Forum Topics

Journalists in 2026: we're shocked that the Labour right smears people

"The prime minister has ordered the Cabinet Office to investigate claims about Labour Together after the group was accused of commissioning a report that investigated the background of a journalist.Labour Together, which helped Sir Keir Starmer get elected as Labour leader, paid APCO Worldwide at least £30,000 to "investigate the sourcing, funding and origins" of a Sunday Times story about undeclared donations at the think tank before the 2024 general election.Sir Keir said he "didn't know anything" about APCO Worldwide's investigation adding: "It absolutely needs to be looked into."Tory chairman Kevin Hollinrake said Labour Together's behaviour "shows a worrying contempt for the free press".He added: "With its close and widely known links to the heart of government, serious questions must be answered about who was aware of these actions, including whether senior figures around the prime minister knew."The party said Labour should suspend its links with Labour Together until the allegations had been independently investigated.It is understood the government's propriety and ethics team will be responsible for the Cabinet Office investigation.The SNP's Westminster deputy leader Pete Wishart said a Cabinet Office investigation amounted to "the Labour government trying to mark its own homework" and called for a cross-party parliamentary inquiry.The party has also called on the prime minister to sack Cabinet Office minister Josh Simons, who commissioned the report, named "Operation Cannon", when he was head of Labour Together."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0q3wx2j3x1oGosh, who'd believe that about "Labour Together", a major force behind Starmer's victory?

David Ainsworth ● 33d0 Comments ● 33d

Assisted Dying Bill

Lord Falconer, who introduced the Assisted Dying Bill to the Lords, has accused objectors in the House of filibustering. He has even threatened to invoke the Parliament Act and force the Lords to accept the Commons Bill unamended. In fact he has no power to do this. It is not a government measure but a private member's bill. The government cannot force the measure through without breaking its declared neutrality and adopting the Bill as Labour policy, which it has no mandate to do.Charles Moore in today's 'Telegraph' lists some of the objections to the Bill which have been raised by peers:how to judge the mental capacity of each candidate for assisted suicide, including people with learning difficulties, Down's syndrome and autismhow to detect coercion by greedy relatives or over-zealous doctors;how the doctors deciding on the panel, who would not be familiar with the candidates, could judge their state of mind;who should sit on any review panels (at present the proposal is to include a KC, so Keir could have a go):the uncertainty of a prognosis and sometimes even the diagnosis of a terminal disease leading to death within six months;the cost to the NHS of finding the professionals to deal with an expected number of at least 6000 applications each year;the question of whether a pregnant woman should be allowed to apply;the problem of language and literacy difficulties with certain candidates.I think peers are right to raise these issues and they should not be accused of filibustering.

Steven Rose ● 49d13 Comments ● 44d

Cuts to ODA budget

As a Borgen Project Ambassador and Putney constituent, I am writing to express my concern and repulsion at Labour’s announcement to slash the ODA’s foreign aid budget nearly in half (from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3%). The latest round of cuts threatens to strip an estimated £150 million from programmes fighting tuberculosis, AIDS, and malaria—diseases that continue to kill millions and disproportionately affect the world’s poorest communities. These abhorrent cuts follow the dark path set out by Boris Johnson and Donald Trump, who’s governments slashed the ODA and USAID budgets, also resulting in massive global deaths from disease and hunger. I think it’s important to clear up a few common misconceptions around foreign aid spending. Surveys show that Britons routinely overestimate how much we spend on foreign aid, with many believing it accounts for 10% of national spending when, even at 0.7% (now 0.3%), it was less than a penny in the pound. In addition, there’s often a notion that foreign aid is a leftwing or progressive concept, in truth, both Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher strengthened development efforts, recognizing that stability abroad furthers security and prosperity at home. Wandsworth is proudly “the Brighter Borough” and “the Borough of Culture,” these slogans reflect our shared values of compassion, openness, and outward-looking values. Standing up for foreign aid means standing up for who we are. I’d like to commend my local MP, Fleur Anderson, for upholding these values through her work opposing these cuts and championing effective, life-saving development assistance. I encourage her to continue and urge her colleges to join in her courageous efforts.The Borgen Project works to ensure communities like ours speak up for smart, humane foreign policy. Wandsworth should continue to lead that effort.Oliver Lefferts

