Forum Topic

As I understand it there is a second report which will go into the details of the building modifications at Grenfell. It does seem a bit the wrong way around as far as Grenfell is concerned. However, given that buildings ther than Grenfell have also been modified with non fire containing materials I guess the fire service needs to look at modifying their procedures to cope with this appalling situation. Given the illicit modifications to Genfell I can't see how the fire brigade could necessarily be expected to deal with something that developed in a way they weren't prepared for. It's easy in hindsight to say they should have reacted differently: another time, another place perhaps someone might have realised what was happening but in that situation people will normally follow the process and procedures they're trained in because deviating from them causes problems and itself may lead to disciplinary action. (You might get me on a rant as to why in an emergency people with knowledge and experience are more important than junior procedure followers but I won't go there!) I feel very sorry for the fire service; ok, they perhaps could have done better and new procedures can be developed but it's not unreasonable to say with the information they had available on that night they would do the same, obviously knowing now the building had been illicitly modified they'd react differently. But that's the value of hindsight!Interesting that this coincides with the US Congress investigation into Boeing's 737 Max and the impossible position the pilots of those two aircraft were put into not knowing there was new software in the planes and not having any training in what it did, or how to counteract it.

Michael Ixer ● 2568d

Why is this taking so long?  How can there still be so many tall buildings that have still not had their cladding removed?How can 400 architects misread the Building Regulations?  OK that is presuming that there is one per building but even if one is responsible for more than one - it is a ridiculous number.I think there was also mention of missing fire cavity barriers.There appears also to be a problem with another type of cladding called HPL which I understand is a mixture of wood fibre and resin.  There seem to have been several fires in flats with this.  Why weren't our Building Regs updated?  How can they be 20 years old?  Issuing changes that are only required in NEW buildings is ridiculous.  We need to be asking more questions about what is and isn't going on.Yes, I think the Grenfell one was said to have been started by a Hotpoint fridge freezer.  The one in Hammersmith that MP Andy Slaughter was asking questions in the HoC about was an Indesit dryer.  Which? has been running a campaign for the backs of fridges to be metal rather than plastic. I understand this is because the plastic is very flammable and can allow a fire to travel. British Standards have now been changed but that is for NEW ones:https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/fridge-freezers/article/fridge-freezer-safetyI have also seen a fridge freezer re-installed in a fitted kitchen without the ventilation that is required by the manufacturer in the installation instructions.  Then when there was a water leak it was re-installed yet again without enough ventilation. With the Whirlpool ones many people may not realise that it is Whirlpool GROUP machines and that includes Creda, Hotpoint, Indesit and Proline dryers.  https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/uk/consumer-advice/consumer-rights/a27938889/whirlpool-recall-tumble-dryers/There has been a call for the identification marks on white goods to be on metal plates so that problematic machines can be properly identified.

Philippa Bond ● 2567d