Forum Topics

The most moral army in the world is creating a humanitarian city

You have to be cruel to be kind. That'll be it.Israel clearing new section of Rafahpublished at 14:07 7 July14:07 7 JulyBenedict GarmanBBC Verify senior journalistDemolition work is under way in one of the few areas in Rafah, southern Gaza, where most buildings were still standing.Satellite imagery reveals that dozens of buildings in the Saudi neighbourhood, a residential area in the city’s northwest, have been destroyed in recent days.Below is a side-by-side comparison of satellite pictures. The one on the right was taken on Saturday, with the left taken one month ago. The latest image shows rubble and dust where buildings once stood - highlighted by the white boxes.[Satellite image captured on 5 June compared to 5 July showing RafahImage source,Planet Labs PBC]These are likely to be demolitions rather than air strikes because this is an area held by the IDF for some time and in other areas where they have operational control there have frequently been videos showing controlled detonations.The pace and comprehensive nature of the destruction, as well as local, external reports, external of buildings in the neighbourhood being blown up tallies with this.The neighbourhood was built by the Saudi Rehousing Project - a partnership between the UN's Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA) and Saudi Arabia. The project's aim was to provide houses for people displaced as a result of previous conflict with Israel.It was only opened in 2015, external, and was home to around 10,000 people.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c98wejpp89pt?post=asset%3Ae370bb65-510e-4b45-b67d-0a7470534d18#postAnd today:-Israel’s Katz outlines plans for 'humanitarian city' on ruins of Rafahpublished at 10:2610:26Benedict GarmanBBC Verify senior journalistSatellite imagery showing how whole areas of Rafah has been demolishedImage source,Planet LabsIsrael's defence minister Israel Katz has described a plan he says is under way to establish a new 'humanitarian city' on the ruins of Rafah in the south of Gaza.The plan initially aims to accommodate 600,000 displaced Palestinians who are currently living in the al-Mawasi area on the Gazan coast. This is where Israeli forces have told people to go for “safety” throughout the war - though it has also been targeted by strikes more than 100 times.At least four more aid distribution sites - like the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation facilities already in operation - would be built under the Katz plan. We have already identified one new aid site under construction and can see that it has developed further in recent satellite imagery.Katz said development of this zone would happen during any potential ceasefire, assuming the current indirect ceasefire negotiations are successful. The ultimate aim would be to eventually move the entire Gazan population into the “city”.Satellite imagery, like the image above, captured on 4 July by Planet Labs, shows Rafah has been almost entirely reduced to rubble. Yesterday we reported on demolitions taking place in one of the last areas still standing.Demolitions continue elsewhere in Rafah too, with drone footage, external published on Sunday - we’ve screen-grabbed a key frame below - showing a building named as al-Shawka Girls' Secondary School in online maps being blown up in a controlled explosion.Screen grab of drone footage showing a building marked as girls' school on satellite mapping being demolishedImage source,Xhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c75rvk9pqn0tAnd the girls' school:-https://x.com/YinonMagal/status/1941831414019711113

David Ainsworth ● 274d1 Comments ● 273d

Nearly half of Israelis support army killing all Palestinians in Gaza, poll finds

Nearly half of Israelis support army killing all Palestinians in Gaza, poll finds24 May 2025An overwhelming majority of Israeli Jews support the transfer of Palestinians from Gaza, according to a poll by Pennsylvania State University.The survey, conducted in March and published by Haaretz newspaper on Thursday, found that 82 percent of Israeli Jews support the forced expulsion of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip.Meanwhile, 47 percent of Israeli Jews answered yes to the question: "Do you support the claim that the [Israeli army] in conquering an enemy city, should act in a manner similar to the way the Israelites did when they conquered Jericho under the leadership of Joshua, ie to kill all its inhabitants?" The reference is to the biblical account of the conquest of Jericho.Earlier this month, Israel launched the "Operation Gideon's Chariots" in the besieged strip, which, according to the Israeli news outlet Ynet, is intended to advance US President Donald Trump's plan to "clean out" Gaza.Ynet reported that during the operation, the Israeli army plans to push as many Palestinians as possible towards the Rafah area in the southern Gaza Strip, where food and aid will be delivered. The new military plan is also aimed at promoting the "voluntary emigration" of Palestinians, according to Ynet.The new plan has garnered support among the majority of the Israeli public, even though the Israeli army's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, warned that it would pose a danger to the lives of the Israeli captives in Gaza.According to a separate Channel 13 poll, 44 percent of the Israeli public supports the operation while 40 percent oppose it.The same poll showed that the Israeli public also supports the continuation of the full blockade that Israel has imposed on the Gaza Strip since the beginning of March. It found that 53 percent of the Israeli public think that Israel should not allow humanitarian aid into the enclave.Earlier this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that one of Israel's war goals is to implement Trump's proposed plan to expel the Palestinians from Gaza.At a press conference, Netanyahu said that he was willing to end the war but only "under clear conditions that will ensure the safety of Israel: all the hostages come home, Hamas lays down its arms, steps down from power, its leadership is exiled from the strip"."And we carry out the Trump plan - a plan that is so correct and so revolutionary," he added.Secular public supports expulsionAccording to the Penn State poll, support for the mass expulsion of Palestinians from the enclave was also found among 70 percent of the secular Jewish public, parts of which are considered liberal. Meanwhile, support among the Masortim (traditionalists), religious, and ultra-Orthodox communities exceeds 90 percent.The sweeping and cross-political and social support for the expulsion of Palestinians does not stop at the borders of the occupied Gaza Strip. According to the poll, 56 percent of Israeli Jews support the expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel from their land.While the highest levels of support for the move were recorded amongst the Masortim, religious, and ultra-Orthodox communities, exceeding 60 percent, there was also significant backing among the secular public. Thirty-eight percent of secular Israeli Jews support the expulsion of Palestinian citizens of Israel from the country, the poll reported.Commenting on the results survey, Shay Hazkani, a professor of history and Jewish studies at the University of Maryland, and Tamir Sorek, a professor in the history department at Penn State University, wrote: "There are those who see the shock and anxiety that befell the Israeli public in the wake of the events of October 7th as the only explanation for this radicalization."But the massacre only seems to have unleashed demons that have been nurtured over decades in the media and in the legal and educational systems."Throughout the war, Israeli media outlets have echoed calls for the expulsion and killing of Palestinians. Recently, Israeli human rights organisations submitted a request to the Supreme Court to open an investigation against Channel 14, seen as loyal to Netanyahu, on suspicion of "incitement to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity".The education system has also played a role in shaping extremist views among young Israelis. Hazkani and Sorek say that since the early 2000s, it has undergone a process of radicalisation.According to the poll, only 9 percent of Jewish men under the age of 40, representing most of the soldiers in regular and reserve duty, were fully opposed to the ideas of expulsion and transfer.Religious languageIt was only last March that the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed a petition filed by human rights organisations seeking to compel the government to allow humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip. In the ruling, one of the justices used religious language to justify the verdict.Since the beginning of the war, religious language has been widely used in Israel to describe the war in Gaza. One frequently invoked term is “Amalek” - referring to an ancient enemy of the Israelites, against whom Jewish tradition commands an all-out war.A week after the 7 October Hamas-led attack, Netanyahu urged ground troops preparing to enter Gaza to "remember what Amalek has done to you".Religious discourse in Israel, however, is not limited to the religious public. The poll found that 65 percent of the Jewish population believes there is a modern-day "Amalek". And of those, about 93 percent think the "mitzvah" , or commandment, to “wipe out the memory of Amalek” should still apply today."Zionism, in addition to being a national movement, is also a movement of immigrant-settlers, which seeks to push the local population out," wrote Hazkani and Sorek."The aspiration for absolute and permanent security can lead to an operative plan to eliminate the opposing population, and therefore every settlement project has the potential for ethnic cleansing and genocide."https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/majority-israelis-support-expulsion-palestinians-gaza-poll

David Ainsworth ● 274d11 Comments ● 274d

Glastonbury ~ Mr Vylan😡

Will he be arrested and charged and jailed for inciting violence like Lucy Connolly? Or will the Two-TierKeir justice system kick in? Rupert Lowe on FB this morning:“I heard you want your country back. Ha. Shut the f*** up” angrily yells Vylan, fresh from calling for “death to the IDF”, to a chanting crowd of white middle-class British liberals excitedly waving their foreign flags. All rather depressing, isn’t it?I note the intense border security at Glastonbury, which far outstrips that of Dover’s. Build bridges, not walls, they cry - apart from around their own filthy little sanctuary.How so very progressive of them, flying their Palestinian flags - they must all feel so very proud of themselves. Sipping their £8 iced lattes, posting on tiktok from the newest iphone. Really revolutionary stuff.A fatal blow struck against the capitalist system. Well done, everyone.All broadcast live on the BBC, our ‘national’ broadcaster. Fantastic work from them, as usual.None of this is Britain. Real Britain. Actual Britain. Decent Britain.Not the Britain built by generations of hardworking, patriotic British men and women.Who quite frankly, have had enough. I know I have.We will all be closely watching, as Lucy Connolly rots in jail, what action the police will take against this revolting man - the precedent has been set.So, yes Mr Vylan. You heard correctly, we do want our country back.But no. We will definitely not "shut the fuck up".Learn how to sing, take a shower and sod off.Watch the cretinous half-wit here:https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1APMABcqjF/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Sue Hammond ● 283d136 Comments ● 276d

Is a Glastonbury chant the real problem?

"On Sunday, the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire grilled Starmer’s health secretary, Wes Streeting, on remarks from the Israeli embassy in London condemning what it termed “the normalisation of extremist language” and the “glorification of violence” at Glastonbury.Unexpectedly, Streeting avoided jumping whole-heartedly on the media outrage band-wagon, led by the Mail on Sunday, whose front page demanded the arrest of the two band members for what the paper wrongly described as a chant demanding “Death to Israelis”. The Mail, apparently, believes that all Israelis, presumably including the country’s children, are currently serving in the Israeli military.There are four important points to make about the interview between Derbyshire and Streeting:1. The Israeli embassy in London, like the Israeli government it represents, has precisely no concerns about the “glorification of violence” when Israel is doing either the glorifying or the violence. Israel is currently celebrating its “success” in slaughtering and maiming hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza, including huge numbers of children; attacks by its soldiers and state-backed Jewish settler militias on Palestinian civilians in the West Bank; its eradication of whole communities in Lebanon; and its bombing of residential tower blocks across Tehran, killing many hundreds.Violence has been Israel’s signature policy for the past 21 months – and long before that. Israel has revelled in the carnage it has inflicted on populations across the region.In a post on social media, the Israeli embassy additionally argued of Bob Vylan’s chant: “When speech crosses into incitement, hatred, and advocacy of ethnic cleansing, it must be called out – especially when amplified by public figures on prominent platforms.”And yet public figures from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to British prime minister Keir Starmer have incited against the Palestinians, with Netanyahu comparing them to “Amalek”, a people the Israelites were commanded by God to exterminate, and Starmer terming the wholesale starvation of the people of Gaza “self-defence”.Israeli officials from Netanyahu down have advocated the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. And, even more seriously, Israel has not just threatened but repeatedly carried out the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians under its belligerent rule.2. It is beyond ridiculous for the BBC to echo the Israeli government in prioritising a harsh crackdown on words at Glastonbury "glorifying violence" towards Israeli soldiers ahead of the actual violence of genocide being committed by those Israel soldiers.The BBC has avoided criticising the Israeli government for its actual violence – its bombing and active starvation of Palestinian civilians – and the Starmer government for colluding in that violence, or what the International Court of Justice termed more than a year ago a “plausible” genocide by Israel.As a recent report by the Centre for Media Monitoring confirmed, the BBC has dramatically skewed its language to present Israel, the aggressor, in a more favourable light than the victim, the Palestinians of Gaza. The BBC’s own whistleblowing journalists have warned that the state broadcaster has all but banned the use of the word “genocide”, even by experts on the matter.By arming Israel, by organising spy flights over Gaza from RAF base Akrotiri on Cyprus, and by providing diplomatic cover, Starmer has effectively glorified Israel’s slaughter of Palestinian children in the enclave. Bob Vylan’s chants of “Death to the IDF” have a far more dangerous counterpart in Starmer’s recital of Israel’s “right to defend itself” when that “defence” involves Israel mercilessly starving Gaza’s population of food, water and power.Bob Vylan are a punk band; Starmer is the British prime minister, the man who directs Britain’s foreign policy and directs its army.No one, least of all the BBC, has held Israeli or British officials accountable not just for glorifying violence but for actually carrying it out on an industrial scale for nearly two years.But the BBC is suddenly interested in holding to account two punk musicians for leading a chant – one that made a symbolic, hypothetical threat of violence – against an Israeli military carrying out the ultimate form of violence, an actual genocide. In a serious media, Israel’s supposed “concerns” about the glorification of violence and extremist language would be laughed off the stage rather than respectfully aired.3. Wes Streeting is being congratulated and condemned in equal measure on social media for refusing to be drawn into the Mail and BBC’s confected outrage. “I’d say to the Israeli embassy, get your own house in order,” he responded to Derbyshire. But hang on a minute. Streeting’s resistance to Derbyshire’s line of questioning was perhaps unexpected. But it also, let us not forget, serves the interests of both the Starmer and Israeli governments.Streeting’s insistence that Israel “get its house in order” had, as he made clear, nothing to do with its 21-month slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza. Starmer is still defining the Gaza genocide as Israel’s supposed “right to defend itself”. In responding to Derbyshire, Streeting expressed concern only at what he called violent “settler attacks” in the West Bank. He said the Israeli embassy needed to “get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank”.This was intended purely as deflection, designed to serve Starmer and Israel, the West’s key client state in the oil-rich Middle East. It benefits the UK government to make an issue of West Bank settler attacks – and present them as disorganised, random violence by individual extremists that the Israeli government is not responsible for but needs to get a firmer grip on.By highlighting problems in the West Bank, the Starmer government can avoid addressing the genocide in Gaza and the Israeli state’s clear responsibility for that genocide. Which is precisely why in recent weeks Britain has made so much noise about imposing feeble penalties on a handful of extremist settlers and two fascist ministers in Benjamin Netanyahu’s government that represent those settlers.Starmer and Streeting’s prioritising of Israel’s West Bank violence over Israel’s Gaza violence is a switch and bait twice over.Most of the violence in the West Bank is not coming from settler extremists, even though they are the ones being punished by the UK. It is coming from the Israeli military, which has bulldozed thousands of homes there over the past year, driving 40,000 Palestinians off their lands.Further, settler violence is not random. It is coordinated with Israeli field commanders, many of them settlers themselves, to uproot Palestinians so that Israel can move in Jewish settlers to colonise the land – or, in the words of successive Israeli governments, “Judaise” it.None of this is new either. Israel has engineered and imposed a violent, apartheid system on Palestinians for decades to make life unbearable and encourage them to leave their homeland.Second, Glastonbury’s anger-fuelled chant against the IDF was not primarily motivated by Israel’s violent actions in the West Bank. It was against the Israeli military for committing a genocide in Gaza, which the British government has been supporting. Streeting’s aim was to drag the debate on to safer territory for him and Starmer: that Britain needs to deal not with a genocide in Gaza but with a handful of violent loons in the West Bank.Even in criticising the Israeli government for not doing enough to tackle settler violence, Streeting is still operating within the confines of a public discourse dictated by Israel, which prefers any criticism to be directed at individuals not at the Israeli state behind those individuals.4. The BBC, the Starmer government and the Israel lobby are all delighted to play their part in this game of deflection and deception because these kinds of moral panics obscure the real issue: that all these parties are actively colluding in Israel's genocide in Gaza. While the media and government can now have a long backwards and forwards about whether criticism of Israel's genocidal army needs to be defined in law as a criminal offence or "terrorism", Israel will get a free pass to continue with the real terrorism: a genocide in Gaza.Famously, the black civil rights fighter Malcolm X observed of the role of the media: “They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. … If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.” Sixty years on, nothing has changed."https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/is-a-glastonbury-chant-the-real-problem

David Ainsworth ● 277d0 Comments ● 277d

Not Israel's fault - it is Netanyahu's

Times of Israel, 5th June 2025“Netanyahu confirms move: 'It saves lives of IDF soldiers'Israel providing guns to Gaza gang to bolster opposition to HamasSecurity cabinet wasn’t informed of plan to start arming Abu Shabab group, which was created in Rafah last year and has its roots in looting aid trucksBy Emanuel FabianIsrael has been arming a criminal gang in the Gaza Strip as part of an effort to strengthen opposition to Hamas in the enclave, defense sources confirmed on Thursday following remarks on the matter by former defense minister Avigdor Liberman.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later confirmed the report, saying the move helped save Israeli soldiers’ lives.Liberman, who heads the opposition Yisrael Beytenu party, told the Kan public broadcaster on Thursday morning that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had unilaterally approved the transfer of weapons to the Abu Shabab clan, an armed gang or militia that is opposed to Hamas’s rule in the Gaza Strip.“The Israeli government is giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons, identified with Islamic State, at the direction of the prime minister,” Liberman charged. “To my knowledge, this did not go through approval by the cabinet.”He claimed that Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar was aware of the decision to arm the group, “but I don’t know how much the IDF chief of staff was in on it.”The group in question, which is sometimes described as a militia and sometimes as a criminal gang, is led by Yasser Abu Shabab, a member of a large clan in southern Gaza. It has been linked in the past to smuggling operations with Egyptian Jihadist groups, but it was not immediately clear why Liberman branded it as linked to the Islamic State.His gang has been documented in recent days operating in an area near the Kerem Shalom border crossing under Israeli military control.In the footage, which was published online by Abu Shabab, members of the group can be seen wearing military-style uniforms with the Palestinian flag and the words “Counter-Terrorism Mechanism” emblazoned on them.The Prime Minister’s Office, in response to Liberman’s comments, did not deny the allegations but said instead that Israel was “working to defeat Hamas through various means, based on the recommendations of all the heads of the security establishment.”In a later statement, Netanyahu confirmed the move.In the latest installment in a series of short interviews with advisor Topaz Luk his office has posted in recent weeks, Netanyahu said that “in consultation with security officials, we made use of clans in Gaza that are opposed to Hamas.”“What’s wrong with that?” he continued. “It’s only good. It saves lives of IDF soldiers.”“It’s extremely serious,” Netanyahu said of Liberman revealing the move and predicting that it won’t be investigated. “Publicizing it only does good for Hamas.Liberman’s accusation was later confirmed by defense officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity, and the details were cleared for publication by the Israeli military censor.The sources confirmed that Israel has been arming the gang with Kalashnikov rifles, including some that were seized from Hamas during the ongoing war.The decision to start arming the group was made without the approval of Israel’s security cabinet, forgoing normal procedure. It was instead led by Israeli security bodies, with Netanyahu’s approval, the defense sources said.The militia has been operating in Rafah, in an area under Israeli military control. Abu Shabab has claimed to be securing the humanitarian aid convoys entering Israel through the southern border crossings, although others have accused his gang of looting them.Targeted by HamasThe clan has caught Hamas’s attention. Hamas published an official video on May 30 showing a group of armed, masked men operating outside a building before being blown up.The terror group claimed the group in the video was working with the IDF to inspect buildings before Israeli troops moved in, without specifying whether they were Israeli or Palestinian. However, online comparisons to previous images of Abu Shabab’s gang suggested it was the same group.In a conversation with Lebanon’s Al-Akhbar newspaper earlier this week, anonymous Hamas sources shared more information about the group, which they admitted has been a thorn in their side.According to the sources, the militia comprises some 300 people, of whom Abu Shabab personally recruited around 50. They alleged that the remaining 250 members were recruited through the Palestinian Authority’s intelligence service.The Hamas sources did not offer proof of Abu Shabab’s alleged ties to the Ramallah-based PA, and Al-Akhbar did not verify any of the terror group’s claims.The group emerged in Rafah in May 2024, following the IDF invasion of the Strip’s southernmost city, the Hamas sources said. They told Al-Akhbar that the Al-Qassam Brigades have “already started carrying out direct assassinations” against members of Abu Shabab’s gang, and that its continued existence has fast become a “central issue” for the terror group.According to the sources, some members of the group belong to an extremist Salafi faction that had run-ins with Hamas prior to the war as well.This is not the first time that Netanyahu has been involved in or accused of propping up burgeoning militias and terror groups to undermine a common enemy.Various reports over the years have indicated that Israel’s policy under Netanyahu was to treat Hamas as an asset that could be used to weaken the Palestinian Authority.The premier reportedly told a Likud faction meeting back in 2019 that anyone who opposed the establishment of a Palestinian state should support sending funds to Hamas, the enemy of the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority.Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich made a similar claim in an interview in 2015.Amid the outrage generated by Liberman’s revelation on Thursday, the left-wing The Democrats leader Yair Golan pointed out the pattern of behavior.“Netanyahu, who transferred billions to Hamas in suitcases full of cash, based on the incorrect belief that Hamas is an ‘asset,’ is now promoting a new dangerous concept: Arming a Gazan militia with ties to ISIS,” the politician wrote on X.“Netanyahu is dangerous to Israel’s security,” he charged. “This is not a mistake. This is systematic. Netanyahu is selling Israel’s security for another day in office.””

David Ainsworth ● 281d24 Comments ● 279d

Testaments of Youth

I genuinely wonder which of the following is most representative of British 'youth' today. 1) "Police review footage of chants led by Glastonbury acts"'The government has "strongly condemned" chants from Bob Vylan who called for "death" to the Israeli military during their performance which was broadcast live on the BBC.Rapper Bobby Vylan led chants of "free, free Palestine" and "death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]".Vylan is part of a black rap group and a good example of the racism that many blacks, especially 'rappers', show towards Jews.Though born in the UK Vylan claims to be 'very much influenced by his  Jamaican genres as a tribute to Bobby's Jamaican heritage'.Will he be charged with inciting racial hatred or incitement to violence ?Don't hold your breath.Blacks can't commit racism only whites.It's "'cos of slavery man".The crowd, who had paid £375 for a ticket, loved him.But to their credit and my surprise the Glastonbury organisers put out a statement -  "Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence."But what does it say about the type of society we are becoming.2) Meanwhile England win the the UEFA under-21 Championship Final 3-2 beating Germany (YEEEEES!)A wonderful and joyous occasion where a multi-racial team of true British working class lads put their hearts and souls into the game on behalf of their country, their teammates and their watching families. And ex-FFC local boy Harvey Elliott was made 'Man of the Tournament' and in his post match interview had nothing to say about Palestine !

John Hawkes ● 283d2 Comments ● 281d

Sudan - ‘world’s largest humanitarian crisis’

The vast majority of media comment from the BBC to the left-wing press such as the Guardian and even posts on this humble Forum has raged about and denounced what are claimed to be 'humanitarian atrocities' - military actions, civilian deaths etc, carried out by Israel in its war with the Palestinians.Posters on this Forum have stated their positions as to whether they believe Israel is perpetrating such, and if so whether in a time of war some explanation, if not the condoning of them, is possible.However what the continual focus on and denouncing of Israel's behaviour has done, perhaps deliberately, is to turn attention away from what is happening in other parts of the world and what atrocities Islamist Arabs are perpetrating on a far, far more massive scale against non-Arabs in Africa.Even the Guardian and the UN is beginning to take notice and show concern, diverting its attention from Gaza.Today's Guardian."NGOs and UN say country is ‘worse off than ever before’ with wide-scale displacement, hunger and attacks on refugee camps". 'Sudan is suffering from the largest humanitarian crisis globally and its civilians are continuing to pay the price for inaction by the international community, NGOs and the UN have said, as the country’s civil war enters its third year.The UK is hosting ministers from 20 countries in London on Tuesday in an attempt to restart stalled peace talks. However, diplomatic efforts have often been sidelined by other crises, including the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.Two years to the day since fighting erupted in Khartoum between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary (ISLAMIST - my comment) Rapid Support Forces, hundreds of people were feared to have died in RSF attacks on refugee camps in the western Darfur region in the latest apparent atrocity of a war marked by its brutality and wide-scale humanitarian impact.The consequences for Sudan’s 51 million people have been devastating. Tens of thousands are reportedly dead. Hundreds of thousands face famine. Almost 13 million people have been displaced, 4 million of those to neighbouring countries.“Sudan is now worse off than ever before,” said Elise Nalbandian, Oxfam’s regional advocacy manager. “The largest humanitarian crisis, largest displacement crisis, largest hunger crisis … It’s breaking all sorts of wrong records.”There were “massive-scale” violations of international humanitarian law in the conflict, said Daniel O’Malley, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in Sudan. “All of the civilian population, irrespective of where they are in the country, have basically been trapped between one, two or more parties. And they have been bearing the brunt of everything. The sheer numbers are just mind-boggling.”It is also claimed that as a fall out from this intra-Islamic civil war is that Christians are also being persecuted. In January of this year the US formally declared that the RSF had committed genocide, marking the second time in less than 30 years that genocide had been perpetrated in Sudan.The United Arab Emirates has been accused of fuelling the conflict by arming the RSF. Emirati passports allegedly found on the battlefield last year point to potential covert boots on the ground.All of this does not make for pleasant writing or reading and of course any claims of genocide should not be ranked in order of wickedness.However it does put the claims made against Israel into some form of perspective.

John Hawkes ● 358d24 Comments ● 285d

Happy deluded Daniel Hannan day!!

