown on words at Glastonbury "glorifying violence" towards Israeli soldiers ahead of the actual violence of genocide being committed by those Israel soldiers.The BBC has avoided criticising the Israeli government for its actual violence – its bombing and active starvation of Palestinian civilians – and the Starmer government for colluding in that violence, or what the International Court of Justice termed more than a year ago a “plausible” genocide by Israel.As a recent report by the Centre for Media Monitoring confirmed, the BBC has dramatically skewed its language to present Israel, the aggressor, in a more favourable light than the victim, the Palestinians of Gaza. The BBC’s own whistleblowing journalists have warned that the state broadcaster has all but banned the use of the word “genocide”, even by experts on the matter.By arming Israel, by organising spy flights over Gaza from RAF base Akrotiri on Cyprus, and by providing diplomatic cover, Starmer has effectively glorified Israel’s slaughter of Palestinian children in the enclave. Bob Vylan’s chants of “Death to the IDF” have a far more dangerous counterpart in Starmer’s recital of Israel’s “right to defend itself” when that “defence” involves Israel mercilessly starving Gaza’s population of food, water and power.Bob Vylan are a punk band; Starmer is the British prime minister, the man who directs Britain’s foreign policy and directs its army.No one, least of all the BBC, has held Israeli or British officials accountable not just for glorifying violence but for actually carrying it out on an industrial scale for nearly two years.But the BBC is suddenly interested in holding to account two punk musicians for leading a chant – one that made a symbolic, hypothetical threat of violence – against an Israeli military carrying out the ultimate form of violence, an actual genocide. In a serious media, Israel’s supposed “concerns” about the glorification of violence and extremist language would be laughed off the stage rather than respectfully aired.3. Wes Streeting is being congratulated and condemned in equal measure on social media for refusing to be drawn into the Mail and BBC’s confected outrage. “I’d say to the Israeli embassy, get your own house in order,” he responded to Derbyshire. But hang on a minute. Streeting’s resistance to Derbyshire’s line of questioning was perhaps unexpected. But it also, let us not forget, serves the interests of both the Starmer and Israeli governments.Streeting’s insistence that Israel “get its house in order” had, as he made clear, nothing to do with its 21-month slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza. Starmer is still defining the Gaza genocide as Israel’s supposed “right to defend itself”. In responding to Derbyshire, Streeting expressed concern only at what he called violent “settler attacks” in the West Bank. He said the Israeli embassy needed to “get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank”.This was intended purely as deflection, designed to serve Starmer and Israel, the West’s key client state in the oil-rich Middle East. It benefits the UK government to make an issue of West Bank settler attacks – and present them as disorganised, random violence by individual extremists that the Israeli government is not responsible for but needs to get a firmer grip on.By highlighting problems in the West Bank, the Starmer government can avoid addressing the genocide in Gaza and the Israeli state’s clear responsibility for that genocide. Which is precisely why in recent weeks Britain has made so much noise about imposing feeble penalties on a handful of extremist settlers and two fascist ministers in Benjamin Netanyahu’s government that represent those settlers.Starmer and Streeting’s prioritising of Israel’s West Bank violence over Israel’s Gaza violence is a switch and bait twice over.Most of the violence in the West Bank is not coming from settler extremists, even though they are the ones being punished by the UK. It is coming from the Israeli military, which has bulldozed thousands of homes there over the past year, driving 40,000 Palestinians off their lands.Further, settler violence is not random. It is coordinated with Israeli field commanders, many of them settlers themselves, to uproot Palestinians so that Israel can move in Jewish settlers to colonise the land – or, in the words of successive Israeli governments, “Judaise” it.None of this is new either. Israel has engineered and imposed a violent, apartheid system on Palestinians for decades to make life unbearable and encourage them to leave their homeland.Second, Glastonbury’s anger-fuelled chant against the IDF was not primarily motivated by Israel’s violent actions in the West Bank. It was against the Israeli military for committing a genocide in Gaza, which the British government has been supporting. Streeting’s aim was to drag the debate on to safer territory for him and Starmer: that Britain needs to deal not with a genocide in Gaza but with a handful of violent loons in the West Bank.Even in criticising the Israeli government for not doing enough to tackle settler violence, Streeting is still operating within the confines of a public discourse dictated by Israel, which prefers any criticism to be directed at individuals not at the Israeli state behind those individuals.4. The BBC, the Starmer government and the Israel lobby are all delighted to play their part in this game of deflection and deception because these kinds of moral panics obscure the real issue: that all these parties are actively colluding in Israel's genocide in Gaza. While the media and government can now have a long backwards and forwards about whether criticism of Israel's genocidal army needs to be defined in law as a criminal offence or "terrorism", Israel will get a free pass to continue with the real terrorism: a genocide in Gaza.Famously, the black civil rights fighter Malcolm X observed of the role of the media: “They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. … If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.” Sixty years on, nothing has changed."https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/is-a-glastonbury-chant-the-real-problem

