Forum Topics

Something clicked

"The man embroiled in a heated exchange with Jeremy Corbyn has been revealed as a Tory activist - and has been on the show four times.Ryan Jacobsz, 36, who has lived in Hessle for four years, says something "clicked in him" after studying the Labour leader's demeanour ahead of the BBC Question Time leadership debate on Friday evening."Corbyn's provocative demeanour now. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/question-time-jeremy-corbyn-hessle-3570638"The die-hard Tory supporter, who has appeared on the programme on three previous occasions, said: "I had planned a different question and prepped it up because it's a great experience on the night and then Corbyn went for this persona with this righteous guy attitude and at that point, something clicked within me.""Planned a different question", but "something clicked". Very understandable of course. He was so lucky that he had the detail at his fingertips, for this suddenly provoked question.Fourth appearance on QT. And fourth question asked, apparently. How difficult it must be for the BBC to assemble an audience.https://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2018/08/ryan-jacobsz-to-win-the-next-election-the-conservatives-must-make-better-use-of-their-activists.html#idc-coverI’m not against QT audience members being political activists, (and pip-pip to the Tories for using their activists so well now), but I do think that they should have to reveal it when they ask a question. After all the people who ask questions on Gardeners’ Question Time always mention to which gardening club they belong.And the anonymity of these activists is not broken by the majority rightwing press. They just present the activists as genuinely outraged  “furious father”, a “father from Hull” etc.I sometimes wonder if Mr Game might be a bit right about the BBC.

David Ainsworth ● 2545d4 Comments ● 2544d

Anti-Social Cycling on Pavements

Hi All, Don't post here often but wanted to flag some things that happened in Putney last 24 hours. I am aware there is another cycling thread - just want to say what I write here in no way criticises those that cycle properly on roads, in lanes, with the appropriate safety gear.I know she's offski but I just penned Justine an email on this subject, if anyone is interested or shares my concerns (bit long sorry!): "I am becoming ever increasingly concerned with the amount of antisocial cycling behaviours that are occurring in Putney, which has unfortunately culminated in some quite distressing scenes for me and others in the past day and weeks. I would like to state I thoroughly advocate efforts for a greener society and I especially applaud Wandsworth on installing electric car parking points in the street lamps. I enjoy our amazing parks and green spaces, the efforts to replant trees and particularly the gifting a plant campaign. I am a keen runner and I thoroughly support getting vehicles which are particularly pollutive off of our streets. I understand cycling comes hand in hand with all this, however this should not be at consequence to pedestrian safety. Yesterday evening on Upper Richmond Road outside the Ghost Whale beer boutique, on my way home from East Putney tube at 8pm, I witnessed three youths in altercation with four elderly ladies. Myself and others stopped to see what was going on in what was very upsetting circumstances. The three boys had been cycling their large mountain bikes on the pavements, run into one of the ladies, who had then quite rightfully told them they should not be on the pavement. To this, the response from the boys was quite frankly disgusting. The language used and persistent taunting was thoroughly shameful to witness. Myself and other passers-by stepped in, and we then became the target of their abuse. They cycled away and everyone dispersed, only to circle back down the road, mount the pavement again by East Putney Tavern and approach the four ladies again who were just trying to get to their destination for a night out. Again, myself and others intervened. I tried calling 112 to report the incident but was told it was an emergency number. At this point a gentleman quite firmly sent the boys packing and the four woman diverted into the Prince of Wales just to escape their torment. One lady was left in tears from the ordeal. Sadly, whilst this is by far the worst incident, it is not isolated. This evening I was walking my dog in Wandsworth Park to find a gentleman cycling his bike in the park. He had a single front light (which runners also use, easily mistaken) and was not wearing a helmet or any high vis. It is very clearly signed posted on every entrance of Wandsworth Park, that cycling is not permitted and by laws apply. It is also clearly painted on the pathways at all entrances. The only part of the park in which cyclists are permitted to cycle is along the embankment. As I do with all cyclists who choose to ignore the law in the park, causing danger to people, dogs and children, I told him he should be on the road. He circled back to argue with me and my husband about the matter, saying he’d risk his life on the roads. My husband pointed out perhaps he’d consider wearing a helmet then, seeing as he was not. I told him firmly he was breaking the law and was causing a danger to us and our dog who should be able to roam freely without us worrying about a bike travelling 10-15mph that might hit him. Again we received only argument and abuse. Also this evening walking down my road to my home, a gentleman in black was riding a large bike on the pavement coming towards me, as the cars on queued in traffic. He just ignored me as I told him he should not be on the pavement. All of the above has occurred in a 24 hour period as I type this email. I can quote many more incidents, but I think you will understand the message. Quite frankly myself and others are sick of the constant disregard for highway codes, the law and the abuse some cyclists spout in defence of their illegal actions. Please please, what can be done to police cycling better and protect those who choose to walk the pavements. It is a real problem that appears to only be getting worse. It will only end in someone getting hurt."