Was anybody more wrong about something than Lord Hannan? https://www.reaction.life/p/britain-looks-like-brexitIt’s 24 June, 2025, and Britain is marking its annual Independence Day celebration. As the fireworks stream through the summer sky, still not quite dark, we wonder why it took us so long to leave. The years that followed the 2016 referendum didn’t just reinvigorate our economy, our democracy and our liberty. They improved relations with our neighbours.The United Kingdom is now the region’s foremost knowledge-based economy. We lead the world in biotech, law, education, the audio-visual sector, financial services and software. New industries, from 3D printing to driverless cars, have sprung up around the country. Older industries, too, have revived as energy prices have fallen back to global levels: steel, cement, paper, plastics and ceramics producers have become competitive again.The EU, meanwhile, continues to turn inwards, clinging to its dream of political amalgamation as the euro and migration crises worsen. Its population is ageing, its share of world GDP shrinking and its peoples protesting. “We have the most comprehensive workers’ rights in the world”, complains Jean-Claude Juncker, who has recently begun in his second term as President of the European Federation, “but we have fewer and fewer workers”.The last thing most EU leaders wanted, once the shock had worn off, was a protracted argument with the United Kingdom which, on the day it left, became their single biggest market. Terms were agreed easily enough. Britain withdrew from the EU’s political structures and institutions, but kept its tariff-free arrangements in place. The rights of EU nationals living in the UK were confirmed, and various reciprocal deals on healthcare and the like remained. For the sake of administrative convenience, Brexit took effect formally on 1 July 2019, to coincide with the mandates of a new European Parliament and Commission.That day marked, not a sudden departure, but the beginning of a gradual reorientation. As the leader of the Remain campaign, Lord Rose, had put it during the referendum campaign, “It’s not going to be a step change, it’s going to be a gentle process.” He was spot on.In many areas, whether because of economies of scale or because rules were largely set at global level, the UK and the EU continued to adopt the same technical standards. But, from 2019, Britain could begin to disapply those regulations where the cost of compliance outweighed any benefits.The EU’s Clinical Trials Directive, for example, had wiped out a great deal of medical research in Britain. Outside it, we again lead the world. Opting out of the EU’s data protection rules has turned Hoxton into the software capital of the world. Britain is no longer hampered by Brussels restrictions on sales, promotions and e-commerce.Other EU regulations, often little known, had caused enormous damage. The REACH Directive, limiting the import of chemical products, had imposed huge costs on manufacturers. The bans on vitamin supplements and herbal remedies had closed down many health shops. London’s art market had been brutalised by EU rules on VAT and retrospective taxation. All these sectors have revived.Financial services are booming – not only in London, but in Birmingham, Leeds and Edinburgh too. Eurocrats had never much liked the City, which they regarded as parasitical. Before Brexit, they targeted London with regulations that were not simply harmful but, in some cases, downright malicious: the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, the ban on short selling, the Financial Transactions Tax, the restrictions on insurance. After Britain left, the EU’s regulations became even more heavy-handed, driving more exiles from Paris, Frankfurt and Milan. No other European city could hope to compete: their high rates of personal and corporate taxation, restrictive employment practices and lack of support services left London unchallenged.Other cities, too, have boomed, not least Liverpool and Glasgow, which had found themselves on the wrong side of the country when the EEC’s Common External Tariff was phased in in the 1970s. In 2016, the viability of our commercial ports was threatened by the EU’s Ports Services Directive, one of many proposed rules that was being held back so as not to boost the Leave vote. Now, the UK has again become a centre for world shipping.Shale oil and gas came on tap, almost providentially, just as the North Sea reserves were depleting, with most of the infrastructure already in place. Outside the EU, we have been able to augment this bonanza by buying cheap Chinese solar panels. In consequence, our fuel bills have tumbled, boosting productivity, increasing household incomes and stimulating the entire economy.During the first 12 months after the vote, Britain confirmed with the various countries that have trade deals with the EU that the same deals would continue. It also used that time to agree much more liberal terms with those states which had run up against EU protectionism, including India, China and Australia. These new treaties came into effect shortly after independence. Britain, like the EFTA countries, now combines global free trade with full participation in EU markets.Our universities are flourishing, taking the world’s brightest students and, where appropriate, charging accordingly. Their revenues, in consequence, are rising, while they continue to collaborate with research centres in Europe and around the world.The number of student visas granted each year is decided by MPs who, now that they no longer need to worry about unlimited EU migration, can afford to take a long-term view. Parliament sets the number of work permits, the number of refugee places and the terms of family reunification. A points-based immigration system invites the world’s top talent; and the consequent sense of having had to win a place competitively means that new settlers arrive with commensurate pride and patriotism.Unsurprisingly, several other European countries have opted to copy Britain’s deal with the EU, based as it is upon a common market rather than a common government. Some of these countries were drawn from EFTA (Norway, Switzerland and Iceland are all bringing their arrangements into line with ours). Some came from further afield (Serbia, Turkey, Ukraine). Some followed us out of the EU (Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands).The United Kingdom now leads a 22-state bloc that forms a free trade area with the EU, but remains outside its political structures. For their part, the EU 24 have continued to push ahead with economic, military and political amalgamation. They now have a common police force and army, a pan-European income tax and a harmonised system of social security. These developments have prompted referendums in three other EU states on whether to copy Britain.Perhaps the greatest benefit, though, is not easy to quantify. Britain has recovered its self-belief. As we left the EU, we straightened our backs, looked about us, and realised that we were still a nation to be reckoned with: the world’s fifth economy and fourth military power, one of five members on the UN Security Council and a leading member of the G7 and the Commonwealth. We recalled, too, that we were the world’s leading exporter of soft power; that our language was the most widely studied on Earth; that we were linked by kinship and migration to every continent and archipelago. We saw that there were great opportunities across the oceans, beyond the enervated eurozone. We knew that our song had not yet been sung.

Michael Brigo ● 288d6 Comments ● 287d

Should we bomb ourselves?

Google was asked a question:-"which countries supplied israel with nuclear material""AI OverviewSeveral countries are known to have supplied Israel with materials or expertise that contributed to its nuclear weapons program. These include France, which provided a reactor and assistance in building a reprocessing plant, and the UK, which secretly supplied heavy water. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting the US also played a role, potentially through the illegal transfer of enriched uranium. Here's a more detailed breakdown:France:France was a key partner in the early stages of Israel's nuclear program, providing a reactor and training for Israeli scientists and engineers. There was even a secret agreement to cooperate on nuclear weapons, though this was later scrapped under U.S. pressure. United Kingdom:Britain secretly sold Israel 20 tons of heavy water, which is crucial for producing plutonium for nuclear weapons. This deal was concealed from the US. United States:While the US officially opposed nuclear proliferation, evidence suggests some US-made materials may have been acquired by Israel, potentially through a company called NUMEC, which handled nuclear materials. There are also reports of uranium being stolen from the US. Other countries:While not directly supplying materials, some countries, like Norway, were involved in facilitating the transfer of heavy water from the UK to Israel.AI responses may include mistakes."---------------------------"Hans, are we the baddies?"

David Ainsworth ● 293d2 Comments ● 293d

Another Screeching U-Turn By Hapless Starmer

Yvette Cooper made an 'unequivocal' apology to grooming gang victims today as a 'damning' report accused institutions of 'dodging' questions about the ethnicity of offenders.In a moment of shame for UK authorities, the Home Secretary finally triggered a national inquiry into the sexual abuse of underage girls, admitting those who suffered 'despicable crimes' had been 'let down'.  Ms Cooper said a national inquiry will be set up oversee local investigations - something Keir Starmer had been rejecting until his humiliating U-turn at the weekend.  The PM made a dramatic volte face at the weekend after reading the report. He previously suggested those calling for a national probe into the rape and sexual abuse of thousands of girls by gangs of mainly Pakistani-heritage men were 'jumping on the bandwagon' of the 'far-Right'.  Starmer must now publicly apologise to all the victims that he has ignored for so long; and to Nigel Farage, Rupert Lowe and Kemi Badenoch who have all put sustained pressure on him for months to do the right thing.  But of course he won't and it is interesting that his volte face occurred at the weekend when he was out of the country and did not have to face the media scrutiny. One of the rape-gangs most vocal victims Sammy Woodhouse, has written a bestselling book about her ordeal and I thoroughly recommend it if you want to know the raw truth.  I hope this national inquiry will expose all the cover-ups that have been perpetrated by the all the local authorities, social services and children's homes involved, the police and by Starmer himself who I believe tried to bury the scandal so as not to antagonise Labour's Muslim voters.  There were 364 Labour MPs who toed the party line and were also complicit in the cover-up, and guess who is one of them ...  There were 364 Labour MPs who toed the party line and were also complicit in the cover-up, and guess who is one of them ...  The list of shameThese are the 364 cowardly MPs who voted against a national inquiry into child sexual exploitation and Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs.They deserve to be named and shamed.Never forget their betrayal.Jack Abbott (Labour)Debbie Abrahams (Labour)Shockat Adam (Independent)Zubir Ahmed (Labour)Luke Akehurst (Labour)Sadik Al-Hassan (Labour)Bayo Alaba (Labour)Dan Aldridge (Labour)Heidi Alexander (Labour)Douglas Alexander (Labour)Rushanara Ali (Labour)Tahir Ali (Labour)Rosena Allin-Khan (Labour)Mike Amesbury (Independent)Callum Anderson (Labour)Fleur Anderson (Labour)😡Tonia Antoniazzi (Labour)Scott Arthur (Labour)Jess Asato (Labour)James Asser (Labour)Jas Athwal (Labour)Catherine Atkinson (Labour)Lewis Atkinson (Labour)Calvin Bailey (Labour)Olivia Bailey (Labour)David Baines (Labour)Alex Baker (Labour)Richard Baker (Labour)Alex Ballinger (Labour)Antonia Bance (Labour)Lee Barron (Labour)Alex Barros-Curtis (Labour)Johanna Baxter (Labour)Danny Beales (Labour)Lorraine Beavers (Labour)Apsana Begum (Independent)Torsten Bell (Labour)Hilary Benn (Labour)Siân Berry (Green Party)Clive Betts (Labour)Polly Billington (Labour)Matt Bishop (Labour)Olivia Blake (Labour)Rachel Blake (Labour)Chris Bloore (Labour)Elsie Blundell (Labour)Kevin Bonavia (Labour)Jade Botterill (Labour)Sureena Brackenridge (Labour)Jonathan Brash (Labour)Phil Brickell (Labour)Chris Bryant (Labour)Julia Buckley (Labour)Richard Burgon (Independent)Maureen Burke (Labour )David Burton-Sampson (Labour)Dawn Butler (Labour)Ruth Cadbury (Labour)Nesil Caliskan (Labour)Markus Campbell-Savours (Labour)Irene Campbell (Labour)Juliet Campbell (Labour)Alan Campbell (Labour)Sam Carling (Labour)Sarah Champion (Labour)Bambos Charalambous (Labour)Luke Charters (Labour)Ellie Chowns (Green Party)Feryal Clark (Labour)Ben Coleman (Labour)Jacob Collier (Labour)Lizzi Collinge (Labour)Tom Collins (Labour)Liam Conlon (Labour)Sarah Coombes (Labour)Andrew Cooper (Labour)Beccy Cooper (Labour)Yvette Cooper (Labour)Jeremy Corbyn (Independent)Deirdre Costigan (Labour)Pam Cox (Labour)Neil Coyle (Labour)Jen Craft (Labour)Stella Creasy (Labour)Torcuil Crichton (Labour)Chris Curtis (Labour)Janet Daby (Labour)Nicholas Dakin (Labour)Ashley Dalton (Labour)Emily Darlington (Labour)Alex Davies-Jones (Labour)Jonathan Davies (Labour)Paul Davies (Labour)Marsha De Cordova (Labour)Josh Dean (Labour)Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)Jim Dickson (Labour)Anna Dixon (Labour)Samantha Dixon (Labour)Anneliese Dodds (Labour)Helena Dollimore (Labour)Stephen Doughty (Labour)Peter Dowd (Labour)Graeme Downie (Labour)Rosie Duffield (Independent)Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour)Angela Eagle (Labour)Maria Eagle (Labour)Lauren Edwards (Labour)Sarah Edwards (Labour)Clive Efford (Labour)Damien Egan (Labour)Maya Ellis (Labour)Chris Elmore (Labour)Kirith Entwistle (Labour)Florence Eshalomi (Labour)Bill Esterson (Labour)Chris Evans (Labour)Linsey Farnsworth (Labour)Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)Mark Ferguson (Labour)Patricia Ferguson (Labour)Natalie Fleet (Labour)Emma Foody (Labour)Catherine Fookes (Labour)Vicky Foxcroft (Labour)Daniel Francis (Labour)James Frith (Labour)Gill Furniss (Labour)Barry Gardiner (Labour)Allison Gardner (Labour)Anna Gelderd (Labour)Gill German (Labour)Tracy Gilbert (Labour)Becky Gittins (Labour)Mary Glindon (Labour)Ben Goldsborough (Labour)Jodie Gosling (Labour)Georgia Gould (Labour)John Grady (Labour)Lilian Greenwood (Labour)Nia Griffith (Labour)Andrew Gwynne (Labour)Amanda Hack (Labour)Paulette Hamilton (Labour)Emma Hardy (Labour)Carolyn Harris (Labour)Helen Hayes (Labour)Tom Hayes (Labour)Claire Hazelgrove (Labour)Mark Hendrick (Labour)Meg Hillier (Labour)Chris Hinchliff (Labour)Sharon Hodgson (Labour)Rachel Hopkins (Labour)Claire Hughes (Labour)Alison Hume (Labour)Patrick Hurley (Labour)Imran Hussain (Independent)Leigh Ingham (Labour)Natasha Irons (Labour)Sally Jameson (Labour)Dan Jarvis (Labour)Terry Jermy (Labour)Adam Jogee (Labour)Diana Johnson (Labour)Darren Jones (Labour)Gerald Jones (Labour)Lillian Jones (Labour)Louise Jones (Labour)Ruth Jones (Labour)Sarah Jones (Labour)Gurinder Singh Josan (Labour)Sojan Joseph (Labour)Warinder Juss (Labour)Chris Kane (Labour)Mike Kane (Labour)Satvir Kaur (Labour)Liz Kendall (Labour)Afzal Khan (Labour)Naushabah Khan (Labour)Stephen Kinnock (Labour)Jayne Kirkham (Labour)Gen Kitchen (Labour)Sonia Kumar (Labour)Uma Kumaran (Labour)Peter Kyle (Labour)Laura Kyrke-Smith (Labour)Peter Lamb (Labour)Ian Lavery (Labour)Noah Law (Labour)Kim Leadbeater (Labour)Brian Leishman (Labour)Emma Lewell-Buck (Labour)Andrew Lewin (Labour)Clive Lewis (Labour)Simon Lightwood (Labour)Rebecca Long Bailey (Independent)Josh MacAlister (Labour)Alice Macdonald (Labour)Andy MacNae (Labour)Justin Madders (Labour)Shabana Mahmood (Labour)Seema Malhotra (Labour)Amanda Martin (Labour)Rachael Maskell (Labour)Keir Mather (Labour)Alex Mayer (Labour)Douglas McAllister (Labour)Kerry McCarthy (Labour)Martin McCluskey (Labour)Andy McDonald (Labour)Chris McDonald (Labour)John McDonnell (Independent)Blair McDougall (Labour)Lola McEvoy (Labour)Pat McFadden (Labour)Alison McGovern (Labour)Alex McIntyre (Labour)Gordon McKee (Labour)Kevin McKenna (Labour)Catherine McKinnell (Labour)Jim McMahon (Labour)Anna McMorrin (Labour)Frank McNally (Labour)Kirsty McNeill (Labour)Anneliese Midgley (Labour)Julie Minns (Labour)Navendu Mishra (Labour)Abtisam Mohamed (Labour)Iqbal Mohamed (Independent)Perran Moon (Labour)Jessica Morden (Labour)Stephen Morgan (Labour)Grahame Morris (Labour)Joe Morris (Labour)Luke Murphy (Labour)Chris Murray (Labour)Ian Murray (Labour)James Murray (Labour)Katrina Murray (Labour)Luke Myer (Labour)James Naish (Labour)Connor Naismith (Labour)Lisa Nandy (Labour)Kanishka Narayan (Labour)Josh Newbury (Labour)Samantha Niblett (Labour)Charlotte Nichols (Labour)Melanie Onn (Labour)Chi Onwurah (Labour)Simon Opher (Labour)Abena Oppong-Asare (Labour)Kate Osamor (Labour)Kate Osborne (Labour)Tristan Osborne (Labour)Sarah Owen (Labour)Darren Paffey (Labour)Andrew Pakes (Labour)Matthew Patrick (Labour)Michael Payne (Labour)Stephanie Peacock (Labour)Jon Pearce (Labour)Matthew Pennycook (Labour)Toby Perkins (Labour)Jess Phillips (Labour)Bridget Phillipson (Labour)David Pinto-Duschinsky (Labour)Lee Pitcher (Labour)Jo Platt (Labour)Luke Pollard (Labour)Joe Powell (Labour)Lucy Powell (Labour)Gregor Poynton (Labour)Peter Prinsley (Labour)Richard Quigley (Labour)Steve Race (Labour)Connor Rand (Labour)Andrew Ranger (Labour)Mike Reader (Labour)Ellie Reeves (Labour)Joani Reid (Labour)Emma Reynolds (Labour)Martin Rhodes (Labour)Jake Richards (Labour)Jenny Riddell-Carpenter (Labour)Dave Robertson (Labour)Tim Roca (Labour)Matt Rodda (Labour)Sam Rushworth (Labour)Sarah Russell (Labour)Oliver Ryan (Labour)Jeevun Sandher (Labour)Michelle Scrogham (Labour)Mark Sewards (Labour)Naz Shah (Labour)Tulip Siddiq (Labour)Josh Simons (Labour)Andy Slaughter (Labour)John Slinger (Labour)Cat Smith (Labour)David Smith (Labour)Jeff Smith (Labour)Nick Smith (Labour)Sarah Smith (Labour)Karin Smyth (Labour)Gareth Snell (Labour)Alex Sobel (Labour)Euan Stainbank (Labour)Jo Stevens (Labour)Kenneth Stevenson (Labour)Elaine Stewart (Labour)Will Stone (Labour)Alistair Strathern (Labour)Alan Strickland (Labour)Lauren Sullivan (Labour)Kirsteen Sullivan (Labour)Peter Swallow (Labour)Mark Tami (Labour)Mike Tapp (Labour)David Taylor (Labour)Rachel Taylor (Labour)Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)Fred Thomas (Labour) (Proxy vote cast by Chris Elmore)Gareth Thomas (Labour)Adam Thompson (Labour)Emily Thornberry (Labour)Marie Tidball (Labour)Stephen Timms (Labour)Jessica Toale (Labour)Jon Trickett (Labour)Henry Tufnell (Labour)Anna Turley (Labour)Matt Turmaine (Labour)Karl Turner (Labour)Laurence Turner (Labour)Derek Twigg (Labour)Liz Twist (Labour)Harpreet Uppal (Labour)Valerie Vaz (Labour)Chris Vince (Labour)Christian Wakeford (Labour)Imogen Walker (Labour)Chris Ward (Labour)Melanie Ward (Labour)Paul Waugh (Labour)Chris Webb (Labour)Michelle Welsh (Labour)Catherine West (Labour)Andrew Western (Labour)Matt Western (Labour)Michael Wheeler (Labour)John Whitby (Labour)Jo White (Labour)Katie White (Labour)Nadia Whittome (Labour)David Williams (Labour)Steve Witherden (Labour)Rosie Wrighting (Labour)Yuan Yang (Labour)Mohammad Yasin (Labour)Steve Yemm (Labour)https://mol.im/a/14817277

Sue Hammond ● 296d55 Comments ● 293d

The era of reductions in the number of nuclear weapons is coming to an end

"Era of nuclear disarmament 'coming to an end', SIPRI warns""The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) stressed in its annual assessment of the state of armaments, disarmament and international security, that although the number of nuclear warheads in the world continued to decline last year due to the US and Russia dismantling retired warheads, the pace of such dismantlements is slowing down.The rate at which new warheads enter global stockpiles could therefore soon outpace dismantlements, SIPRI said, as nuclear states pursue modernisation programmes."The era of reductions in the number of nuclear weapons in the world, which had lasted since the end of the Cold War, is coming to an end," Hans M. Kristensen, Associate Senior Fellow with SIPRI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme said in a statement."Instead, we see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements," he added.Nine countries - the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) and Israel - have nuclear warheads in their arsenals with an estimated global inventory of 12,241 warheads, of which 9,614 were in military stockpiles for potential use."https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/06/16/era-of-nuclear-disarmament-coming-to-an-end-sipri-warnshttps://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2025/nuclear-risks-grow-new-arms-race-looms-new-sipri-yearbook-out-now

David Ainsworth ● 295d2 Comments ● 295d

What is Starmer's record on prosecuting grooming gangs?

"In 2012 The Times newspaper investigated Rotherham grooming gangs, which led to a major inquiry.At least 1,400 children were subjected to appalling sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, according to a 2014 report, written by Prof Alexis Jay.The report made headlines in the UK and around the world and led to major debates in Parliament.Similar scandals also occurred in other towns, including Oldham, Oxford, Rochdale and Telford, leading to a national inquiry into child sexual abuse, which was also led by Prof Jay.The cases sparked investigations into alleged failures to properly address the crimes and support victims.Was the CPS or Starmer 'complicit'?The CPS, an independent body, prosecutes criminal cases in England and Wales.After the police investigate crimes and present their findings, the CPS decides whether to prosecute based on evidence and public interest.Sir Keir was appointed head of the CPS in 2008 and held the role for five years. He became an MP in 2015.The CPS was criticised for a decision not to proceed with a prosecution in Rochdale on the basis that it viewed the main victim as "unreliable" following an investigation between August 2008 and August 2009.That decision was overturned later by Nazir Afzal in 2011 after being appointed by Sir Keir as the CPS chief prosecutor for north-west England.Speaking to BBC Verify, Mr Afzal said that the view of prosecutors not to proceed to trial at the time was "if the police aren't happy that she will give credible evidence then we're not happy either".He went on to say that he had reviewed and reversed the decision as "I believed what she [the victim] was saying".But this is not the only instance where the CPS has faced criticism.Prof Jay's report into the Rotherham cases said the police would often cite the CPS as being unwilling to prosecute alleged perpetrators, but they said that it had been "much more helpful" later on.A 2013 report from the Home Affairs Committee said that "unlike many other official agencies implicated in this issue", the CPS had "readily admitted that victims had been let down by them and have attempted both to discover the cause of this systematic failure and to improve the way things are done so as to avoid a repetition of such events".It added: "Mr Starmer has striven to improve the treatment of victims of sexual assault within the criminal justice system throughout his term as Director of Public Prosecution (DPP)."Maggie Oliver, a former Manchester detective who now campaigns for victims of child sex abuse, told BBC Verify that the CPS "bear a great deal of responsibility for the failures around this issue", including bringing inadequate charges and blaming victims.She added that while there was now much more awareness around the issue, "in my foundation we still see individual cases subjected to massive failures in the systems".We have been unable to find any direct criticism of Sir Keir personally in any of the reports on the scandal, nor can we identify any suggestions that he himself made any decisions not to prosecute.How has Starmer responded?The prime minister has robustly defended his record as the former head of the CPS, telling journalists he:Changed the prosecution approach to "challenge myths and stereotypes" that had stopped victims from being heardLeft office when the CPS had the highest number of child sex abuse prosecutions on recordReopened cases that had been closedBrought the first prosecution of an Asian grooming gangIt is correct that he revised the guidance on child sexual exploitation in 2013 to make future prosecutions easier.Previously, victims may not have been viewed as credible if they had not complained immediately, if they had used drugs or alcohol or if they had dressed or acted in particular ways.On child sexual abuse prosecutions, we found CPS figures dating back to 2007 but the early years are now only on archived web pages - as they are no longer on the CPS website.They show that the "number of prosecutions for child sexual abuse flagged cases" did rise from that year to reach 4,794 in April 2010 to March 2011 - a peak for Sir Keir's time in charge of the CPS.That total was subsequently surpassed - there were nearly 7,200 prosecutions in 2016-2017.BBC Verify has asked Downing Street for more detail on the data behind the prime minister's claim.On reopening cases, Mr Afzal said that the creation of a national panel to revisit cases under Sir Keir had been a success."That panel also included - for the first time ever - external representatives. It revisited dozens of cases that were then restarted," he said.How many child grooming cases were prosecuted under Starmer?In defending his record, the prime minister referred only to the broad category of child sex abuse prosecution data.When it comes to child grooming gangs, there is no single clear data set because no specific offence exists.Instead, offenders can be prosecuted for causing or facilitating sexual exploitation, or for committing specific offences such as rape and indecent assault.Information on child grooming-related prosecutions appear in Prof Jay's 2022 report into child sexual exploitation by organised networks, external - a government-commissioned report into institutional child abuse failings published in 2022.The report mentions several "significant prosecutions" between 2010 and 2014, including 35 convictions which took place while Sir Keir was DPP:November 2010 - five men convicted in RotherhamNovember 2010 - 11 men convicted in Derbyshire2008-2010 - three men convicted in CornwallMay 2012 - nine men from Rochdale and Oldham convictedJune 2013 - seven men from Oxford convictedA Times report from 2011 identified 17 grooming gang prosecutions, external since 1997.It said 14 of them took place during the previous three years and involved the on-street grooming of girls aged 11 to 16 by groups of men across 13 towns and cities.A report by the National Police Chiefs' Council last year concluded that 5% of child sexual abuse and exploitation crimes were group-based - but more specific figures weren't disclosed."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo

David Ainsworth ● 295d1 Comments ● 295d

Anti-semitic murder comes to the streets of New York

I wonder how long it might be before the antisemitism which is at he core of support in the UK for the Palestinians in Hamas results in a similar incident in London ?From BBC News today."Suspect charged with murder of two Israeli embassy workers in Washington DC"'The suspect accused of gunning down two Israeli embassy staff members outside a Jewish museum in Washington DC has been charged with first-degree murder, as well as murder of foreign officials and related firearm charges.Wednesday night's attack is being investigated as a hate crime, and more charges are expected, US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said at a news conference.Steve Jenson, from the FBI's Washington DC field office, called the killings "an act of terror and directed violence against the Jewish community".Couple Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim were shot dead outside an event at the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington DC around 21:08 local time (02:08 BST) on Wednesday, police said. The suspect opened fire on a group of four exiting the event, killing the two victims, police said.Police identified the suspect as 30-year-old Elias Rodriguez from Chicago who had bought a ticket to the museum event about three hours before it began. He was arrested at the scene shortly after the shooting.Police said the suspect also shouted "free Palestine" before he was taken into custody.Social media accounts linked to the suspect also indicate that he was heavily involved in the pro-Palestinian protest movement. Investigators said they were working to authenticate writings online purportedly authored by him, accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza, criticising US policy and discussing the use of political violence'.Not that I am suggesting they advocate 'political violence', but those that are so vociferous in attacking Israel and making often unfounded accusations against them, should be careful not to stir up a hornet's nest of potentially violent trouble makers in the UK.Already, the statistics of antisemitic attacks in London are on the rise.

John Hawkes ● 320d16 Comments ● 317d

Eurovision Song Contest

I am not sure I will be watching the Eurovision Song Contest tomorrow. Firstly I have had serious doubts over the impartiality of European voters ever since 1959.Then the UK's Pearl Carr and Teddy Johnson singing 'Sing Little Birdie' were pushed into second place by the Netherlands with the song "Een beetje", performed by Teddy Scholten. A song (but who remembers it) ? with rather dubious moral undertones we have now come to expect from that country.But secondly the competition has been predictably sullied by the coming together of the influences of today's drumbeat political issues - the wickedness of Israel and gender politics."The current Eurovision champion (sic) has said they (he is a man so should be 'he') support the decision to ban Israel from the 2025 competition".Nemo Mettler won the song contest in 2024 on behalf of Switzerland with the song The Code.This song was described by Nemo as one that details their (his) experience with accepting their (his) non-binary identity. A song that must have gone down well in pubs, at parties and any other occasion for fun and jollity.'Ahead of last year, the singer joined critics in calling for a boycott of Eurovision if Israel’s Eden Golan was allowed to participate as the conflict in the Middle East continued to rage on.Nemo, who was the first openly non-binary (whatever this means) act to represent Switzerland in Eurovision, was one of nine acts who issued a group statement expressing solidarity with Palestine.This time around, the singer-rapper (sic) has once again objected to Israel’s participation."Israel’s actions are fundamentally at odds with the values that Eurovision claims to uphold — peace, unity, and respect for human rights."Obviously he has not read the Hamas Charter !Views undoubtedly Gary Lineker would endorse as he also once lobbied to get Israel banned from international football competition.Why is a song competition so politicised and life in general so dulled by issues much over stressed both in importance and the public's acceptance of them ?Lulu, Sandie, "Brotherhood of Man" and "Buck's Fizz" with your naughty skirt pulling routine  - where are you now when we so need you, surrounded as we are by so many miserabilists ?

