Forum Topics

The Speaker Rebukes Reeves

Sir Lindsay Hoyle has accused Chancellor Rachel Reeves of acting with “supreme discourtesy” towards MPs given her “premature disclosure” of Budget details.The Commons Speaker said it was “totally unacceptable to go around the world telling everybody” about “major” new policy announcements rather than giving the information first to MPs.Sir Lindsay also questioned whether MPs would need to bother attending the House to hear Ms Reeves deliver her first Budget on Wednesday, given “we’ll all have heard it” already.During a round of broadcast interviews while attending the International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington DC, Ms Reeves confirmed a technical change in the way she would measure progress against the target of managing debt.It is expected Ms Reeves will use the Budget to open the door for the Government to spend billions more on long-term infrastructure, such as replacing dilapidated buildings on the public sector estate.Sir Lindsay, making a statement, told the Commons: “In media interviews last week the Chancellor announced that she intended to introduce changes to the fiscal rules relating to the funding of day-to-day spending through tax receipts and to the measurement of the public debt.“These are major new policy announcements with significant and wide-ranging implications for the Government’s fiscal policy and for the public finances.“It is evident to me that this should therefore have been made in the first instance in this House and not to the world’s media.“This principle is clearly and unambiguously set out in paragraph 9.1 of the Ministerial Code. While this can hardly be described as a leak – the Chancellor herself gave interviews on the record and on camera – the premature disclosure of the contents of the Budget has always been regarded as a supreme discourtesy to the House.“Indeed, I still regard it as such.“I am very, very disappointed that the Chancellor expects the House to wait nearly a full week to hear her repeat these announcements in the Budget statement on Wednesday.”Sir Lindsay said he has “always defended” the right of MPs to be the first to hear major Government policy announcements, adding: “Ministers should expect to face proper, sustained scrutiny when these announcements are made from the elected Members of this House and not the American news channels.”He noted Treasury minister Darren Jones would be making a statement to the House on “fiscal rules” on Monday, adding: “Perhaps no coincidence.“Honourable members may be wondering how they’ll get a seat on Wednesday (for the Budget) – to be quite honest, the way it’s going you won’t need to, we’ll all have heard it. It’s not acceptable, I don’t want it to continue and I want to treat this House with the respect it deserves.”Sir Lindsay added: “It’s totally unacceptable to go around the world telling everybody rather than these Members. They were elected by the constituents of this country and they deserve to be treated better.”He went on to note Labour when in opposition complained about the previous Tory government behaving in a similar manner, adding: “Get your acts together, all sides, treat Members with respect.”

Sue Hammond ● 740d16 Comments ● 738d

Starmer's Confusion

I already know about Starmer's confusion and inability to explain what a woman is 🤷🏻‍♀️and now I am confused about HIS confusion over 'working people'🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️This confusing rhetoric from the government must end pdq because much of Reeve's🙍🏻‍♀️budget is centred around this ambiguous group.  Starmer🤓and his stooges need to have an urgent pow-wow in No 10 to sort this out because time is running out for them. 'Former Bank of England governor Mervyn King described Labour's pledge on national insurance, VAT and income tax as 'very unwise'.He also said the debate around not putting up taxes on working people was a 'terrible illusion' and warned putting up employers' national insurance was likely to depress workers' salaries.Lord King told Sky News: 'All this debate about not putting up taxes on working people is a terrible illusion, really.'Taxes are paid by people, they're not paid by companies or institutions, ultimately, they fall on the amount that people can spend.'And you only can raise significant amounts of money by raising taxes on most people, however you care to define that, but it's most people will have to pay higher taxes.And if they, instead of unwinding the cuts in employees' national insurance contributions, put up employers' national insurance contributions, that will make it less likely that companies will exceed to wage demands, they will press down on that, they will probably be less enthusiastic about creating new jobs.'Ultimately, the impact of these higher taxes has to be on the consumption of most people, however you care to define that group.'Lord King also warned that Ms Reeves' expected Budget plans could have an impact on interest rates.The Chancellor is set to rewrite the Government's fiscal rules to allow her to increase borrowing for public investment by around £50billion.Asked if he thinks the expected plans may have an impact on interest rates, particularly mortgage rates now, Lord King said: 'It could do, it could do.'https://mol.im/a/14007537