David Ainsworth ● 57d0 Comments ● 57d

Not Israel's fault - it is Netanyahu's

Times of Israel, 5th June 2025“Netanyahu confirms move: 'It saves lives of IDF soldiers'Israel providing guns to Gaza gang to bolster opposition to HamasSecurity cabinet wasn’t informed of plan to start arming Abu Shabab group, which was created in Rafah last year and has its roots in looting aid trucksBy Emanuel FabianIsrael has been arming a criminal gang in the Gaza Strip as part of an effort to strengthen opposition to Hamas in the enclave, defense sources confirmed on Thursday following remarks on the matter by former defense minister Avigdor Liberman.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later confirmed the report, saying the move helped save Israeli soldiers’ lives.Liberman, who heads the opposition Yisrael Beytenu party, told the Kan public broadcaster on Thursday morning that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had unilaterally approved the transfer of weapons to the Abu Shabab clan, an armed gang or militia that is opposed to Hamas’s rule in the Gaza Strip.“The Israeli government is giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons, identified with Islamic State, at the direction of the prime minister,” Liberman charged. “To my knowledge, this did not go through approval by the cabinet.”He claimed that Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar was aware of the decision to arm the group, “but I don’t know how much the IDF chief of staff was in on it.”The group in question, which is sometimes described as a militia and sometimes as a criminal gang, is led by Yasser Abu Shabab, a member of a large clan in southern Gaza. It has been linked in the past to smuggling operations with Egyptian Jihadist groups, but it was not immediately clear why Liberman branded it as linked to the Islamic State.His gang has been documented in recent days operating in an area near the Kerem Shalom border crossing under Israeli military control.In the footage, which was published online by Abu Shabab, members of the group can be seen wearing military-style uniforms with the Palestinian flag and the words “Counter-Terrorism Mechanism” emblazoned on them.The Prime Minister’s Office, in response to Liberman’s comments, did not deny the allegations but said instead that Israel was “working to defeat Hamas through various means, based on the recommendations of all the heads of the security establishment.”In a later statement, Netanyahu confirmed the move.In the latest installment in a series of short interviews with advisor Topaz Luk his office has posted in recent weeks, Netanyahu said that “in consultation with security officials, we made use of clans in Gaza that are opposed to Hamas.”“What’s wrong with that?” he continued. “It’s only good. It saves lives of IDF soldiers.”“It’s extremely serious,” Netanyahu said of Liberman revealing the move and predicting that it won’t be investigated. “Publicizing it only does good for Hamas.Liberman’s accusation was later confirmed by defense officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity, and the details were cleared for publication by the Israeli military censor.The sources confirmed that Israel has been arming the gang with Kalashnikov rifles, including some that were seized from Hamas during the ongoing war.The decision to start arming the group was made without the approval of Israel’s security cabinet, forgoing normal procedure. It was instead led by Israeli security bodies, with Netanyahu’s approval, the defense sources said.The militia has been operating in Rafah, in an area under Israeli military control. Abu Shabab has claimed to be securing the humanitarian aid convoys entering Israel through the southern border crossings, although others have accused his gang of looting them.Targeted by HamasThe clan has caught Hamas’s attention. Hamas published an official video on May 30 showing a group of armed, masked men operating outside a building before being blown up.The terror group claimed the group in the video was working with the IDF to inspect buildings before Israeli troops moved in, without specifying whether they were Israeli or Palestinian. However, online comparisons to previous images of Abu Shabab’s gang suggested it was the same group.In a conversation with Lebanon’s Al-Akhbar newspaper earlier this week, anonymous Hamas sources shared more information about the group, which they admitted has been a thorn in their side.According to the sources, the militia comprises some 300 people, of whom Abu Shabab personally recruited around 50. They alleged that the remaining 250 members were recruited through the Palestinian Authority’s intelligence service.The Hamas sources did not offer proof of Abu Shabab’s alleged ties to the Ramallah-based PA, and Al-Akhbar did not verify any of the terror group’s claims.The group emerged in Rafah in May 2024, following the IDF invasion of the Strip’s southernmost city, the Hamas sources said. They told Al-Akhbar that the Al-Qassam Brigades have “already started carrying out direct assassinations” against members of Abu Shabab’s gang, and that its continued existence has fast become a “central issue” for the terror group.According to the sources, some members of the group belong to an extremist Salafi faction that had run-ins with Hamas prior to the war as well.This is not the first time that Netanyahu has been involved in or accused of propping up burgeoning militias and terror groups to undermine a common enemy.Various reports over the years have indicated that Israel’s policy under Netanyahu was to treat Hamas as an asset that could be used to weaken the Palestinian Authority.The premier reportedly told a Likud faction meeting back in 2019 that anyone who opposed the establishment of a Palestinian state should support sending funds to Hamas, the enemy of the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority.Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich made a similar claim in an interview in 2015.Amid the outrage generated by Liberman’s revelation on Thursday, the left-wing The Democrats leader Yair Golan pointed out the pattern of behavior.“Netanyahu, who transferred billions to Hamas in suitcases full of cash, based on the incorrect belief that Hamas is an ‘asset,’ is now promoting a new dangerous concept: Arming a Gazan militia with ties to ISIS,” the politician wrote on X.“Netanyahu is dangerous to Israel’s security,” he charged. “This is not a mistake. This is systematic. Netanyahu is selling Israel’s security for another day in office.””