John Hawkes ● 327d18 Comments ● 324d

Bridge envy: Renfrew bridge (£117M) is a 184-meter double-leaf bobtail cable-stayed swing bridge

A selection of quotes from the below links. Work started on site in May 2022 — Open 9th May 2025. £117M twin-leaf opening road bridge across River Clyde opens to traffic — 9th May 2025 The 184-metre, twin-leaf bridge uses a cable stay system similar to the Queensferry Crossing and provides a two-lane crossing for vehicles, pedestrians and active travel as it connects Meadowside Street in Renfrew and Dock Street in Yoker, with the ability to open for passing ships as required.
A sustainable facet to the project was the installation process.  By floating in bridge segments from Belgium, the surrounding region and native ecosystem were not affected by lorries transporting large components. The bridge materials were fabricated in Belgium in a well-ventilated warehouse with controlled conditions. There was no disruption to Glaswegian neighbourhoods due to fabrication, paint, and assembly of the bridge. The bridge is powered by a hydraulic motor system, and the team uses biodegradable hydraulic fluid.


https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/117m-twin-leaf-opening-road-bridge-across-river-clyde-opens-to-traffic-09-05-2025/#:~:text=New%20Civil%20Engineer-,%C2%A3117M%20twin%2Dleaf%20opening%20road%20bridge,River%20Clyde%20opens%20to%20traffic&text=The%20Renfrew%20Bridge%2C%20the%20first,and%20Renfrew%20Riverside%20regeneration%20project.
https://iabse.org.uk/event/site-visit-renfrew-bridge-river-clyde/

Ed Robinson ● 326d4 Comments ● 324d

Random pic 27 April 2025

'Marie-Antoinette' Breguet No. 160 watch. Originally designed by Abraham-Louis Breguet, 1783 https://flic.kr/p/2qWatt5This jewel of a timepiece was crafted from the finest materials: gold wherever possible and sapphires to reduce friction on the moving parts. However, Breguet was not choosing style over substance. His ingenious design, and the mechanical expertise of his workshop's craftsmen, enabled the watch to be packed with many impressive functions, each known as a 'complication'. Over the more than 40 years it was being worked on, Breguet continued to add new complications as he developed them.Among the watch's 823 parts, Breguet included mechanisms which perform a range of functions beyond the telling of time in hours, minutes.and seconds. These include:
• Pare-chute' shock absorber
• Self-winding mechanism
• 48-hour power reserve indicator
• Minute repeater sounding a sequence of hour, quarter hour and minute
• Independent second hand - acting as a stopwatch
• Calendar for date, day and month - corrected to account for leap years
• Equation-of-time indicator
in minutes
• Bimetallic thermometeIn 1783 the clockmaker Abraham-Louis
Breguet was given an unlimited budget to craft an exceptional timepiece for Queen Marie-Antoinette. Although no records confirm this, it may have been commissioned by the Swedish soldier-diplomat Axel von Fersen a close friend of the queen.A Labour of Love:The timepiece would exceed all others in beauty and complexity, becoming Breguet's masterpiece. In his pursuit of perfection, and interrupted by the French Revolution, the watch was not completed until the 1820s, long after Marie-Antoinette's death in 1793.At the London Science Muuseum, Versailles Science and Splendour Exhibition(Lent by The L. A. Mayer Museum for Islamic Art, Jerusalem, Israel Loan no. L2024-129 Images Avshalom Avital)[Text from Science Museum Exhibition Label]

Michael Ixer ● 346d1 Comments ● 346d

Illegal HMOs

The story of April 10 about 'Charles Marguiles of BMR Hemini Ltd', who apparently operates 'more than 200 properties across the capital'.. should have faced far stronger legal and police action. These vultures are buying up three bedroom houses and making them into seven or more mini-bed houses. Streets become filled with excess cars, pushing out local resident's vehicles; the amount of sewage increases three-fold. Politicians and the authorities need to wake up - this is Putney's most serious problem: such developers should be ordered to convert the housing back into original configuration.In Ealing they estimate there are 25,000 'additional' HMOs - caravans, garden sheds, etc - all pouring huge amounts of additional human waste into the Thames. When I rowed on the Thames 30 years ago it was far cleaner than it is today. Not now: the Thames Tunnel will have little effect on the increasing volumes. Mark my word.A landlord and a property development company have been fined £43,000 for an illegal development in a Southfields garden.Charles Marguiles of BMR Hemini Ltd operates more than 200 properties across the capital. He specialises in buying residential properties and converting them into Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) to rent to individual tenants.In 2022 the company bought the house on Linstead Way and proceeded to build accommodation at the rear.When residents objected, it emerged that no planning permission had been sought or granted for the new buildings. A retrospective application was made but this was refused by borough planners and an enforcement notice was issued for demolition.An appeal was launched against the notice and tenants were moved into the new units.A Government Inspector supported the council’s position but then BMR Hemini claimed it was unable to comply because the buildings already had a tenant in them.The council began prosecution proceedings on the basis that failure to comply with the enforcement notice was an offence under the Town and Country Planning Act, It was only following a court summons that the extension was demolished, nine months after it first went up.Despite this belated compliance, the council continued the prosecution due to the stress the neighbours had experienced.Margulies and BMR Hemini Ltd were convicted on 24 March, at Wimbledon Magistrates Court for failure to comply with the enforcement notice. They were fined £16,000, ordered to pay the council’s legal fees of £23,554 and pay a victim surcharge of £3,600.The judge was critical of their actions particularly placing a tenant in the building when they knew an enforcement notice was pending.The Leader of Wandsworth council, Simon Hogg, said, “All of the actions from this landlord clearly show that they cared more about rental income than following the rules.“The outcome of this case sends a clear message that we will not tolerate breaches of planning control in Wandsworth which ignore the impact such actions have on neighbours.”

Marcus Gibson ● 355d0 Comments ● 355d

Hackers are our enemies

This is behind a paywall but I've copied and pasted the article (long but interesting)https://www.thetimes.com/article/e23e4c23-1485-4f0b-8b90-8a1a53a3113eAn alliance of pro-Russian and pro-Palestinian hackers are launching cyberattacks every week against British organisations and state agencies, including the armed forces, security services, infrastructure operators and councils.United by a shared opposition to liberal western values, the Holy League coalition of about 90 so-called hacktivist groups came together with the stated intention of waging cyberwarfare against Ukraine, Israel and their allies.The coalition includes groups believed to be working alongside Russia’s military intelligence branch, the GRU, as well as hackers said to have been trained by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).Analysts have said that Britain’s more prominent leadership role in support of Ukraine over the last two months has made it a bigger target.Though the majority of these attacks are crude and low-impact, GCHQ has recently warned of a growing threat from state-aligned hacktivists, who are increasingly looking to target critical national infrastructure systems in an attempt to sow societal unease.Last month, hackers claimed to have carried out simultaneous attacks on the websites of the British Army, Royal Navy and Office for Nuclear Security. It was announced on the group’s Telegram channel with the words: “Our message is clear: this is just a warning … and worse is yet to come.”The MI6 website was also targeted. Both attacks were carried out by a Holy League member who goes by the name Mr Hamza, a pro-Palestinian hacker thought to be based in Morocco. The group has previously claimed attacks on other intelligence services around Europe.In January, the signing of a 100-year partnership between Britain and Ukraine prompted a wave of attacks from a pro-Russian Holy League member, NoName057(16), against several local councils, the North East Combined Authority and National Highways. A month earlier, the group launched similar attacks in retaliation to Ukraine’s use of British Storm Shadow missiles against Russian territory.The vast majority of cyberattacks carried out by these groups are unsophisticated distributed denial of service (DDoS) strikes, which render a website, server or online service inaccessible by overwhelming it with a flood of internet traffic from multiple sources.• Russian hackers pose as remote IT staff on Microsoft TeamsThe groups will typically provide evidence for their claims in the form of “check host” links that show how long a website was not working. This is often little more than a few minutes, though in some cases it can last several hours or even days.For sites that require users or employees to log in to access services and information this can also cause significant disruption. DDoS attacks can also interfere with a site’s defences making it easier to hack into.Earlier this month, X was hit by a major DDoS strike causing a prolonged outage of more than six hours. Elon Musk, the chairman of X, said that hackers in Ukraine had been behind it, however a pro-Palestinian group called Dark Storm Team later took responsibility. Dark Storm Team is not part of the Holy League, but has in the past worked alongside its members.The Holy League was founded at the end of last summer by a cybercriminal called Abu Omar, who is also leader of the Cyber Islamic Resistance, a member of the league.In November, he gave an interview to a Russian state-media agency in which he said he worked with partners from Russia, Belarus, Morocco, Egypt and Algeria and “also with my brothers in the Middle East.” He also claimed that members of Cyber Islamic Resistance were trained by the Badr Organisation, an IRGC militia in Iraq.Asked what victory looked like, Omar said: “I want the conflicts to end with the destruction of the ‘Evil Empire’, including Ukraine, Israel and Nato.”Among the league’s members is the Cyber Army of Russian Reborn (Carr), a group suspected of working on behalf of APT44, the GRU’s cyberwarfare unit, which for more than a decade has worked to infiltrate and infect Ukrainian and western systems through sophisticated hacking operations.Ben Read, a senior manager at Google Threat Intelligence Group, said that his team had found that YouTube accounts for Carr were set up from an IP address known to be controlled by APT44, which is better known as Sandworm.“We have observed a close operational relationship between APT44 and Cyber Army of Russia Reborn and judge that the operators behind APT44 have the ability to direct and influence Cyber Army of Russia Reborn’s activity across multiple platforms,” he said.In July 2024, two members of the Carr — Yuliya Pankratova and Denis Degtyarenko, both Russian citizens — were sanctioned by the US Department of the Treasury for hacking water facilities in both the US and Poland, as well as disrupting operations at a facility in France.On December 4, Carr and NoName057(16) claimed to have launched a joint attack on the M6 toll road in Britain. Pankratova’s husband, Artem, is behind NoName057(16), according to Molfar, a Ukrainian intelligence firm.For several months now, Britain’s cybersecurity chiefs have warned of the growing threat posed by hackers. At the end of last year, the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), part of GCHQ, said there was “a widening gap” between increasingly complex threats and the UK’s capability to defend critical national infrastructure.In its annual review, the NCSC said that Russia and Iran were looking to encourage “a new wave of state-aligned hacktivism”, citing Carr as an example, adding that these groups posed “an active threat to poorly-defended critical systems far beyond their traditional activities of DDoS attacks”.“The NCSC has seen a stark increase in the focus on critical national infrastructure systems, as hacktivist groups strike to compromise these systems for political effect and propaganda victories,” the review said.Pascal Geenens, the director of threat intelligence at Radware, a cybersecurity firm that tracks attacks by hacktivist groups, said he had seen a marked increase in the precision and co-ordination of politically motivated DDoS campaigns.“After several years of continuous attacking, building experience, and gathering a following, hacktivists such as NoName057(16) are becoming better organised, and their attacks are increasingly sophisticated,” he said.Another cybersecurity expert, who asked not to be named for fear of reprisal, said that hacktivists aimed to function as “agents of chaos”. “If you can create the illusion of chaos and things failing you can create the narrative that the government isn’t doing enough to protect you,” he said.A government spokesman said: “We don’t routinely comment on cyberactivity claimed by online groups. The government is committed to using all of its levers to disrupt cyberthreats and to keep the public safe.”

Lucille Grant ● 366d10 Comments ● 365d

Police Raid On Westminster Quaker Meeting House

It is with the greatest concern for Freedom and for democracy that I relay the news about the  Police raid on Westminster Quaker Meeting House which too place on March 27th 2025. The Police arrested six young people holding a meeting over concerns for the climate and Gaza. In the following statement, the Quakers say: "We strongly condemn the violation of our place of worship which is a direct result of stricter protest laws removing virtually all routes to challenge the status quo."Just before 7.15pm more than 20 uniformed police, some carrying tasers, forced their way into Westminster Meeting House."They broke open the front door without warning or ringing the bell first, searching the whole building and arresting six women attending the meeting in a hired room."The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and the Public Order Act 2023 have criminalised many forms of protest and allow police to halt actions deemed too disruptive.Meanwhile, changes in judicial procedures limit protestors' ability to defend their actions in court. All this means that there are fewer and fewer ways to speak truth to power."Quakers support the right to nonviolent public protest, acting themselves from a deep moral imperative to stand up against injustice and for our planet."Many have taken nonviolent direct action over the centuries from the abolition of slavery to women's suffrage and prison reform."Paul Parker, recording clerk for Quakers in Britain, said: "No-one has been arrested in a Quaker meeting house in living memory."This aggressive violation of our place of worship and the forceful removal of young people holding a protest group meeting clearly shows what happens when a society criminalises protest."Freedom of speech, assembly, and fair trials are an essential part of free public debate which underpins democracy."https://www.indcatholicnews.com/news/52036

Miles Thompson ● 375d16 Comments ● 369d

The truth about Hamas atrocities of October 2023

"A savage rupturing of our civilisation"'A new report leaves no doubt: 7 October was a hyper-violent onslaught against Jews and humanity'.This report is titled '7 October Parliamentary Commission Report' and written by the eminent historian Baron Andrew Roberts.The Report, though not an official Parliamentary enquiry (it was commissioned by the All Party UK-Israel Parliamentary Group) was  chaired by Lord Roberts of Belgravia. A parliamentary panel took part in testimony collection, chaired by Roberts, consisting of Lord Macdonald of River Glaven KC, Baroness Fox of Buckley, Lord Farmer, Baroness Smith of Newnham, Baroness Hodge of Barking, Greg Smith MP and Sharon Hodgson MP.Its brief statement of objectives says -  "Following the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023—one of the deadliest terror attacks in history—parliamentarians sought to create an independent record of the events. The assault resulted in 1,182 deaths, over 4,000 injuries, and 251 hostages taken, making it the deadliest massacre of Jewish people since the Holocaust. Among the victims were 18 UK citizens, marking the largest UK loss in a Middle Eastern terror attack.Amid rising misinformation and efforts to distort the facts, this report provides a clear, factual, and chronological account to preserve historical accuracy. By drawing on survivor testimonies, eyewitness statements, and expert analysis, it ensures the full scale and impact of the attack are properly documented. In an era of denialism, it serves as an impartial, evidence-based record to support informed discussion and prevent the erasure of truth".The report is a long one and I cannot claim to have read all 300 pages.It describes all the attacks by Hamas; names the people they raped, killed and kidnapped and the disgusting actions they perpetrated against them.But the author's synopsis is very pertinent"Holocaust denial took a few years to take root in pockets of society, but on 7 October 2023 it took only hours for people to claim that the massacres in southern Israel had not taken place. Hamas and its allies, both in the Middle East and equally shamefully in the West, have sought to deny the atrocities, despite the ironic fact that much of the evidence for the massacres derives from film footage from cameras carried by the terrorists themselves - though of course there is also much more from many other sources, as this Report delineates. The present Report has been undertaken to counter such pernicious views, and to lay down incontrovertible proof - for now and for the years to come – that nearly 1,200 innocent people were indeed murdered by Hamas and its allies, and very often in scenes of sadistic barbarism not seen in world history since the Rape of Nanjing in 1937.On 4 October 2024, almost a year after the attacks, Khalil Al-Hayya, the most senior leader of Hamas outside Gaza, was asked by Jeremy Bowen of the BBC in Doha, “Why did you kill so many civilians, women and children?” He replied, “We ordered our resistance fighters on 7 October not to target civilians, women and children. The objective was the occupation soldiers who are always killing, bombing and destroying in Gaza. We don’t endorse harming civilians. On the ground, there were certainly personal mistakes and actions. The fighters may have felt their lives were in danger"'In fact, Israel unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005.“We’ve all seen how the fighters visited the houses,” Al-Hayya continued, “they spoke to the families, they ate and drank.” Pressed on this bizarre version of events, he added, “When they went into some of the houses, none of the women and children they dealt with were terrified. Those videos were published by the Israeli occupation. They weren’t published by us.” Asked about the taking of women and children as hostages, something even he could hardly deny, Al-Hayya claimed, “One of the goals of 7 October was to kidnap a small group of Israeli soldiers to exchange them for Palestinian prisoners. But when the [IDF] Gaza division completely collapsed in the face of the resistance fighters, we took a lot of prisoners. It was not our plan to capture civilians, including women and children.” Yet as we shall show, Hamas not only planned to take hostages, but abused them in the act.Specifically asked by Bowen about sexual assault, Al-Hayya stated, “The orders and ethics of all Palestinians and the resistance fighters were humanitarian. We’re brought up according to the Islamic religion, culture and national civilisation. We protect them as we protect ourselves. Sexual, or non-sexual, assault has never been proven” When Bowen said that evidence of sexual assault was piling up, Al-Hayya said, “I told you the instructions were clear. There may have been abnormal acts by irresponsible people, but these are just allegations.” By total contrast, our Report details that horrific acts of systematic rape and sexual abuse took place, in contradiction to Koranic teaching, and that everything Al-Hayya said was a lie, as he must have known it was. We have allowed no embellishment of the facts, which are painful and distressing enough as they are. We have gone out of our way not to include information that we suspect is true but cannot be double-checked. We have concentrated on the two days between the unleashing of the assault on the morning of 7 October 2023 and the liberation of the last of the Kibbutzim, and we have documented each of nearly 1,200 deaths so that future generations will not be misled about the extent and horror of the massacre.As a Gentile, I believe that it is vital to prevent the emergence of another, more modern version of Holocaust denial, namely 7 October denial. After the Holocaust, non-Jews like me owe the Jewish people nothing less. This can only be done by the kind of facts-based, evidential work in this Report, which is dedicated to Emily Damari, the British hostage who was held in Gaza for 471 days, and daughter of the superbly brave Mandy Damari who our investigation teams have met in Israel and London.Lest anyone doubt the importance of showing the truth about what happened, let us remember that in the British general election of July 2024 there were several parliamentary candidates who openly attempted to justify the 7 October atrocities. Rami Ruhayem, a journalist based in Beirut who appears on BBC News, also sought to question the BBC reports about the massacres. In the Oxford Union in November 2024, Miko Peled, who calls himself a radical anti-Zionist, described the murders, rapes, and kidnappings of 7 October as “acts of heroism”.The Palestinian poet Mohammed El-Kurd, who has equated Zionism with genocide, started his speech by announcing that there was “no room for debate” and ended it by walking out of the chamber. The anti-Israel motion passed by 278 to 59 votes. After fifteen months of fighting, a second ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas was signed in January 2025. Immediately after the agreement was announced Al-Hayya exposed the full extent of the Hamas ideology – 'that Hamas and its supporters viewed the atrocities on 7 October 2023 as a “miraculous and unprecedented military and security achievement...[and] will remain a source of pride for [their] people and [their] resistance, passed down from generation to generation.”Our Report will hopefully permit people to see such denials and justifications for what they really are: a perversion of reason and rejection of human decency. We owe it to the victims and their grieving families to set down the ghastly, unvarnished truth about the sheer barbarism that Hamas and its terrorist allies unleashed on 7 October 2023'. Andrew RobertsLord Roberts of BelgraviaHouse of Lords March 2025 Here are some details from the report that describe despicable acts the brave Hamas freedom fighters inflicted on Jewish women, children and the elderly in the attack written by Brendan O'Neillhttps://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/20/a-savage-rupturing-of-our-civilisation/'The methods of murder included shooting, burning, asphyxiation, grenade explosions and missile attacks. Many of the victims were subjected to mutilation, sexual violence and ‘other forms of deliberate brutality’, either before or after death. A woman was raped at gunpoint. Other women were raped in their bedrooms before being murdered. Rescue forces found women’s bodies ‘stripped of their underwear’ as well as ‘signs of semen’. The part of the report where I had to take a break from reading describes the discovery of a woman’s body where there had been ‘[the] insertion of a knife into the genital area’.The violence was ferocious. Molotov cocktails were thrown to burn people alive. A father and his baby daughter suffered savage burns when Hamas militants used a butane gas cylinder to make an inferno of their home. Dad spent 58 days in an induced coma, his daughter spent eight days. Hamas entered one home screaming ‘Yahud!’, meaning Jews. And they found Jews: a father, a mother and their four kids. Dad used a piece of furniture in a desperate effort to ward off the invaders – they shot him dead. They then shot his daughter in the face. She had ‘a hole in her cheek and she was gasping her last breaths’, her mother later recounted. Mum and the three surviving kids were taken to Gaza and forced into a ‘hole’ in the ground. Why? Because they’re Yahud.The report is full of accounts like this, of the most bestial violence, visited with extreme prejudice on men, women, children. 7 October feels like a thing from the last century, the century of war and extermination. It was as if atavistic hatreds had leapt from the history books and imprinted themselves on our complacent era. Perhaps the report’s most valuable contribution is to make it crystal clear that this was no impulsive assault. This was not the Wretched of the Earth ‘breaking out’ of their ‘prison camp’ to wreak desperate revenge on their oppressors, as Hamas-adjacent leftists would have us believe. No, this pogrom was years in the making. It was a conscious and thoroughly organised massacre of Jews.Seven-thousand militants took part. That included 3,800 of Hamas’s elite Nukhba forces and its Al-Qassam Brigades and 2,200 individuals from other terror armies, including Palestinian Islamic Jihad. A further 1,000 pogromists remained in Gaza to fire missiles at Israel and provide tactical back-up to the killers on the ground. Hamas had been planning the onslaught since 2018, when it set up a ‘Joint Room for Palestinian Resistance Factions’ to pool terror resources and plot the invasion. On the day itself, the pogromists attacked by land, sea and air. Far from an act of spontaneous violence, fuelled by despair, this was a highly disciplined act of fascist terror with the express purpose of killing as many Jews as possible.Reading this report is a distressing task, but it’s one everyone would benefit from. It is our human duty to know and tell the truth about 7 October. The words of German novelist Herta Müller rang in my ears as I read. She described 7 October as a ‘total derailment from civilisation’. ‘There is an archaic horror in this bloodlust that I no longer thought possible in this day and age’, she wrote. The report brings crashing down the snivelling and unforgivable moral equivalence many Western observers make between Hamas’s violence and Israel’s response. The war in Gaza is awful but it is war. What happened on 7 October was something else entirely. It was the intimate, barbarous torture of Jews, carried out with pride and glee. It was fascism.This, then, is what the activist class has been making excuses for. This is what they referred to as ‘resistance’. This is what they called ‘a day of celebration’. The burning to death of Jews. The rape of Jewish women. The murder of Jewish children. The assassination of a Jew who had survived the greatest crime in history. We now have all the data, all the timelines and all the information about 7 October. But we still await that moment of moral clarity when our intellectual elites finally acknowledge the gravity of this crime against Jews and humanity, and devote themselves to defending the civilisation it so gravely offends'.What do you make of all this Messrs Carter, Ainsworth and Ms Holliday ?

John Hawkes ● 383d15 Comments ● 372d

Trump as usual supports the ethnic cleansers - Netanyahu and Putin

Land grabber and gangster "The Don".BBC 5 March 2025US President Donald Trump has issued what he called a "last warning" to Hamas to release the hostages being held in Gaza."I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don't do as I say," Trump said in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform.Hamas accused the US president of encouraging Israel to break the ceasefire deal currently in effect between the two sides.Trump's statement came just hours after the White House confirmed it was holding direct talks with Hamas over the remaining hostages.Washington has until now avoided direct engagement with the group, and there is a longstanding US policy against having direct contact with entities it lists as terrorist organisations.In his social media post, Trump said there would be "hell to pay" if the hostages were not released, while not specifying the nature of the support he was sending Israel."Release all of the hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered, or it is OVER for you," he added."For the leadership, now is the time to leave Gaza, while you still have a chance."He also appeared to issue a wider threat: "Also, to the People of Gaza: A beautiful Future awaits, but not if you hold Hostages. If you do, you are DEAD!"Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said in a statement that such threats "complicate matters regarding the ceasefire agreement and encourage the occupation [Israel] to avoid implementing its terms".It's not the first time Trump has threatened Hamas. In December, he said there would be "all hell to pay" if hostages were not released by the time he took office."Of course, Trump supports the big guys, as ever. He stops the arms supply and intelligence cooperation with Ukraine, but for Israel rather different treatment:"Feb 7 2025 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration announced on Friday that it had approved military sales to Israel worth some $7.4 billion, despite a Democratic lawmakers' request that the sale be paused until he received more information.The Department of Defense announced that the State Department had approved a package for Israel worth an estimated $6.75 billion that included munitions, guidance kits and fuses with Boeing Co (BA.N), opens new tab among the principal contractors.It also detailed a deal estimated at $660 million to sell Hellfire Missiles to Israel in which Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab would be the principal contractor."Producing the rubble foundations for TrumpGazaWorld and golf course. Must make poor little Israel safe.

David Ainsworth ● 398d71 Comments ● 378d

Trump Engineers 30 Day Ceasefire

Ukraine 'agrees to a 30-day ceasefire' with Russia as Trump lifts pause on military aid and intelligence sharingUkraine has agreed to a U.S. proposal for a 30-day ceasefire with Russia as President Donald Trump lifts a pause on military aid and intelligence sharing to the country. The agreement, under intense pressure from the U.S. side, now puts the ball in Moscow's court, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said at the conclusion of a day of talks with Ukrainian officials in Saudi Arabia. 'Today, we've made an offer that the Ukrainians have accepted, which is to enter into a ceasefire and into immediate negotiations to end this conflict in a way that's enduring and sustainable,' said Rubio.We're going to tell them this is what's on the table. Ukraine is ready to stop shooting and start talking. And now it'll be up to them to say yes or no,' Rubio said. The Trump administration now plans to present the temporary ceasefire offer to Moscow, which has raised a series of demands.Those include the removal of President Volodymyr Zelensky, recognizing seized territory as now independent states, and a prohibition on Ukraine joining the NATO alliance.The breakthrough will put the onus on the Kremlin, just days after an angry Oval Office meeting exposed a rupture between Trump and Zelensky.Now, following high-stakes meetings in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, the president is also lifting a military aid and intelligence sharing pause to Ukraine.'As a result of that, and I think as a result of this positive step forward, the president has decided to lift the pause on our security assistance to Ukraine going forward, and that's effective immediately,' Rubio said.That allows for the U.S. to continue providing roughly $4 billion in previously authorized money to arm Ukraine.https://mol.im/a/14487421

Sue Hammond ● 393d0 Comments ● 393d

France is aware of the threat of Islamic terrorism, Is the UK ?

Source - Spectator online today"‘Low-cost’ jihadists are Europe’s new danger"https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/low-cost-jihadists-are-europes-new-danger/'There is a new Islamist terror threat in Europe that the French describe as ‘low-cost terrorism’. The expression was deployed in a television interview at the start of this week by Bruno Retailleau, the Minister of the Interior. Warning France that Islamic State is ‘reconstituting themselves in Africa and elsewhere’, Retailleau said that the other menace was the individual extremist acting on his own initiative. Unskilled in bomb-making and with no access to firearms, these ‘low-cost’ Islamists kill with knives or behind the wheel of a car'. However the greatest killers of Muslims around the world are Islamic extremists. Between 1979 and April 2024, Islamists carried out 66,872 attacks worldwide and killed nearly 250,000 people. Of that staggering death toll, 204,937 lost their lives between 2012 and 2024, and most of the victims were Muslims.The data, compiled by the French think tank Fondapol (Fondation pour l’innovation politique), show that the vast majority of the attacks – 96.7 per cent – do not occur in the West. They take place in the Middle East, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa, and rarely do they make the western mainstream news.How many people are aware, for example, that since Christmas 2024, at least 237 Christians have been killed by Islamic State Central Africa Province (ISCAP) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo? In total, since 2017, the Islamist group has murdered 6,000 Christians in this country.The Islamist attacks that do make the news in the West are small by comparison, although they are growing in number. This year alone, there have been atrocities committed in France (Mulhouse), Austria (Villach) and Germany (Aschaffenburg, Berlin and Munich). The attack in Aschaffenburg, which killed two, including a toddler, was carried out by an Afghan, although police attribute the atrocity to mental instability.These five attacks have taken the lives of six people, two of whom were run down by a car and the others fatally stabbed. They are in marked contrast to the Islamist terrorism of a previous generation; those who planned and carried out the mass-casualty attacks in Madrid (2004), London (2005), Paris (2015) and Brussels (2016) had been trained overseas. In an interview with the Sunday Telegraph at the weekend, Lord Walney, the former Labour MP who served as the government’s independent adviser on political violence and extremism, stated: ‘Islamist extremism and Islamist terrorism is the greatest threat this country faces.’A similar warning was issued this week in France by Francois Fillon, the former Prime Minister, who said that extremism is ‘gaining ground in Europe, where a growing proportion of Muslim populations are bowing to the rules of a radical, authoritarian, freedom-destroying Islam that represents a real and immediate danger to our values and our way of life’.Some might claim that good starting point for Britain would be to scrap the planned definition of ‘Islamophobia’, which would, in effect, proscribe any criticism of Islam. Is the Labour government unable to distinguish between criticism of a religion and discrimination against a person because of their religion ?

