Forum Topic

Hello Richard,Thank you for your post and I wholeheartedly agree with you.  Trump's decision to attack Iran was not only foolish but disastrous as well.  He acts like a hero in a cowboy film when reality works differently.While I agree in a way with Steven when he says: "... the Iranian regime continued to murder its own citizens, finance terror groups in the Middle East and build a nuclear bomb."my view is that first two statements above are incorrect because, if that was the case, he would have intervened in Sudan too. Trump's aims are oil. The attacks in Venezuela and in Iran demonstrate this as both have massive oil wealth. With Iran, the possibility of building nuclear bombs is not only frightening but, above all, Trump wants the uranium too.Interesting that, on July 22, 2026, the United States and Saudi Arabia signed an agreement that will provide the kingdom with uranium enrichment capability for its civilian nuclear program. The deal will last 30 years and is also expected to involve U.S. firms in developing the program.  I think Trump must tread carerfully as he is saying his friends can have uranium enrichment facilities only.  I do not like the Iranian regime at all!  If regime change was in fact at the forefront, they should have the considered the options available to them.  But this consideration is secondary to oil and uranium reserves.......As an aside, I would like to say that the US has in the past intervened successfully in South American countries to change their regimes but none with a war.  Whoever wishes to blame me of TDS, please note that the Deranged Syndrome is suffered by Trump himself.On another matter, it is interesting to note that:US walks out of UN Security Council meeting during France's remarks28 July 2026The US delegation walked out of a UN Security Council meeting on Monday, in protest at comments made by France that compared Washington's voting on human rights to that of authoritarian states......The diplomatic row was initially sparked last week, when the US joined North Korea and Russia in voting against extending Volker Turk's (Austrian) term as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.......Turk has criticised Russia's war in Ukraine and Israel's military conduct in Gaza......"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c87nj3w9gxjoAs the saying goes:  A man is known for the company he keeps.

Ivonne Holliday ● 18d

Mr Ixer'Whatever one thinks of the Iranian leaders - and, yes, they are murderous, theocratic dictators - it looks like Trump, Hesgeth et al have misjudged them.One of your typical attempts at Middle East political analysis that in order to show your supposed and self-referential political sophistication and 'wit', tries to equate the actions of Trump and the US with the Khamenei clan and Iran. About time you decided which side you are on.Surely not Abdul Ballout, a 21-year-old German citizen with Lebanese heritage, a man suspected of carrying out what authorities say was likely an "Islamist terror attack" at Berlin Pride has been shot and killed by police. We have of course suffered many murders and attacks by Islamic militants in the UK over recent years in the main against Jews.I have little doubt that our security services have been aided in their attempts to foil them by intelligence from the CIA.So get on the right side of history.Something Angela Merkel tragically failed to do when 'on August 25, 2015, Germany's immigration ministry announced that Syrians fleeing civil war would be waved in with few checks or questions. Then came the moment that changed Europe for ever.On August 31, Chancellor Angela Merkel uttered her now infamous rallying cry at a Press conference. 'Wir Schaffen Das' or 'We can do it.'Her words were a clarion call to people the world over to come to her country, sparking an immigration crisis with all and sundry from a myriad of nations heading to Germany'. Now they are paying the price and we must be on high alert to ensure we do not join them.

John Hawkes ● 21d

Whatever one thinks of the Iranian leaders - and, yes, they are murderous, theocratic dictators - it looks like Trump, Hesgeth et al have misjudged them. Iran's military hasn't been destroyed, probably seriously degraded, but they're still retaliating with attacks on states within the Arabian peninsula. The US attacks have helped retain support against the Iranian government - the school that was hit by the US early on in the conflict has probably been used to dilute any support for the US; an early admission of the mistake and a promise of reparations as has been the case in earlier conflicts would have been sensible (the evidence points to the use of out of date intelligence although the US has held back publication of the official report). These things aren't binary; just because many Iranian hate their leaders doesn't mean they see Trump as their saviour.The Iranian regime know they have an advantage - they're unaccountable to an electorate whereas Trump has mid term elections looming - and rising gas prices, inflation and a billions of dollar bill for the conflict aren't going to help the Republican Party retain power in Congress.There's also the issue of who is leading the Iranian regime and who the US are ultimately negotiating with. It's nominally the late Ayatolla's son, Mojtaba Khamenei, but he was apparently seriously wounded in the attack that killed his father. He hasn't been seen in public, perhaps to protect him from Israeli assassination, but he may be incapacitated or even dead and just being used as a figurehead to give authority to others' decisions.It seems improbable that bombing will force regime change so Trump will have to negotiate and there's a growing opinion that any deal will be similar to Obama's one - only with Trump’s signature on it. I doubt Trump would put troops on the ground to try and force regime change.Iranians in my experience are well educated and sane, they will have the scientific and technological ability to build a fission bomb given time. However, given an appropriate agreement will they want to and, even if they did, is it just part of the whole nuclear weapons MAD power struggle - I'd consider North Korea a more realistic threat. Anyway, I wonder what the US military would do if a Chinese or Russian navy shop escorted a tanker flying their flag through the Strait of Hormuz to collect oil? I suspect Trump will feel the need for a deal soon.As the meme from the US going the rounds of Facebook yesterday said "What's the difference between Vietnam and Iran: Trump had a plan to avoid Vietnam ...".

Michael Ixer ● 21d