Forum Topic

Sue. I'm in no way defending polygamous marriages or poly amorous relationships - I thought I'd made that clear already - and, as an atheist, I'm unlikely to defend the rituals or customs of any religion, although I'd admit to an indoctrination into Christianity at school so that might have biased me towards its religious ideas. Sharia courts have no legal authority: they are not part of the UK judicial system and cannot overrule British courts or make legally binding decisions. They're essentially not dissimilar to arbitration rules with industry bodies agreed in commercial contracts to avoid courts when resolving disputes (actually, arbitration bodies probably have more authority as the companies involved have agreed that under UK civil law whereas Sharia courts have no legal basis).I'd agree there is some confusion because marriages that take place in mosques are religious ones only; ones legal within UK law have to be covered by a separate registry office wedding. I understand some Muslim brides, particularly from abroad, don't understand this and might be undermined if only a religious wedding takes place. Their "husband" might subsequently marries someone else, or in fact decide to have multiple religious weddings. I don't think that's illegal and, in some ways, as it's polyamory (not polygamy) it's not a lot different from the Marquis of Bath's "wifelets" other than it's probably being done without the consent of the first "wife" who, unfortunately, doesn't realise she isn't legally married. I suppose it could be deception which might be considered fraudulent? I certainly in no way agree with such deception! However, a polygamous marriage may be recognised in the UK if it was legal in the country where the ceremony and registration took place, both parties had legal capacity to enter into a polygamous marriage and at the time of the marriage were domicile in the country where it was legal, and neither party was domicile in the UK at the time of the marriage. This is an interesting article about polygamous marriages. It appears not to be that common even in countries where it's legal. An exception appears to be mainly in sub-saharan countries where it appears it's not limited to Muslims and is not uncommon among Christians in that area. So it's probably more cultural than religious? I note Afghanistan is a highlight on the map as well, again perhaps a result of Taliban terrorists misusing religion than Islam per se? We shouldn't forget Mormon Christians who seem to be keen on poligamy? https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/12/07/polygamy-is-rare-around-the-world-and-mostly-confined-to-a-few-regions/I've seen that some extreme religious evangelist sects in the US are now re-establishing the idea that men are the head of the household, there's rumours some MAGA followers would like to export that to the UK ... One might want to worry about that as well as Sharia courts and polygamous marriages - it's the evangelist in the US that push for abortion bans and controls on contraception? (I'm sure Mr Farage and co will push back on that.)On your other point, from a pragmatic point of view, I'd agree it might be considered sensible for women to try and protect themselves against pregnancy as they are often the one literally held olding the baby, but condoms do fail and the pill can have side effects - I can remember a friend of a friend having a stroke at the age of about 22 back in the 1970s because of the contraceptive pill. Viewing this from a secular point of view, I just feel there's a number of inconsistencies and hypocrisy around this area, particularly when you consider the number of children born to unmarried mothers is now apparently greater than 50% and 1 in 10 children live in a blended family ("stepfamilies" or separated families where there may be a mix of step parents, natural parents, one parent versus children and any siblings). Still, I guess your views are pretty obvious, Sue!As I said, life isn't perfect, especially after a few drinks ...(Mr Google's AI assisted with the collection of information and statistical data and apologies, I may have used the term polygamy previously when I should have said polyamory.)

Michael Ixer ● 27d

Mr Brigo'As you are the one complaining about the size of the welfare state perhaps you should 'play your part' and refuse to collect your pension?'Certainly not.I have paid for it during many years of paid employment through NI contributions and higher rate income tax paid even now on my non-state pension. And yourself ?I and many others including the Labour Party sensibles are more concerned with benefit payments to those, often young, who will not or claim are unable to work, often because of bogus mental health issues.https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2pvxdn9v4o "'Life being stressful is not an illness' - GPs on mental health over-diagnosis"'Hundreds of GPs across England have told the BBC they think mental health problems are being over-diagnosed.One commonly-held view by family doctors, our research suggests, is that society tends to over-medicalise normal life stresses. But they're also concerned about how hard it is to get help for patients with mental health conditions.Earlier this week, the Health Secretary ordered an independent review into the reasons for a rising demand for mental health, ADHD and autism services in England, and where the gaps in support are.BBC News sent a questionnaire to more than 5,000 GPs in England asking about their experiences helping patients with mental health concerns. Their responses give an insight into how challenging this issue is for many family doctors.Of the 752 GPs who took part in our research, 442 said they believed that over-diagnosis is a concern. More said mental health problems were over-diagnosed by a little than over-diagnosed by a lot.Eighty-one GPs who responded felt that mental health problems were under-diagnosed'.Cheer up !😟😉