Sue Hammond ● 741d13 Comments ● 739d

As Gaza burns, Israeli settlers make 'real estate' plans

"Cheered on by influential members of Netanyahu's far-right coalition, Israel's emboldened settler movement argues that Palestinians should leave the enclave""US Secretary of State Antony Blinken flew into Israel on Tuesday pressing for a ceasefire in Gaza following the killing of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar.But a ceasefire was the last thing on the mind of the Knesset members, government ministers and hundreds of Israeli settlers who convened a day earlier to plan the future of the enclave.These plans did not include any kind of negotiation. There was one subject under discussion at the conference, timed to coincide with the annual Sukkot religious holiday which marks the exodus of the Jews from Egypt.The event, organised by the settler organisation Nahala, was held just three kilometres from the Gaza frontier.Significantly it was in a closed military zone, and this conference was held under army protection. The regular thud of outgoing artillery fire interrupted speeches, and was greeted by applause and cries of, "God bless our brave soldiers.”Many of the men present carried machine guns or pistols.“In the event of a terrorist infiltration,” boomed the PA announcer, “we ask you please not to fire your weapon. Let the security handle it. This is for everyone’s safety.”Those present at the conference included supporters from the United States, South Africa and Australia.One great grandmother from Melbourne wore a sticker saying in Hebrew that “Gaza is part of Israel” and on the other “Kahane was right”.A number of those at the conference carried stickers celebrating Meir Kahane, the late American-born rabbi and convicted terrorist who advocated that Palestinians should be forced out of Israel.Nahala leader Daniella Weiss, one of the heroes of the conference, boasted that families were ready to move to the edge of the Gaza border, claiming that Nahala had already entered a deal worth “millions of dollars” for temporary housing units as a preliminary to settlement of the Strip.She predicted: “You will witness how Jews go to Gaza and Arabs disappear from Gaza.”Gaza seafront 'a bargain'Which would be excellent business for Or Yomtovyan, an activist for Israeli security minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s far-right Jewish Power party.Yomtovyan is in the property business. Speaking outside the Jewish Power sukkot (tent) he told MEE that settling Gaza would be “a good solution for the real estate problem. We are a small country and there’s big land here we can use.”Asked when Gaza could be occupied, he replied: “First things first. As soon as possible.”Asked by MEE how much seafront property in Gaza might be worth, he replied “it will be a bargain. Properties in Tel Aviv next to the sea cost 20-50 million shekels [$5m-$13m]. Here we can sell cheap.”Yomtovyan said he was 16th on Jewish Power’s parliamentary candidates list, and predicted that its leader, Ben Gvir, would be Israel’s next prime minister after Netanyahu.It would be a serious error to dismiss the conference as a fringe event reflecting the wild fantasies of Israel’s settler movement. Big money and top politicians have a stake in the future of Gaza.The event was attended by senior government ministers and Knesset members, including several from Netanyahu’s Likud party.Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, who is also in charge of civil administration in the West Bank and has called for Israel to annex the occupied Palestinian territory, was there.But Ben Gvir was the star of the show, joining in communal dancing and hailed by many others present as the next prime minister.Ben Gvir maintained that Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on 7 October last year, in which about 1,200 Israelis were killed and hundreds more taken hostage, had changed the mindset of Israelis.“We are the owners of this land,” he said. “They understand that when Israel acts like the rightful owners of this land, that is what brings results.”He told his audience that Israel would encourage what he called the “voluntary transfer of all Gazan citizens”, adding “We will offer them the opportunity to move to other countries because that land belongs to us”.Ben Gvir and Smotrich are senior members of the Likud-led coalition that governs Israel.And recent history shows that these two settler leaders get what they want.This is partly a result of growing popular support, but above all because Netanyahu’s government would fall without them. Ben Gvir’s vision of a Palestinian-free Gaza is backed by raw power.Nahala leader Daniella Weiss alluded to this new settler power when she referenced Netanyahu’s statement earlier this year that the idea of Gaza settlement was “unrealistic”.She pointed out that many had made the same observation of the West Bank, which is today overrun by Israeli settlers.“We have the political support, the public support and the experience of 55 years of settling Judea [and] Samaria [the occupied West Bank] and the Golan Heights. More than 330 settlements. We have accumulated a lot of experience to do this politically.”As far as she is concerned, the Palestinians must leave Gaza. She told a crowd of international journalists that they should go “to England, to Africa, to Turkey. Just as people of Afghanistan moved during the war, such as people of Syria, such as people from Ukraine.”The Palestinians, emphasised Weiss “will not stay in Gaza by no means”."Etc.https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/edge-gaza-israeli-settlers-applaud-thud-artillery-fire

David Ainsworth ● 740d31 Comments ● 739d