John Hawkes ● 396d0 Comments ● 396d

Trump takes on Hamas

BBC News 6/3/25"Trump issues 'last warning' to Hamas as US confirms direct hostage talks" 'US President Donald Trump has issued what he called a "last warning" to Hamas to release the hostages being held in Gaza."I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don't do as I say," Trump said in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform.Hamas accused the US president of encouraging Israel to break the ceasefire deal currently in effect between the two sides.Trump's statement came just hours after the White House confirmed it was holding direct talks with Hamas over the remaining hostages.Washington has until now avoided direct engagement with the group, and there is a longstanding US policy against having direct contact with entities it lists as terrorist organisations.In his social media post, Trump said there would be "hell to pay" if the hostages were not released, while not specifying the nature of the support he was sending Israel."Release all of the hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered, or it is OVER for you," he added."For the leadership, now is the time to leave Gaza, while you still have a chance."He also appeared to issue a wider threat: "Also, to the People of Gaza: A beautiful Future awaits, but not if you hold Hostages. If you do, you are DEAD!"At last perhaps the force required to crush these terrorist killers and the destruction of their craven leadership not already hiding in exile.

John Hawkes ● 398d16 Comments ● 398d

Arab leaders approve $53bn alternative to Trump's Gaza plan

Previously I posted a report of Trump's plan turn Gaza into a holiday resort: away from being a base solely for Hamas Palestinian terrorists intent on annihilating Israel and its Jewish citizens.Though I commented it being somewhat fanciful I did feel that the concept was a good one for both civilising the area and providing meaningful employment for Gazans.An alternative to murder, kidnapping and digging tunnel repositories for arms and the corpses of its captives.I have also commented on the fact that near by Arab states with great wealth have kept their distance from the 'freedom fighting' of their Palestinian, Iranian and Syrian neighbours.And particularly had not offered to invest their wealth for the betterment of all. However, on BBC News today -'A $53bn (£41.4 billion) reconstruction plan to rival President Donald Trump's idea for the US to "take over Gaza" and move out more than two million Palestinians has been approved by Arab leaders at an emergency summit in the Egyptian capital Cairo."The Egypt plan is now an Arab plan," announced the secretary general of the Arab League Ahmed Aboul Gheit at the end of this hours-long gathering.Without referring specifically to President Trump's ideas, he underlined that "the Arab stance is to reject any displacement, whether it is voluntary or forced".Good news.An Arab solution to an Arab problem and no displacement of peace seeking Gazans.I wonder how Hamas will respond ?

John Hawkes ● 399d3 Comments ● 399d

Thought on a new world order ...

I've been pondering what Trump and Putin are up to and Steve Rosenberg (BBC's Russian correspondent) brought my ideas together - he proposed they want a "Yalta 2" to determine the future world order. Appears it's essentially what they're trying to do in Ukraine, and Trump is attempting for in Gaza. However, I can't see how they do this and not include Putin's far east ally, Xi, so tariffs and canal disputes with China don't fit. I guess North Korea and Israel would follow them for their own self interest? I guess the EU, UK, Saudis and others in the middle east would just be sidelined if they ignored the new order? Basically a new world order governed by oligarchs? But does alienating all your friends and neighbours help?A slight issue is there's a lot of internal backlash to many of Trump's internal moves inthe US; there's talk of withholding federal taxes because of the emasculation of some federal agencies - no taxation without representation ... would Trump risk internal conflict?There's another aspect to this; perhaps Trump really does hate war? I'm not sure criticising his miraculous bone spurs is altogether fair. Going back to that time, there was a strong anti Vietnam war movement in the US and elsewhere. (I was glad Wilson and others didn't involve the UK.) Aside from not wanting to get killed many didn't feel the US should be there for reasons of conscience - and eventually the US had to pull out. Perhaps, that's given him a particular viewpoint, although the Russian aggression against Ukraine doesn't seem comparable with the US in Vietnam? Mind you, my memory of those days is a little distant!Alternatively,  perhaps Trump's only plan is Buckingham all the world's wealth into his control and Russia's a useful vehicle for that?

Michael Ixer ● 400d7 Comments ● 399d

I Want My Country Back ~ Lee Anderson MP

I want my country back.Just sat on the train scribbling a few notes.Tell me what you think
'What exactly do you mean when you say you want your country back?' 
This is the question every wet, woke and weak left leaning liberal individual asks me. The response they want is based on the colour of a person's skin, their ethnicity, or their religion. These people are the race baiters who love nothing more than to describe anyone who does not agree with them as a 'racist.
So here are a few examples of what I mean.I remember a time when children went to school and were not told that they could be a different gender, or they may have to use a different toilet and they did not have to sit down and watch a drag queen reading them stories. If people had been told this would happen 30 years ago then they would have been told you that you were insane. Yet it has been happening under our watch.I want this nonsense to stop, let kids be kids and let them grow and develop as they have always done. Just because a little boy picks a doll up it doesn't mean he wants to be a girl and every girl that kicks a football does not want to be a boy.
I want my country back and the country I am talking about would not tolerate this stupidity.
Imagine telling people just 20 years ago that over 130,000 illegal migrants would cross the English Channel in three years and would be picked up by British boats then placed in 4-star hotels, given free legal advice, and then allowed to settle in our country. Then tell the same people from 20 years ago that over 90% of these arrivals would be voung men destined for a life of crime and and some would go on and murder and rape British citizens.Imagine telling them that the government of the day would pass three Acts of Parliament to try and stop these crossings, but the young men kept coming and coming.
I want my country back and the country I am talking about would not tolerate this stupidity.
Many people remember the 1970s when East German female shot-putters had to undergo a sex test to see if they were really females. Have no fear as sex tests are not needed these days. A six-foot 6 hairy arsed bloke can put on an ill-fitting wig, a charity shop dress, and a bit of lippy and enter sporting competitions alongside women. To make matters worse on his way home he can then nip into a lady's boutique and try on a pair of size 16 stilettos whilst sat in a lady's changing room.
I want my country back and the country I am talking about would not tolerate this stupidity.
Back in the 80s and 90s if you applied for a council house you would get the choice of three houses but nowadays you have literally no chance of even being considered for one, yet we are letting over 1 million people a year into this country. That's hundreds of thousands of people putting extra pressure on our public services and whilst decent hard-working Brits struggle to get a GP appointment, a dental appointment, a school place for their kids the politicians tell them that immigration makes us all better off.
I want my country back and the country I am talking about would not tolerate this stupidity.
Back in the day if we had civil unrest on our streets, you could be rest assured that our boys in blue would be quickly on the scene to get stuck in so as decent folk could go about their daily business. Imagine telling folk on the picket lines of the 80s that in the future that a load of under nourished grey-haired vegans in their 60s could turn up in their Jesus sandals and bring London to a standstill whilst the Met police stood by and did nothing?
I want my country back and the country I am talking about would not tolerate this stupidity.Don't even start me on the pro-Palestinian marches.I want my country back.
WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK 

Sue Hammond ● 401d23 Comments ● 400d

Doubleplusgood Newspeak

"The Republican House Foreign Affairs Committee chair instructed GOP staff to refer to the West Bank by its biblical name, Judea and Samaria.The term is still used by Israel’s government to refer to territory of the West Bank along the Jordan River, claimed by both Israelis and the Palestinians. Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), chair of the committee, wrote in a staff memo that all “formal correspondence, communication, and documentation” would refer to the territory of the West Bank as Judea and Samaria. The term is often used by Israel’s religious and political right to emphasize Israel’s claim over the territory. Mast said he was making the change to recognize the “inherent right of the Jewish people to their ancient homeland” and demonstrate the U.S.’s “unbreakable bond with Israel.”https://thehill.com/homenews/5165472-gop-house-committee-west-bank-name/"In the U.S., the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) has officially updated “Gulf of Mexico” to “Gulf of America.” As we announced two weeks ago and consistent with our longstanding practices, we've begun rolling out changes to reflect this update.10 Feb 2025""President Donald Trump appeared to make a U-turn on his opinion on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, denying he ever called him a dictator.When asked about that comment, he told reporters in the Oval Office: 'Did I say that? I can't believe I said that. Next question.'" (Daily Mail)"‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."" (1984)

David Ainsworth ● 400d0 Comments ● 400d

Israel air-dropped 600 highly [and widely] destructive 2000 lb bombs in 6 weeks on Gaza

"BOSTON, MA – October 10, 2024 A new study reveals that between October 7 and November 17, 2023, the Israeli military air-dropped nearly 600 highly destructive 2000 lb bombs with the capacity to damage hospital infrastructure and kill or cause severe injury hundreds of meters away. One-third of the bombs identified were within dangerous proximity of hospitals across the Gaza Strip.“This study supports emerging evidence that the Israeli military has disregarded the protection of hospitals, mandated by international humanitarian law, through the systematic pattern of dropping massive M-84 bombs close enough to hospitals to knowingly cause significant damage, injury, and death. The damage to hospitals due to these and other munitions will have immediate and long-term effects on the health of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip,” said Yara M. Asi, PhD, Assistant Professor at the University of Central Florida, Visiting Scientist at the FXB Center, and one of the authors of the study.Using publicly available data from CNN and The New York Times satellite imagery investigations, the authors created a map of the Gaza Strip with the locations of craters formed by air-dropped 2000 lb bombs. They then overlaid this map with geospatial data from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN-OCHA) and Open Street Map to measure the distances of these bomb craters to hospitals in the Gaza Strip. The 2000 lb bombs, made by the American arms manufacturer General Dynamic and Ordinance Tactical System, have a blast radius that can kill people 360 m away from the point of detonation and can cause severe injury and damage building infrastructure 800 m away. Data analysis showed at least one bomb crater within 800 m of 83% percent of the 36 hospitals in the Gaza Strip, and nine of those hospitals had 2000 lb bomb craters within 360 m. Most hospitals in Gaza had several bomb craters within dangerous proximity. During the time when this satellite imagery was captured, tens of thousands of civilians used these hospitals and their surrounding areas as places to seek refuge, all while the hospital system itself was losing capacity to treat the overwhelming number of casualties. This analysis raises serious concern for the violation of international humanitarian law. “The ongoing genocide in Gaza is an escalation amongst a litany of catastrophic events of a mass genocidal plan spanning decades. Almost a year bearing witness to an abhorrent imperialist violence, there is a total failure to comply with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rulings or normative framework of international law,” said Dr. Tlaleng Mofokeng, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to health. “I continue my call on Israel and its allies to immediately ceasefire and end the occupation.” The analysis also found the Israeli military air-dropped over one hundred 2000 lb bombs in the officially designated evacuation zone for civilians. In the time span that this analysis covers, approximately 1 million people (about the population of Delaware) were estimated to have evacuated from the northern Gaza governorates to the southern governorates below the Wadi Gaza."https://fxb.harvard.edu/2024/10/10/new-study-shows-israel-air-dropped-2000lb-bombs-within-lethal-and-damage-ranges-of-hospitals-in-gaza/#:~:text=The%202000%20lb%20bombs%2C%20made,building%20infrastructure%20800%20m%20away.

David Ainsworth ● 407d8 Comments ● 402d

Foreign Aid Cut To Fund Increase To Defence Spending

I have been waiting for an outraged bleeding heart to post about this and I am shocked nobody has, so I am kindly doing it instead. Starmer slashes aid to fund major increase in defence spending:Keir Starmer has announced that Britain will “fight for peace in Europe” with a generational increase in defence spending paid for by slashing the foreign aid budget.The move, just two days before the prime minister is due to meet Donald Trump, raised immediate concerns that he was pandering to the US president, and fury from aid groups that say it could cost lives in countries that rely on UK support.In a surprise announcement, Starmer announced the biggest increase in defence spending since the end of the cold war, with the budget rising to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 – three years earlier than planned – and an ambition to reach 3%.https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/feb/25/starmer-slashes-aid-to-fund-major-increase-in-defence-spendingThe fact that Starmer announced it 2 days before his face to face meeting with Trump, was this purely coincidental, or a panic move to take something positive to the table in order to ingratiate himself? I would say the latter.  However I am glad that the foreign aid budget is being cut at long last.   Over the decades it has become hugely bloated and open to corruption and no longer fit for purpose.  Farage and Reform have always advocated for it to be cut, so at least Starmer has listened. I doubt that #NoCharmerStarmer will sleep much tonight and I would love to be a fly on the Oval Office wall tomorrow!🥹

Sue Hammond ● 406d4 Comments ● 402d

Didn't reach their first birthday in Gaza

I suppose that without independent confirmation of this, it will not be accepted. It comes from the Gaza Health Ministry via AlJazeera.Noura Walid Abdulsalam Shaheen (0 years old)Maryam Nour Al-Din Wael Daban (0 years old)Fatima Louay Rafiq Al-Sultan (0 years old)Watan Mohammed Abd Al-Rahim Al-Madhoon (0 years old)Mohammad Al-Jabbari Said Misbah Al-Khour (0 years old)Diyaa Ahmed Abd Al-Aati Saleh Moussa (0 years old)Oday Mohammed Rafiq Al-Sultan (0 years old)Mohammed Nidal Hisham Attallah (0 years old)Ahmad Shadi Talal Al-Haddad (0 years old)Masa Mohammed Youssef Nasr (0 years old)Ayat Abd Al-Aziz Omar Farwana (0 years old)Maalek Mohammed Shafeeq Abu-Al-Kas (0 years old)Sarah Abd Al-Rahman Mohammed Hamad (0 years old)Mohammed Saleh Mahmoud Al-Deiri (0 years old)Mecca Ahmed Eid Abu-Sherekh (0 years old)Iyad Abd Al-Rahman Jihad Muhaysen (0 years old)Adam Mohammed Sameer Abu-Ajwah (0 years old)Alayan Abd Al-Rahman Alayan Al-Ashqar (0 years old)Alma Moumen Mohammed Hamdan (0 years old)Diyaa Mohammed Zuheir Al-Bar'ai (0 years old)Misk Abd Al-Hai Sami Al-Halabi (0 years old)Elina Moumen Riad Al-Rifi (0 years old)Ali Raed Khalil Rahmi (0 years old)Younis Wissam Abdullah Afaneh (0 years old)Celine Abd Al-Hadi Adel Zahir (0 years old)Asil Amir Ali Al-Ashi (0 years old)Mira Abd Al-Rahman Fathi Radwan (0 years old)Fatima Mohammed Kamel Faisal Akela (0 years old)Mohammed Abd Al-Karim Mohammed Jabir Al-Safadi (0 years old)Anas Abdullah Bahaa Al-Din Sakik (0 years old)Sobhi Hamdan Sobhi Hassouna (0 years old)Celine Ehab Ayman Al-Bahtiti (0 years old)Mohammed Mazen Abdullah Al-Sanwar (0 years old)Mohammed Abd Al-Samad Maher Mohsen (0 years old)George Sobhi George Al-Souri (0 years old)Osama Ahmed Mohammed Hamada (0 years old)Elaf Karim Abdullah Al-Aywa (0 years old)Masa Jalal Moein Al-Harkaly (0 years old)Hassan Hamza Hassan Al-Omosa (0 years old)Anas Abd Al-Aziz Mohammad Zahir (0 years old)Daughter/Sona Hani Awada (0 years old)Niveen Mohammad Sameer Saadeh (0 years old)Issam Mohammad Issam Farag (0 years old)Ismail Ahmed Ismail Farhat (0 years old)Jouri Anas Bassam Shamia (0 years old)Aliya Abd Al-Noor Sami Al-Souri (0 years old)Kinan Amin Marwan Abu-Shakian (0 years old)Roz Abd Al-Aziz Mohammad Al-Ghoul (0 years old)Mohammad Hamid Nidal Aloua (0 years old)Salama Mohammad Marwan Abu-Atiwi (0 years old)Sham Ahmed Fawzi Al-Qafidi (0 years old)Luay Mahmoud Saleh Al-Ajrami (0 years old)Daughter/Shahd Omar Al-Qattati (0 years old)Lana Yasser Nassif Hijazi (0 years old)Abdullah Mohammad Abd Al-Hamid Mehana (0 years old)Son/Ahmed Fouad Sikeik (0 years old)Raed Ehab Raed Salmanaly (0 years old)Omar Ahmed Abd Al-Nasir Shamlakh (0 years old)Moaz Abd Al-Fattah Khaled Al-Zuhairi (0 years old)Maria Yasser Kamal Al-Masry (0 years old)Raed Khaled Raed Rajab (0 years old)Malak Abd Al-Salam Ali Abu-Saif (0 years old)Iyla Mohammad Salem Al-Dremli (0 years old)Sela Mahmoud Jamal Abu-Dhahir (0 years old)Layan Rami Anwar Faisal (0 years old)Najwa Mahmoud Fathi Radwan (0 years old)Mohammad Ahmed Salem Al-Qanou (0 years old)Yomna Omar Riyadh Al-Rifi (0 years old)Basil Mohammad Hossam Abu-Jaser (0 years old)Yasmine Khalil Jawad Abu-Binat (0 years old)Ayla Adi Abd Al-Jawad Abu-Ras (0 years old)Noor Yousef Bassam Abu-Hasira (0 years old)Juwan Ali Nasr Amer (0 years old)Saba Ahmed Ali Al-Qazzaz (0 years old)Fadel Maysara Mohammad Abu-Hasira (0 years old)Anisa Mahmoud Ahmed Ali (0 years old)Omar Jihad Omar Al-Bahtini (0 years old)Sundus Mohamed Sobhi Samara (0 years old)Farah Hosam Abd Al-Karim Hanoun (0 years old)Kenan Ahmed Ismail Al-Hattab (0 years old)Layan Abd Al-Karim Asaad Al-Dahshan (0 years old)Mahmoud Fadi Khaled Al-Baba (0 years old)Abd Al-Khaleq Fadi Khaled Al-Baba (0 years old)Maha Fadi Khaled Al-Baba (0 years old)Khaled Fadi Khaled Al-Baba (0 years old)Hamza Mohamed Abd Al-Hamid Ashour (0 years old)Yasmin Ramez Abd Al-Razzaq Al-Masri (0 years old)Reem Zakaria Yehia Badawi (0 years old)Joud Bahaa Eldin Haidar Al-Nadeem (0 years old)Najwa Ahmed Fathy Radwan (0 years old)Mahmoud Eid Mohamed Nabhan (0 years old)Suzan Iyad Mohamed Al-Ashi (0 years old)Kanary Moatasem Mahmoud Aql (0 years old)Atef Majd Atef Darwish (0 years old)Tala Mohamed Rafeeq Abu-Ghali (0 years old)Ghaith Rami Khaled Abu-Riya (0 years old)Sidra Yehia Khalil Abu-Zarifa (0 years old)Mohamed Hosam Ashraf Shahin (0 years old)Sahar Mohamed Raed Musleh (0 years old)Waad Waleed Sameer Sabah (0 years old)Bassam Mohamed Jamil Al-Maqousi (0 years old)Ali Islam Sameer Abu-Al-Einin (0 years old)Esraa Ahed Mohamed Radwan (0 years old)Son/ Ghadir Mohamed Kaid Shafoot (0 years old)Saber Sabri Abdullah Al-Farra (0 years old)Samar Bara Mohamed Abu-Ghbit (0 years old)Mohamed Ahmed Sami Al-Amawi (0 years old)Hour Khamis Suleiman Al-Khateeb (0 years old)Maria Khaled Nasr Al-Jed (0 years old)Kanzy Mohamed Ayman Al-Khateeb (0 years old)Nada Anas Ayman Abd (0 years old)Odai Adel Mohamed Al-Ghosein (0 years old)Malak Murad Ammar Barash (0 years old)Jory Murad Ammar Barash (0 years old)Hour Osama Suleiman Abu-Sanima (0 years old)Misk Ahmed Abd Al-Karim Hararah (0 years old)Hour Youssef Rashad Abu-Safi (0 years old)Daughter/Aisha Mohamed Ibrahim Abu-Matwi (0 years old)Daughter/Suhair Mohamed Shahda Khattab (0 years old)Son/Ilham Ahmed Hammad Khattab (0 years old)Daughter/Ilham Ahmed Hammad Khattab (0 years old)Jouri Mohamed Mohamed Abu-Sultan (0 years old)Maram Mohamed Mustafa Abu-Ghoula (0 years old)Mahmoud Hassan Khalil Obeid (0 years old)Yamen Mahmoud Abbas Muqata (0 years old)Yusuf Saher Nasr Abu-Sahlool (0 years old)Nazira Saher Nasr Sahlool (0 years old)Malak Saher Nasr Abu-Sahlool (0 years old)Carmel Alaa Walid Hamdan (0 years old)Asil Mansour Khaled Al-Louh (0 years old)Misk Yusuf Zuhair Al-Qanousi (0 years old)Amal Mohamed Jumaa Abu-Soueis (0 years old)Kenan Shadi Hashem Mushtaha (0 years old)Sila Islam Mousa Al-Talbani (0 years old)Mai Ibrahim Labad (0 years old)Baraa Mohamed Fawzi Shaldan (0 years old)Tariq Mohamed Fawzi Shaldan (0 years old)Raafat Mohamed Raafat Abed (0 years old)Mohamed Naim Nasr Ayad (0 years old)Ziad Mohamed Jamil Habib (0 years old)Suhaib Ahmed Moein Zakout (0 years old)Fatima Saleh Yasser Al-Hout (0 years old)Habiba Hesham Abd Al-Aty Abu-Jarri (0 years old)Masa Mohamed Hamza Al-Rifi (0 years old)Kamla Rabee Faraj Al-Ata'out (0 years old)Mohamed Malik Mahmoud Al-Marnakh (0 years old)Daughter/ Zeinab Mohamed Al-Abed Nawwas (0 years old)Abd Al-Rahman Zayed Ziad Mahani (0 years old)Salma Ahmed Ezzat Azzam (0 years old)Samira Ahmed Ezzat Azzam (0 years old)Ibrahim Abd Al-Fattah Said Salam (0 years old)Son/ Anwar Ahmed Mohamed Darwish (0 years old)Habiba Hesham Hassan Abu-Jarri (0 years old)Rahaf Deeb Mahmoud Al-Skafi (0 years old)Maysaa Deeb Mahmoud Al-Skafi (0 years old)Tabarak Ahmed Mahmoud Abbas (0 years old)Son of Israa Jamal Salem Abu-Mazkour (0 years old)Sewar Hossam Talal Abu-Atiwi (0 years old)Khitam Bara'a Abd Al-Bari Abu-Foul (0 years old)Ahmed Saed Amer Ayash (0 years old)Girl/Randa Mohammed Abd Al-Qader Wahba (0 years old)Daughter/Mona Jamal Mohammed Abu-Layla (0 years old)Mohannad Ahmed Jumaa Azzam (0 years old)Yasser Salah Yasser Al-Dalou (0 years old)Daughter/Nidal Jalal Al-Banna (0 years old)Zain Omar Zuhair Al-Daour (0 years old)Son/Alaa Murad Ali Binat (0 years old)Wissam Wissam Naeem Abu-Anza (0 years old)Insam Mahmoud Jihad Al-Louh (0 years old)Son/Nabila Nasr Mohammed Nofal (0 years old)Mohammad Ehab Eddin Khaled Owaidah (0 years old)Son/Rahima Saadi Mohammed Shahin (0 years old)Sara Arafat Hameed Al-Arjani (0 years old)Wateen Yahya Khaled Abu-Hilal (0 years old)Siyala Raafat Jamal Shatat (0 years old)Nisreen Mohammed Mohammed Al-Najjar (0 years old)Rakan Moumen Mousa Rabee (0 years old)Sanad Bilal Nabil Amara (0 years old)Hala Yasser Hamed Al-Sinnwar (0 years old)Hamadah Ibrahim Mohammed Al-Hajj Yousuf (0 years old)Maria Maher Yahya Al-Sikk (0 years old)Mohammad Saeed Adel Abu-Al-Rous (0 years old)Rateel Yasser Juma Abu-Al-Fita (0 years old)Bisan Ibrahim Mohammed Al-Mallahi (0 years old)Jannat Naji Abd Al-Rahman Abu-Hammad (0 years old)Ahmed Mohammed Amin Nofal (0 years old)Malak Abd Al-Rahman Ayash Darwish (0 years old)Rital Khalil Yahya Al-Batsh (0 years old)Ahmed Alaa Abd Al-Majeed Issa (0 years old)Qais Mohammed Ramadan Obeid (0 years old)Ibrahim Ammar Saad Al-Qara (0 years old)Karam Amjad Hafez Shamlakh (0 years old)Rafif Mahmoud Aref Al-Faqaawi (0 years old)Al-Anoud Suleiman Jaber Al-Qirinaawi (0 years old)Hour Mohammed Ibrahim Al-Mamlouk (0 years old)Maimouna Saher Said Al-Sayyid (0 years old)Rami Raafat Nidal Al-Amawasi (0 years old)Hour Rashad Said Habib (0 years old)Mohammed Omar Mustafa Shehab (0 years old)Raafat Khalil Raafat Anan (0 years old)Sanaa Ghassan Wagdi Hamouda (0 years old)Mohammed Nour Al-Din Yahya Al-Aqad (0 years old)Hassan Mohammed Hassan Abu-Dakkah (0 years old)Saif Ashraf Karim Abu-Hijr (0 years old)Abd Al-Raouf Ibrahim Abd Al-Raouf Al-Farra (0 years old)Hassan Ibrahim Abd Al-Karim Abu-Dwaba (0 years old)Tulin Ibrahim Barjas Awaijeh (0 years old)Khaled Bilal Mohammed Abu-Al-Omrein (0 years old)Tasnim Ramzi Awda Qarman (0 years old)Habiba Ashraf Mahmoud Abu-Assi (0 years old)Samira Ziyad Abd Al-Qader Al-Smeiri (0 years old)Mohammed Basel Mahmoud Al-Khayat (0 years old)Huda Mustafa Hatem Abu-Seif (0 years old)Abd Al-Rahman Samir Salama Saad (0 years old)Doaa Ali Hassan Al-Ghandour (0 years old)Ghaith Yasser Nabil Noufal (0 years old)Mohammed Mustafa Khalil Tammous (0 years old)Misk Mahmoud Ibrahim Hejazi (0 years old)Malak Walid Yousef Abu-Al-Khair (0 years old)Mazeen Hassan Mazen Al-Tawil (0 years old)Muayyad Mohammed Masoud Ashour (0 years old)Rafif Alaa Labib Al-Tabatabai (0 years old)Useid Haider Moen Al-Aff (0 years old)Batoul Khaled Shaaban Dawas (0 years old)Lynn Khaled Shaaban Dawas (0 years old)Sewar Khaled Saber Abu-Qashlan (0 years old)Wateen Bara'a Abd Al-Rahman Al-Hour (0 years old)Rafif Walid Sabri Al-Nabahin (0 years old)Fatima Mohammed Rizk Al-Wawi (0 years old)Bilal Khaled Mohammed Sobh (0 years old)Zein Al-Din Suleiman Moin Al-Najjar (0 years old)Malak Jihad Mohammed Al-Nemnem (0 years old)Rajwa Mahmoud Zuhdi Abu-Sharia (0 years old)Kinan Akram Sameeh Karim (0 years old)Jannah Hisham Mohammed Hamouda (0 years old)Tolin Ibrahim Jihad Al-Maghari (0 years old)Miyan Yahya Yousef Al-Astal (0 years old)Mostafa Mohammed Farid Qandil (0 years old)Moatasem Kanaan Farid Al-Jamal (0 years old)Mohammed Eyad Maher Abu-Leila (0 years old)Tahani Ezz Al-Din Ahmed Zourob (0 years old)Ayloul Omar Kamel Abu-Rahmeh (0 years old)Hanan Mohammed Abd Al-Hakim Asfour (0 years old)Hour Omar Mahmoud Al-Azib (0 years old)Lana Yousef Emad Lolo (0 years old)Wateen Sharif Bakr Al-Batniji (0 years old)Raghad Ahmed Oudah Abu-Khattab (0 years old)Aisha Jihad Jalal Shaheen (0 years old)Mohammed Hussein Mohammed Abu-Hamed (0 years old)Osayd Hussein Mohammed Abu-Hamed (0 years old)Badr Yasser Rafiq Abu-Habib (0 years old)Asia Hussein Ahmed Hamad (0 years old)Aseel Mohammed Jumah Dhahir (0 years old)Alma Adnan Jamal Al-Qatraoui (0 years old)Moaz Hani Mohammed Al-Aidi (0 years old)Mohammed Alaa Othman Mohammed (0 years old)Belal Mohammed Kamal Hamdan (0 years old)Hamza Abd Al-Samad Taysir Abu-Warda (0 years old)Maryam Khaled Suhail Abed (0 years old)Hour Hazem Ahmed Al-Madhoun (0 years old)Ryan Abd Al-Rahim Jamal Al-Qatraoui (0 years old)Eliana Mohammed Nabil Mukhaimer (0 years old)Sari Mahmoud Abd Al-Aziz Alayan (0 years old)Mohammed Hani Mohammed Al-Zahar (0 years old)Mohammed Mohammed Hosni Abu-Sharar (0 years old)Zaher Mohammed Zaher Abu-Awaili (0 years old)Ibrahim Ahmed Salem Azzam (0 years old)Omar Ismail Omar Sharaf (0 years old)Hind Khaled Ahmed Jahjouh (0 years old)Saba Ramez Mohammed Abu-Maamar (0 years old)Mervat Wissam Maher Al-Daalesa (0 years old)Shaimaa Saeed Nabil Al-Laham (0 years old)Maria Khaled Zakaria Al-Shantti (0 years old)Rima Mohammed Sabri Al-Braim (0 years old)Issa Mahmoud Mohammed Qarmoot (0 years old)Abd Al-Rahim Ahmed Abd Al-Rahim Awad (0 years old)Wateen Munzer Saher Khattab (0 years old)Zain Mohammed Ali Al-Zard (0 years old)Mohammed Taher Ahmed Abu-Younis (0 years old)Majd Ismail Jad Hamad (0 years old)Khaled Hamza Khaled Al-Louh (0 years old)Abd Al-Hakim Mohammed Abd Al-Hakim Hussein (0 years old)Taj Arafat Ramadan Al-Balawi (0 years old)Ibrahim Al-Mu'tasim Waleed Al-Qouqa (0 years old)Ahmed Saeed Ahmed Fouda (0 years old)Mohammed Suleiman Kamel Farajallah (0 years old)Amr Mahmoud Tayseer Abu-Al-Laban (0 years old)Hadeel Othman Khalil Saydam (0 years old)Mira Omar Fares Sukkar (0 years old)Sila Mohammed Suleiman Abu-Amsha (0 years old)Mu'tasim Billah Moad Hamad Hamad (0 years old)Layan Mohammed Youssef Hussein (0 years old)Zain Shihada Mustafa Al-Shaer (0 years old)Jehad Mohammed Ra'fat Al-Da'lais (0 years old)Mahmoud Amjad Saeed Bakhit (0 years old)Yaqeen Karam Khadr Al-Turk (0 years old)Qutaiba Diaa Mohammed Abu-Qaliq (0 years old)Zain Mohammed Khaled Al-Houbi (0 years old)Raseel Ahmed Abd Al-Bari Abu-Foul (0 years old)Mohammed Tamer Muslih Al-Qanoua (0 years old)Osama Mohammed Adeeb Asleem (0 years old)Abd Al-Hakim Mohammed Abd Al-Hakim Abu-Al-Shaar (0 years old)Abdullah Amir Abdullah Al-Khour (0 years old)Alma Ahmed Mohammed Al-Atal (0 years old)Ahmed Moamen Ahmed Daloul (0 years old)Zaid Khaled Jumaa Al-Bahbahani (0 years old)Youssef Haitham Youssef Abu-Mahadi (0 years old)Fatima Ahmed Salah Al-Sawafiri (0 years old)Wateen Abd Rabbo Taleb Abu-Jrei (0 years old)Mohammed Talaat Ibrahim Al-Hassaineh (0 years old)Salma Adnan Abd Al-Karim Abu-Mustafa (0 years old)Judy Ahmed Akram Al-Araqaan (0 years old)Sanad Mohammed Sami Salman (0 years old)Obaida Bilal Youssef Abu-Mailaq (0 years old)Sama Ibrahim Majid Al-Wadeeah (0 years old)Noor Rami Naeem Al-Asmar (0 years old)Qais Ali Nabil Al-Aidi (0 years old)Moustafa Hani Issam Saqallah (0 years old)Salma Ibrahim Basem Shaaban (0 years old)Wael Amir Sharif Assaf (0 years old)Moaz Mohammed Jawad Al-Wadeeah (0 years old)Yazan Ahmed Mohammed Al-Attar (0 years old)Joud Abdullah Ahmed Qassem (0 years old)Nasr Alaa Nasr Jargon (0 years old)Nabil Saif Al-Islam Nabil Al-Hallol (0 years old)Khaled Moamen Amin Shubair (0 years old)Sama Mohammed Yousef Darwish (0 years old)Alaa Al-Din Ali Kamal Balatah (0 years old)Rayan Abdullah Zakaria Al-Astal (0 years old)Nabil Bilal Nabil Al-Aidi (0 years old)Aws Mohammed Hussein Al-Atal (0 years old)Salam Wael Ahmed Al-Astal (0 years old)Sanad Yaseen Moustafa Al-Zeinati (0 years old)Jewel Atallah Ibrahim Al-Amash (0 years old)Hurriya Ahmed Imran Ghabn (0 years old)Mohammed Fadi Mohammed Al-Loqa (0 years old)Taqa Mousa Khalil Abu-Nussairah (0 years old)Malek Azzouz Ali Awad (0 years old)Warda Mahmoud Allam Al-Yazji (0 years old)Mohammed Ahmed Riyad Abu-Zurqa (0 years old)Adam Majdi Jaber Al-Dahdouh (0 years old)Mohammed Amr Mohammed Magari (0 years old)Basima Ibrahim Mohammed Al-Souri (0 years old)Sobhi Ramzi Sobhi Al-Ajal (0 years old)Mousab Mohammed Smeeh Subeih (0 years old)Elias Mohammed Emad Iyyad (0 years old)Marah Homam Yousef Bahar (0 years old)Farah Homam Yousef Bahar (0 years old)Yahya Jawad Mohammed Al-Labban (0 years old)Firas Mohammed Abd Al-Aziz Tamraz (0 years old)Abd Al-Jawad Meer Jamal Housso (0 years old)Yousry Bahaa Jun Musleh (0 years old)Amir Mahmoud Zuhdi Al-Masri (0 years old)Sarah Ahmed Medhat Abu-Bakr (0 years old)Ammar Islam Omar Harb (0 years old)Manal Moamen Majid Abu-Al-Aouf (0 years old)Munir Fadi Munir Shabat (0 years old)Rakan Hossam Hussein Mousa (0 years old)Dana Khaled Saleh Abu-Labda (0 years old)Diyaa Majed Ahmed Kashkou (0 years old)Jud Karam Ahmed Abu-Shawish (0 years old)Fahd Uday Imad Al-Ajez (0 years old)Maria Ahmed Nayef Ryan (0 years old)That is half the list for the under-ones. I doubt that it will convince.Anyhow:-"Israeli Intelligence Has Deemed Hamas-Run Health Ministry’s Death Toll Figures Generally Accurate":-https://www.vice.com/en/article/israeli-intelligence-health-ministry-death-toll/