John Hawkes ● 30d

"I really do not believe that 50% of benefits is spent on pensions.  But yes, the UK has an ageing population.  I do not think that the "triple lock" is to blame by any stretch of the imagination."Google AI:-"In the UK, pensions for the elderly consume the largest share of the welfare budget, making up roughly half of total welfare spending, with projections for 2025-26 showing about 55% of social security funds (£174.9 billion) going to pensioners, primarily for State Pensions and related benefits like Pension Credit and Winter Fuel Payments, a figure expected to grow with an aging population.Key Figures & Breakdown (UK Focus):Overall Share: In 2024/25, pensioners received nearly half (48%) of the total UK welfare budget.By Benefit Type (2025-26 Forecast): Around 55% of the social security system's expenditure is projected to go to pensioners, amounting to £174.9 billion in Great Britain.Largest Component: The State Pension itself is the biggest single cost, followed by Pension Credit, Housing Benefit (for pensioners), and Winter Fuel Payments. Context:Dominant Spending: Pension spending is the largest single element within the UK's social protection spending, a trend likely to continue as the population ages.Welfare System: This includes benefits beyond just the State Pension, such as Pension Credit and Winter Fuel Payments, which are grouped under pensioner benefits. In essence, when looking at welfare spending, especially in the UK, a majority portion goes towards supporting older individuals through retirement benefits, with the State Pension being the core cost.""Dura lex, sed lex"

David Ainsworth ● 30d

Comment from the Spectator "Reality Check" by Michael Simmons 5/12/25"After the economic explosion that was last week’s Budget, the fallout has already begun. Richard Hughes, chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility, resigned on Monday over the watchdog’s accidental release of its Budget report less than an hour before Rachel Reeves’s statement. However, he won’t be the only one left jobless following the Chancellor’s announcements." Labour is overseeing a transfer – started under the Tories – from work to welfare".That shift is both fiscal and human. The real outcome of the Budget is tax rises for workers, coupled with yet more debt for future generations to fund a benefits bonanza. Labour’s second Budget alone adds another £16 billion to that bill. Factor in pensions, and welfare spending is on course to hit £406 billion by 2030 – £109 billion of which will go on sickness payments. To pay for this, Reeves is euphemistically ‘asking’ workers for more, pushing taxes to a record high. The average person on £38,000 will now hand over £2,000 a year just to finance welfare.But this isn’t simply an economic disaster – it’s a human one. Some 6.5 million Britons are now on out-of-work benefits, with more than five million under no obligation to seek work. Payrolled jobs have fallen by about 180,000 in a year. And nearly one in eight 16- to 24-year-olds – almost a million young people – are now Neets: not in education, employment or training. Many of them will never leave this worklessness trap – unless Labour starts working harder'.An example is it not of the Labour Party's general attitude to social and economic policy ?

John Hawkes ● 31d

@AndyI asked the question to an AI bot and the reply is below, not sure if any use or not-----------In the UK, it depends on the type of benefit: some benefits are taxable and count towards your total taxable income, while others are completely tax‑free and do not get added on top of your wages for income tax purposes. You are always taxed on the total of your taxable income sources, not just your wages.Taxable vs tax‑free benefitsSome state benefits are specifically classed as taxable, for example things like the State Pension, contribution‑based Jobseeker’s Allowance and Carer’s Allowance. These are added to your earnings (wages, self‑employment, pensions, etc.) and the combined figure is what HMRC uses to work out if you are over your personal allowance and which tax band you fall into. In your £2,000‑a‑month example, if you were getting a taxable benefit on top, it would normally be added to that £2,000 to calculate tax.Other benefits are explicitly tax‑free, such as Housing Benefit, Income Support in many cases, Disability Living Allowance (DLA), Personal Independence Payment (PIP), Child Benefit (though high earners may face a separate charge), and similar support payments. These tax‑free benefits are not added to your wages when working out income tax, so you would only pay income tax based on your £2,000 salary (plus any other taxable income), subject to your personal allowance.Personal allowance still appliesEveryone who is UK‑resident and under the very high‑income taper usually has a personal allowance (currently £12,570 per tax year) on which they pay no income tax. That allowance covers taxable income only; it does not need to cover tax‑free benefits because those are ignored for income tax. So if your total taxable income (wages plus any taxable benefits) stays within the personal allowance, you will not pay income tax, regardless of how much additional tax‑free benefit income you receive.If you tell HMRC or your employer which benefits you receive, they adjust your tax code so that the right overall amount of tax is taken across both earnings and any taxable benefits. For a precise answer in your situation, the key is to check whether each specific benefit you claim is on the “taxable” or “tax‑free” list and then add only the taxable ones to your £2,000 when working out your tax.

Michael Brigo ● 33d