David Ainsworth ● 61d24 Comments ● 59d

Testaments of Youth

I genuinely wonder which of the following is most representative of British 'youth' today. 1) "Police review footage of chants led by Glastonbury acts"'The government has "strongly condemned" chants from Bob Vylan who called for "death" to the Israeli military during their performance which was broadcast live on the BBC.Rapper Bobby Vylan led chants of "free, free Palestine" and "death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]".Vylan is part of a black rap group and a good example of the racism that many blacks, especially 'rappers', show towards Jews.Though born in the UK Vylan claims to be 'very much influenced by his  Jamaican genres as a tribute to Bobby's Jamaican heritage'.Will he be charged with inciting racial hatred or incitement to violence ?Don't hold your breath.Blacks can't commit racism only whites.It's "'cos of slavery man".The crowd, who had paid £375 for a ticket, loved him.But to their credit and my surprise the Glastonbury organisers put out a statement -  "Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence."But what does it say about the type of society we are becoming.2) Meanwhile England win the the UEFA under-21 Championship Final 3-2 beating Germany (YEEEEES!)A wonderful and joyous occasion where a multi-racial team of true British working class lads put their hearts and souls into the game on behalf of their country, their teammates and their watching families. And ex-FFC local boy Harvey Elliott was made 'Man of the Tournament' and in his post match interview had nothing to say about Palestine !

John Hawkes ● 63d2 Comments ● 61d

Sudan - ‘world’s largest humanitarian crisis’

