Forum Topics

ULEZ - report on Putney Society ULEZ meeting last night

The Putney Society meeting on the proposed ULEZ zone was very well attended with over 70 people coming along.  We had speakers from TfL, the Council and Dr Ian Mudway from the King's College air quality team who all fielded lively questioning and shed much light on an important issue which will affect many of us.TfL made it clear the key aim of the ULEZ zone is to drive down use of diesel vehicles over 4 years old.  Petrol vehicles up to c15 years old will probably be OK but it is easy to check on their website by keying in your vehicle reg:  https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ultra-low-emission-zone/ulez-vrm-checker.  The zone is planned to come in during 2021.The new ULEZ in the Congestion Charge zone only came in earlier this year but has already been very successful in reducing NO2 by 29% in 6 months - a remarkable achievement.TfL's aim is to deter users of non compliant vehicles - not ban them.  But diesel vans will be a problem and there is a much higher charge for non compliant HGVs. However TfL are offering some scrappage scheme support to micro businesses, charities and those on benefits to help them replace non compliant vehicles and/or switch to electric ones.Interestingly we learnt that overall traffic volumes in Wandsworth have fallen by c20% over 20 years (but we are only one of six out of 33 boroughs where this is the case).  Registered vehicles in the borough have fallen from 120,000 to 80,000 while our population has risen from c275,000 to c325,000 over the same period.  However this decline has tailed off more recently due to the growth in home delivery vehicles, Uber-type taxis etc.The Council is working with TfL on zone border issues eg side roads into the zone that can only exit back out of it (a good example is Smugglers Way where our recycling facilities are located).  They also need clarity on what happens when the Wandsworth one-way system is reconfigured - where will the ULEZ boundary end up?  The South Circular will be the border but not actually in the zone.  The Council is busy introducing more electric charging points for cars using converted lampposts.  Low emission cars will all be exempt from the ULEZ charge.Dr Ian Mudway gave a very sobering presentation on the pernicious effects of air pollution on all of us.  The health issues are undeniable especially reduced lung growth of young children in areas with high levels of air pollution.  Later improvements in air quality will not restore their lost lung capacity and this will store up problems for them in later life.  Adults and older people become more prone to strokes, heart problems, diabetes and dementia where they are exposed to poor air quality.  All these are later life problems and bring huge additional costs to the NHS - costs which are still not being adequately factored in when the costs of ULEZ or other mitigating initiatives are calculated. Traffic is the prime source of pollution and diesels are the worst offenders.  NO2 and NOX are the core of the problem but particulates are also dangerous. The current EU limit the UK adheres to (for now) is higher than the more stringent WHO limit.  Ian also mentioned the issue of super-fine particulates emitted mainly by aircraft.  There is no specific limit for these and high levels have been measured in and around airports.  They are potentially a worse problem than the emissions of road traffic generated by airports.  AN area where more research is needed. Copies of the presentations will be placed on the Putney Society website: http://www.putneysociety.org.uk/

Jonathan Callaway ● 2571d8 Comments ● 2568d

Lib Dem Fibs & How Remainers are voting in Putney

Am I the only one to be irked by the Liberal Democrat's highly misleading leaflets? After receiving five pieces of literature from the LDs over 2 months (with Pizza delivery and Windows advertisements also brazenly splashed inside), I am rather annoyed at their attempts to deliberately mislead the public. There are several highly misleading bar charts insinuating that Putney is a straight contest between the LDs and the Conservatives; this could not be further from the truth! Having looked at the small print; even if there was a great deal of tactical voting, the LDs would STILL not win in Putney.So, in the interests of busting some Lib Dem Fibs, here are some facts for you:- Going back to 1918, the Lib Dems have NEVER come second in Putney.- The last time there was a Lib Dem councillor in Wandsworth was in 1982 (they achieved 1 councillor and this was their best result for as long as records went back).- At the last election, the Conservatives and Labour achieved 44.1% and 40.8% of the vote respectively. The Liberal Democrats stopped Labour winning the seat, achieving only 11.6% of the vote.I am sorry to say this to the Liberal Democrats, but you are losing my respect by printing this nonsense about coming second and winning here. It would be much better for the LDs to spend their efforts in places like Richmond.As an avid Remainer, I will be voting Labour in the upcoming GE and I urge all likeminded individuals to get behind Fleur Anderson (The pro-remain, centrist Labour candidate).

Daniel Shearer ● 2568d14 Comments ● 2568d