Forum Topic

Boycie'By the way, John and Steven, you don't have to respond to EVERY post repeating the same old same old - could you give it a break. Cheers!'I speak only for myself but I will stop posting 'the same old same old' as you put it when 'same old same old' antisemitic and anti-USA posts made by others cease.I now feel obliged to post counterarguments to those Iranophiles and Americaphobes such as you who have taken up the cause of a country that has been sponsoring state terrorism for decades and also seems to have been close to getting its hands on nuclear weapons.Iran is both a real and present danger globally and on the streets of the UK as is Islamism in general.Even in leafy West Putney.'There was no case presented to legally justify the attacks at this stage and there was no thought-through plan with a clear, achievable, objective.'When a country is potentially under threat and the world destabilised by truly psychotic theocratic fascist dictators (or even nepo ones as I read that Khomeini's son might take over ruling the country after his father's sad demise), then 'legality' does not come into it.As was the case in WWII when Churchill lead our war with Nazi Germany.In any case which legal norms in which court do you have in mind ?  And the objective was quite clear.Put Iran on the back foot in its plans to develop and use nuclear weapons.Straightforward really. None of this would seem does to concern you so long as you can feel a childlike satisfaction from criticising US policy as "it is getting at Trump".Whose side are you on ?'Keir is not another reckless, hysterical, psycho-killer'.It's the Starmer fence-sitting I am concerned with.That is because he has no policy and cannot make up his mind  over which side in this conflict he should take.Probably because he does not want to upset 'the Muslim vote' in upcoming local elections or their fellow travellers such as you appear to be.As regards the defence of this country Trump is right about him - "he is no Churchill".Which 'psycho-killer' are you referring to ?Do we have any troops to be sacrificed ?It would seem we do not have a navy.Thank God for the Greeks coming to our aid in Cyprus.And WTF is the Epstein case to do with the price of fish ?Simply smutty childlike obfuscation.

John Hawkes ● 18d

"Anyway, hopefully this latest utter shit-show put on by Bibi and Donny is over as soon as.... I'm not holding my breath though!"It won't be. Israel won't get this level of support again (well, hopefully not) and remodelling an area as large as the Middle East takes quite a while."According to three Israeli defense officials, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered military leaders at the end of last year to begin planning for a solo strike against Iran to be carried out sometime between April and June.Military commanders were unenthusiastic, one defense official said, because they did not believe that Israel, acting alone, could achieve much more than it had in the 12-day war in June 2025. They were also concerned about their ability to defend against what they expected would be an Iranian response targeting Israeli population centers with ballistic missiles, the defense official said.Once it became clear that the United States would be Israel’s partner in an attack on Iran and it began to amass forces in the region, two defense officials said, Israeli generals changed their tune. They grasped a historic opportunity to batter Iran, destroy its missile arsenal, further damage its nuclear program, and even try to push the Iranian government to the breaking point.The shouldering of much of the burden by the Americans — including sending aloft a huge fleet of midair-refueling tankers — made it possible for Israel to deploy its largest air fleet ever on Saturday, the two officials said. That allowed for what proved a devastating assault on Iranian missile launchers, they said."From:-"An Emboldened Israel Is Seizing Opportunities to Remake RegionWith the war against Iran underway, and the U.S. military as a powerful ally, the Israeli government is seizing its chance to move against other adversaries."By David M. Halbfinger and Ronen BergmanReporting from Jerusalem and Tel AvivMarch 3, 2026. New York Times.

David Ainsworth ● 19d

Ivonne, Iran is an ally of Russia; they've been supplying drones and the drone manufacturing knowledge for use against Ukraine. Trump might be disappointed by Putin's comment given Trump's bias against Zelensky. Interesting that Trump was quick to criticise Zelensky before checking that the attack on Putin's Black Sea Palace was misinformation but feels it ok to assassinate Iran's leader at his residence. Does this set a precedent that all heads of state are fair game? Not that I have any sympathy with the Ayatollah; what atheist would have sympathy for any religious fanatics? Obviously, no sane individual wants extremists to gain nuclear weapons but who knows where this will end? We shouldn't forget that it was Trump's deal, subsequently implemented by Biden, that allowed the Taliban back into Afghanistan. And I seem to recall in the past Pakistani technicians sympathetic to Iran have illicitly sneaked information to Iran (perhaps in a similar way to how the USSR got "the bomb" via the UK).I can't see how bombing cities in Iran will help the many Iranians who want democracy; there seems to be no way of guaranteeing an outcome ranging from anarchy to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard implementing a bloody clamp down? Or will the US, or Israelis eventually put troops in to take control? And will the Saudis, UAE et al start distancing themselves from the US because of the damaging effect it's had on their countries.I've no idea, and I've no confidence those in power across the world do either ... still,  we've all stopped talking about the Epstein files! Sorry if that's too cynical ...