David Ainsworth ● 409d28 Comments ● 406d

Yet more evidence of Hamas barbarity. Trump should act.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14417465/Hamas-sickens-world-parade-hostages-coffins-condemned-Israel.htmlHamas has been condemned for parading the coffins of hostages in Gaza, with the United Nations rights chief saying the 'abhorrent' treatment of the October 7 attack victims 'flies in the face of international law.'How low can the cowards that refuse to show their faces go ?But they should still worry: the IDF will deal with them in the end.And why is President Trump fighting with potential allies in Ukraine and not going to sort out Hamas and other Arabic terrorists ?https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clydwlxykzyo"Israel's 'hearts lie in tatters' as Hamas hands over first dead hostages" - BBC News today.'"The hearts of an entire nation lie in tatters," Israel's president has said, as the bodies of four hostages taken alive by Hamas in its attack on 7 October 2023 were returned to Tel Aviv.Hamas says the bodies are those of a mother and two children from the Bibas family, whose unknown fate has gripped Israel, and Oded Lifschitz, 84, a veteran peace activist.It is the first time the group Hamas has returned captives dead since the ceasefire began last month, with Israel saying it will confirm their identities after forensic examinations.In choreographed scenes reminiscent of recent handovers of living hostages, four black coffins were laid out on a stage decked with propaganda in Khan Younis in southern Gaza in front of crowds of spectators.A Red Cross official appeared to sign documents at a table alongside armed Hamas fighters before the coffins were driven away in Red Cross vehicles.Earlier the Red Cross had called for a dignified handover by Hamas following widespread denunciation of the way in which it had released hostages in recent weeks.It is not known how Shiri, Kfir and his brother Ariel - if confirmed - died. Hamas said in November 2023 that they had been killed in an Israeli air strike, without providing evidence. At the time, then-member of Israel's war cabinet Benny Gantz said there was no confirmation of the claim.The family were taken along with the father, Yarden, from kibbutz Nir Oz when hundreds of Hamas gunmen burst through the border with Israel and attacked communities, security forces sites and a music festival.About 1,200 people - mostly civilians - were killed in the attack and 251 others taken back to Gaza as hostages.Sixty-six hostages taken on 7 October are still being held in Gaza. Three other hostages, taken more than a decade ago, are also being held. About half of all the hostages still in Gaza are believed to be alive'.The whole orchestrated event is sickening to look at and just shows how depraved Hamas Palestinians are.Another question.Is the BBC impartial in its reporting of the Israel/Hamas conflict ?Earlier -"BBC faces questions over Gaza film's Hamas link"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9wpk5re5e1o'The culture secretary has said she will raise concerns with BBC bosses about a documentary on Gaza that was narrated by the son of a Hamas official.The broadcaster has been criticised for Gaza: How To Survive A War Zone, which centred on a 13-year-old boy who is the son of Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture.Lisa Nandy said she would discuss the matter with the BBC's director general and chairman, "particularly around the way in which they sourced the people who were featured in the programme".The BBC said it had not been informed of the family connection in advance by the film's production company, and has apologised "for the omission of that detail".Wonderful editorial control from an organisation we are legally obliged to pay for.

John Hawkes ● 412d5 Comments ● 407d

Trump's Controversial Speech ~ Very Long Post

Much condemnation has been expressed over Trump's outburst but there is an article in tobay's Spectator that is worth reading.  I think it's probably behind a paywall so I have copied it:"The cruellest thing about Trump vs Zelensky? Trump’s right. And just like that, we are back in 2017. Donald Trump, the President of the United States, is posting ridiculous hyperbole on his socials and mouthing off from Mar-a-Lago, as he always has.

In the last 24 hours, however, the global political and media classes have gone back to gnashing their teeth and wailing in way they did in Trump’s first term. It’s disgraceful! It’s sub-literate! He’s Vladimir Putin’s puppet! He’s reckless and utterly out of control! And that, of course, is the point.

Trump’s re-election proved that he is no aberration, so in 2025 the liberal, western world order has tried to come to terms with him. Western statesmen took turns to recognise his achievements, or his mandate, and to distance themselves from their past condemnations. But this was all insincere politesse and it was never going to work. Trump doesn’t care. His mandate is to cripple their authority. And on the international stage, Ukraine was always going to be the breaking point. The West has invested a huge amount of capital – political, economic and strategic – in the fight against Russia, and it has failed. Trump knows that and so he’s ending the war: if that means insulting Volodymyr Zelensky, parroting Russian talking points and playing nice with Putin, so be it.

Fact-checkers have been queueing up to rebut Trump’s incoherent Truth Social post last night, which is worth reposting here in full:

‘Think of it, a modestly successful comedian, Volodymyr Zelensky, talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn’t be won, that never had to start, but a War that he, without the U.S. and “TRUMP,” will never be able to settle. The United States has spent $200 Billion Dollars more than Europe, and Europe’s money is guaranteed, while the United States will get nothing back. Why didn’t Sleepy Joe Biden demand Equalization, in that this War is far more important to Europe than it is to us – We have a big, beautiful Ocean as separation. On top of this, Zelenskyy admits that half of the money we sent him is “MISSING.” He refuses to have Elections, is very low in Ukrainian Polls, and the only thing he was good at was playing Biden “like a fiddle.” A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left. In the meantime, we are successfully negotiating an end to the War with Russia, something all admit only “TRUMP,” and the Trump Administration, can do. Biden never tried, Europe has failed to bring Peace, and Zelenskyy probably wants to keep the “gravy train” going. I love Ukraine, but Zelenskyy has done a terrible job, his Country is shattered, and MILLIONS have unnecessarily died – And so it continues...’ And so it does.
To westerners who have spent years grandstanding against Putin, such words are anathema. To the many Ukrainians who have fought and died fighting Russian forces in their country, such rhetoric is beyond reprehensible. But if you can somehow look through the insensitivity, the febrile exaggerations, the score-settling with Zelensky, the half-lies and the cruel braggadocio, you have to admit that he is right – or at least not wrong.

Only offensive, odious Donald could end the war in Ukraine, which he is now doing. Europe has failed to bring peace. In a press conference on Tuesday, Trump said that Ukrainians shouldn’t complain about not being involved in his dialogue with Russia: ‘Well, you’ve been there for three years... you should have ended it three years... You should have never started it. You could have made a deal.’ That’s been widely interpreted as him saying that Ukraine started the war, and while his choice of words was poor, in context he is clearly referring to the thwarted efforts to achieve peace in the conflict’s early days in 2022. Trump is also right to say that vast amounts of western funding to Ukraine have gone missing, because the country is – and always has been – deeply corrupt.For European leaders who have spent years advocating on behalf of Ukraine, the most painful part will be Trump’s reckoning on Zelensky. In the days and months that followed Russia’s invasion, when Ukraine’s President bravely stayed in Kyiv and led Ukraine’s impressive resistance, Zelensky became a western hero. People called him a 21st-century Churchill. He was fêted in European capitals, Hollywood and on the cover of Vogue magazine as young men killed each other on the front line.There’s no doubt that, in our eagerness to champion the man in the military fatigues, we overlooked the more sordid aspects of his leadership. The Pandora papers showing his links to shady offshore bank accounts were forgotten about. His ties to deeply corrupt and double-dealing oligarchs, such as Ihor Kolomoisky, were brushed over. His ruthless suppression of Moscow-affiliated religious groups was dismissed as Kremlin ‘disinformation’.Western politicians, and military-industrial types who have made a lot of money from the war effort, have always known, deep down, that in supporting Ukraine against Putin they have covered up awkward truths. What really frightens them now is not necessarily Trump’s recklessness. It’s that the murkier realities of the Ukraine-Russia relationship and the West’s involvement in the conflict going back to 2014 and before, may soon come to light."

Sue Hammond ● 412d19 Comments ● 410d

Palestinian refugees given right to come to Britain

Palestinian refugees given right to come to Britain under Ukraine settlement scheme - as Home Office warns the move could open 'floodgates'The family of six from Gaza - a mother, father and four children between seven and 18 years old - had reportedly applied to the Ukraine Family Scheme asking to join their brother already living in the UK, but the Home Office rejected their application.The scheme allowed Ukrainians and their family members to find refuge in Britain if they have a relative who is either a UK national or settled in the UK. It closed last February, nearly two years after it was set up in March 2022. An immigration tribunal initially refused the claim because the scheme for Ukrainians did not apply to the situation of the Palestinian family.The judge ruled that it should be up to Parliament to decide which countries should benefit from resettlement schemes. But this decision was overturned by judge Hugo Norton-Taylor at a higher-level tribunal.He granted the Palestinians the right to live in the UK with their brother under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which outlines the right to a family life. Judge Norton-Taylor reportedly said that the family's 'extreme and life-threatening' situation was outweighing the 'public interest' of rules regulating the entry to the UK.Shadow secretary Mr Philp criticised the 'alarming and dangerous' ruling, telling the Telegraph that it provides 'a basis for anyone in any conflict zone anywhere in the world with relations in the UK to come here'.https://mol.im/a/14386875So a senior judge uses Article 8 of an ECHR dictate to overrule an asylum claim that had already been rejected twice by the Home Office.This is why we MUST leave the ECHR and only Reform U.K.will do this if it forms the next government!

Sue Hammond ● 420d48 Comments ● 415d

Hammersmith Bridge. £2.9m for temporary resurfacing … ?

Fleur Anderson MPHouse of CommonsLondonSW1A 0AAFrom the ParliamentaryUnder Secretary of StateSimon Lightwood MPGreat Minster House33 Horseferry RoadLondonSW1P 4DR29 January 2025Dear Fleur,Thank you for reaching out to the Department for Transport regardingHammersmith Bridge.We understand the significant impact that the ongoing closure of the bridge tomotor vehicles has had on congestion levels in South-West London and onthe daily lives of residents and workers in the surrounding areas.Typically, a project of this nature would fall under the jurisdiction of theLondon Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham as the owner of the bridge.However, the Government acknowledges the unique challenges posed by theHammersmith Bridge, given its age, construction materials, and status as alisted structure. Consequently, the Department for Transport has beenactively involved in this project and has contributed nearly £13 million to date.This funding includes £4 million for emergency exploratory works followingthe complete closure of the bridge, £2.93 million for initial stabilisation efforts,£2.5 million for geo-technical works, and £2.9 million for the temporaryresurfacing of the bridge carriageway.The Hammersmith Bridge Taskforce was set up by the previousadministration in September 2020, to work towards the safe reopening of thebridge. The taskforce brought together the key stakeholders, with the sharedambition of finding solutions to the closure and enabling the repair works.The Taskforce was paused in November 2021, following an agreement toonly call further meetings when there were issues that required unblockingbetween members.After five years of disruption, and the imminent completion of the first phaseof works on the bridge, this government has decided to reconvene theTaskforce to re-evaluate all viable and cost-effective solutions for the nextstage of works on Hammersmith Bridge, with the hope of reaching anagreement.The Taskforce is scheduled to meet on Thursday, and we expect all parties tocollaborate and reconsider all feasible and affordable options for the future ofthe bridge, especially in these challenging economic conditions. A summarystatement will be made available following the meeting.Thank you once again for taking the time to write to us about this importantissue. We hope this response clarifies the steps the Government is taking totry and resolve this longstanding situation.Yours sincerely,SIMON LIGHTWOOD MPMINISTER FOR LOCAL TRANSPORT

John Cameron ● 427d4 Comments ● 417d

Labour - the Nasty Party ?

'A Labour Minister has been sacked after The Mail on Sunday exposed his racist and sexist messages, including one vile post saying he hoped a pensioner who didn't vote Labour would die before the next election.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14375823/Labour-minister-SACKED-vile-jibe-saying-hopes-pensioners-dont-vote-party-die-election-expose-racist-sexist-messages.htmlAndrew Gwynne also made anti-Semitic slights and 'jokes' about a constituent being 'mown down' by a truck.The comments were made on a WhatsApp group made up of Greater Manchester Labour MPs and Councillors. The MP apologised for his 'badly misjudged comments'.I wonder what he really meant to say !!'Now it can be revealed that Oliver Ryan, the 29-year-old MP for Burnley, was another leading member of the group, where he has posted more than 2,000 messages'.The Daily Mail has also learned that Greater Manchester Police are now assessing a number of complaints made about the WhatsApp group's offensive content.In the private chat, called Trigger Me Timbers, Mr Ryan takes part with others in apparently homophobic banter as they joke about a fellow Labour MP being gay. In a series of posts, Mr Ryan also makes cruel remarks about a local Labour leader and life-long lollipop man in Greater Manchester called Colin Bailey'.What is revealing if you look at their CVs is that both MPs have never had a proper job in the real world.They have spent all of their time in and earned all of their income from Local and National Labour Party politics. Their comments give lie to the claim that Labour exists to promote the welfare of persecuted minorities and the vulnerable.I do hope that Putney's Labour MP has confronted these men and supports Kier Starmer in condemning them.

John Hawkes ● 422d11 Comments ● 420d

Another Bad Decision By Starmer

Mandelson was always a weird choice in my opinion. Donald Trump is considering rejecting Sir Keir Starmer’s nominee for UK ambassador to the US in what would be an extremely rare move.Sources within the Trump team have told The Independent that it is still not certain Peter Mandelson’s credentials will be accepted by Mr Trump after he becomes president.While the threat of rejecting Lord Mandelson could be sabre rattling, strains between the Labour government and the incoming administration are being blamed. However, there also are concerns about Lord Mandelson’s perceived links to China.Labour has told the Trump transition team that “it is a huge compliment” that Sir Keir wants to send such a senior Labour figure, but a source noted: “We are not buying that.”It was noted that Lord Mandelson did not attend the pre-inauguration party on Friday hosted by Nigel Farage in Washington DC, even though he had been invited in an effort to help build bridges with key members of the Trump team.The outgoing UK ambassador Dame Karen Pierce, who has impressed the transition team, was there.For an ambassadorial nominee to formally take up their role, the head of state of the country they have been sent to has to accept the “letters of credence”.In the UK this is done via the Court of St James’s where letters are presented to the King and in the US letters have to be presented to the president.One source said that strained relations with Mr Trump and the British government continue to be a problem which has “been made worse” by the nomination of Lord Mandelson.However, it is connections with China which are most alarming to the incoming Trump administration.“It is quite possible that Mandelson’s credentials could still be rejected,” a source said. “There are serious concerns about his links to China.”Lord Mandelson has been a strong advocate of close trading and other ties with China, even penning an article in 2018 warning that Mr Trump’s antipathy to China was “putting free trade at risk”.https://www.aol.co.uk/trump-considering-rejecting-lord-mandelson-162908190.html

Sue Hammond ● 445d50 Comments ● 434d

Can you see what it is yet?

"Trump wants Jordan and Egypt to accept more Palestinian refugees and suggests plan to 'clean out' Gaza US President  Donald Trump  has indicated that he would like to see Jordan, Egypt and other Arab nations increase the number of Palestinian refugees they are accepting from the  Gaza  Strip. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One yesterday, Trump, an ally of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said: “You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing and say, ‘You know, it’s over.’” Trump also told reporters that he had call earlier in the day with  King Abdullah II o f Jordan and would speak with Egyptian President  Abdel Fattah el-Sissi  on Sunday. The newly inaugurated Republican president said he complimented Jordan for having successfully accepted Palestinian refugees and that he told the king: “I’d love for you to take on more, cause I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess. It’s a real mess.” For context,Jordan is already home to more than 2.39 million registered Palestinian refugees,  according to the UN . Trump added: I don’t know, something has to happen, but it’s literally a demolition site right now. Almost everything’s demolished and people are dying there, so I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing in a different location where I think they could maybe live in peace for a change. Trump said that the potential housing “could be temporary” or “could be long-term”. During Israel’s 15 month war on Gaza,  more than two-thirds of buildings  have been destroyed or damaged by one of the most intensive bombardments in modern times. It has sparked a refugee crisis as large parts of the territory are now uninhabitable." (Guardian today) No surprises.

David Ainsworth ● 437d20 Comments ● 435d

Govt To Provide £117 Million More Funding To Protect Muslims

How thoughtful. No money found though for the Pensioners' Winter Fuel Allowance or the WASPI Women. 🤬
Today’s announcement marks a package of longer-term support to provide reassurance that anti-Muslim abuse, threats or harassment or any form of hate crime will not be tolerated.  
The funding will provide protective security measures to ensure the UK’s Muslim community can be, and just as importantly, can feel safe. 

Measures include technology such as CCTV, alarm systems and secure perimeter fencing at mosques, Muslim faith community centres, and Muslim faith schools.  
This comes alongside the extension of the deadline for the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme, and the government continues to invite mosques and Muslim faith community centres to register for protective security measures. 
The government will continue to work closely with policing and community partners to ensure the safety and security of Muslims.
Home Secretary James Cleverly said: Anti-Muslim hatred has absolutely no place in our society. We will not let events in the Middle East be used as an excuse to justify abuse against British Muslims.
The Prime Minister has made clear that we stand with Muslims in the UK. That is exactly why we have committed to this funding, giving reassurance and confidence to UK Muslims at a time when it is crucially needed.
Labour is committed to protecting the Muslim vote whatever the cost! 

Sue Hammond ● 436d2 Comments ● 436d

Why have Labour been so incompetent?

A list of some of Labour's errors since taking office:abandoning the Rwanda schemegiving striking doctors and train drivers inflationary pay awardswithdrawing winter fuel allowancepausing free speech protection in universitiesimposing the National Curriculum on AcademiesImposing IHT on family farmsraising employers' NI contributionsextending day-one employment rightsimposing a football regulatorgiving away the Chagos islandscancelling North Sea oil and gas explorationimposing VAT on private schoolsagreeing to enforce an ICC arrest warrant on Netanyahu.The cause of these unforced errors is to be found in Labour's move away from state socialism to what Tony Blair called ethical socialism, an ideology based on a market economy but characterised by a series of  anti-isms - anti-elitism, anti-racism, anti-colonialism, anti-sexism, anti-nationalism and so on. These 'anti-isms' are not wrong in themselves but are pursued with such unthinking fervour that they run counter to the government's economic objectives and the nation's interests and actually cause injustice.The anti-elitist strain in Labour, for example, regards successful entrepreneurs with suspicion, equating profit with exploitation. This has led to Rachel Reeve's decision to increase employers' NI contributions as well as to extend day-one employment rights for workers. These measures will result in reduced investment and slow growth, the very opposite of the government supposedly wants to achieve.. Anti-elitist ideology is also responsible for the unjust decision to impose VAT on private schools, a measure which will force parents of modest means to withdraw their children from efficient and much-loved schools even when adequate state provision is lacking. It is also behind the decision to impose unaffordable IHT bills on family farms, which will compel many asset-rich but income-poor farmers to sell up, jeopardising food production in this country.   

Steven Rose ● 437d18 Comments ● 437d

Palestinian terrorists release some female Israeli hostages

From BBC News.'Four female hostages who were held by Hamas in Gaza have returned to IsraelGunmen and crowds gathered in Palestine Square in Gaza City as the hostages were released to the Red Cross in a highly choreographed handoverThe four women - who are the second group of hostages released since a ceasefire deal was agreed - are Israeli soldiers who were taken on 7 OctoberIsrael is set to release 200 Palestinian prisoners in return, 70 of whom are expected to be deportedHowever, the Israeli government accused Hamas of breaching the ceasefire deal by not releasing civilian hostage Arbel YehudIn response, Israel said displaced Palestinians will not yet be allowed to return to northern Gaza, as had been scheduled under the dealMeanwhile, Hamas is expected to provide more information about the remaining 26 hostages due to be released in the coming weeks.Under the agreement, 50 prisoners are to be released for every Israeli soldier, and 30 prisoners are released for every Israeli civilian.During his press conference a little earlier, IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari expressed concern for the welfare of two children still held by Hamas.The youngest hostages still in Gaza are part of the Bibas family. They are brothers Kfir and Ariel, aged two and four respectively.Kfir was only ten months old when he was taken captive alongside his parents Sheri and Yarden.****Hamas said in December 2023 that Sheri and the boys had been killed'****.The BBC report shows a graphic picture of today's handover event with the identities of the brave boys of Hamas hidden behind masks and balaclava helmets and who are carrying automatic weapons.The women are smiling but who knows what the Palestinians subjected them to.Hamas claim this as a sign of victory, particularly the release of those of their members tried and convicted for terrorist offences in the past such as bombings of civilians in Israel.But I wonder what lies in store for them once Israel has all its captured citizens back. BTW was there a pro-Palestine/anti-Israel 'peace march in London today ?