Oliver Lefferts ● 57d10 Comments ● 50d

It is now 85 seconds to midnight 2026: Doomsday Clock Statement

"A year ago, we warned that the world was perilously close to global disaster and that any delay in reversing course increased the probability of catastrophe. Rather than heed this warning, Russia, China, the United States, and other major countries have instead become increasingly aggressive, adversarial, and nationalistic. Hard-won global understandings are collapsing, accelerating a winner-takes-all great power competition and undermining the international cooperation critical to reducing the risks of nuclear war, climate change, the misuse of biotechnology, the potential threat of artificial intelligence, and other apocalyptic dangers. Far too many leaders have grown complacent and indifferent, in many cases adopting rhetoric and policies that accelerate rather than mitigate these existential risks. Because of this failure of leadership, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Science and Security Board today sets the Doomsday Clock at 85 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been to catastrophe.Last year started with a glimmer of hope in regard to nuclear risks, as incoming US President Donald Trump made efforts to halt the Russia-Ukraine war and even suggested that major powers pursue “denuclearization.” Over the course of 2025, however, negative trends—old and new—intensified, with three regional conflicts involving nuclear powers all threatening to escalate. The Russia–Ukraine war has featured novel and potentially destabilizing military tactics and Russian allusions to nuclear weapons use. Conflict between India and Pakistan erupted in May, leading to cross-border drone and missile attacks amid nuclear brinkmanship. In June, Israel and the United States launched aerial attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities suspected of supporting the country’s nuclear weapons ambitions. It remains unclear whether the attacks constrained those efforts—or if they instead persuaded the country to pursue nuclear weapons covertly.Meanwhile, competition among major powers has become a full-blown arms race, as evidenced by increasing numbers of nuclear warheads and platforms in China, and the modernization of nuclear delivery systems in the United States, Russia, and China. The United States plans to deploy a new, multilayered missile defense system, Golden Dome, that will include space-based interceptors, increasing the probability of conflict in space and likely fueling a new space-based arms race. As these worrying trends continued, countries with nuclear weapons failed to talk about strategic stability or arms control, much less nuclear disarmament, and questions about US extended deterrence commitments to traditional allies in Europe and Asia led some countries without nuclear weapons to consider acquiring them. As we publish this statement, the last major agreement limiting the numbers of strategic nuclear weapons deployed by the United States and Russia, New START, is set to expire, ending nearly 60 years of efforts to constrain nuclear competition between the world’s two largest nuclear countries. In addition, the US administration may be considering the resumption of explosive nuclear testing, further accelerating a renewed nuclear arms race.An array of adverse trends also dominated the climate change outlook in the past year. The level of atmospheric carbon dioxide—the greenhouse gas most responsible for human-caused climate change—reached a new high, rising to 150 percent of preindustrial levels. Global average temperature in 2024 was the warmest in the 175-year record, and temperatures in 2025 were similar. With the addition of freshwater from melting glaciers and thermal expansion, global average sea level reached a record high. Energized by warm temperatures, the hydrologic cycle became more erratic, with deluges and droughts hopscotching around the globe. Large swaths of Peru, the Amazon, southern Africa, and northwest Africa experienced droughts. For the third time in the last four years Europe experienced more than 60,000 heat-related deaths. Floods in the Congo River Basin displaced 350,000 people, and record rainfall in southeast Brazil displaced over half a million."https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2026-statement/

David Ainsworth ● 53d6 Comments ● 52d

Chagos ~ Another U-turn On The Way?