The vast majority of media comment from the BBC to the left-wing press such as the Guardian and even posts on this humble Forum has raged about and denounced what are claimed to be 'humanitarian atrocities' - military actions, civilian deaths etc, carried out by Israel in its war with the Palestinians.Posters on this Forum have stated their positions as to whether they believe Israel is perpetrating such, and if so whether in a time of war some explanation, if not the condoning of them, is possible.However what the continual focus on and denouncing of Israel's behaviour has done, perhaps deliberately, is to turn attention away from what is happening in other parts of the world and what atrocities Islamist Arabs are perpetrating on a far, far more massive scale against non-Arabs in Africa.Even the Guardian and the UN is beginning to take notice and show concern, diverting its attention from Gaza.Today's Guardian."NGOs and UN say country is ‘worse off than ever before’ with wide-scale displacement, hunger and attacks on refugee camps". 'Sudan is suffering from the largest humanitarian crisis globally and its civilians are continuing to pay the price for inaction by the international community, NGOs and the UN have said, as the country’s civil war enters its third year.The UK is hosting ministers from 20 countries in London on Tuesday in an attempt to restart stalled peace talks. However, diplomatic efforts have often been sidelined by other crises, including the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.Two years to the day since fighting erupted in Khartoum between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary (ISLAMIST - my comment) Rapid Support Forces, hundreds of people were feared to have died in RSF attacks on refugee camps in the western Darfur region in the latest apparent atrocity of a war marked by its brutality and wide-scale humanitarian impact.The consequences for Sudan’s 51 million people have been devastating. Tens of thousands are reportedly dead. Hundreds of thousands face famine. Almost 13 million people have been displaced, 4 million of those to neighbouring countries.“Sudan is now worse off than ever before,” said Elise Nalbandian, Oxfam’s regional advocacy manager. “The largest humanitarian crisis, largest displacement crisis, largest hunger crisis … It’s breaking all sorts of wrong records.”There were “massive-scale” violations of international humanitarian law in the conflict, said Daniel O’Malley, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in Sudan. “All of the civilian population, irrespective of where they are in the country, have basically been trapped between one, two or more parties. And they have been bearing the brunt of everything. The sheer numbers are just mind-boggling.”It is also claimed that as a fall out from this intra-Islamic civil war is that Christians are also being persecuted. In January of this year the US formally declared that the RSF had committed genocide, marking the second time in less than 30 years that genocide had been perpetrated in Sudan.The United Arab Emirates has been accused of fuelling the conflict by arming the RSF. Emirati passports allegedly found on the battlefield last year point to potential covert boots on the ground.All of this does not make for pleasant writing or reading and of course any claims of genocide should not be ranked in order of wickedness.However it does put the claims made against Israel into some form of perspective.

John Hawkes ● 138d24 Comments ● 65d

Happy deluded Daniel Hannan day!!

