Forum Topic

Another Bad Decision By Starmer

Mandelson was always a weird choice in my opinion. Donald Trump is considering rejecting Sir Keir Starmer’s nominee for UK ambassador to the US in what would be an extremely rare move.Sources within the Trump team have told The Independent that it is still not certain Peter Mandelson’s credentials will be accepted by Mr Trump after he becomes president.While the threat of rejecting Lord Mandelson could be sabre rattling, strains between the Labour government and the incoming administration are being blamed. However, there also are concerns about Lord Mandelson’s perceived links to China.Labour has told the Trump transition team that “it is a huge compliment” that Sir Keir wants to send such a senior Labour figure, but a source noted: “We are not buying that.”It was noted that Lord Mandelson did not attend the pre-inauguration party on Friday hosted by Nigel Farage in Washington DC, even though he had been invited in an effort to help build bridges with key members of the Trump team.The outgoing UK ambassador Dame Karen Pierce, who has impressed the transition team, was there.For an ambassadorial nominee to formally take up their role, the head of state of the country they have been sent to has to accept the “letters of credence”.In the UK this is done via the Court of St James’s where letters are presented to the King and in the US letters have to be presented to the president.One source said that strained relations with Mr Trump and the British government continue to be a problem which has “been made worse” by the nomination of Lord Mandelson.However, it is connections with China which are most alarming to the incoming Trump administration.“It is quite possible that Mandelson’s credentials could still be rejected,” a source said. “There are serious concerns about his links to China.”Lord Mandelson has been a strong advocate of close trading and other ties with China, even penning an article in 2018 warning that Mr Trump’s antipathy to China was “putting free trade at risk”.https://www.aol.co.uk/trump-considering-rejecting-lord-mandelson-162908190.html

Sue Hammond ● 113d50 Comments

It could get really ugly and it is hardly the norm in healthy democracies to use the law against your political enemies in the way Trump intends.  Russia does it, China obviously does it too and a few others such as Hungary, India etc are following suit.Here is Trump's current hit list:- former National Security Advisor John Bolton- Hillary Clinton- Joe Biden (of course)- Kamala Harris (of course)- former FBI Director Christopher Wray- former Republican Senator Liz Cheney, daughter of the former neocon Vice-President Dick Cheney- Democrat Senator Adam Schiff- former Special Counsel Jack Smith, who brought two of the federal criminal cases against Trump.There may be more.Mark Zaid, a Washington lawyer who represents several people who have been the target of Trump’s threats, said it would be “naïve and foolish not to take the explicit threats or even implicit taunts of retaliation by President Trump and his allies seriously.”He said: “He has promised that his second term will be one of fulfilled promises, and while every president breaks many, it is quite low-hanging fruit to take certain steps of retribution against perceived enemies.“That could include serious actions such as prosecution, but it could also be responses like revoking security clearances or terminating employment — acts that are already within the authority and power of the presidency, even without providing due process in some cases.”One lever available to Trump is ordering the  Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to audit his rivals: during the first Trump White House, former FBI Director James Comey was put through a brutal, forensic audit.Nonprofit journalism newsrooms that criticise the President-elect could have their charitable status revoked by the Treasury Department.... and so it goes on.And some believe this man will make the world a safer place.  I find that hard to believe but (a huge but) if he can get Russia to back off in Ukraine and allow that country to determine its own independent future, then I would be very happy to change my mind.

Jonathan Callaway ● 112d

The list of poor decisions by Labour under Starmer:1) giving the doctors and the train drivers inflationary pay deals2) withdrawing winter fuel allowance from millions of pensioners, many of whom will be unable to heat their homes this winter3)  forcing many parents on modest incomes to withdraw their children from private schools even when adequate state provision is lacking4) undermining family farms by imposing unaffordable inheritance tax bills5) raising employers’ NI contributions and thereby slowing growth6) handing the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, an ally of China, without consulting the islanders7) taxing the overseas incomes of non doms, many of whom are now moving to Italy where they will enhance Giorgia Meloni’s tax receipts7) appointing David Lammy as Foreign Secretary and Peter Mandelson as Ambassador, both of whom have insulted the President elect of Britain’s most important ally.These errors of judgment are largely the result of the ‘black hole’ ( to use the expression favoured by Rachel from Accounts) at the core of Labour’s thinking. Starmer no longer believes in socialism, which is why he has disavowed most of the left wing policies on which he stood in the leadership election.  And the same is true of the ministers he has chosen. Having little or or no idea of what they are for, they  define themselves in terms of what they are against. Their hates include the following:a) Trump (hence the foolishly undiplomatic language used by Lammy and Mandelson)b) the boss class (hence the hike in employers’ contributions)c) rich bastards (hence ending non dom status for foreigners and taxing farmers)d) aspirational parents (hence the imposition of VAT on private schools)e) colonialism (hence the decision to hand the Chagos Islands to Mauritius).

Steven Rose ● 113d