Pressure grows on Starmer to ditch 'terrible' plan to hand Chagos Islands to Mauritius as Labour MPs say it should be an axed.Pressure mounted on Sir Keir Starmer to ditch his ‘terrible’ plan of surrendering the Chagos Islands amid mounting opposition from his own LabourMPs.The Prime Minister faced calls to heed the concerns of Donald Trump and scrap the plan entirely – not just pause it.Senior Labour backbench MP Dan Carden said: ‘This is not about obeying Trump - it's about using common sense and doing the right thing for the country.’The plea came after the surprise news on Friday that Sir Keir was pulling the next stage of legislation needed to ratify the controversial territory – which includes a giant joint UK/US military base – to Mauritius.The Bill was due to be discussed in the House of Lords on Monday but the draft law was withdrawn just days after the US president came out strongly against the handover.It also came after Tory peers demanded to know if the agreement complied with international law, with the Tories warned it would break a UN treaty between the UK and US in 1966 which stated: 'The territory shall remain under UK sovereignty.'But the Government insist that the deal – which critics say could eventually cost the UK £35 billion in payments to Mauritius, more than 10 times the Government’s estimate - will still go ahead.A Government spokesman said: ‘The Government remains fully committed to the deal to secure the joint UK-US base on Diego Garcia, which is vital for our national security.’This is irresponsible and reckless behaviour by peers, whose roles is to check legislation, not interfere with our national security priorities.’https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15494287/Pressure-Starmer-plan-Chagos-Islands-Mauritius-Labour-

Sue Hammond ● 56d5 Comments ● 56d

Stayed a little back, a little off the front lines

"Donald Trump never served in Vietnam; he received five draft deferments that prevented him from being conscripted.  In an interview with Fox News in early 2026, Trump criticized the contribution of America's allies in the Afghanistan conflict, stating: "They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan… and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines".These remarks sparked widespread condemnation from British veterans and politicians, who pointed to the 457 British personnel who died in the conflict as proof that they were indeed on the front lines. Donald Trump’s Vietnam War Record Trump himself did not see combat or serve in the military during the Vietnam era: Draft Deferments: He received five deferments: four for being a college student and one for a medical diagnosis of bone spurs in his heels."Personal Vietnam": In a 1997 interview with Howard Stern, Trump controversially compared the risks of dating and avoiding sexually transmitted diseases to the dangers of the Vietnam War, calling it his "personal Vietnam" and stating he felt like a "brave soldier" for navigating the dating scene.Lottery Number: While Trump has frequently claimed his high draft lottery number (356) kept him out of the war, records show he had already received his medical exemption over a year before the 1969 lottery took place.""Casualties: Over 3,400 NATO-led coalition troops died during the conflict, including approximately 1,100 non-U.S. personnel from allies such as the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Denmark.Intense Fighting Zones: British and Canadian forces, in particular, were responsible for some of the most dangerous frontline regions, including Helmand and Kandahar provinces, which were heartlands of the Taliban insurgency.Highest Per Capita Losses: Denmark and Estonia suffered significant casualty rates, with Denmark experiencing the highest number of combat deaths per capita of any coalition member.Article 5 Invocation: The mission in Afghanistan remains the only time in history that NATO’s collective defense clause (Article 5) was invoked, specifically to support the United States following the 9/11 attacks."------------------"Research suggests that for post-9/11 veterans, the number of suicides (estimated at 30,177 between 2001–2021) is roughly four times higher than the number of personnel killed in action (7,057) during the same period."

David Ainsworth ● 57d4 Comments ● 57d

I nearly fell of my chair!!