Was anybody more wrong about something than Lord Hannan? https://www.reaction.life/p/britain-looks-like-brexitIt’s 24 June, 2025, and Britain is marking its annual Independence Day celebration. As the fireworks stream through the summer sky, still not quite dark, we wonder why it took us so long to leave. The years that followed the 2016 referendum didn’t just reinvigorate our economy, our democracy and our liberty. They improved relations with our neighbours.The United Kingdom is now the region’s foremost knowledge-based economy. We lead the world in biotech, law, education, the audio-visual sector, financial services and software. New industries, from 3D printing to driverless cars, have sprung up around the country. Older industries, too, have revived as energy prices have fallen back to global levels: steel, cement, paper, plastics and ceramics producers have become competitive again.The EU, meanwhile, continues to turn inwards, clinging to its dream of political amalgamation as the euro and migration crises worsen. Its population is ageing, its share of world GDP shrinking and its peoples protesting. “We have the most comprehensive workers’ rights in the world”, complains Jean-Claude Juncker, who has recently begun in his second term as President of the European Federation, “but we have fewer and fewer workers”.The last thing most EU leaders wanted, once the shock had worn off, was a protracted argument with the United Kingdom which, on the day it left, became their single biggest market. Terms were agreed easily enough. Britain withdrew from the EU’s political structures and institutions, but kept its tariff-free arrangements in place. The rights of EU nationals living in the UK were confirmed, and various reciprocal deals on healthcare and the like remained. For the sake of administrative convenience, Brexit took effect formally on 1 July 2019, to coincide with the mandates of a new European Parliament and Commission.That day marked, not a sudden departure, but the beginning of a gradual reorientation. As the leader of the Remain campaign, Lord Rose, had put it during the referendum campaign, “It’s not going to be a step change, it’s going to be a gentle process.” He was spot on.In many areas, whether because of economies of scale or because rules were largely set at global level, the UK and the EU continued to adopt the same technical standards. But, from 2019, Britain could begin to disapply those regulations where the cost of compliance outweighed any benefits.The EU’s Clinical Trials Directive, for example, had wiped out a great deal of medical research in Britain. Outside it, we again lead the world. Opting out of the EU’s data protection rules has turned Hoxton into the software capital of the world. Britain is no longer hampered by Brussels restrictions on sales, promotions and e-commerce.Other EU regulations, often little known, had caused enormous damage. The REACH Directive, limiting the import of chemical products, had imposed huge costs on manufacturers. The bans on vitamin supplements and herbal remedies had closed down many health shops. London’s art market had been brutalised by EU rules on VAT and retrospective taxation. All these sectors have revived.Financial services are booming – not only in London, but in Birmingham, Leeds and Edinburgh too. Eurocrats had never much liked the City, which they regarded as parasitical. Before Brexit, they targeted London with regulations that were not simply harmful but, in some cases, downright malicious: the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, the ban on short selling, the Financial Transactions Tax, the restrictions on insurance. After Britain left, the EU’s regulations became even more heavy-handed, driving more exiles from Paris, Frankfurt and Milan. No other European city could hope to compete: their high rates of personal and corporate taxation, restrictive employment practices and lack of support services left London unchallenged.Other cities, too, have boomed, not least Liverpool and Glasgow, which had found themselves on the wrong side of the country when the EEC’s Common External Tariff was phased in in the 1970s. In 2016, the viability of our commercial ports was threatened by the EU’s Ports Services Directive, one of many proposed rules that was being held back so as not to boost the Leave vote. Now, the UK has again become a centre for world shipping.Shale oil and gas came on tap, almost providentially, just as the North Sea reserves were depleting, with most of the infrastructure already in place. Outside the EU, we have been able to augment this bonanza by buying cheap Chinese solar panels. In consequence, our fuel bills have tumbled, boosting productivity, increasing household incomes and stimulating the entire economy.During the first 12 months after the vote, Britain confirmed with the various countries that have trade deals with the EU that the same deals would continue. It also used that time to agree much more liberal terms with those states which had run up against EU protectionism, including India, China and Australia. These new treaties came into effect shortly after independence. Britain, like the EFTA countries, now combines global free trade with full participation in EU markets.Our universities are flourishing, taking the world’s brightest students and, where appropriate, charging accordingly. Their revenues, in consequence, are rising, while they continue to collaborate with research centres in Europe and around the world.The number of student visas granted each year is decided by MPs who, now that they no longer need to worry about unlimited EU migration, can afford to take a long-term view. Parliament sets the number of work permits, the number of refugee places and the terms of family reunification. A points-based immigration system invites the world’s top talent; and the consequent sense of having had to win a place competitively means that new settlers arrive with commensurate pride and patriotism.Unsurprisingly, several other European countries have opted to copy Britain’s deal with the EU, based as it is upon a common market rather than a common government. Some of these countries were drawn from EFTA (Norway, Switzerland and Iceland are all bringing their arrangements into line with ours). Some came from further afield (Serbia, Turkey, Ukraine). Some followed us out of the EU (Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands).The United Kingdom now leads a 22-state bloc that forms a free trade area with the EU, but remains outside its political structures. For their part, the EU 24 have continued to push ahead with economic, military and political amalgamation. They now have a common police force and army, a pan-European income tax and a harmonised system of social security. These developments have prompted referendums in three other EU states on whether to copy Britain.Perhaps the greatest benefit, though, is not easy to quantify. Britain has recovered its self-belief. As we left the EU, we straightened our backs, looked about us, and realised that we were still a nation to be reckoned with: the world’s fifth economy and fourth military power, one of five members on the UN Security Council and a leading member of the G7 and the Commonwealth. We recalled, too, that we were the world’s leading exporter of soft power; that our language was the most widely studied on Earth; that we were linked by kinship and migration to every continent and archipelago. We saw that there were great opportunities across the oceans, beyond the enervated eurozone. We knew that our song had not yet been sung.

Michael Brigo ● 68d6 Comments ● 67d

Should we bomb ourselves?

Google was asked a question:-"which countries supplied israel with nuclear material""AI OverviewSeveral countries are known to have supplied Israel with materials or expertise that contributed to its nuclear weapons program. These include France, which provided a reactor and assistance in building a reprocessing plant, and the UK, which secretly supplied heavy water. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting the US also played a role, potentially through the illegal transfer of enriched uranium. Here's a more detailed breakdown:France:France was a key partner in the early stages of Israel's nuclear program, providing a reactor and training for Israeli scientists and engineers. There was even a secret agreement to cooperate on nuclear weapons, though this was later scrapped under U.S. pressure. United Kingdom:Britain secretly sold Israel 20 tons of heavy water, which is crucial for producing plutonium for nuclear weapons. This deal was concealed from the US. United States:While the US officially opposed nuclear proliferation, evidence suggests some US-made materials may have been acquired by Israel, potentially through a company called NUMEC, which handled nuclear materials. There are also reports of uranium being stolen from the US. Other countries:While not directly supplying materials, some countries, like Norway, were involved in facilitating the transfer of heavy water from the UK to Israel.AI responses may include mistakes."---------------------------"Hans, are we the baddies?"

