Forum Topics

Reducing our reliance on cars

I know this has come up before, but it's worth raising again because cutting fossil fuel use is absolutely essential if we're ever to tackle global warming. Since the government has feebly passed the buck to local authorities on dealing with the closely linked issue of air pollution, we have to turn to our own borough, but its record is not strong. It has pressed for hybrid buses to be introduced in Putney, and that has had a definite effect (and anyway credit for that should go to TfL), though Putney High Street is still well over the legal limit for NO2, but otherwise its record is lacklustre.Now Robert Molteno of Wandsworth Living Streets has produced an interesting analysis (on which I've drawn: thank you, Robert) of the latest planned increases in parking charges in the borough - for example, increasing an annual resident's parking charge from £146 to £161, an increase running at twice the rate of inflation; the charge for a second car is only £35 more than for a resident's first car. This would have been a great opportunity to further improve air quality (by, for example, introduce higher Parking Permit charges for dirty diesels, to discourage car ownership or to raIse funds to build pedestrian and cycle-friendly infrastructure. What a missed opportunity!The paper does have a goal for reducing the number of cars owned in the borough - but the aimed reduction is only 9,218 by 2041. This is a decrease of only 11% over 27 years – or an average of 341 fewer cars (less than half a per cent of the total number) in our borough each year.So unless we can press the borough to attempt something stronger, it's down to all of us to act. One way is to walk and cycle more, thus reducing our car use. No doubt the usual suspects will complain about cycling on the pavement or people wearing lycra, but I hope this will be received more positively.One weak reason people use to argue against cycling (apart from the obvious one of the real danger from heedless - or worse - drivers, is the complaint that you can't take your shopping home on a bike. That is a particularly weak argument: for example, I've just brought home 10 kilos (22 lbs) of shopping in two panniers, and before someone says it's all right for me, I'm a youngster, I can assure you that I am very far from that.With effects of dirty air and global warming becoming ever more serious, it's past time we pressed our borough (and the government) to act, and also to act ourselves. We cannot go on as things are.

Richard Carter ● 2832d38 Comments ● 2810d

Anti-vaccination campaigns: a real threat

These campaigns (especially in the US but also here) against vaccination are increasingly prevalent and dangerous. They operate  on the spurious grounds that vaccination causes harm: Andrew Wakefield, who was responsible for the paper in The Lancet claiming that the MMR vaccine caused autism and who was struck off, now lives in the US and continues to plug his discredited line.It's shocking how many people are prepared to ignore the evidence and prevent their children from being vaccinated. Measles is a particularly unpleasant disease: the CDC in the US reports that "some people may suffer from severe complications, such as pneumonia (infection of the lungs) and encephalitis (swelling of the brain). They may need to be hospitalised and could die. As many as one out of every 20 children with measles gets pneumonia, the most common cause of death from measles in young children."  And yet we get idiots like one Hilary Bilkis, a massage therapist and “intuitive healer” in New Jersey, who has said that “My grandparents fled Europe to avoid being harassed, persecuted and murdered because they were of the Jewish faith,” complaining about the infringement of individual liberties, as if the Holocaust were remotely similar to the purported effects of vaccination.But don't imagine the threat is confined to the wilder reaches of the US: a BMJ editorial, writing about Wakefield's work, described it as an "elaborate fraud" that led to lower vaccination rates, putting hundreds of thousands of children at risk and diverting energy and money away from research into the true cause of autism.

Richard Carter ● 2815d9 Comments ● 2814d