Forum Topics

Another Bad Decision By Starmer

Mandelson was always a weird choice in my opinion. Donald Trump is considering rejecting Sir Keir Starmer’s nominee for UK ambassador to the US in what would be an extremely rare move.Sources within the Trump team have told The Independent that it is still not certain Peter Mandelson’s credentials will be accepted by Mr Trump after he becomes president.While the threat of rejecting Lord Mandelson could be sabre rattling, strains between the Labour government and the incoming administration are being blamed. However, there also are concerns about Lord Mandelson’s perceived links to China.Labour has told the Trump transition team that “it is a huge compliment” that Sir Keir wants to send such a senior Labour figure, but a source noted: “We are not buying that.”It was noted that Lord Mandelson did not attend the pre-inauguration party on Friday hosted by Nigel Farage in Washington DC, even though he had been invited in an effort to help build bridges with key members of the Trump team.The outgoing UK ambassador Dame Karen Pierce, who has impressed the transition team, was there.For an ambassadorial nominee to formally take up their role, the head of state of the country they have been sent to has to accept the “letters of credence”.In the UK this is done via the Court of St James’s where letters are presented to the King and in the US letters have to be presented to the president.One source said that strained relations with Mr Trump and the British government continue to be a problem which has “been made worse” by the nomination of Lord Mandelson.However, it is connections with China which are most alarming to the incoming Trump administration.“It is quite possible that Mandelson’s credentials could still be rejected,” a source said. “There are serious concerns about his links to China.”Lord Mandelson has been a strong advocate of close trading and other ties with China, even penning an article in 2018 warning that Mr Trump’s antipathy to China was “putting free trade at risk”.https://www.aol.co.uk/trump-considering-rejecting-lord-mandelson-162908190.html

Sue Hammond ● 658d50 Comments ● 647d

Can you see what it is yet?

"Trump wants Jordan and Egypt to accept more Palestinian refugees and suggests plan to 'clean out' Gaza US President  Donald Trump  has indicated that he would like to see Jordan, Egypt and other Arab nations increase the number of Palestinian refugees they are accepting from the  Gaza  Strip. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One yesterday, Trump, an ally of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said: “You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing and say, ‘You know, it’s over.’” Trump also told reporters that he had call earlier in the day with  King Abdullah II o f Jordan and would speak with Egyptian President  Abdel Fattah el-Sissi  on Sunday. The newly inaugurated Republican president said he complimented Jordan for having successfully accepted Palestinian refugees and that he told the king: “I’d love for you to take on more, cause I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess. It’s a real mess.” For context,Jordan is already home to more than 2.39 million registered Palestinian refugees,  according to the UN . Trump added: I don’t know, something has to happen, but it’s literally a demolition site right now. Almost everything’s demolished and people are dying there, so I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing in a different location where I think they could maybe live in peace for a change. Trump said that the potential housing “could be temporary” or “could be long-term”. During Israel’s 15 month war on Gaza,  more than two-thirds of buildings  have been destroyed or damaged by one of the most intensive bombardments in modern times. It has sparked a refugee crisis as large parts of the territory are now uninhabitable." (Guardian today) No surprises.

David Ainsworth ● 650d20 Comments ● 648d

Govt To Provide £117 Million More Funding To Protect Muslims

How thoughtful. No money found though for the Pensioners' Winter Fuel Allowance or the WASPI Women. 🤬
Today’s announcement marks a package of longer-term support to provide reassurance that anti-Muslim abuse, threats or harassment or any form of hate crime will not be tolerated.  
The funding will provide protective security measures to ensure the UK’s Muslim community can be, and just as importantly, can feel safe. 