David Ainsworth ● 73d2 Comments ● 73d

Another Screeching U-Turn By Hapless Starmer

Yvette Cooper made an 'unequivocal' apology to grooming gang victims today as a 'damning' report accused institutions of 'dodging' questions about the ethnicity of offenders.In a moment of shame for UK authorities, the Home Secretary finally triggered a national inquiry into the sexual abuse of underage girls, admitting those who suffered 'despicable crimes' had been 'let down'.  Ms Cooper said a national inquiry will be set up oversee local investigations - something Keir Starmer had been rejecting until his humiliating U-turn at the weekend.  The PM made a dramatic volte face at the weekend after reading the report. He previously suggested those calling for a national probe into the rape and sexual abuse of thousands of girls by gangs of mainly Pakistani-heritage men were 'jumping on the bandwagon' of the 'far-Right'.  Starmer must now publicly apologise to all the victims that he has ignored for so long; and to Nigel Farage, Rupert Lowe and Kemi Badenoch who have all put sustained pressure on him for months to do the right thing.  But of course he won't and it is interesting that his volte face occurred at the weekend when he was out of the country and did not have to face the media scrutiny. One of the rape-gangs most vocal victims Sammy Woodhouse, has written a bestselling book about her ordeal and I thoroughly recommend it if you want to know the raw truth.  I hope this national inquiry will expose all the cover-ups that have been perpetrated by the all the local authorities, social services and children's homes involved, the police and by Starmer himself who I believe tried to bury the scandal so as not to antagonise Labour's Muslim voters.  There were 364 Labour MPs who toed the party line and were also complicit in the cover-up, and guess who is one of them ...  There were 364 Labour MPs who toed the party line and were also complicit in the cover-up, and guess who is one of them ...  The list of shameThese are the 364 cowardly MPs who voted against a national inquiry into child sexual exploitation and Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs.They deserve to be named and shamed.Never forget their betrayal.Jack Abbott (Labour)Debbie Abrahams (Labour)Shockat Adam (Independent)Zubir Ahmed (Labour)Luke Akehurst (Labour)Sadik Al-Hassan (Labour)Bayo Alaba (Labour)Dan Aldridge (Labour)Heidi Alexander (Labour)Douglas Alexander (Labour)Rushanara Ali (Labour)Tahir Ali (Labour)Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour)Mike Amesbury (Independent)Callum Anderson (Labour)Fleur Anderson (Labour)😡Tonia Antoniazzi (Labour)Scott Arthur (Labour)Jess Asato (Labour)James Asser (Labour)Jas Athwal (Labour)Catherine Atkinson (Labour)Lewis Atkinson (Labour)Calvin Bailey (Labour)Olivia Bailey (Labour)David Baines (Labour)Alex Baker (Labour)Richard Baker (Labour)Alex Ballinger (Labour)Antonia Bance (Labour)Lee Barron (Labour)Alex Barros-Curtis (Labour)Johanna Baxter (Labour)Danny Beales (Labour)Lorraine Beavers (Labour)Apsana Begum (Independent)Torsten Bell (Labour)Hilary Benn (Labour)Siân Berry (Green Party)Clive Betts (Labour)Polly Billington (Labour)Matt Bishop (Labour)Olivia Blake (Labour)Rachel Blake (Labour)Chris Bloore (Labour)Elsie Blundell (Labour)Kevin Bonavia (Labour)Jade Botterill (Labour)Sureena Brackenridge (Labour)Jonathan Brash (Labour)Phil Brickell (Labour)Chris Bryant (Labour)Julia Buckley (Labour)Richard Burgon (Independent)Maureen