John Hawkes ● 438d6 Comments ● 437d

Southport attack: next steps statement. 'Prevent' section

Oral statement to Parliament Southport attack: next steps The Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has given an update on the actions the government will take including the creation of an independent public inquiry. From: Home Office and The Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP Published 21 January 2025 "With permission Mr Speaker, I will make a statement on the Southport murders." Large section removed. See the link at end. "Firstly, on Prevent. The government and Counter Terrorism Policing jointly commissioned an immediate prevent learning review during the summer, and I will publish detailed findings following the sentencing. The 3 referrals took place between 3 and 4 years before the Southport attack, including following evidence he was expressing interest in school shootings, the London Bridge attack, the IRA, MI5, and the Middle East. On each occasion, Rudakubana’s case was assessed by Counter Terrorism Policing, but in each instance, there was no onward referral to specialist channel support. The learning review has concluded that the referrals should not have been closed, and that cases such as these, given his age and complex needs, should be referred to channel. It concludes that too much weight was placed on the absence of ideology, without considering the vulnerabilities to radicalisation, or taking account of whether he was “obsessed with massacre or extreme violence.” And the cumulative significance of those 3 repeat referrals was not properly considered. Mr Speaker, the Prevent programme is vital for our national security. Its officers work with huge dedication to keep us safe. But we need it to be effective. Some changes have already been made since 2021 including new Prevent duty guidance, new training for frontline workers on radicalisation, and stronger policy on repeat referrals. In September 2024, a new Prevent assessment framework was launched, supplemented by robust training for all Prevent police officers. But these changes do not go far enough. Given the importance of the programme, I cannot understand how it has been allowed to operate for so long without proper independent oversight. That is why I announced before Christmas the introduction of a new independent Prevent Commissioner with power to review cases and ensure standards are being met. I am today appointing Lord David Anderson KC as the interim Prevent Commissioner, to start work immediately and his first task will be to conduct a thorough review of the Prevent history in this case to identify what changes are needed to make sure serious cases are not missed, particularly where there is mixed and unclear ideology. I have also tasked my department to conduct an end-to-end review of Prevent thresholds including on Islamist extremism where referrals have previously been too low. We are also looking at cases where mental ill-health or neurodivergence is a factor. And developing new arrangements with other agencies which may not meet the threshold for channel support but where violent behaviour urgently must be addressed." Continues. See link :-



Southport attack: next steps - GOV.UK

David Ainsworth ● 440d0 Comments ● 440d

Economy Trumps Climate Emergency - says Labour

After snuffing out UK growth through months of spouting doom & gloom it looks like Labour are about to copy Trump — who has only been in the job a couple of days and attracted billions of dollars of new investment in the US. Labour are now going full throttle when it comes to runways. I wouldn't be surprised if they even proposed a new Thames Estuary Airport! Love him or hate him or simply ove to hate him: Trump after 4 years out of office knew what he wanted to do and set about doing it — immediately! Contrast that with Labour's more than a decade out of power and have so far managed to bring a 'Save the taxpayer and Kill your old folk kindly bill" along with killing vacancies with a huge employment tax increase!  "The chancellor is expected to give her firm support to the expansion of Britain’s busiest airport – as well as bringing a second runway at Gatwick into full-time use and increasing the capacity of Luton – in a speech later this month." Expect $$ to flow to the US to be invested where the new government seems to appreciate them. Economy harmer Starmer in the meantime is trying to find new management speak that he hasn't used before: Twelve missions, seven pillars, half a dozen values, five milestones, eight foundations and and an unknown number of hard targets — in an effort to kill the rest of us via PowerPoint! https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/jan/22/rachel-reeves-says-growth-matters-more-than-net-zero-heathrow-third-runway-decision

Ed Robinson ● 440d0 Comments ● 440d

Trump wants UK to take back groomed Shamima

"Britain MUST take back Shamima Begum and other Isis members from Syrian prisons, Trump's terror chief says""The UK should take back British members of Islamic State who are languishing in Syrian prison camps, Donald Trump's incoming terror chief has said. Sebastian Gorka, a British-American, called on Sir Keir Starmer to bring the citizens home as part of his 'commitment' to the international fight against the jihadist group. His comments come after ISIS bride Shamima Begum last year lost her final appeal against the government's decision to rescind her British citizenship.It is thought she would be one of the members of the terror group who would be repatriated under his plans. There are currently around 20 British women, 40 children and 10 men detained in prison camps in northeastern Syria, according to charities working in the region.Gorka, who has been appointed a deputy assistant to the president-elect, told The Times countries needed to act in a way that reflects their desire to be a US ally. And when asked whether Britain should be forced to take the ISIS prisoners back, he said: 'Any nation which wishes to be seen to be a serious ally and friend of the most powerful nation in the world should act in a fashion that reflects that serious commitment.'That is doubly so for the UK which has a very special place in President Trump's heart and we would all wish to see the "special relationship" fully re-established.'""Since ISIS was defeated in 2019, the US has been piling on the pressure for its partners to repatriate their citizens many of whom have been detained for years.The American Justice Department has argued it is their 'moral responsibility' to solve to bring the prisoners home and try them there. Britain has so far taken a hard line on the matter and has refused most repatriation requests- with the most notorious being the Begum case."https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14265157/Shamima-Begum-Isis-members-Syrian-Trump.html

David Ainsworth ● 451d63 Comments ● 445d

Axe murderer?

Must be true."Tough-on-crime crusader Elon Musk claims that there was an axe murderer on the loose in the city of San Francisco who tried to kill several of his employees, with the authorities doing nothing to catch the assailant. The key word in all of this being "claims.""About a year ago, a guy tried to kill three X employees with an axe outside the former Twitter HQ in SF. They reported it to the police, but nothing was done," Musk tweeted, responding to the account End Wokeness (a favorite of his). "He later killed someone with that axe."If this is true, the city has become so utterly lawless that the cops never got wind of the grisly murder. On Monday, local police said they could find no records supporting Musk's story, the San Francisco Chronicle reports — evidence that, once again, Musk may be simply be fibbing or falling victim to preposterous rumors."Based on the information provided, we cannot find any incident that matches this description in that location in 2023 or 2024," Evan Sernoffsky, a San Francisco police spokesperson, told the Chronicle.Tall FailsYes, it would be remiss to take the authorities at their word. But Musk can't even get his own story straight here. As we'll show, he's made these claims before, changing key details literally every time he's done so.When Musk shared a similar account last April, he stated that "several" employees were threatened "by a guy with a machete" outside a Walgreens — not with an axe, and not outside Twitter headquarters."They didn't report it," Musk claimed, "because that doesn't constitute an arrestable crime in California. That guy later killed 3 people." His most recent version of events, however, purports that the employees did report the crime — and that the assailant only killed one person.In an interview with Tucker Carlson last October, Musk threw in another variation in body count: the hatchet man, back to menacing employees outside Twitter HQ rather than a drugstore, killed two people, according to the Chronicle.Facts vs FeelingsMusk has frequently lied and spread conspiracy theories in his railing against crime, foreigners, and anything else that can be pinned on the "woke" agenda. Last year, for example, he chimed in the conservative moral-panic-of-the-moment by accusing Haitian immigrants of being "cannibals," while spreading other unfounded claims. He's even suggested that most homeless people don't exist, and that the word "homeless" is "usually a propaganda word for violent drug addicts."Given his conflicting reports and his history of fabulism — whether as part of the culture war or to prop up his enterprises — it's hard to take this axe-slash-machete murderer tale of his seriously.The real axeman of San Francisco may in fact be Musk himself: after taking over Twitter, he annihilated 80 percent of its workforce, or more than 6,000 employees." (The Byte, 16/1/25)https://futurism.com/the-byte/elon-musk-axe-murdererhttps://x.com/elonmusk/status/1878319143860253042

David Ainsworth ● 446d4 Comments ● 445d

'Let's name the guilty men'

David AinsworthDate/Time: 10/01/25 18:06:00It's all very well for some people to turn accusations of what are obviously major sex crimes against children into a defence against so called politically (by the Conservatives) motivated racism against groups of Pakistani Muslims.To many the 'crime' of racism seems to be more heinous than the crime of child rape.However I have not seen such accusations made against other ethnic or religious groups.Now I know many will stop reading here for below are descriptions of these crimes and their perpetrators taken from today's MailOnline - a well known extreme right wing publication. (boo ! hiss !).What I cannot really understand is why these criminals cannot be deported to to their place of birth and origin.Can anyone explain ?"Violated all over again and haunted by the paedophiles who raped us: How the evil Rochdale Nine have been handed a fortune in legal aid so that a decade on only ONE has been deported - to the anguish of victims" 'Few people outside the town of Rochdale would recognise Abdul Rauf if they saw him. But for those in the know in this Greater Manchester town, the sight of the 55-year-old paedophile, a key figure in one of the UK’s most notorious child grooming gangs, is an utter outrage which strikes at their hearts.By rights this abusive monster should have been deported to his native Pakistan years ago but today, thanks largely to bureaucratic red tape and taxpayer-funded legal filibustering, he’s out of jail and back at home in his red-brick semi with his wife, five children and grandchildren – free to come and go as he pleases.Rauf himself was convicted in 2012 of trafficking a teenage girl and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child after driving one 15-year-old victim to different locations where he and some of his monstrous cronies had sex with her up to 20 times.The men, mainly British Pakistanis, often plied the girls with drink and drugs and passed them around for sex but police initially failed to investigate amid fears of being accused of racism.Mohammed Sajid was found guilty of conspiracy, trafficking, one count of rape and one count of sexual activity with a child.Hamid Safi was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking.Taxi driver Abdul Aziz, known as 'The Master' was found guilty of conspiracy and trafficking for sexual exploitation.Abdul Qayyum, known as 'Tiger', was found guilty of conspiracy.Kabeer Hassan was found guilty of conspiracy and rape.Adil Khan renounced his Pakistani nationality days before the Court of Appeal ruled he could be stripped of his UK citizenship.Shabir Ahmed was the ringleader of a Rochdale child sex grooming gang who cited human rights laws to appeal against deportation.Mohammed Amin was jailed for five years'.  

John Hawkes ● 452d2 Comments ● 451d

Musk's 'disinformation' endangering me, says Phillips

"Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips has told BBC's Newsnight that "disinformation" spread by Elon Musk was "endangering" her but that it was "nothing" compared to the experiences of victims of abuse.The tech billionaire and adviser to US President-elect Donald Trump labelled Phillips a "rape genocide apologist" and said she should be jailed.Asked if the threat to her own safety had gone up since his social media posts and whether protections were in place, Phillips replied "yes".She said the experience had been "very, very, very tiring" but that she was "resigned to the lot in life that you get as a woman who fights violence against women and girls".She added: "I'm no stranger to people who don't know what they're talking about trying to silence women like me."The row between Mr Musk and the UK government concerns cases of groups of men - mainly of Pakistani descent - being convicted for sexually abusing and raping predominantly white girls around the UK.Mr Musk's intervention came in response to Phillips rejecting a request for the government to lead a public inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Oldham - which sparked calls from the Conservatives and Reform UK for a national inquiry into grooming gangs.Phillips decision was taken in October but first reported by GB News at the start of the year, and then picked up by Mr Musk on his social media platform X.Phillips defended the government's decision not to hold a national inquiry, arguing that local inquiries, such as one held in Telford, were more effective at leading to change."What I saw happen in Telford is the exact opposite of what I have seen happen because of the national expert inquiry for the last two years since it came out - I saw change happen," she said.She said she would be getting council leaders together to learn the lessons from Telford."When people say it's the council marking their own homework, it isn't."It is an independent inquiry led locally and it's the only model I've seen work, and I've worked in this field for 15 years."The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, which lasted seven years and reported in 2022, made 20 recommendations - however, none has yet been implemented.Speaking to the Today programme earlier Prof Alexis Jay, who led the inquiry, said: "We've had enough of inquiries, consultations and discussions... we have set out what action is required and people should just get on with it locally and nationally.""BBC Jan 8th

David Ainsworth ● 453d0 Comments ● 453d

Grooming Gang Rapist Defies Deportation

Unbelievable!!🤬How has this been allowed to happen?  Qari Abdul Rauf has been represented by tax-funded human rights lawyers (that we all pay for) who subsequently took the case to the ECHR.His lawyers argued that Rauf is stateless' having renounced his Pakistani citizenship and deportation would breach his right to private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.'Rochdale rape gang ringleader's VERY comfortable life in Britain a decade after he was released and told he'd be deportedThe ringleader of an Asian grooming gang is still living in the town where he committed his horrific crimes - almost a decade after he was released from jail and told he would be deported.MailOnline can reveal the 55-year-old has been working for a takeaway delivery app, prompting fears he might meet one of his victims during the course of his work.He is among nine members of the Rochdale grooming gang who were jailed for raping and trafficking young children across England in 2012.Rauf was told he would be deported to Pakistan in 2014 after serving two and half years of a six-year prison sentence.The presence of the former taxi driver adds fuel to the fire over demands that the Government hold a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal.Rauf, who was stripped of his UK citizenship, was told he would be sent back to Pakistan following his release in November 2014.Immigration Tribunal judges have twice rejected his appeal against deportation in 2020 and 2022.However his lawyers argued Rauf is 'stateless' after him having renounced his Pakistani citizenship (crafty and effective), and deportation would breach his right to private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.'https://mol.im/a/14258565

Sue Hammond ● 455d7 Comments ● 455d

Genuine? Jenrick!

"Jenrick shape-shifts on air with reality-bending Today interviewJohn Crace (Gdn, yesterday)Shadow justice secretary makes case for second child sexual abuse inquiry, despite ignoring the last one.Robert Jenrick brushed off the observation that he had never before even mentioned the subject in parliament.""You can tell that Elon Musk must have overstepped the mark when even Kemi Badenoch has taken a break from tweeting her support for the ketamine-riddled world’s richest man. The Tory leader’s reality is largely shaped by what she reads on social media, so unless she’s taken time out to help the Muskster find a drug counsellor, she’s decided that she’d be better off keeping quiet for a while. Quite the concession for a politician who never knowingly avoids the chance to make a bad situation worse.But you can always rely on Robert Jenrick to step into any vacuum. It’s hard to know who the real Honest Bob really is. Is it the fresh-faced David Cameron wannabe who was first elected in 2014? The soft-hearted liberal who was totally in favour of remaining in the EU. Is it the minister with no moral compass who was happy to expedite a planning permission for an erstwhile pornographer and Tory donor? Or is it the politician of the far right? The man who has never yet met an immigrant he didn’t want to deport?Not even Honest Bob really knows. There is so little to him that he can only approximate to what he thinks best serves his interests at any given time. And right now he has somehow got it into his head that he should be the next leader of the Tory party.What the Conservatives have done to deserve him is hard to fathom, but that doesn’t worry our Bob. He’s always led a gilded life. Assumes that people must always be thrilled to see him. Just by breathing he is doing us all a favour. And he’s come to the conclusion that his best chance of fulfilling his destiny is to shape-shift to the right. So that’s who he now is.Along the way, Jenrick has also become a useful idiot to people like Musk. While Elon works his way through his stash, Honest Bob is on hand to pick up the pieces of his increasingly deranged tweets. It’s win-win for both of them. Musk gets to feel as if he is as important as his ego demands while Honest Bob gets to kickstart another culture war. Along the way, reality has long since left the building. Not that either of them have noticed.With Musk’s tweets about child grooming gangs still dominating the news, it was inevitable that sooner or later Bob would turn up on the radio to be unpleasant and make a fool of himself. And sure enough, he was granted the prime 8.10am slot on the Today programme. Presenter Nick Robinson couldn’t believe his luck. It wasn’t a fair fight.Robinson began with a reminder that it wasn’t Elon Musk’s tweets that really mattered; it was getting justice for the girls and young women who were victims of sex abuse. A caveat that was wasted on Honest Bob as, like in all things, this was all about him and his ambitions.“We need a national inquiry,” Bob demanded. Labour were trying to cover up a scandal. Robbo looked at Jenrick as if he was a halfwit. Um … He was aware that there had already been an inquiry conducted by Prof Alexis Jay, wasn’t he? And that Jay had said there was no need for another one. What would really help was for its recommendations to be implemented.Honest Bob wasn’t to be distracted. The first inquiry had achieved nothing. Jay hadn’t really known what she was doing. Only he was in possession of the real facts. Except, as you will have guessed, he wasn’t. Robbo had to spell it out as simply as possible for him.Let’s get this straight, said Robbo. You are saying that child sexual abuse is still going on all over the place. Yes. So why didn’t you do anything about it when you were in power? You could have set up any number of inquiries if you thought the Jay inquiry wasn’t sufficiently wide-ranging. And why are you only talking about child grooming gangs now and not when you were a Home Office minister? You didn’t mention it once in parliament (he had checked Hansard). You’re just an opportunist.All this rather confused Bob. Logic has a habit of doing that to him. So he went back to the beginning. Could he have another inquiry please? For the first time, Robinson was taken aback. There was simple and then there was Jenrick. To recap. Inquiries took an age. Some had never reported after 10 years or more. Was that what he really wanted? For justice to be further delayed?“Absolutely,” said Jenrick. There was no arguing with him. And he wanted to correct one statement. The Tories may not have implemented any of the Jay recommendations but they had carried forward two of them. And how did that help the victims? Aha! Honest Bob wasn’t to be distracted. Carrying forward was a necessary first step. It was far too easy to get hung up on implementation.Robinson chose to move on. So had Bob had a chance to reflect on his remarks that Pakistani men were from an alien culture with medieval attitudes? It hadn’t gone down well with Samuel Kasumu, a former race adviser to the Tories.I stand by every word, Jenrick declared. So Sajid Javid had medieval attitudes? Well, maybe not him. Though he couldn’t rule it out. How about Sadiq Khan? Almost certainly. The thing was to keep the hate going. None of this was about achieving justice for the victims. Just a reminder to observe the two-minute hate. War is peace.Over on LBC radio, Nigel Farage was bewildered to yet again find himself to the centre of the Tory party on L’Affaire Musk. He tried to rectify the situation. He wouldn’t personally call Jess Phillips a rape-genocide apologist but he was happy for Elon to do so. Nige wasn’t going to let go of a multimillion-dollar potential donation that easily.“I too want an inquiry,” Farage said. “And if Labour won’t give me one, I will have one myself. We could get it up and running in a couple of weeks or so.” That’s £100m and the next 10 years taken care of."Good 'un from the Gdn.

David Ainsworth ● 455d1 Comments ● 455d

Could Starmer Be Any More Stupid & Insensitive? 😡

Keir Starmer's far-Right 'smear' on Rochdale rapists critics'Keir Starmer was last night accused of ‘smear tactics’ after claiming those wanting an inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal were jumping on a ‘far-Right bandwagon’.The Prime Minister triggered a furious backlash after saying Tory demands for an inquiry into the rape of thousands of white girls by gangs of predominantly Pakistani-origin men were ‘amplifying what the far-Right are saying’.Sir Keir also angrily defended his record as Director of Public Prosecutions after Tesla tycoon Elon Musk suggested he was ‘complicit’ in the failure to tackle the abuse. And he claimed Kemi Badenoch’s interventions on the issue showed she was ‘desperate for attention’.The Tory leader hit back, accusing the PM of ‘applying Labour smear tactics from 20 years ago’.She added: ‘That such a huge scandal could occur should prompt soul-searching not ranting that those of us who care about it are “the far-Right”.’ Mrs Badenoch revealed she will table a Commons amendment this week designed to force a vote on the need for an inquiry.Former police detective Maggie Oliver, who helped blow the whistle on the scandal in Rochdale, said she was ‘incandescent with rage’ at the PM’s comments.She told GB News: ‘I am no far-Right activist. I am a woman who gave 16 years of my life to the police and protecting children was No 1 priority in my life.'All the victims that I know and that we support have had their lives destroyed. To write them off as far-Right extremists is insulting in the extreme.’Former home secretary James Cleverly warned that the PM’s comments risked inflaming public anger over the issue.'Accusing those who disagree with him, or who seek legitimate answers about repeated failures of child protection, as “far-Right” is deeply insulting and counterproductive. He is the best recruiting sergeant for extremism,’ Mr Cleverly said'https://mol.im/a/14256619

Sue Hammond ● 456d10 Comments ● 455d

BBC tomorrow a.m. - Paedophile Information Exchange, or PIE - active in the 1970s and 80s

The List Episode 1 of 6In Dark Corners Series 2 Tomorrow January 8th on BBC Radio 4 at 9.30 AM."Journalist Alex Renton is shown a secret document, containing the names and addresses of people signed up to a pro-paedophile group called the Paedophile Information Exchange, or PIE, which was active in the 1970s and 80s.That’s not all: weeks after getting the membership list Alex meets a contact who gives him bags full of documents, crammed with reports, contact details, letters.As Alex starts following up on leads; detail of the criminal activities committed by some of PIE’s members, and those connected with them, begins to emerge.It’s a lot to take in. Alex is not only a journalist, he’s a survivor of child sexual abuse. All of this information about PIE; it feels like a heavy weight to carry. Are children still at risk?Alex sets off on a dizzying journey into the dark history of the Paedophile Information Exchange and uncovers abuses committed by PIE's members: teachers, clergy, social workers, government advisors.As Alex finds out more, he starts to wonder: where are all those hundreds of members now?He meets the former deputy editor of Private Eye, journalist Francis Wheen: he has a long memory for news and a nose for stories that people in power want to keep secret. What does he know about PIE?Archive credits: Newsnight, BBC, August 1983Details of organisations offering information and support for victims of child sexual abuse are available at bbc.co.uk/actionline"https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00272c5

David Ainsworth ● 456d3 Comments ● 455d

The first mention of "grooming" on the Forum?

The first mention of "grooming" on the Forum was apparently in 2014. It was by Iftikhar Ahmad whom some may remember. "Sexual Grooming Forum HomePosted by: Iftikhar AhmadDate/Time: 27/06/14 15:40:00Sexual GroomingChildren as young as 10 are being sexually exploited by organised gangs of men in cities across the UK, a leading charity says.Barnardo's says it is working with more than 1,000 children who have been groomed, abused and trafficked for money, and the problem is growing. This is sickening. It's no wonder Great Britain is in such a bad shape. Ten years old British girls are having babies out of wedlock. They are not allowed to get married but are allowed to have babies.Why don't we just report the rapes, rather than have to say MUSLIM rapes? When non Muslims commit rapes, do we say white rapists, Christian rapists etc? So why the need to label?  Or is it only when a rapist happens to be Muslim, some of us feel the need for whatever reason, to say MUSLIM rapist? When grooming paedophiles happen to be white (btw this is the MAJORITY), nobody mentions that either, or saying hmmm we need to study why so many white men take part in grooming little girls. But if it happens to be a Muslim or Asian, oh well, we must say Muslim, we must say Asian, and we must study why these things are happening amongst their community, lol, what a load of baloney. Sadly, many people don't actually care about the rapes itself, they want to politicise the rapes as a means to target specific communities, i.e. Muslims, Asians etc.Under the law of Islam, the punishment for rapist is "stoned to death" in public by public --- no matter what religion the criminal is affiliated. Rape is considered as a serious offense in Islam warranting death to offenders, more than just "illegal sexual intercourse" commonly known as adultery."There is much more, but this first part seems enough.

David Ainsworth ● 457d1 Comments ● 456d

Prosecute professionals who stay silent on child abuse claims – Starmer

"This article is more than 11 years old""Prosecute professionals who stay silent on child abuse claims – Keir StarmerFormer director of public prosecutions calls for change in law to prevent more victims slipping through netJosh HallidayMon 4 Nov 2013 00.01 GMTTeachers and health workers should be prosecuted for failing to alert the police to allegations of child abuse, according to the former director of public prosecutions, who is calling for an overhaul of the law to prevent more victims from slipping through the net.Keir Starmer QC, who left his role as Britain's top prosecutor last week, becomes the most senior official to call for the introduction of mandatory reporting following a string of high-profile cases, including the Jimmy Savile scandal, in which victims of the TV and radio star were repeatedly failed by the social care system.In an interview with BBC1's Panorama programme to be aired on Monday, Starmer says: "I think the time has come to change the law and close a gap that's been there for a very long time. I think there should be a mandatory reporting provision."Starmer says Britain should be brought into step with countries such as the US, Canada and Australia, where it is a criminal offence for care professionals not to report child abuse allegations to the authorities."The problem is, if you haven't got a central provision requiring people to report, then all you can do is fall back on other provisions that aren't really designed for that purpose and that usually means they run into difficulties. What you really need is a clear, direct law that everybody understands," he says.His intervention comes a year after it was revealed that Savile, who died in 2011, had abused hundreds of victims at schools, hospitals and BBC premises over five decades.Savile was never apprehended, despite high-level concerns over his behaviour and complaints to police and care workers."https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/nov/04/child-abuse-keir-starmer-prosecute-professionals

David Ainsworth ● 457d1 Comments ● 457d

Forget Latin: Labour's education plans

'Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson was last night accused of taking a ‘simplistic’ approach after she said that top exam results alone will not make children ‘happy’.Laying out her vision for schooling in her first address to academy trust leaders since Labour came to power, Mrs Phillipson said that while a string of A* grades may ‘open important doors’, pupils need a ‘wider’ set of goals for a ‘healthy and happy life’.In a clear swipe at the Tories’ former regime, she accused them of having ‘tunnel vision’ when it comes to exam results - and said she wanted to promote ‘collaboration’ rather than ‘competition’.She has called for a review of the school syllabus and the emphasis to be placed by schools on teaching in general.She is to be aided in this by a committee lead by Professor Becky Francis.Prof Francis, who criticised the Tony Blair government for “an obsession with academic achievement”, and the committee leading the review are now considering proposals suggested by teaching unions, school groups, think tanks and Royal Societies.From Andrew Pierce in Mailonline - "Labour appoints academic (Prof Becky Francis) who specialises in equality and gender issues and accused the Tories of being obsessed with improving exam grades in charge of overhauling school curriculum"On her watch, the conventional orthodoxy on education will be turned upside down, with less reliance on rote learning and even less emphasis on exam grades.Don't take my word for it, just note what Francis wrote with co‑author Louise Archer in her 2006 book about schools, ­Understanding Minority Ethnic Achievement: Race, Gender, Class and 'Success'.In the preface, they say: 'Our intention is to help lever social justice concerns back into mainstream educational debates that have been dominated by the neo‑liberal language of 'quality' – in which concerns with ­'equality' have been evacuated and consigned to the margins.'So the new education supremo is more concerned about equality than quality. Improving grades will take second place to tackling so-called injustice.In the book, Francis also despairs over what she regards as the then Labour government's 'obsession with academic achievement'.She wrote: 'This is amply illustrated by the proliferation of testing regimes, academic league tables and the regular high profile publication of achievement statistics, from children's earliest years through to GCSEs.'Indeed, we would assert that achievement is not just an educational issue for the current government it is the educational issue.'