Michael Ixer ● 19d

Both Palestinians and Jews possess significant Canaanite ancestry, as both populations are descended from the ancient inhabitants of the Levant. However, studies indicate that modern Palestinians generally exhibit a higher percentage of Canaanite ancestry, while Jewish populations, particularly Ashkenazi Jews, have higher levels of admixture from other, non-Levantine populations. Key Findings on Canaanite DNA:Palestinians: Research suggests Palestinians derive a high proportion—sometimes estimated around 80%—of their ancestry from Canaanites and other ancient Levantine populations. They are considered one of the most direct descendants of the ancient Canaanite population.Jews: Studies show that various Jewish groups (especially Sephardic, Mizrahi, and to a lesser extent, Ashkenazi) share a high degree of common ancestry with the Levant. However, due to centuries of diaspora, Ashkenazi Jews in particular have significant intermixture with European populations, reducing their overall percentage of Canaanite, and thus, Levantine, DNA.Shared Ancestry: Despite these differences, both populations are genetically closer to each other than to other populations. They are both considered "Canaanite cousins", sharing a common, deeply rooted Levantine, Canaanite, and Israelite genetic core. In summary, while both groups share the same ancient ancestors, Palestinians tend to have a higher proportion of Canaanite ancestry, while Jewish populations possess a more mixed, although still heavily Levantine, genetic profile.However long Israeli Jews claim they have been in the land, so have the Palestinians. There is no basis on which the Israeli Jews can claim priority over the Palestinians.

David Ainsworth ● 19d

CNN yesterday:-"Nearly 6 in 10 Americans disapprove of the US decision to take military action in Iran, as most say a long-term military conflict between the two nations is likely, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS.The poll, fielded shortly after US and Israeli attacks launched the war with Iran, finds majorities express doubts about President Donald Trump’s handling of the situation. Most say they lack trust in Trump to make the right decisions about US use of force in Iran, with 60% saying they do not think he has a clear plan for handling the situation and 62% saying he should get congressional approval for any further military action.Just over a quarter (27%) feel that the US made enough of an effort at diplomacy with Iran before using military force, with 39% saying the US did not try hard enough at diplomacy first and 33% unsure."Still you don't need to worry about CNN in the future. It is highly probable that it will be taken over by Larry Ellison,  a billionaire Trump supporter and Zionist. The right is gradually going for full spectrum dominance of the media in the US.--------------------"Israeli nationalists chant 'death to Arabs' during procession through Jerusalem" 2025.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDXBGIKWzpU----------------An indisputable fact: Israel has erased Palestine from the map.----------------So my question to the supporters of the attack on Iran is, ‘Do you want Israel to keep a monopoly on nuclear weapons in the Middle East?’ Or perhaps eventually in the whole world?

David Ainsworth ● 19d

"Some of what you consider 'corruption' in Iran seems to be exactly what is happening in Israel - the taking away of land belonging to Palestinians and the creation of regulations that it is difficult for Palestinians to comply with.  Then there is the burning/pulling up of Palestinians' olive groves followed by the claims that farms are abandoned."It has gone on since Israel's takeover of Palestine in 1948. "a detailed account of exactly how abandoned Arab property assisted in the absorption of the new immigrants was prepared by Joseph Schechtman, an important Zionist:-"It is difficult to overestimate the tremendous role this lot of abandoned Arab property has played in the settlement of hundreds of thousands of Jewish immigrants who have reached Israel since the proclamation of the state in May 1948. Forty-seven new rural settlements established on the sites of abandoned Arab villages had by October 1949 already absorbed 25,255 new immigrants. By the spring of 1950 over 1 million dunams had been leased by the custodian to Jewish settlements and individual farmers for the raising of grain crops.Large tracts of land belonging to Arab absentees have also been leased to Jewish settlers, old and new, for the raising of vegetables. In the south alone, 15,000 dunams of vineyards and fruit trees have been leased to cooperative settlements; a similar area has been rented by the Yemenites Association, the Farmers Association, and the Soldiers Settlement and Rehabilitation Board. This has saved the Jewish Agency and the government millions of dollars. While the average cost of establishing an immigrant family in a new settlement was from $7,500 to $9,000, the cost in abandoned Arab villages did not exceed $1,500 ($750 for building repairs and $750 for livestock and equipment).Abandoned Arab dwellings in towns have also not remained empty. By the end of July 1948, 170,000 people, notably new immigrants and ex-soldiers, in addition to about 40,000 former tenants, both Jewish and Arab, had been housed in premises under the custodian's control; and 7,000 shops, workshops and stores were sublet to new arrivals. The existence of these Arab houses-vacant and ready for occupation-has, to a large extent, solved the greatest immediate problem which faced the Israeli authorities in the absorption of immigrants. It also considerably relieved the financial burden of absorption."From Joseph Schechtman:- The Arab Refugee Problem (1952).Schechtman had long been researching population transfers, and encouraged the creation of the circumstances for it to happen. The 1948 war made it possible. While UN Resolution 194 in 1948 called for repatriation or compensation, Israel has maintained that returning refugees would threaten its existence as a Jewish state.Between 1948 and 1956, Israeli border guards shot and killed an estimated 2,700 to 5,000 Palestinians attempting to cross the border to return to their homes, with the vast majority being unarmed individuals seeking to return for economic or social reasons. These shootings were part of a broader, violent effort to prevent the return of Palestinian refugees.