Stephanie Geary ● 2546d21 Comments ● 2545d

Why we should stay in the EU

Here's a challenge for the Brexiteers here: let's see if they can produce a list like the one below, but showing the benefits that they imagine Brexit will bring. Our EU membership has given us...▪️ The longest unbroken period of peace in European history▪️ Freedom for UK citizens to visit, work, live and retire in the EU, own property, open bank accounts and set up companies there.▪️ Single market and customs union underpinning over £600 billion in trade▪️ Free trade deals with over 70 countries▪️ Just in time manufacturing that supports millions of jobs, thanks to no customs checks or complex procedures▪️ Scientific and academic collaboration▪️ Shared space exploration▪️ Participation in the Galileo GPS satellite cluster▪️ Driving licenses valid all over the EU▪️ Car insurance valid all over the EU▪️ Pet passports to make travel with pets simple▪️ Simplified fixed compensation scheme for flight delays and cancellations▪️ European Health Insurance Card (EHIC)▪️ Mobile roaming (calls, texts and data) at home prices▪️ Portable streaming services (can watch Netflix etc. all over the EU)▪️ Erasmus student exchange programme▪️ Simplified VAT reverse charge mechanism for those selling across the EU▪️ Safer food▪️ Cleaner beaches▪️ Courses for the unemployed funded by the European Social Fund▪️ Disaster relief funding e.g. the 60 million euro we received for flood relief in 2017▪️ Free movement for musicians and instruments, bands and equipment, artists and materials etc.▪️ Enhanced environmental protections▪️ Court of last resort (ECJ)▪️ Security cooperation and sharing of crime/terrorist databases▪️ EURATOM for medical isotopes▪️ Service providers (e.g. freelance translators) can offer their services to clients all over the EU▪️ No UK VAT or duty on imports from the EU (great for online shopping)▪️ EU citizenship (it's a thing - look it up!)▪️ Cross-border collaboration on taxes, e.g. to hold huge firms like Amazon and Facebook to account more than we otherwise could▪️ Venture capital funding▪️ A bigger presence on the world stage as a key part of the largest trade block in the world▪️ Use of EU queues at ports and airports▪️ Products made or grown in the UK can be sold in 31 countries without type approval, customs duties, phytosanitary certificates etc.▪️ Protection from GM food and chlorinated chicken▪️ Objective 1 funding for deprived areas▪️ Financial services passport, enabling firms in the City to service the whole EU market▪️ Strong intellectual property protections▪️ Baseline of worker protections (which we can always improve on)▪️ Enhanced medical research▪️ A friend to cosy up to against the might of the USA and China▪️ Source of workers, making an important contribution to our NHS, construction, hospitality and dozens of other sectors... and many more. [Thanks due to Edwin Hayward for compiling this list.]

Richard Carter ● 2550d37 Comments ● 2547d