John Hawkes ● 458d2 Comments ● 458d

Antisemitism

"The term ‘antisemitism’ is being weaponised and stripped of meaning – and that’s incredibly dangerous"by Rachel Shabi"When the international criminal court issued arrest warrants for Israeli officials in November, the response from the country’s government was all too familiar. The prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, rejected outright the warrants for alleged war crimes in Gaza against him and the former defence minister Yoav Gallant, calling them “an antisemitic decision”. The ultranationalist national security adviser, Itamar Ben-Gvir, declared that the court had shown “once again that it is antisemitic through and through”. And the transport minister, Miri Regev, chimed in, claiming: “This is modern antisemitism in the guise of justice.”Bleakly, none of this was a surprise. Over a year into Israel’s assault on Gaza, which some experts have described as a genocide, accusations of antisemitism raised to counter criticism of Israel have gone into overdrive. Such claims have been made against protesters crying out for an end to the bloodshed in Gaza and against the UN and aid agencies warning of a humanitarian catastrophe. They have been levelled at global news channels and the international court of justice; against actors, artists, pop stars and even British-Jewish film-makers. So sweepingly and speech-chillingly are such claims made by Israel’s diehard defenders that the very term “antisemitism” is losing its meaning. It is exactly as the British-Jewish philosopher Brian Klug warned 20 years ago: “When antisemitism is everywhere, it is nowhere.” Blanket misuse has, troublingly, turned the term into a feature on an Israeli politician’s lingo-bingo scorecard."https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/dec/31/antisemitism-israel-gaza-war-right

David Ainsworth ● 461d31 Comments ● 458d

Destroy Food, Water and Power Sources in Gaza

"Controversial 'Generals' Plan' in northern Gaza picks up steam.The proposed strategy involves several steps: First, encircling and evacuating the population. This would be followed by the remote destruction of all energy sources, including fuel and solar facilities, and the elimination of food sources such as warehouses and water reservoirs. The plan also calls for the remote elimination of anyone moving in the area who does not surrender with a white flag during the siege.Eight members of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee have recently signed a letter demanding that Defense Minister Israel Katz immediately replace the operational plan in Gaza.A situation report presented to committee members recently reveals that Hamas is swiftly rebuilding in every area from which the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has withdrawn, including rearming in Khan Yunis and Nuseirat.Likud Member of Knesset (MK) Amit Halevi initiated the letter, which was signed by MKs from all coalition factions. It contains harsh criticism of the war's conduct thus far and demands that Katz himself replace the current operational plan, which Halevi describes as "stagnation," with a strategy focused on "victory and decisive action."Members of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, who closely monitor IDF operations since the start of the ground offensive, argue that the ground operation that began on October 27, 2023, and its subsequent execution, "fails to achieve the war's objectives as defined by the political echelon – dismantling Hamas's governmental and military capabilities." They note that these goals remain unrealized, despite the operation taking place in a relatively small area against an enemy lacking the tools and capabilities of a modern army.The signatories contend that the IDF's current approach, relying on focused raids, allows Hamas to repeatedly rebuild its capabilities. This strategy, they argue, has resulted in a war of attrition that does not bring about a decisive outcome."....................."Katz, who due to the war's intensity has not received the customary 100 days of grace in his new role, is now tasked with reevaluating the operational plan alongside the Prime Minister. They are expected to lead the implementation of the "Generals' Plan" to defeat Hamas wherever the IDF needs to engage.The proposed strategy involves several steps: First, encircling and evacuating the population. This would be followed by the remote destruction of all energy sources, including fuel and solar facilities, and the elimination of food sources such as warehouses and water reservoirs. The plan also calls for the remote elimination of anyone moving in the area who does not surrender with a white flag during the siege.Only after these actions and a period of siege on those who remain should the IDF gradually enter for a complete clearing of enemy strongholds. This approach, the signatories argue, would minimize unnecessary risks to IDF soldiers' lives.""Katz, who has not shied away from confrontation with the IDF chief of staff, now faces perhaps his most significant challenge in shaping Gaza operational decisions – a domain previously led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Katz's predecessor.The prolonged nature of the Gaza war, now exceeding a year without achieving its stated objectives, has become a source of deep concern for many Israelis. This includes parents of soldiers, families of hostages, and residents of communities bordering Gaza. Committee members, who field repeated inquiries on this matter and compare them against IDF responses, fear that the current approach will fail to achieve the war's objectives, both in the near term and long term."To date, IDF representatives in the committee have failed to provide satisfactory explanations for why they are not taking the necessary actions to decisively defeat the enemy, nor have they outlined clear plans for the future," the letter concludes. "We therefore request your immediate intervention to address these questions and provide appropriate directives to the IDF. The goal must be to achieve a decisive victory and halt the unjustified risk to our soldiers' lives.""https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/01/02/knesset-committee-pushes-for-controversial-generals-plan-in-gaza/Don't worry, Trump's a-coming to help!

David Ainsworth ● 460d5 Comments ● 460d

Definition

Genocide is quite often mentioned in the Forum, so I thought that it would be worthwhile quoting Rafael Lemkin, who coined the word during World War Two:-"New conceptions require new terms. By "genocide" we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homicide, infanticide, etc. Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.(Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, by Raphael Lemkin, 1944)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_definitionshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

David Ainsworth ● 462d0 Comments ● 462d

Freezing This Christmas By Sir Keir Starmer & The Granny Harmers

Freezing This Christmas by Sir Keir Starmer and The Granny HarmersThis brilliant spoof is the #1 downloaded song of this year. The MP3 can be purchased directly from iTunes, or from Amazon for just 79p and all proceeds are being donated to AgeUK.👏🏻The song is also #3 in the normal charts despite it being banned by the British Biased Company aka BBC 🤬LyricsTry to imagine a house that’s full of cold,
Try to imagine being 80 years old,
That’s where I’ll be since the cure left me,
I wish tears could heat my home.What can I do without fuel?
I’ve got no place, no place to go,
It’ll be freezing this Christmas without fuel at home,
It’ll be freezing this Christmas while K-Star is warm.
It’ll be cold, so cold without fuel at home this Christmas.And she told me that she doesn’t get out of bed till midday,
Because she didn’t want to turn the heating on.
Each time I remember, I’ve paid taxes all my life,
I cry as I wonder: Will I make it?
 Will my wife?I just break down as I look around,
And the only things I see are foreign walls and open doors,
And a freezing OAP.
It’ll be freezing this Christmas while the money goes abroad.
It’ll be freezing this Christmas while Rachel Reeves is a fraud.
It’ll be cold, so cold without fuel at home this Christmas.We inherited a situation where there was a £22 billion black hole in the public finances. (Reeves speaking).
Do you remember last year when Rishi was here?
We never thought there’d be an end.
And I remember looking at you then,
And I remember thinking that next Christmas things won’t be this bad.
For us, but darling, this year things are even worse.
And we really, we really need warmth.
But two-tier here doesn’t care at all.It’ll be freezing this Christmas without fuel at home,
It’ll be freezing this Christmas while K-Star is warm. Watch the video on Guido Fawkes here:https://order-order.com/2024/12/12/watch-freezing-this-christmas-starmer-parody-song-tops-itunes-chart/

Sue Hammond ● 471d0 Comments ● 471d

West Bank 2025 - softly, softly

Jerusalem Post 11/11/24"Smotrich: The time has come to apply Israeli sovereignty over West BankThe United States has for decades backed a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians and has urged Israel not to expand settlements.Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Monday he hoped Israel would extend sovereignty into the West Bank in 2025 and that he would push the government to engage the incoming Trump administration to gain Washington's support.Israel's foreign minister said separately that while no decision was made, the issue could come up in talks with the future US administration in Washington.Smotrich, who also wields a defense ministry supervisory role for settlers as part of his coalition deal with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said he hopes the incoming Trump administration in Washington will recognize an Israeli sovereignty push.Smotrich has for years called for Israeli sovereignty in the West Bank, land Palestinians want for a future state.At a meeting of his far-right faction in parliament on Monday, Smotrich said he had instructed Israeli authorities overseeing West Bank settlements "to begin professional and comprehensive staff work to prepare the necessary infrastructure" for extending sovereignty, according to a statement from his office.He also said he would push the government to engage the incoming Trump administration to recognize such a move.""The West Bank is among territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war and where Palestinians, with international support, seek statehood. Most world powers deem the settlements illegal. Israel disputes that, citing historical claims to the West Bank and describing it as a security bulwark."The readers' comments are well worth a look too.https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-828584More detail:-https://mondoweiss.net/2024/11/west-bank-annexation-will-israel-finally-do-the-deed/

David Ainsworth ● 494d89 Comments ● 485d

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you

This article is a useful discussion."John Patrick LearyJanuary 3, 2024Israel’s “Right to Exist” Is a Rhetorical TrapNo country has a right to exist, so what do people really mean when they say Israel does?“There can be no genuine peace in the Middle East until the Arab states abandon the policy of hostility to Israel and show by deeds and words readiness to accept Israel’s right to exist,” Abba Eban, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, told the Overseas Writers Club in Washington in 1955. Sixty-six years later, Dani Dayan, the Israeli consul general in New York, wrote in The New York Times, “The day Palestinians accept Israel’s right to exist as the legitimate homeland of the Jewish people, a real peace process will begin.” Through the intervening years of wars, invasions, occupation, peace processes, and treaties, Israel’s right to exist has stubbornly endured. Just last month, the House of Representatives passed a resolution that “denying Israel’s right to exist is a form of antisemitism.” The phrase and its long history compels us to ask: What does it mean for a nation to “exist,” and who judges its right to do so?Republican Congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey said recently that “Israel is the only state in the world whose fundamental right to exist, within any borders at all, is openly denied by other states.” But Israel is the only nation with a “right to exist,” as the phrase is not commonly attached to any other country. And that’s the tell: This is not a legal concept, but a political one, available for broad interpretation and rhetorical weaponization.The “right to exist” as a nation is, as the Palestinian scholar Edward Said once wearily dismissed it, “a formula hitherto unknown in international or customary law.” Rights pertain to individuals, not countries. And universal rights can’t, by definition, belong to some peoples and not others. It’s one of the great ironies, then, of the Israel-Palestine conflict that Israel seems untouchable by international law as it actually exists—it suffers no sanctions for routine violations of Geneva Convention prohibitions against settlements in the occupied West Bank—but is so fulsomely protected by a statute of international law that is basically made up.However intensely Israel feels under threat, its right to exist is meaningless as a matter of law. Its realest meaning is as a flexible piece of political rhetoric. One consistency in its use over the years is that Israel’s “right to exist” is always invoked negatively, as a thing someone somewhere denies or won’t accept. It’s most typically used to characterize Arab and Palestinian intransigence or dogmatism. After Israel’s resounding victory in the 1967 Six-Day War against Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, Egypt’s foreign minister told the press in obvious exasperation:Perhaps we have not said this loudly enough or plainly enough.... That this document [the Egyptian-Israeli Armistice Agreement of 1949] would guarantee the right of Israel to exist is self-evident. We do know Israel exists, we have signed a piece of paper. We did not sign it with shadows.Palestine Liberation Organization President Yasir Arafat sounded a similar note in 1988, after an official statement that the Palestinian National Council “accepted the existence of Israel as a state in the region.” “The PNC accepted two states, a Palestinian state and a Jewish state, Israel,” Arafat said. “Is that clear enough?”Apparently, it was not. The specific meaning of the phrase relies a lot on things unsaid or implied: Both the nature of the supposed refusal and the implication that denying Israel’s “right to exist” means denying Jews’. It also depends a lot on the dependent clauses that come after that word: “as a state,” “in peace and security,” or “as a Jewish state”?In 1993, as a precondition of the Oslo peace negotiations, the PLO recognized the “right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security,” a declaration based on the 1967 U.N. Joint Resolution 242 that affirms every Middle Eastern nation’s “right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.” As the peace process collapsed, and Israeli politics moved sharply to the right, the country’s parliament passed its so-called “Nation-State Law,” which declared that “the exercise of the right to national self-determination in the State of Israel is exclusive to the Jewish people.” The goalposts of “existence” had moved considerably. Now Israel’s right to national self-determination—its national right to exist, if you like—seemed to explicitly reject Palestine’s. How could Palestinians accept this right without denying their own?In a column in October, The New York Times’ Bret Stephens wrote of activists (many of them Jews) protesting Israel’s latest bombardment of Gaza: “‘Anti-occupation’ is opposition to Israel’s right to exist in any form.” Here, the “right to exist” is used to insinuate that those critical of Israel’s policies in Gaza are antisemitic. That is the rhetorical trap that Israel’s “right to exist” has always set for the country’s critics: On the one hand, reject Israel’s “right to exist,” and risk being accused of rejecting Jews’ human rights to exist; on the other, accept Israel’s right to exist and risk accepting whatever interpretation a future audience will choose to make of the phrase’s ever-changing meaning.Questions of “existence” are typically left to theologians and philosophers, for good reason—pinning treaty obligations on issues of metaphysics is a recipe for confusion. So what can we say with honesty? Israel has no right to exist because no nation does; only people do. Israelis exist; so do Palestinians. They all have a right to exist but only because they are human beings. And there is no justice in securing your own right to exist by denying it to others."https://newrepublic.com/article/177768/israel-right-to-exist-rhetorical-trap

David Ainsworth ● 487d9 Comments ● 486d

Gazans to be helped towards a "Two-State" Solution?

Gotta go somewhere, I guess."Tori OttenJanuary 3, 2024/5:51 p.m. ETReport: Israel in Talks With Third Country to Expel Palestinians EntirelyIsrael’s solution to the conflict is moving Palestinians in Gaza to another country 4,500 miles away.It seems that Israel is finally opening up to the idea of a two-state solution to its conflict with Palestine — so long as the second state is on a completely different continent.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right coalition has been secretly speaking with the Democratic Republic of Congo about resettling thousands of Palestinians in the African nation, the Israeli outlet Zman Israel [the Hebrew-language sister paper of The Times of Israel] reported Wednesday.“Congo will be willing to take in migrants, and we’re in talks with others,” a senior source in the security Cabinet, speaking anonymously, said.Netanyahu and his allies floated the idea of sending Palestinians elsewhere last week, but the idea has been vehemently rejected by the international community. Moreover, Congo is unlikely to have the resources necessary to take care of such a massive influx of displaced people. More than half of the country’s population lives below the poverty line, according to the World Food Programme.Israeli officials have made it increasingly clear in recent days that their plan is to completely eliminate Palestine. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said Monday that a way to solve the war was to “encourage the voluntary migration of Gaza’s residents to countries that will agree to take in the refugees.”Separately, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir told reporters Monday that the war was an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza.”The U.S. State Department slammed the officials’ comments as “inflammatory” and “irresponsible.”“We have been told repeatedly and consistently by the Government of Israel, including by the Prime Minister, that such statements do not reflect the policy of the Israeli government. They should stop immediately,” department spokesman Matthew Miller said in a statement.But it seems that Smotrich and Ben Gvir’s statements do reflect the policy of the Israeli government. Nearly all of the 2.3 million people living in the Gaza Strip have been displaced due to Israel’s unrelenting bombardment of the region. Palestinians were forced to flee to designated “safe zones,” only for Israel to bomb those areas, as well.South Africa asked the International Court of Justice on December 29 for an urgent order declaring that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in its nearly three-month assault on the Gaza Strip. More than 22,000 Palestinians have been killed, the majority women and children. Some organizations, such as the nonprofit Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, put the death toll at nearly 30,000."Well, Congo appears to have fallen through since.Have to go somewhere though. Gaza is not very livable for longterm now. Obviously Israel won't take them. Egypt resists the transfer, so far. The Israeli settlers won't want them transferred to the West Bank, oh no. There is, of course, the only other border, the sea (controlled by Israel naturally). No! Not drowning! Becoming refugees by sea. To Italy, France, Germany and, well, who knows where else?And then reconstruction will begin in Gaza.

David Ainsworth ● 487d0 Comments ● 487d

Israel: the making of an outlaw state

"The Guardian view on Israel v the UN: the making of an outlaw state - Editorial""Israel’s rightwing government is recklessly steering the nation toward rogue-state status, with deeply troubling, escalating attacks on the United Nations that fuel a dangerous drift from international accountability. From its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, down, it exhibits a brazen contempt for the global norms that govern human rights, conflict and diplomacy.Hamas’s murderous attack last year in Israel, which left 1,200 people dead, ignited the current crisis. However, Israel’s response has been wildly disproportionate. Schools, hospitals and shelters have been struck, resulting in thousands of civilian deaths.""The US and its allies have shielded Israel from the consequences of its actions. Washington could end the war tomorrow by stopping its arms flows and forcing a ceasefire deal on both sides that would see Israeli hostages go home. It should do so forthwith. But American politics has been paralysed by the need to win an election in which criticism of Israeli actions is deemed beyond the pale.The UN asserts, correctly, that the US’s double standards undermine international law enforcement. This hypocrisy creates competing justice standards, weighing crimes against humanity against a state’s strategic value."https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/28/the-guardian-view-on-israel-v-the-un-the-making-of-an-outlaw-stateToo late, chum.

David Ainsworth ● 526d60 Comments ● 494d

How's It Going Then Rache?

It's official... Rachel Reeves DID deliver the biggest tax-raising Budget on record: OBR watchdog's database shows Chancellor hiked the burden by £41.5bn - MORE than Norman Lamont's notorious 1993 raid.https://mol.im/a/14082155UK economy stalls: Slowdown fears as GDP goes into the red in September and ekes out just 0.1% growth over third quarter - with Budget tax hit still to come.https://mol.im/a/14085927A calamitous start from the Government that pre-election stressed it would not raise taxes for 'working people', which has now proven to be a big fat lie.😡Oh, and Rache, you had better stop spouting nonsense about 'black holes' because you clearly make up these figures as you go along.🤥Oh, and another thing Rache, all the doom and gloom pre-Budget rhetoric from you and himself 🤓 clearly spooked the financial markets, as shown by the slump in the economy.🤨Oh, and finally Rache, your latest slogan of growth growth growth has fallen flat after your punitive tax burdens on employers was announced. Thousands of SME businesses have already thrown in the towel and many others will not be able to expand or take on apprentices. Large businesses are pee'd off too but they will just pass on their extra costs to their customers, which means we will all have less money in our pockets to spend on goods and services. Not a recipe for growth, but very much for anti-growth.😖Job losses and price hikes inevitable, warn UK’s biggest firms in stark message to Rachel Reeves over Budget | The Independenthttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/reeves-budget-business-starmer-tax-b2646944.html

Sue Hammond ● 509d38 Comments ● 504d

Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it

"Kneejerk response, then overcorrection: what the aftermath of the Amsterdam violence should teach usRachel ShabiAssumptions were made about clashes between Maccabi Tel Aviv fans and Amsterdam locals – and the far right took advantageGdn Sat 16 Nov 2024 07.00 GMTIn the aftermath of a sudden eruption of violence or unrest, there is often a brief, vital window when the narrative about what actually happened is up for grabs. Last Friday, the day that street violence between Israeli Maccabi Tel Aviv football fans and local people in Amsterdam made headlines around the world – with reports of antisemitic “hit-and-run” attacks in the Dutch city – the decision of the Israeli state to send military planes to airlift fans home, and of the Israeli president, Isaac Herzog, to describe the events as an “antisemitic pogrom”, were crucial in cementing a particular story. So too were the words of the Dutch king, who said that his nation had “failed” the Jewish community as it had during the second world war – when three-quarters of the Dutch Jewish population were murdered by the Nazis. But then, as more evidence emerged, a more complex picture came into view. It was revealed that from the night before the match onwards, hardline supporters of Maccabi Tel Aviv – a club with a reputation for racism and hooliganism among some of its fans – had torn down a Palestinian flag from the facade of a building and burned it, attacked one taxi with their belts, and vandalised others. Among the deplorable chants they saw fit to shout on the streets of Amsterdam, home to a large Muslim community, were: “Let the IDF [Israeli army] win, we will fuck the Arabs”, “Fuck you Palestine” and “Why is there no school in Gaza? There are no children left there.”Their words bring into focus the elephant in the room. Israel’s brutal war in Gaza, which has now killed upwards of 45,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, displaced most of the population and decimated the besieged territory with such ferocity as to render it uninhabitable. After a year in which many western politicians and commentators have seemed more concerned with, say, campus protests against the war than with the apocalyptic carnage in Gaza, historically illiterate pronunciations of a “pogrom” in the Dutch capital seemed to follow the same script: overlooking or downplaying Israeli violence.The worst manifestation of this was an Orwellian doublespeak in plain sight, when footage of Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters attacking local people near Amsterdam Central Station was captioned as the polar opposite: as a violent attack on Israeli Jews. (The Guardian made a correction to a package of video footage on Saturday 9 November.) The Dutch photographer who filmed these events is still imploring news sites to correct the error. Examining the issue in a segment dedicated to uncovering instances of fake news, France24 this Wednesday reported that the BBC, Wall Street Journal and CBS News were still running incorrectly captioned footage.What happened in Amsterdam – and, crucially, the media coverage and the political reactions – felt familiar, following the contours of our harmful and divisive conversations about antisemitism. Necessary rebuttals to prevailing one-sided portrayals sought to bring the overt anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian racism into view. But in doing so, the antisemitism that was one of the factors in the fray was often elided or glossed over. The initial, distorted coverage itself spawned an overcorrective, corralling us into polarised sides: either it was about thuggish anti-Palestinian hatred, or it was rampant antisemitism, but not both. Yet an appraisal more befitting a joined-up and coherent anti-racism would recognise that understandable hostility to the state of Israel during the ongoing war does sometimes get articulated through antisemitism, and expressed as violence.In Amsterdam, we saw this in the frightening invocation of a “Jew hunt” in a chat coordinating an attack, and the use of a Dutch racial slur translating as “cancer Jew”; in the instances where people deemed to look Jewish were stopped and asked about their nationality, or allegedly forced to say “Free Palestine” in order to escape assault. This is not happening because criticism of Israel and anti-Jewish hatred are one and the same. Rather, it is because antisemitism, as scholars such as Prof David Feldman of Birkbeck, University of London have argued, can be likened to a reservoir that runs deep across European societies: a readily available language of prejudice that is drawn on in moments of provocation, crisis, or tension. The better we understand this as a social force, the more effectively we are able to counter it.But there is another layer to this sorry story. Casting the Amsterdam violence as purely antisemitism has helped buttress the far right. The Dutch government is dominated by the Party for Freedom (PVV), helmed by the anti-Islam, anti-migrant Geert Wilders. And this party is pursuing a well-worn script deployed by the far right across Europe: championing Israel, pretending to care about antisemitism, and using both to push rampant Islamophobia. Far-right parties – often with unsavoury track records on antisemitism – are chasing a political revival by situating themselves as self-declared defenders of Jewish communities in a clash-of-civilisations fight with Islam.Having effectively received a global seal of approval for his hate- and bigotry-fuelled misreading of events, Wilders is now threatening to deport and strip the citizenship of those he deems to have instigated the violence: Dutch Moroccans. And so the far right’s supposed concern about antisemitism is rerouted into using the power of the state to deprive another racialised other of citizenship. As for the Jewish and Muslim communities of Amsterdam, they have been left fearful, in shock and reeling from the repercussions of political forces intent on fomenting tensions in pursuit of a migrant- and Muslim-bashing agenda.""if a Lie be believ’d only for an Hour, it has done its Work" (Swift)

David Ainsworth ● 508d6 Comments ● 507d

UK on the wrong side

"UN approves new study on effects of nuclear war" (1/11/24)"Melissa Parke, Executive Director for ICAN welcomed the study: “This new study is an opportunity to bring our understanding of the impact of nuclear war out of the 1980s and into the 21st century.  As the world becomes increasingly more interconnected, we need to make sure that policy decisions are based on science- not dogma and scaremongering. This study is a chance to bring that science together and guide us towards the future we want.”The vote on the resolution was not unanimous. Some of the nuclear-armed states and their allies actively lobbied against this study, possibly out of concern that more knowledge on what these weapons of mass destruction do would further erode any citizens’ support for having nuclear weapons. Only France, the Russian Federation and the United Kingdom voted against the resolution. However, the vast majority of states (144) – ranging from those that lead on disarmament and have been impacted by nuclear weapons testing in previous decades to those whose policies support the use of nuclear weapons – chose to commission this critical study." "Only France, the Russian Federation and the United Kingdom voted against the resolution." There were 30 abstentions, including the US.https://www.icanw.org/un_approves_new_study_on_effects_of_nuclear_warhttps://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com24/resolutions/L39.pdfI guess that we know enough already and are not bothered.

David Ainsworth ● 522d3 Comments ● 522d

The Speaker Rebukes Reeves

Sir Lindsay Hoyle has accused Chancellor Rachel Reeves of acting with “supreme discourtesy” towards MPs given her “premature disclosure” of Budget details.The Commons Speaker said it was “totally unacceptable to go around the world telling everybody” about “major” new policy announcements rather than giving the information first to MPs.Sir Lindsay also questioned whether MPs would need to bother attending the House to hear Ms Reeves deliver her first Budget on Wednesday, given “we’ll all have heard it” already.During a round of broadcast interviews while attending the International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington DC, Ms Reeves confirmed a technical change in the way she would measure progress against the target of managing debt.It is expected Ms Reeves will use the Budget to open the door for the Government to spend billions more on long-term infrastructure, such as replacing dilapidated buildings on the public sector estate.Sir Lindsay, making a statement, told the Commons: “In media interviews last week the Chancellor announced that she intended to introduce changes to the fiscal rules relating to the funding of day-to-day spending through tax receipts and to the measurement of the public debt.“These are major new policy announcements with significant and wide-ranging implications for the Government’s fiscal policy and for the public finances.“It is evident to me that this should therefore have been made in the first instance in this House and not to the world’s media.“This principle is clearly and unambiguously set out in paragraph 9.1 of the Ministerial Code. While this can hardly be described as a leak – the Chancellor herself gave interviews on the record and on camera – the premature disclosure of the contents of the Budget has always been regarded as a supreme discourtesy to the House.“Indeed, I still regard it as such.“I am very, very disappointed that the Chancellor expects the House to wait nearly a full week to hear her repeat these announcements in the Budget statement on Wednesday.”Sir Lindsay said he has “always defended” the right of MPs to be the first to hear major Government policy announcements, adding: “Ministers should expect to face proper, sustained scrutiny when these announcements are made from the elected Members of this House and not the American news channels.”He noted Treasury minister Darren Jones would be making a statement to the House on “fiscal rules” on Monday, adding: “Perhaps no coincidence.“Honourable members may be wondering how they’ll get a seat on Wednesday (for the Budget) – to be quite honest, the way it’s going you won’t need to, we’ll all have heard it. It’s not acceptable, I don’t want it to continue and I want to treat this House with the respect it deserves.”Sir Lindsay added: “It’s totally unacceptable to go around the world telling everybody rather than these Members. They were elected by the constituents of this country and they deserve to be treated better.”He went on to note Labour when in opposition complained about the previous Tory government behaving in a similar manner, adding: “Get your acts together, all sides, treat Members with respect.”