Measures include technology such as CCTV, alarm systems and secure perimeter fencing at mosques, Muslim faith community centres, and Muslim faith schools.  
This comes alongside the extension of the deadline for the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme, and the government continues to invite mosques and Muslim faith community centres to register for protective security measures. 
The government will continue to work closely with policing and community partners to ensure the safety and security of Muslims.
Home Secretary James Cleverly said: Anti-Muslim hatred has absolutely no place in our society. We will not let events in the Middle East be used as an excuse to justify abuse against British Muslims.
The Prime Minister has made clear that we stand with Muslims in the UK. That is exactly why we have committed to this funding, giving reassurance and confidence to UK Muslims at a time when it is crucially needed.
Labour is committed to protecting the Muslim vote whatever the cost! 

Sue Hammond ● 649d2 Comments ● 649d

Why have Labour been so incompetent?

A list of some of Labour's errors since taking office:abandoning the Rwanda schemegiving striking doctors and train drivers inflationary pay awardswithdrawing winter fuel allowancepausing free speech protection in universitiesimposing the National Curriculum on AcademiesImposing IHT on family farmsraising employers' NI contributionsextending day-one employment rightsimposing a football regulatorgiving away the Chagos islandscancelling North Sea oil and gas explorationimposing VAT on private schoolsagreeing to enforce an ICC arrest warrant on Netanyahu.The cause of these unforced errors is to be found in Labour's move away from state socialism to what Tony Blair called ethical socialism, an ideology based on a market economy but characterised by a series of  anti-isms - anti-elitism, anti-racism, anti-colonialism, anti-sexism, anti-nationalism and so on. These 'anti-isms' are not wrong in themselves but are pursued with such unthinking fervour that they run counter to the government's economic objectives and the nation's interests and actually cause injustice.The anti-elitist strain in Labour, for example, regards successful entrepreneurs with suspicion, equating profit with exploitation. This has led to Rachel Reeve's decision to increase employers' NI contributions as well as to extend day-one employment rights for workers. These measures will result in reduced investment and slow growth, the very opposite of the government supposedly wants to achieve.. Anti-elitist ideology is also responsible for the unjust decision to impose VAT on private schools, a measure which will force parents of modest means to withdraw their children from efficient and much-loved schools even when adequate state provision is lacking. It is also behind the decision to impose unaffordable IHT bills on family farms, which will compel many asset-rich but income-poor farmers to sell up, jeopardising food production in this country.   

Steven Rose ● 651d18 Comments ● 650d

Palestinian terrorists release some female Israeli hostages

From BBC News.'Four female hostages who were held by Hamas in Gaza have returned to IsraelGunmen and crowds gathered in Palestine Square in Gaza City as the hostages were released to the Red Cross in a highly choreographed handoverThe four women - who are the second group of hostages released since a ceasefire deal was agreed - are Israeli soldiers who were taken on 7 OctoberIsrael is set to release 200 Palestinian prisoners in return, 70 of whom are expected to be deportedHowever, the Israeli government accused Hamas of breaching the ceasefire deal by not releasing civilian hostage Arbel YehudIn response, Israel said displaced Palestinians will not yet be allowed to return to northern Gaza, as had been scheduled under the dealMeanwhile, Hamas is expected to provide more information about the remaining 26 hostages due to be released in the coming weeks.Under the agreement, 50 prisoners are to be released for every Israeli soldier, and 30 prisoners are released for every Israeli civilian.During his press conference a little earlier, IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari expressed concern for the welfare of two children still held by Hamas.The youngest hostages still in Gaza are part of the Bibas family. They are brothers Kfir and Ariel, aged two and four respectively.Kfir was only ten months old when he was taken captive alongside his parents Sheri and Yarden.****Hamas said in December 2023 that Sheri and the boys had been killed'****.The BBC report shows a graphic picture of today's handover event with the identities of the brave boys of Hamas hidden behind masks and balaclava helmets and who are carrying automatic weapons.The women are smiling but who knows what the Palestinians subjected them to.Hamas claim this as a sign of victory, particularly the release of those of their members tried and convicted for terrorist offences in the past such as bombings of civilians in Israel.But I wonder what lies in store for them once Israel has all its captured citizens back. BTW was there a pro-Palestine/anti-Israel 'peace march in London today ?

John Hawkes ● 651d6 Comments ● 650d