Forum Topic

I've read that swimming as a sport has decreased in popularity but I don't know how you can actually measure this when there aren't a huge number of pools as so many have closed.  There are always so many activities in pools to take up pool-time what with swimming clubs with all ages - juniors through to masters, and aqua-aerobics, canoeing, waterpolo, underwater hockey (octopush), synchronised swimming, pool parties etc that there can be a lot of competition for pool-time slots which leaves little time for those family swims - which are so popular and are such worthwhile family time. Fewer people will be able to swim if the facilities just aren't there.  Many younger learners will not be swimming in any outdoor pools for a lot of the year because unless they can swim well they will just get cold far too quickly.  This is why smaller private pools are now so popular as teaching pools including school pools.https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/london-s-first-olympicsized-pool-in-decades-is-open-6745792.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_long-course_swimming_pools_in_the_United_Kingdom#See_alsoEaling's Gurnell looks as though it will soon go on site. There will be many children who have not had the chance to compete against each other or even learnt to swim in recent years as a result of there being fewer easily accessible public pool. Travelling miles to train before school or the office takes some dedication and more so when you rely on parents for transport.  No wonder numbers are down.It's a sport that so many people of ALL AGES can and should be able to benefit from.

Philippa Bond ● 1d

I don't agree. I swim in the pool occasionally as I am lucky enough to have one close to my work but lane swimming is my main form of exercise.I can see the logic of Dan Hawtrey's point about increased congestion of swimmers and this is inevitable with a smaller pool. However, there is an important offset. When two swimmers are travelling at different speeds at some point one catches up with the other and overtaking is necessary. This can cause conflict with swimmers going in the opposite direction.Pool etiquette, which is observed in most pools I have swum in is, if another swimmer has nearly caught you up by the end of the lane, you give way and that clears potential traffic jams allowing faster swimmers to proceed. This happens more often in a 25metre pool as opposed to a 33 metre pool. There are other reasons why the shortening is a good idea. The main impetus behind it must be to cut energy costs because pools for lane swimming must be deeper. Combined with the extra length - the extra on the heating bill will be significant. This is money that could be used to maintain and improve the facility for everyone.There is also the point that 25metres is a standard size for pools now. My own swimming regime is based around this and it is a pain to have to adjust. Perhaps more importantly for that a standard size makes it possible for the Leisure Centre to host school competitions.As I say, I am a passionate lane swimmer and believe it is one of the best ways to stay healthy. However, those that exercise like this tend to be younger and relatively fit already. A more important role for a public pool is to enable children to learn to swim so this change seems to me as Places Leisure having its priorities right. Also the teaching area could probably also be repurposed for activities such as aqua aerobics for seniors.

Peter Higgins ● 1d