Sue Hammond ● 527d16 Comments ● 525d

Starmer's Confusion

I already know about Starmer's confusion and inability to explain what a woman is 🤷🏻‍♀️and now I am confused about HIS confusion over 'working people'🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️This confusing rhetoric from the government must end pdq because much of Reeve's🙍🏻‍♀️budget is centred around this ambiguous group.  Starmer🤓and his stooges need to have an urgent pow-wow in No 10 to sort this out because time is running out for them. 'Former Bank of England governor Mervyn King described Labour's pledge on national insurance, VAT and income tax as 'very unwise'.He also said the debate around not putting up taxes on working people was a 'terrible illusion' and warned putting up employers' national insurance was likely to depress workers' salaries.Lord King told Sky News: 'All this debate about not putting up taxes on working people is a terrible illusion, really.'Taxes are paid by people, they're not paid by companies or institutions, ultimately, they fall on the amount that people can spend.'And you only can raise significant amounts of money by raising taxes on most people, however you care to define that, but it's most people will have to pay higher taxes.And if they, instead of unwinding the cuts in employees' national insurance contributions, put up employers' national insurance contributions, that will make it less likely that companies will exceed to wage demands, they will press down on that, they will probably be less enthusiastic about creating new jobs.'Ultimately, the impact of these higher taxes has to be on the consumption of most people, however you care to define that group.'Lord King also warned that Ms Reeves' expected Budget plans could have an impact on interest rates.The Chancellor is set to rewrite the Government's fiscal rules to allow her to increase borrowing for public investment by around £50billion.Asked if he thinks the expected plans may have an impact on interest rates, particularly mortgage rates now, Lord King said: 'It could do, it could do.'https://mol.im/a/14007537

Sue Hammond ● 528d13 Comments ● 525d

As Gaza burns, Israeli settlers make 'real estate' plans

"Cheered on by influential members of Netanyahu's far-right coalition, Israel's emboldened settler movement argues that Palestinians should leave the enclave""US Secretary of State Antony Blinken flew into Israel on Tuesday pressing for a ceasefire in Gaza following the killing of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar.But a ceasefire was the last thing on the mind of the Knesset members, government ministers and hundreds of Israeli settlers who convened a day earlier to plan the future of the enclave.These plans did not include any kind of negotiation. There was one subject under discussion at the conference, timed to coincide with the annual Sukkot religious holiday which marks the exodus of the Jews from Egypt.The event, organised by the settler organisation Nahala, was held just three kilometres from the Gaza frontier.Significantly it was in a closed military zone, and this conference was held under army protection. The regular thud of outgoing artillery fire interrupted speeches, and was greeted by applause and cries of, "God bless our brave soldiers.”Many of the men present carried machine guns or pistols.“In the event of a terrorist infiltration,” boomed the PA announcer, “we ask you please not to fire your weapon. Let the security handle it. This is for everyone’s safety.”Those present at the conference included supporters from the United States, South Africa and Australia.One great grandmother from Melbourne wore a sticker saying in Hebrew that “Gaza is part of Israel” and on the other “Kahane was right”.A number of those at the conference carried stickers celebrating Meir Kahane, the late American-born rabbi and convicted terrorist who advocated that Palestinians should be forced out of Israel.Nahala leader Daniella Weiss, one of the heroes of the conference, boasted that families were ready to move to the edge of the Gaza border, claiming that Nahala had already entered a deal worth “millions of dollars” for temporary housing units as a preliminary to settlement of the Strip.She predicted: “You will witness how Jews go to Gaza and Arabs disappear from Gaza.”Gaza seafront 'a bargain'Which would be excellent business for Or Yomtovyan, an activist for Israeli security minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s far-right Jewish Power party.Yomtovyan is in the property business. Speaking outside the Jewish Power sukkot (tent) he told MEE that settling Gaza would be “a good solution for the real estate problem. We are a small country and there’s big land here we can use.”Asked when Gaza could be occupied, he replied: “First things first. As soon as possible.”Asked by MEE how much seafront property in Gaza might be worth, he replied “it will be a bargain. Properties in Tel Aviv next to the sea cost 20-50 million shekels [$5m-$13m]. Here we can sell cheap.”Yomtovyan said he was 16th on Jewish Power’s parliamentary candidates list, and predicted that its leader, Ben Gvir, would be Israel’s next prime minister after Netanyahu.It would be a serious error to dismiss the conference as a fringe event reflecting the wild fantasies of Israel’s settler movement. Big money and top politicians have a stake in the future of Gaza.The event was attended by senior government ministers and Knesset members, including several from Netanyahu’s Likud party.Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, who is also in charge of civil administration in the West Bank and has called for Israel to annex the occupied Palestinian territory, was there.But Ben Gvir was the star of the show, joining in communal dancing and hailed by many others present as the next prime minister.Ben Gvir maintained that Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on 7 October last year, in which about 1,200 Israelis were killed and hundreds more taken hostage, had changed the mindset of Israelis.“We are the owners of this land,” he said. “They understand that when Israel acts like the rightful owners of this land, that is what brings results.”He told his audience that Israel would encourage what he called the “voluntary transfer of all Gazan citizens”, adding “We will offer them the opportunity to move to other countries because that land belongs to us”.Ben Gvir and Smotrich are senior members of the Likud-led coalition that governs Israel.And recent history shows that these two settler leaders get what they want.This is partly a result of growing popular support, but above all because Netanyahu’s government would fall without them. Ben Gvir’s vision of a Palestinian-free Gaza is backed by raw power.Nahala leader Daniella Weiss alluded to this new settler power when she referenced Netanyahu’s statement earlier this year that the idea of Gaza settlement was “unrealistic”.She pointed out that many had made the same observation of the West Bank, which is today overrun by Israeli settlers.“We have the political support, the public support and the experience of 55 years of settling Judea [and] Samaria [the occupied West Bank] and the Golan Heights. More than 330 settlements. We have accumulated a lot of experience to do this politically.”As far as she is concerned, the Palestinians must leave Gaza. She told a crowd of international journalists that they should go “to England, to Africa, to Turkey. Just as people of Afghanistan moved during the war, such as people of Syria, such as people from Ukraine.”The Palestinians, emphasised Weiss “will not stay in Gaza by no means”."Etc.https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/edge-gaza-israeli-settlers-applaud-thud-artillery-fire

David Ainsworth ● 527d31 Comments ● 526d

UK apology sought for British war crimes in Palestine

"The people of al-Bassa got their lesson in imperial brutality when the British soldiers came after dawn.Machine guns mounted on Rolls Royce armoured cars opened fire on the Palestinian village before the Royal Ulster Rifles arrived with flaming torches and burned homes to the ground.Villagers were rounded up while troops later herded men onto a bus and forced them to drive over a landmine which blew up, killing everyone on board.A British policeman photographed the scene as women tended to the remains of their dead, before maimed body parts were buried in a pit.It was the autumn of 1938 and UK forces were facing a rebellion in Palestine, under British control after the defeat two decades earlier of the Ottoman Empire.Britain's raid on al-Bassa was part of a declared policy by the local commander of "punitive" action against entire Palestinian villages - this one after a roadside bomb had killed four British soldiers - regardless of any evidence over who was responsible.""The atrocity was revealed in accounts by soldiers and villagers decades after the UK left. It now forms part of a file being brought to the British government seeking accountability for Palestinians subjected to alleged war crimes by UK forces.The petition, involving a 300-page dossier of evidence, asks for a formal acknowledgement and apology for abuses during the period of British rule in Palestine from 1917 until 1948, after which Britain rapidly withdrew and the State of Israel was declared.A BBC review of the historical evidence involved includes details of arbitrary killings, torture, the use of human shields and the introduction of home demolitions as collective punishment. Much of it was conducted within formal policy guidelines for UK forces at the time or with the consent of senior officers."https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-63145992British rule in Palestine 1917-1948 weakened the majority population and vastly strengthened the incoming minority.

David Ainsworth ● 544d21 Comments ● 538d

New Forest Primary School Update

On Friday 6 September, Roehampton Church Forest School celebrated the official status opening of their Forest School. The Bishop of Kingston, Fleur Anderson MP and Colin Cooper, Chief Executive (Wandsworth and Putney Commons), were welcomed by staff, children, families, Headteacher, Lynn Anderson, and governors for this special occasion.In the church service, Fleur Anderson MP, who read the gospel, shared: “There are so many opportunities in connecting children to the heath and nature through the forest school, including to their health. This is a fantastic initiative by the school”. The Early Years Leader talked about the joy and learning some children in Nursery, Reception and Year Six had already experienced in the forest school. This year, the School will be delivering Forest School learning across all year groups. The school will provide a fully inclusive and engaging forest school experience, with exciting outdoor learning opportunities. Carefully planned by Level 3 trained Forest School staff, sessions develop, compliment and extend the curriculum. the beauty and inspiring opportunities of nature.Please note that there are two remaining open days where you can come along and see a live demonstration of Forest School. The first is on this coming Friday, 18 October and the second is on Friday 22 November. The time of each session is from 09.30 to 10.30am.If interested, you can reserve a place by contacting the School:-245, Roehampton LaneRoehamptonLondonSW15 4AATel: 020 8788 8650Email: info@roehampton.wandsworth.sch.uk

Ted White ● 540d0 Comments ● 540d

Divide, separate, rule

"In the entire area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, the Israeli regime implements laws, practices and state violence designed to cement the supremacy of one group – Jews – over another – Palestinians. A key method in pursuing this goal is engineering space differently for each group.Jewish citizens live as though the entire area were a single space (excluding the Gaza Strip). The Green Line means next to nothing for them: whether they live west of it, within Israel’s sovereign territory, or east of it, in settlements not formally annexed to Israel, is irrelevant to their rights or status.Where Palestinians live, on the other hand, is crucial. The Israeli regime has divided the area into several units that it defines and governs differently, according Palestinians different rights in each. This division is relevant to Palestinians only. The geographic space, which is contiguous for Jews, is a fragmented mosaic for Palestinians:Palestinians who live on land defined in 1948 as Israeli sovereign territory (sometimes called Arab-Israelis) are Israeli citizens and make up 17% of the state’s citizenry. While this status affords them many rights, they do not enjoy the same rights as Jewish citizens by either law or practice – as detailed further in this paper. Roughly 350,000 Palestinians live in East Jerusalem, which consists of some 70,000 dunams [1 dunam = 1,000 square meters] that Israel annexed to its sovereign territory in 1967. They are defined as permanent residents of Israel a status that allows them to live and work in Israel without needing special permits, to receive social benefits and health insurance, and to vote in municipal elections. Yet permanent residency, unlike citizenship, may be revoked at any time, at the complete discretion of the Minister of the Interior. In certain circumstances, it can also expire. Although Israel never formally annexed the West Bank, it treats the territory as its own. More than 2.6 million Palestinian subjects live in the West Bank, in dozens of disconnected enclaves, under rigid military rule and without political rights. In about 40% of the territory, Israel has transferred some civilian powers to the Palestinian Authority (PA). However, the PA is still subordinate to Israel and can only exercise its limited powers with Israel’s consent. The Gaza Strip is home to about two million Palestinians, also denied political rights. In 2005, Israel withdrew its forces from the Gaza Strip, dismantled the settlements it built there and abdicated any responsibility for the fate of the Palestinian population. After the Hamas takeover in 2007, Israel imposed a blockade on the Gaza Strip that is still in place. Throughout all of these years, Israel has continued to control nearly every aspect of life in Gaza from outside.Israel accords Palestinians a different package of rights in every one of these units – all of which are inferior compared to the rights afforded to Jewish citizens. The goal of Jewish supremacy is advanced differently in every unit, and the resulting forms of injustice differ: the lived experience of Palestinians in blockaded Gaza is unlike that of Palestinian subjects in the West Bank, permanent residents in East Jerusalem or Palestinian citizens within sovereign Israeli territory. Yet these are variations on the fact that all Palestinians living under Israeli rule are treated as inferior in rights and status to Jews who live in the very same area."From:-https://www.btselem.org/publications/fulltext/202101_this_is_apartheid

David Ainsworth ● 545d7 Comments ● 543d

Hereditary MPs

Thank god they are getting rid of hereditary peers,the privilege the entitlements just stank too too much.Meanwhile back in the lower house there is Hamish Falconer son on Labour peer Charlie. But as Tory web site Guido Fawkes points out "these little connections are everywhere. Morgan McSweeney, the new Downing Street chief of staff, is married to Imogen Walker, the newly-elected Labour MP for Hamilton and Clyde Valley. Liam Conlon, who won the Beckenham and Penge seat for Labour in the election, is the son of Sue Gray. Richard Burgon is the nephew of Colin Burgon, a Labour MP from 1997-2010. Markus Campbell-Savours MP is the son of former Labour MP Dale Campbell-Savours. Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker and a former Labour MP, is the son of former Labour MP, Douglas Hoyle. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is the sister of Lewisham West MP, Ellie Reeves. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is married to Ed Balls, the former MP and minister. Then there’s Hilary Benn (son of Tony) and Stephen Kinnock (son of Neil). There’s Valerie Vaz, who is the sister of former MP, Keith. It is all part of being in the ever-expanding Labour family.To be fair, this kind of thing is not confined to Labour. Plenty of Tories have relatives as former MPs, such as Bernard Jenkin (son of Patrick, who served as a minister under Margaret Thatcher) and Tom Tugendhat (whose uncle Christopher was an MP during the 1970s) – it is just that there are infinitely more on the Labour side of the house"

Hugh Thompson ● 547d12 Comments ● 546d

More Evidence Of Two-Tier Policing, Yvette?

Nigel Farage and Reform UK threatens to bring private prosecution against men accused of attacking cops at Manchester Airport saying failure to charge them yet is evidence of 'two-tier policing'The party has written to the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper over the incident at the airport in July, which sparked accusations of police brutality after officers were filmed kicking an unconscious man in the head while arresting him.The footage of an officer kicking and stamping on the head of Fahir Amaaz, 19, as he and his brother Muhammed Amaad, 25, were restrained by officers, went viral.But further footage, obtained by the Manchester Evening News, emerged days later which showed the immediate lead-up to the incident on July 23, including when two female police officers being hit to the ground before Mr Amaaz was incapacitated with a Taser.In a press conference today Mr Farage and his deputy Richard Tice questioned the delay in charging the men over the attack and said they would bring a private prosecution if it took too long. They are unhappy at the delay, when protesters convicted of crimes during racist riots following the Southport murders were dealt with quickly.An Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is under way into the incident and nobody has been charged.The letter to Ms Cooper, signed by the party's five MPs, said: 'We have genuine reason to be concerned that in fact the CPS is awaiting for the IOPC to find some fault with the police officers, which will then give them a reason not to progress charges against the assailants. This is totally unacceptable.'The letter added: 'We are therefore serving notice that if the CPS is not going to charge the assailants, then we will organise a private criminal prosecution against them. We have taken initial advice and have a legal team on standby to progress when required.'The letter added that the prosecution would be crowdfunded if necessary.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13932621/Nigel-Farage-Reform-UK-private-prosecution-Manchester-Airport.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubuttonI am really looking forward to hearing Cooper's response. She was very happy carping from the sidelines in Opposition but let's see how she copes doing the job for real?

Sue Hammond ● 548d1 Comments ● 548d

Trump - “We’re poisoning the blood of our country"

"If genealogy is destiny, as Donald Trump believes, then “poison in the blood” – a phrase Trump repeatedly uses – determines the fate of nations. By Trump’s logic, “blood” is the true and final measure. Trump, like Hitler, appears to classify people and countries by “blood” on a scale of their innate racial characteristics. Those features define the essence of nations, which are themselves delineated on a racial pyramid, with the purest and whitest, the most Aryan, at the pinnacle." "Trump has Hitler on the brain in unknowable ways until he lets his admiration seep out. “Well, but Hitler did some good things,” Trump remarked to his White House chief of staff, General John Kelly. “Well, what?” asked Kelly. “Well, [Hitler] rebuilt the economy,” Trump replied. Kelly was outraged. He told him, “Sir, you can never say anything good about the guy. Nothing.” Kelly reflected, “It’s pretty hard to believe he missed the Holocaust, though, and pretty hard to understand how he missed the 400,000 American GIs that were killed in the European theater,” Kelly told Jim Sciutto, the CNN correspondent. “But I think it’s more, again, the tough guy thing” – Trump’s insatiable need to playact.On 17 September, Trump launched a new theme with an old echo. He made a prophecy about who should be blamed if he is defeated in the election. “I’m not going to call this as a prediction, but in my opinion, the Jewish people would have a lot to do with a loss,” he said. Then, he repeated, “If I don’t win this election – and the Jewish people would really have a lot to do with that if that happens because if 40%, I mean, 60% of the people are voting for the enemy …” He complained that as “the most popular person in Israel” he was not “treated right” by American Jews.Trump’s Jewish son-in-law Jared Kushner, his converted Jewish daughter Ivanka, his Jewish grandchildren, his Jewish adviser Stephen Miller, who is poised to be the implementer of the replacement theory and deportation of millions, including legal immigrants, and his Jewish supporters and donors are exempt from his condemnation of “the Jewish people”. Trump’s family ties don’t give him pause from his obsession. His “blood” makes them kosher. In the case of an inconvenient contradiction his narcissism prevails.Trump’s blame game is his version of the Dolchstosslegende – the stab in the back legend – that Germany did not lose the first world war in battle but was betrayed on the home front by Jews and leftists. Hitler traced his political awakening to his understanding of the Dolchstoss.Now, after all Trump has done for the Jews, after all he has done for Israel, “the Jewish people” are ungrateful. Too many of them support “the enemy”. Trump is warming up his myth of a scapegoat."By Sidney Blumenthal"Donald Trump’s Hitlerian logic is no mistake"https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/07/donald-trumps-hitlerian-logic-is-no-mistake"Israelis broadly pick former President Donald Trump over Vice President Kamala Harris as better for Israel's security and in turn favor Trump for the U.S. presidency, albeit with sharp political divisions, a national survey by Langer Research Associates and PORI (Public Opinion Research Israel) finds.Fifty-eight percent of Israelis in the survey, conducted in September, said Trump would be better for Israel's security, vs. 20% for Harris. If they had a vote in the U.S. election, Israelis said they'd pick Trump over Harris by a similar 54%-24%, with the rest taking a pass."ABC News 4/10/24

David Ainsworth ● 548d0 Comments ● 548d

Farage ~ Wants Urgent Debate

Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is under pressure to call an emergency debate on Monday on Labour's surrender of the Chagos Islands after Nigel Farage complained that the 'damaging capitulation' occurred while MPs were away from Westminster.The Reform UK leader's move comes as diplomatic sources revealed Sir Keir ­Starmer's humiliating handover of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius, a close ally of China, had been rushed through before a potential Donald Trump victory in next month's US Presidential election.Trump's allies have complained that the deal represents a strategic coup for Beijing.The move – plans for which were first revealed in The Mail on Sunday last year – have triggered fresh speculation about the future of the Falkland islands and Gibraltar after the Prime Minister refused to guarantee that no other British Overseas Territories would be given away.Argentina's foreign minister Diana Mondino said of the Chagos deal: 'We welcome this step in the right direction and the end to outdated practices. With concrete actions and not empty rhetoric, we will recover full sovereignty of Las Malvinas.'In a letter sent this weekend to Foreign Secretary David Lammy and copied to Sir Lindsay, Mr Farage wrote: 'The strategic importance of the Chagos Islands to our nation and to our most important ally, America, is well known... The future of the Chagos Islands was announced when the House was not sitting, meaning that members of all parties remain in the dark about so many aspects of this decision.https://mol.im/a/13927957

Sue Hammond ● 550d3 Comments ● 549d

Rosie Duffield's Resignation Letter

"I can no longer stay a Labour MP under your management of the party, and this letter is my notice that I wish to resign the Labour Party whip with immediate effect.Although many "last straws" have led to my decision, my reason for leaving now is the programme of policies you seem determined to stick to, however unpopular they are with the electorate and your own MPs. You repeat often that you will make the "tough decisions" and that the country is "all in this together". But those decisions do not directly affect any one of us in Parliament. They are cruel and unnecessary, and affect hundreds of thousands of our poorest, most vulnerable constituents.This is not what I was elected to do. It is not even wise politics, and it certainly is not "the politics of service". I did not vote for you to lead our party for reasons I won't describe in detail here. But, as someone elevated immediately to a shadow cabinet position without following the usual path of honing your political skills on the backbenches, you had very little previous political footprint. It was therefore unclear what your political passions, drive or direction might be as the leader of the Labour Party, a large movement of people united by a desire for social justice and support for those most in need. You also made the choice not to speak up once about the Labour Party's problems with antisemitism during your time in the shadow cabinet, leaving that to backbenchers, including new MPs such as me. Since you took office as Leader of the Opposition you have used various heavy-handed management tactics but have never shown what most experienced backbenchers would recognise as true or inspiring leadership. You have never regularly engaged with your own backbench MPs, many of whom have been in Parliament far longer than you, and some of whom served in the previous Labour government. You have chosen neither to seek our individual political opinions, nor learn about our constituency experiences, nor our specific or collective areas of political knowledge. We clearly have nothing you deem to be of value. Your promotion of those with no proven political skills and no previous parliamentary experience but who happen to be related to those close to you, or even each other, is frankly embarrassing. In particular, the recent treatment of Diane Abbott, now Mother of the House, was deeply shameful and led to comments from voters across the political spectrum. A woman of her political stature and place in history is deserving of respect and support, regardless of political differences. As Prime Minister, your managerial and technocratic approach, and lack of basic politics and political instincts, have come crashing down on us as a party after we worked so hard, promised so much, and waited a long fourteen years to be mandated by the British public to return to power. Since the change of government in July, the revelations of hypocrisy have been staggering and increasingly outrageous. I cannot put into words how angry I and my colleagues are at your total lack of understanding about how you have made us all appear. How dare you take our longed-for victory, the electorate's sacred and precious trust, and throw it back in their individual faces and the faces of dedicated and hardworking Labour MPs?! The sleaze, nepotism and apparent avarice are off the scale. I am so ashamed of what you and your inner circle have done to tarnish and humiliate our once proud party. Someone with far-above-average wealth choosing to keep the Conservatives' two-child limit to benefit payments which entrenches children in poverty, while inexplicably accepting expensive personal gifts of designer suits and glasses costing more than most of those people can grasp — this is entirely undeserving of holding the title of Labour Prime Minister. Forcing a vote to make many older people iller and colder while you and your favourite colleagues enjoy free family trips to events most people would have to save hard for — why are you not showing even the slightest bit of embarrassment or remorse? I now have no confidence in your commitment to deliver the so-called "change" you promised during the General Election campaign and the changes we have been striving for as a political party for over a decade. My values are those of a democratic socialist Labour Party and I have been elected three times to act on those values on behalf of my constituents. Canterbury made history when its voters elected their first woman, and only non-Conservative, MP since the seat was created in the thirteenth century. My constituents elected an independent-minded MP who vowed to put constituency before party, and to keep tackling the issues that most affect us here — Brexit fallout, funding for our universities, our desperately struggling East Kent NHS, dire housing situation, repeated sewage pollution and protecting our vital green spaces. I am confident that I can continue to do so as an independent MP guided by my core Labour values. Sadly, the Labour Party has never shown any interest in my wonderful constituency in the seven years that I have been in Parliament. But I am proud of my community and will continue to serve them to the best of my ability. My constituents care deeply about social issues such as child poverty and helping those who cannot help themselves. I will continue to uphold those values as I pledged to do when I first stood before them for election in 2017. As someone who joined a trade union in my first job, at seventeen, Labour has always been my natural political home. I was elected as a single mum, a former teaching assistant in receipt of tax credits. The Labour Party was formed to speak for those of us without a voice, and I stood for election partly because I saw decisions about the lives of those like me being made in Westminster by only the most privileged few. Right now, I cannot look my constituents in the eye and tell them that anything has changed. I hope to be able to return to the party in the future, when it again resembles the party I love, putting the needs of the many before the greed of the few."Wow!! Don't hold back Rosie!! 😹

Sue Hammond ● 556d4 Comments ● 556d

What are Labour's policy commitments fir this Parliament ?

Can anyone list or point me to a list of the policies that Starmer has promised the Labour Party will legislate for and commit to delivering in this Parliament ?By this I mean policies that have some measurable base and target and are not just woolly platitudes such as Miliband's 'tackling the climate crisis that imperils our world'.Though to be fair to him he did make a measurable promise that we would have 'zero carbon electricity by 2030' which would then save families “up to £300” on their bills per year'.So that's one to watch out for.There will also be a 'The Railway Services Bill - bringing our railways back into public ownership.'Now that will raise a cheer from every £65,000 a year (plus pension and other benefits) train driver.Also especially for their leader Mick Lynch whose annual renumeration package is worth some £124,886 -  a £89,962 gross salary, Employers' NI contributions of £11,590 and pension contributions of £23,334.Will he take a pay cut as he will be negotiating, not with the wicked Tories, but with the Party which shares his political viewpoint and which he supports and is thus more likely to give him what he asks for ?An improvement in service will doubtless result from this Bill with performance targets set, monitored and published one hopes.Furthermore we have been promised an improvement in the NHS presumably in terms of efficiency and outputs.Again we should look for targets and measured achievements.Though no member of the Government has any experience in working in business or industry, one hopes they will adopt many of their performance measurement approaches.

John Hawkes ● 560d12 Comments ● 558d

Is Starmer Unfit For The Job?

There's a very insightful article about Starmer written by Peter Hitchens in the Mail on Sunday. It is behind a paywall so I have copied it below. Look away now if you think Starmer a top man in the top job ...Can it be that the Great Prosecutor Starmer is a colourless empty nobody unfit for the top?Is it possible that Sir Keir Starmer simply isn't up to the job the Labour Party tried so hard to get for him? Anyone who observes modern politics knows that many who now struggle to the top of the greasy pole are deeply unwonderful. I am always amused by journalists who boast of their conversations with 'ministers', as if such people are especially intelligent, informed or talented. Most of them are dullard careerists who hope for an easy route to wealth and status.How could Sir Keir, for instance, not have realised that his childlike readiness to accept shiny gifts was a danger childlike readiness to accept shiny gifts was a danger? Honestly, free suits for him and free dresses for his wife? VIP seats at concerts and football matches? This would be a very cheap price to accept for your soul, if you thought you had one, as he doesn't. Perhaps the free glasses failed to improve his vision and made him unable to spot approaching disaster.We are always told he is the great prosecutor, but really, is heading a staff of trained lawyers, with all the prestige and money of the state on your side, so hard? I'd be more impressed if he were a penniless defence counsel who won his cases against the odds.I've many times drawn attention to Sir Keir's past as a wooden-headed, hard-Leftist, revolutionary dogmatist. He doesn't actually disown this past, though nobody has ever properly questioned him about it. He's still an atheist, perhaps the flattest and most boring world-view known to man. It is empty of hope or depth, based on the view that the universe is nothing but a cosmic car crash in which nothing can therefore matter very much.Amazingly (to me anyway) he confessed before the election that he does not have a favourite book or a favourite poem. Some people say he was afraid of getting into trouble if he revealed such things. But I believe him. He acts at all times as if he has no imagination, and no poetry. It is in the imagination that we work out how our actions will affect others, and with poetry we surprise ourselves by finding out what really moves us.We also know he has an unfavourite work of art, a painting of Margaret Thatcher that so got on his nerves that he had it put in some (as yet unidentified) boxroom. This is in the same class as the leaden decision of his equally colourless Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to tolerate no paintings in the State Room in 11 Downing Street, except pictures of or by women.When he felt safe to do so, he used to call for the abolition of the monarchy, another crude and unpoetic opinion. Now that this position would lose him votes, he mumbles vaguely nice things about the monarch and accepts various honours from the Crown. But I haven't heard him say he actually prefers a constitutional monarchy to a republic. He has also followed the Blairite practice of displaying Union Jacks everywhere, in the hope that this will fool people into thinking Labour is a traditionalist, patriotic party. But what do you think he really thinks?And this is why he is making such a mess. He has long-term dogmatic aims – his Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, for example, is pursuing those with vigour and spite. But he only ever wanted to be Chief Commissar and Chief Bureaucrat. The ancient splendours of Downing Street, as the King's First Minister, as heir of Pitt, Wellington, Disraeli, Gladstone, Lloyd George and Churchill, mean little to him. He is an uninteresting man, scuttling about in vast echoing halls and chambers built for far bigger people.https://mol.im/a/13876179

Sue Hammond ● 563d13 Comments ● 558d

Sir Shameless

Sir Shameless is at it AGAIN! Hours after Wardrobegate erupted, PM and Sue Gray enjoy Spurs freebie with lobbyist who backed hated breakaway football super league and advises tax-avoiding tech giants.The freebie row engulfing Sir Keir Starmer deepened tonight as it was revealed that he shared lavish football hospitality with a powerful lobbyist who backed the hated breakaway Super League.Tickets were funded by Spurs, one of the six clubs which mounted the 2021 attempt to leave the Premier League – a plan that was abandoned following a furious reaction from fans.The Prime Minister and his embattled chief of staff Sue Gray enjoyed a corporate box at Tottenham Hotspur last Sunday, just hours after fresh ‘Wardrobegate’ allegations emerged about clothes Sir Keir and his wife had taken from Labour donor *Lord Alli.Sitting next to Ms Gray – who is facing open revolt in No 10 over her management style – was Katie Perrior, the founder and chair of iNHouse Communications, which worked on the attempt to form the Super League. Other clients include tech giants such as Google, who have been criticised for their legal tax avoidance.Sir Keir’s party for Tottenham’s clash with his beloved Arsenal also included Foreign Secretary David Lammy..https://mol.im/a/13877225Sir Keir has received many more freebies than any other MP since becoming Labour leader, receiving £107,145-worth since 2019. *Lord Alli was the biggest donor, giving the equivalent of £39,122, including accommodation worth £20,437

Sue Hammond ● 563d19 Comments ● 563d