David Ainsworth ● 20d

Seems like Khamenei was a pretty sharp cookie money wise.Apparently Sharia law prohibits certain financial activities, including gambling, unethical business activities, and speculation.However he seems to have had his hands on more assets than most !https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15605827/How-Ayatollah-ran-95BILLION-business-empire-built-seizing-thousands-Iranians-properties-selling-profit.htmlIran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei left behind a corrupt and repressive legacy, following his assassination on February 28. 'Before his death, he was the longest-serving ruler in the Middle East, having taken power in 1989 following the death of his mentor Ruhollah Khomeini. His 36 years and eight months leading Iran resulted in the mass repression of women, the slaughter of civilians and the funding of terror groups including Hamas and Hezbollah.But among the most wicked things he did was to amass a business empire worth an estimated $95billion by systematically seizing thousands of properties belonging to ordinary Iranians. Khamenei's business empire was held under Setad, a little-known organisation set up by Ruhollah Khomeini just before his death. Its full name in Persian is 'Setad Ejraiye Farmane Hazrate Emam' - Headquarters for Executing the Order of the Imam. It was one of the keys to the now-dead Iranian leader's power and holds stakes in nearly every sector of Iranian industry, including finance, oil, telecommunications, the production of birth-control pills and even ostrich farming. A Reuters investigation in 2013 found Setad amassed a giant portfolio of real estate by claiming in Iranian courts, sometimes falsely, that the properties are abandoned. The organisation holds a court-ordered monopoly on taking property in the name of the supreme leader, and regularly sells the seized properties at auction or seeks to extract payments from the original owners. Under Khamenei, the organisation expanded its corporate holdings, buying stakes in dozens of Iranian companies, both private and public, with the stated goal of creating an Iranian conglomerate to boost the country's economic growth'.I wonder how much of this benefited the Iranian poor ? 

John Hawkes ● 20d

Ms Grant'Guess you all will be voting Green in the next GE as you appear to agree with Zack Polanski (having watched his interview on BBC yesterday)'.You will have noticed that Messrs Ainsworth, Brigo, Carter, Boyce et al plus Ms Bond and Carter seem at last to have at last found a Party that they can join whose open door immigration, anti-American and anti-Israel foreign policy and anti-capitalism stances seem to fully align with their views.And of course there is now a new 'oppressed' anti-western Government they can propagandise for namely Iran, sponsors of Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist groups who they so idolise and whose causes, namely annihilation of Israel and infiltration into the western democracies they seem so to desire.I am sure they all marched tearfully yesterday in London to mourn the sad demise of Iranian theocratic dictator, the  Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei forgetting of course his 'martyrdom' may not ensure him a blissful Akhirah - eternal Paradise - rather than introducing the risk of him being punished in Hell.This blissful eternity may not be certain after the tens of thousands of his political opponents he had murdered and tortured and the extreme misogyny inflicted on Iranian women. Might this also lose him his right to 72 virgins in the After Life ?I wonder if the politburo of the Putney Palestinian National Front I named above marched with the Iranian exiles in favour of the once Khomeini-led regime or perhaps, realising the naïve errors of their ways joined those Iranians those looking for its overthrow ?"I think we should be told" !

John Hawkes ● 20d