The extract below is from the Sunday Telegraph.  Similar articles are on Huffington Post, Reuters, CNBC among others.  All behind paywalls.Trump ‘wants nations to pay $1bn to join his Gaza peace board’US president’s plan for the strip angers Netanyahu while report suggests White House may be seeking to usurp UN"Donald Trump is asking countries that want a spot on his new “Board of Peace” for Gaza to pay $1 billion (£747 million) which he will control, according to a report.A draft charter for the proposed group, which will oversee the rebuilding of the strip, establishes Mr Trump as the inaugural chairman who would have a veto over new members, Bloomberg reported.According to the document, states would be restricted to a three-year term of membership unless they “contribute more than USD $1,000,000,000 in cash funds to the Board of Peace within the first year of the Charter’s entry into force”.The White House has started to unveil administrators who will supervise Gaza as part of the second phase of the US president’s peace deal.They include Sir Tony Blair, Steve Witkoff, the White House envoy, and Jared Kushner, Mr Trump’s son-in-law.An “Executive Board” will oversee the postwar management of the enclave for the Board of Peace, and will include other world leaders who are expected to be announced at Davos next week.The charter for the group, which on Saturday was sent to dozens of heads of state with an invitation to join the board, suggests that Mr Trump is trying to set up an organisation to rival the United Nations....."https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/01/17/trumps-gaza-peace-board-angers-netanyahu/

Ivonne Holliday ● 63d1 Comments ● 62d

Is Reform for or against this blackmail?

"44m ago16.49 GMTDonald Trump has said “world peace is at stake” as he unveiled 10% tariffs on European countries opposing US plans to acquire Greenland.Posting on Truth Social, the US president said:We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration. Now, after Centuries, it is time for Denmark to give back — World Peace is at stake!Trump concluded his post by saying the US is “immediately open to negotiation with Denmark and/or any of these Countries that have put so much at risk, despite all that we have done for them, including maximum protection, over so many decades”.1h ago16.34 GMTTrump says eight European countries face 10% tariff for opposing US control of GreenlandDonald Trump has said he will impose 10% tariffs on Nato countries - including the UK, France, and Germany – who have deployed troops to Greenland amid US threats to take over the Arctic island.In a lengthy Truth Social post, he said “Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland have journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown”, adding: “This is a very dangerous situation for the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet.”The US president said 10% tariffs will be imposed on all goods the countries export to the United States from 1 February, followed by a 25% rate from 1 June.“This Tariff will be due and payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland,” he added.Trump reiterated his warning that “China and Russia want Greenland”, saying “there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it”."For Trump or Greenland, Ms Hammond?

David Ainsworth ● 63d5 Comments ● 63d

For the Don, disrespect may be a capital offence

New York Times 12/1/26:-"President Trump has added another justification for the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent in Minnesota: She behaved badly.“At a very minimum, that woman was very, very disrespectful to law enforcement,” Mr. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday evening.In the days since Ms. Good, 37, was shot and killed by Jonathan Ross, an ICE agent, Trump administration officials have used a variety of arguments as they have tried to justify the episode. They have called it an act of self-defense, and Mr. Trump has falsely claimed Ms. Good “ran over” the agent. JD Vance, the vice president, has argued that Mr. Ross has “absolute immunity.”"Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, contrasted Mr. Trump’s treatment of Ms. Good with his praise and support for the hundreds of pro-Trump rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and attacked the police.On Jan. 6 this year, the Trump administration made a page on its website that accused the Capitol Police of instigating the riot, and said a pro-Trump rioter whom the police killed during the mayhem was “murdered.”“Trump just pardoned nearly 1,600 insurrectionists,” Mr. Raskin said, “hundreds of whom violently attacked police officers and called them everything from traitors to pigs to racial epithets, and ruthlessly taunted them and maligned them for hours.” He added that “Donald Trump’s very dubious characterization of Renee Good as having been disrespectful is not only factually suspect, but it’s legally irrelevant.”“The police do not have the right to shoot people in the head because they consider them having acted in a disrespectful way,” Mr. Raskin said. “That legal standard would have led to a slaughter on Jan. 6.”"

