Forum Topics

Was French Patrol Boat To Blame For Migrant Deaths?

Taken from the Mail on Sunday:A FRENCH warship was escorting an overloaded small boat across the Channel to UK waters when it sank yesterday, killing at least six migrants, it was claimed last night.A second French vessel was believed to be close by at the time of the tragedy. One of the small boats capsized as it entered a busy shipping lane and almost 70 people were thrown into the water. Six died and two more are thought to be missing. The presence of the French vessels sparked a furious political row as Tory MPs accused the French authorities of encouraging desperate migrants to attempt the perilous crossing in bad weather.‘The boat was being escorted towards Britain by a French navy patrol vessel when it capsized,’ the source told The Mail on Sunday. ‘This is a French policy designed to ensure the migrants make it to British waters as safely and quickly as possible.’Furious MPs last night questioned why France was not doing more to tackle the crisis, given that the UK is giving the country almost £500 million to help stop the crossings.‘We should get that money back,’ one senior Tory MP said.Yesterday’s incident - the worst loss of life in the Channel since November 2021 when 27 migrants perished - was last night described as a ‘wake-up call’ for Labour and Left-wing lawyers blocking Government plans to solve the small-boats crisis.Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: ‘Surely we must do everything to deter them from making that decision and making that perilous crossing. It is a wake-up call for all those who speak only of rights, but seem incapable of balancing those rights against the terrible risks that people are undertaking as they pay their life savings to be shoved on to a boat that is unseaworthy, only to find that it all ends somewhere in the channel.’Tory MP Marco Longhi, a member of the Home Affairs Committee, added: ‘This terrible tragedy should be a wake-up call to Sir Keir Starmer, Labour and the whole of the Left, that this is what happens when they oppose the Government’s sensible measures to tackle the small-boats crisis.‘I hope to God that the Labour leader now sees this and changes his obstructionist approach as soon as possible. People’s lives depend on it.’After another day of tragedy in the Channel, the MoS can reveal:Vile traffickers were attempting to lure more migrants to undertake the perilous crossing just hours after the deaths.■ Despite the accident, over 500 migrants crossed the Channel yesterday, making it the fourth busiest day of 2023.■ At least four other boats were escorted into English waters by French warships in the hours after the tragedy, it is claimed.■ The small boats are more crowded than ever, according to a senior Border Force source.■ People smugglers are refusing to give life jackets to some migrants, despite charging up to £5,000 for a seat on one of the packed boats.Full report here:https://newspaper.mailplus.co.uk/data/2921/reader/reader.html?social#!preferred/0/package/2921/pub/10064/page/1/content/530536

Sue Hammond ● 1183d33 Comments ● 1176d

Government finagry over cancer targets

Allison Pearson in the Telegraph is normally dreadful, but her column today on the government's weasel plan to scrap cancer treatment targets is really good. It's behind their paywall, but this (longish) excerpt summarises it:"This is Health Week on the government’s media grid. With no good news to impart about our calamitous NHS with its 7.5 million (at least) waiting list, Mr Barclay was on the airwaves trying to put the best possible gloss on a decision to scrap two-thirds of cancer waiting-times targets in England. (A move so sublimely cynical it could have come straight out of Yes Minister.) Under the plan, nine targets will be consolidated into three pledges (that weasel word again). Potential cancer patients will no longer have to be routinely referred to a specialist within 28 days which health leaders somehow believe will mean “patients will get better treatment in the longer term”.Honestly, how stupid do they think we are? One in two people gets cancer and Cancer Research UK says this will increase 30 per cent by 2040. Early diagnosis and fast treatment are crucial. The international accepted goal which saves lives is the 62-day treatment target. That is missed in a staggering four out of 10 English patients. (Oncologists around the world regard British waiting times as a sick joke.) Just four weeks’ delay in starting treatment increases the death rate by 8-13 per cent. At least 100,000 people have seen their cancer worsen or been left with fewer treatment options because of appalling NHS delays over the past decade, according to Macmillan Cancer Support. And some 9,000 cancers were missed as a result of breast-screening interruptions during the pandemic.Sorry, I know that’s a lot of statistics to absorb. But those 9,000 women – someone’s wife, someone’s mum, someone’s beloved best friend – are dead or dying now. All the Amys and the Nickys and the Jills buried in the unmarked tomb of excess deaths.It’s mortifying in every sense. But instead of launching a radical new national cancer plan to catch up with superior countries that don’t just allow their citizens to sit on a waiting list until they’ve got Stage 4 (straight to palliative care for you, Sir!), health leaders scratch their heads and exclaim, 'I  know, if we scrap the pesky targets we won’t be accused of failing to hit the targets any more. Simples!'Denial and deceit are their watchwords. The cancer waiting times for April, published on 8 June, were awful, but NHS England continues to insist that everything is tickety-boo. Nothing to see here. Failure in our cancer care has become so normalised that hardly anyone bothers to scream and shout about the obscene number of missed chances to save lives which make the UK such an outlier in the civilised world."https://www.telegraph.co.uk/columnists/2023/08/15/nhs-cancer-crisis-waiting-lists-steve-barclay-rishi-sunak/

Richard Carter ● 1180d26 Comments ● 1176d