Burke (Labour )David Burton-Sampson (Labour)Dawn Butler (Labour)Ruth Cadbury (Labour)Nesil Caliskan (Labour)Markus Campbell-Savours (Labour)Irene Campbell (Labour)Juliet Campbell (Labour)Alan Campbell (Labour)Sam Carling (Labour)Sarah Champion (Labour)Bambos Charalambous (Labour)Luke Charters (Labour)Ellie Chowns (Green Party)Feryal Clark (Labour)Ben Coleman (Labour)Jacob Collier (Labour)Lizzi Collinge (Labour)Tom Collins (Labour)Liam Conlon (Labour)Sarah Coombes (Labour)Andrew Cooper (Labour)Beccy Cooper (Labour)Yvette Cooper (Labour)Jeremy Corbyn (Independent)Deirdre Costigan (Labour)Pam Cox (Labour)Neil Coyle (Labour)Jen Craft (Labour)Stella Creasy (Labour)Torcuil Crichton (Labour)Chris Curtis (Labour)Janet Daby (Labour)Nicholas Dakin (Labour)Ashley Dalton (Labour)Emily Darlington (Labour)Alex Davies-Jones (Labour)Jonathan Davies (Labour)Paul Davies (Labour)Marsha De Cordova (Labour)Josh Dean (Labour)Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)Jim Dickson (Labour)Anna Dixon (Labour)Samantha Dixon (Labour)Anneliese Dodds (Labour)Helena Dollimore (Labour)Stephen Doughty (Labour)Peter Dowd (Labour)Graeme Downie (Labour)Rosie Duffield (Independent)Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)Angela Eagle (Labour)Maria Eagle (Labour)Lauren Edwards (Labour)Sarah Edwards (Labour)Clive Efford (Labour)Damien Egan (Labour)Maya Ellis (Labour)Chris Elmore (Labour)Kirith Entwistle (Labour)Florence Eshalomi (Labour)Bill Esterson (Labour)Chris Evans (Labour)Linsey Farnsworth (Labour)Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)Mark Ferguson (Labour)Patricia Ferguson (Labour)Natalie Fleet (Labour)Emma Foody (Labour)Catherine Fookes (Labour)Vicky Foxcroft (Labour)Daniel Francis (Labour)James Frith (Labour)Gill Furniss (Labour)Barry Gardiner (Labour)Allison Gardner (Labour)Anna Gelderd (Labour)Gill German (Labour)Tracy Gilbert (Labour)Becky Gittins (Labour)Mary Glindon (Labour)Ben Goldsborough (Labour)Jodie Gosling (Labour)Georgia Gould (Labour)John Grady (Labour)Lilian Greenwood (Labour)Nia Griffith (Labour)Andrew Gwynne (Labour)Amanda Hack (Labour)Paulette Hamilton (Labour)Emma Hardy (Labour)Carolyn Harris (Labour)Helen Hayes (Labour)Tom Hayes (Labour)Claire Hazelgrove (Labour)Mark Hendrick (Labour)Meg Hillier (Labour)Chris Hinchliff (Labour)Sharon Hodgson (Labour)Rachel Hopkins (Labour)Claire Hughes (Labour)Alison Hume (Labour)Patrick Hurley (Labour)Imran Hussain (Independent)Leigh Ingham (Labour)Natasha Irons (Labour)Sally Jameson (Labour)Dan Jarvis (Labour)Terry Jermy (Labour)Adam Jogee (Labour)Diana Johnson (Labour)Darren Jones (Labour)Gerald Jones (Labour)Lillian Jones (Labour)Louise Jones (Labour)Ruth Jones (Labour)Sarah Jones (Labour)Gurinder Singh Josan (Labour)Sojan Joseph (Labour)Warinder Juss (Labour)Chris Kane (Labour)Mike Kane (Labour)Satvir Kaur (Labour)Liz Kendall (Labour)Afzal Khan (Labour)Naushabah Khan (Labour)Stephen Kinnock (Labour)Jayne Kirkham (Labour)Gen Kitchen (Labour)Sonia Kumar (Labour)Uma Kumaran (Labour)Peter Kyle (Labour)Laura Kyrke-Smith (Labour)Peter Lamb (Labour)Ian Lavery (Labour)Noah Law (Labour)Kim Leadbeater (Labour)Brian Leishman (Labour)Emma Lewell-Buck (Labour)Andrew Lewin (Labour)Clive Lewis (Labour)Simon Lightwood (Labour)Rebecca Long Bailey (Independent)Josh MacAlister (Labour)Alice Macdonald (Labour)Andy MacNae (Labour)Justin Madders (Labour)Shabana Mahmood (Labour)Seema Malhotra (Labour)Amanda Martin (Labour)Rachael Maskell (Labour)Keir Mather (Labour)Alex Mayer (Labour)Douglas McAllister (Labour)Kerry McCarthy (Labour)Martin McCluskey (Labour)Andy McDonald (Labour)Chris McDonald (Labour)John McDonnell (Independent)Blair McDougall (Labour)Lola McEvoy (Labour)Pat McFadden (Labour)Alison McGovern (Labour)Alex McIntyre (Labour)Gordon McKee (Labour)Kevin McKenna (Labour)Catherine McKinnell (Labour)Jim McMahon (Labour)Anna McMorrin (Labour)Frank McNally (Labour)Kirsty McNeill (Labour)Anneliese Midgley (Labour)Julie Minns (Labour)Navendu Mishra (Labour)Abtisam Mohamed (Labour)Iqbal Mohamed (Independent)Perran Moon (Labour)Jessica Morden (Labour)Stephen Morgan (Labour)Grahame Morris (Labour)Joe Morris (Labour)Luke Murphy (Labour)Chris Murray (Labour)Ian Murray (Labour)James Murray (Labour)Katrina Murray (Labour)Luke Myer (Labour)James Naish (Labour)Connor Naismith (Labour)Lisa Nandy (Labour)Kanishka Narayan (Labour)Josh Newbury (Labour)Samantha Niblett (Labour)Charlotte Nichols (Labour)Melanie Onn (Labour)Chi Onwurah (Labour)Simon Opher (Labour)Abena Oppong-Asare (Labour)Kate Osamor (Labour)Kate Osborne (Labour)Tristan Osborne (Labour)Sarah Owen (Labour)Darren Paffey (Labour)Andrew Pakes (Labour)Matthew Patrick (Labour)Michael Payne (Labour)Stephanie Peacock (Labour)Jon Pearce (Labour)Matthew Pennycook (Labour)Toby Perkins (Labour)Jess Phillips (Labour)Bridget Phillipson (Labour)David Pinto-Duschinsky (Labour)Lee Pitcher (Labour)Jo Platt (Labour)Luke Pollard (Labour)Joe Powell (Labour)Lucy Powell (Labour)Gregor Poynton (Labour)Peter Prinsley (Labour)Richard Quigley (Labour)Steve Race (Labour)Connor Rand (Labour)Andrew Ranger (Labour)Mike Reader (Labour)Ellie Reeves (Labour)Joani Reid (Labour)Emma Reynolds (Labour)Martin Rhodes (Labour)Jake Richards (Labour)Jenny Riddell-Carpenter (Labour)Dave Robertson (Labour)Tim Roca (Labour)Matt Rodda (Labour)Sam Rushworth (Labour)Sarah Russell (Labour)Oliver Ryan (Labour)Jeevun Sandher (Labour)Michelle Scrogham (Labour)Mark Sewards (Labour)Naz Shah (Labour)Tulip Siddiq (Labour)Josh Simons (Labour)Andy Slaughter (Labour)John Slinger (Labour)Cat Smith (Labour)David Smith (Labour)Jeff Smith (Labour)Nick Smith (Labour)Sarah Smith (Labour)Karin Smyth (Labour)Gareth Snell (Labour)Alex Sobel (Labour)Euan Stainbank (Labour)Jo Stevens (Labour)Kenneth Stevenson (Labour)Elaine Stewart (Labour)Will Stone (Labour)Alistair Strathern (Labour)Alan Strickland (Labour)Lauren Sullivan (Labour)Kirsteen Sullivan (Labour)Peter Swallow (Labour)Mark Tami (Labour)Mike Tapp (Labour)David Taylor (Labour)Rachel Taylor (Labour)Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)Fred Thomas (Labour) (Proxy vote cast by Chris Elmore)Gareth Thomas (Labour)Adam Thompson (Labour)Emily Thornberry (Labour)Marie Tidball (Labour)Stephen Timms (Labour)Jessica Toale (Labour)Jon Trickett (Labour)Henry Tufnell (Labour)Anna Turley (Labour)Matt Turmaine (Labour)Karl Turner (Labour)Laurence Turner (Labour)Derek Twigg (Labour)Liz Twist (Labour)Harpreet Uppal (Labour)Valerie Vaz (Labour)Chris Vince (Labour)Christian Wakeford (Labour)Imogen Walker (Labour)Chris Ward (Labour)Melanie Ward (Labour)Paul Waugh (Labour)Chris Webb (Labour)Michelle Welsh (Labour)Catherine West (Labour)Andrew Western (Labour)Matt Western (Labour)Michael Wheeler (Labour)John Whitby (Labour)Jo White (Labour)Katie White (Labour)Nadia Whittome (Labour)David Williams (Labour)Steve Witherden (Labour)Rosie Wrighting (Labour)Yuan Yang (Labour)Mohammad Yasin (Labour)Steve Yemm (Labour)https://mol.im/a/14817277

Sue Hammond ● 76d55 Comments ● 73d