David Ainsworth ● 67d6 Comments ● 65d

Trump in the Atlantic yesterday

"In a telephone interview this morning, President Donald Trump issued a not-so-veiled threat against the new Venezuelan leader, Delcy Rodríguez, saying that “if she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro,” referring to Nicolás Maduro, now residing in a New York City jail cell. Trump made clear that he would not stand for Rodríguez’s defiant rejection of the armed U.S. intervention that resulted in Maduro’s capture.""pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro,”So death, maybe?"When I asked this morning why nation building and regime change in Venezuela would be different from similar efforts he previously opposed in Iraq, Trump suggested posing the question to former President George W. Bush.“I didn’t do Iraq. That was Bush. You’ll have to ask Bush that question, because we should have never gone into Iraq. That started the Middle East disaster,” Trump said.""Secretary of State Marco Rubio said yesterday that the world should take notice after the Venezuela operation. “​​When he tells you that he’s going to do something, when he tells you he’s going to address a problem, he means it,” Rubio said. Trump has repeatedly said that the U.S. “needs” to control Greenland.Trump said it was up to others to decide what U.S.-military action in Venezuela means for Greenland. “They are going to have to view it themselves. I really don’t know. He was very generous to me, Marco, yesterday,” Trump said. “You know, I wasn’t referring to Greenland at that time. But we do need Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defense.”"https://www.theatlantic.com/national-security/2026/01/trump-venezuela-maduro-delcy-rodriguez/685497/"After the raid, a former Trump administration official turned podcaster, Katie Miller, posted an illustrated map of Greenland in the colours of the US stars and stripes with the caption: "SOON." (Sky News 4/1)(Ms Miller is married to Mr Trump's influential deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller)."On Sunday, Dmitry ‍Medvedev, a former Russian president and close ally of Vladimir Putin, said the attacks on Venezuela were unlawful but consistent because Mr Trump was defending US interests.“It must be acknowledged ‍that, ‌despite the obvious unlawfulness of Trump’s behaviour, one cannot deny a certain consistency ‍in his actions. He and his team defend their country’s national interests quite harshly,” he told state news."So what sort of lesson is it for Russia and China then?

David Ainsworth ● 76d50 Comments ● 73d

How Venezuela’s natural resources turn it into a geopolitical prize for US

From Business Today (India):-"Explained: How Venezuela’s natural resources turn it into a geopolitical prize for USBeyond politics and personalities, the core driver is Venezuela’s vast concentration of energy, minerals, metals, and freshwater — resources that can reshape global supply chains and power balances if brought under US influence.The recent US operation in Venezuela has pushed the country from a long-running regional crisis into the centre of global strategic calculations. Beyond politics and personalities, the core driver is Venezuela’s vast concentration of energy, minerals, metals, and freshwater — resources that can reshape global supply chains and power balances if brought under US influence. This is why Venezuela is increasingly viewed not just as a foreign policy challenge, but as a geopolitical prize. 1. Oil: Energy scale leverage Venezuela holds the largest proven crude oil reserves in the world — more than 300 billion barrels, surpassing Saudi Arabia. Why it matters to the US: Acts as a pressure valve against OPEC supply manipulation Enables price stabilisation — or disruption — during global crises Offers leverage over global inflation via energy markets Strengthens US control over Western Hemisphere energy flows With US capital, technology, and logistics, Venezuelan oil could be rapidly integrated into global supply systems on Washington’s terms. 2. Natural Gas: Strategic hedge against global volatility Venezuela’s 200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas give it latent power in a world marked by energy shocks. Strategic value post-operation: Reduces exposure to EU-Russia gas volatility Creates future LNG export leverage if infrastructure scales Strengthens US bargaining power in transatlantic energy diplomacy Gas is not just fuel — it is geopolitical insurance. 3. Iron Ore & Coal: Industrial & military backbone Venezuela has billions of tonnes of iron ore and hundreds of millions of tonnes of coal, essential for industrial production. Why Washington cares: Steel supply underpins military manufacturing Critical for rail, ports, and logistics infrastructure Becomes strategic stock in war-preparation cycles In geopolitical competition, heavy industry resources function like strategic reserves. 4. Gold: Strategic collateral in a shifting financial order With more than 8,000 tonnes of gold resources, Venezuela holds one of the largest gold endowments in the world. Post-operation significance: Provides sovereign collateral amid rising debt stress Gains importance as trust in fiat currencies weakens Positions the US favorably in a potential commodity-backed financial reset Gold is no longer just wealth — it is credibility. 5. Freshwater: Overlooked strategic asset Venezuela controls about 2% of the world’s renewable freshwater, a critical resource in a climate-constrained future. Why it matters geopolitically: Anchors long-term food and agricultural security Enables population resilience and internal stability Enhances soft power through agricultural exports Water is emerging as a strategic resource on par with oil. 6. Strategic minerals: Countering China’s supply chain dominance Venezuela has largely untapped deposits of nickel, copper, and phosphates—key inputs for modern technology. US strategic upside: Supports battery, EV, and semiconductor supply chains Reduces dependence on China-controlled mineral flows Secures inputs for defense and advanced manufacturing This is the long-game advantage embedded in Venezuela’s soil. After the US operation, Venezuela is no longer just a regional flashpoint — it is a strategic node in the global contest over energy, supply chains, and economic power.https://www.businesstoday.in/world/us/story/explained-how-venezuelas-natural-resources-turn-it-into-a-geopolitical-prize-for-us-509321-2026-01-04?utm_source=rssfeed

David Ainsworth ● 76d2 Comments ● 75d

"From the world cop to the world bully in less than one year".

"Americans probably still can be shocked and horrified. An undeclared, unprovoked, and illegal war designed to, well, we can only guess—though Donald Trump and JD Vance have seemed to concede this was a war for oil—puts the United States on the same moral and legal footing as Russia, which invaded its neighbor in a war of pure aggression. The U.S. president this weekend attacked a sovereign nation, killed its citizens, and kidnapped its leader.Rep, Jim Himes, ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said in a statement:Maduro is an illegitimate ruler, but I have seen no evidence that his presidency poses a threat that would justify military action without Congressional authorization, nor have I heard a strategy for the day after and how we will prevent Venezuela from descending into chaos. Secretary Rubio repeatedly denied to Congress that the Administration intended to force regime change in Venezuela. The Administration must immediately brief Congress on its plan to ensure stability in the region and its legal justification for this decision.Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) aptly explained the constitutional outrage. “Trump rejected our Constitutionally required approval process for armed conflict because the Administration knows the American people overwhelmingly reject risks pulling our nation into another war,” he declared on social media. “This will further damage our reputation—already hurt by Trump’s policies around the world—and only isolate us in a time when we need our friends and allies more than ever.” Indeed, Mexico already denounced the action. Others are sure to follow.Any and all regime officials who insisted in congressional briefings that the boat strikes were about drugs, not regime change, lied to Congress as Kim and others have pointed out, and participated in a wholly unconstitutional war. Even Susie Wiles condeded in a recent Vanity Fair article that attacking the mainland would require congressional assent. So much for that.The U.S. attorney general declared that the United States had indicted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, on narcotics charges and will be tried in federal court. That outlandish proposition opens the seizure to scrutiny and raises the interesting possibility that Trump claims he enjoys immunity but not other heads of state.Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), an Iraq War veteran, posted a sobering warning: “I fought in some of the hardest battles of the Iraq War. Saw my brothers die, saw civilians being caught in the crossfire all for an unjustified war. No matter the outcome we are in the wrong for starting this war in Venezuela.” He added, “Second unjustified war in my life time. This war is illegal, it’s embarrassing that we went from the world cop to the world bully in less than one year. There is no reason for us to be at war with Venezuela.”"From:-"Headfirst Into WarThe horrific attack on Venezuela overnight puts the U.S. in the same camp as Russia.Jennifer RubinJan 3"

David Ainsworth ● 77d18 Comments ● 75d