Forum Topic

Yes, we are delighted.. It's only the start..The exit of BBC DG Timothy Davie, universally known as 'Tiny Tim' in its corridors, was absurdly and cranially out of his depth. I met him once: I told him SMEs were 98% of business in the UK yet the BBC never had an 'SME Correspondent'. His reply was proto-typical BBC smear: 'Is that only because YOU want to make programmes..?', somewhat idiotic as I'd retired 15 years earlier.When I worked in the BBC radio newsroom in the late 1980s I was astonished that when a major story broke the editors often said: 'No, let's wait until the newspapers cover it.. and then we'll follow up..' Cowardice et al.The bias among its 2,500 'news journalists' (mostly re-writers of agency output) is in fact widely and deeply embedded into every fabric, every inch of the Corp. For 30 years anyone who objected to immigration was instantly labelled 'racist' without any presenter rebuking the accuser. Only one view of immigration, global warming, Trump, Brexit, gender, being white, grammar schools, 'poverty', big business, class and race was tolerated. In nearly all Brexit programming Remainer guests vastly outnumbered Leavers. Bias and prejudice ruled the roost. Most absurdly nearly all presenters with middle class accents - like Jamie Oliver - pretended for decades to be 'working class' to keep their jobs. David Attenborough endlessly included references to 'global warming' - even when it was absurd - just to keep his job.Davie's career was marked by the emasculation of the few good news units, eg 'Hardtalk', and the introduction of virtually no good new ones. Years ago a noted KGB defector said the KGB spent 85% of budget and effort not on spies but on disinformation - spreading 'guilt' messages among ever-gullible college students about issues in the West that sent them wild: South Africa, nuclear energy, NATO missiles, global warming, class, solar and wind, colonialism, and most successfuly, the 'justice' of mass uncontrolled non-European immigration. Best of all, the KGB man said: not only were/are those students in power: Blair, Starmer, Trudeau, Newsom, all are psycho-blind to the truth of the absurdity of their views - even when presented with concrete, incontrovertible facts to the contrary. For them news is now a 'moral mission'. That's how and why the BBC is deeply mean, biased, bigoted - and fatally flawed - until a whole new generation of properly educated staff arrives sometime in the future - and we return to fact-based, not ideologically, corrupted methods of programme production.

Marcus Gibson ● 2h

Boycie'Finally, a bit of sense and reality from Alistair Campbell, I think he’s spot on here;‘ The real weakness of the BBC, as exemplified by recent events, is its failure to stand up to ludicrous claims from the right that it is somehow hugely biased to the left. Listening to Telegraph journalists bleat about a biased BBC, or Reform MPs enjoying more platforming than any minority party in history, underlines that. This is the work of right wing journalists and owners working hand in glove with right wing forces inside the BBC to undermine it. The Labour government needs to help the BBC stand up for itself and clear out those forces that want the BBC to fail.’Is that Alistair Campbell the author of the 'dodgy dossier' - " a 2003 briefing document for the British prime minister Tony Blair's Labour Party government. It was issued to journalists on 3 February 2003 by Alastair Campbell, Blair's Director of Communications and Strategy, and concerned Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. Along with the earlier September Dossier, these documents were ultimately used by the British government to justify its involvement in the invasion of Iraq in 2003.The claims contained in the September and 'Iraq' Dossiers were called into question when weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were not found in Iraq, and the dossiers were encompassed by House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee inquiry. The Committee subsequently reported that the sources should have been credited, and that the dossier should have been checked by ministers before being released. The dossier had only been reviewed by a group of civil servants operating under Alastair Campbell. The committee stated that the publication was "almost wholly counter-productive" and in the event only served to undermine the credibility of the government's case." - Wiki.This involvement with a right wing American President looking for any reason to avenge the 'Twin Towers' attack by Islamic Arab terrorists (a laudable if mishandled aim in my view) however resulted in the death of 179 British Troops.And of course you totally miss the point about journalistic bias in general.'Right wing' journalists from unashamed 'right wing media' will of course espouse 'right wing' views.That is called free speech and freedom of the press.As is their challenging what they see as 'left wing' bias in  our state news media the BBC.Campbell seems to think the Government in the hands of Labour, a political Party he supports, should 'help the BBC stand up for itself and clear out those forces that want the BBC to fail.’ Sounds a bit totalitarian to me.

John Hawkes ● 4d

Extract from a perceptive article taken from the Spectator -"The BBC’s fake news blindspot"10 November 2025, 11:47amBrendan O’Neill'The rot at the BBC is worse than people think. It’s far more serious than the occasional twisting of facts to get one over on a politician the Beeb hates, like Donald Trump – an act of journalistic malpractice for which director-general Tim Davie and News CEO Deborah Turness have now resigned.This scandal exposes a great truth of our time – that the elites are often more susceptible to fallacy and hysteria than the rest of usThe deeper problem is that the BBC has been so corrupted by faddish ideology that it is now content to burn truth itself in the service of that ideology. It has supped so heartily on the Kool-Aid of correct-think that it is even willing to promote such delirious untruths as ‘male breastmilk’ in order to stay sweet with its fellow ideologues. This is the true crisis: the BBC has forsaken its old noble goal of informing the masses in preference for flattering the delusional beliefs of the elites.It is no surprise that the Beeb’s shortcomings pertain to three issues in particular: Trump, trans and Gaza. For this is the holy trinity of moral obsessions in chattering-class circles. Hating Trump, believing men can become women, insisting in the absence of anything resembling evidence that Israel is a ‘genocidal entity’. Fail to bow to these neo-religious diktats and it’s curtains for you in polite society.The Beeb has thoroughly imbibed all three commandments. Its doctoring of that footage of Trump confirms it feels greater loyalty to Trump Derangement Syndrome 😁 than to truth. Its ceaseless promotion of the trans ideology – and its sidelining of critical women’s voices – confirmed it will even set fire to science to please its fellow congregants in the church of high-status opinion. And its frothing obsession with Gaza, often to the exclusion of every other tragedy on earth (HEAR ! HEAR ! - JH), confirms it bows deeply to the bourgeois cult of Israelophobia.We have witnessed something extraordinary – the subversion of the BBC by a cruel new creed that cares little for truth and even less for fairness. That’s what is so infuriating about today’s cries that the BBC is being ‘taken down’ by a toxic cabal of right-wing loons. The reason we’re in the mess is because the Beeb has already been taken down, or taken over, by leftish loons who think men can make milk and war is genocide'.

John Hawkes ● 4d

Ms HammondThe BBC World Service broadcasts BBC News in 40 languages, which means it likely that it broadcast Panorama's misleading editing of Donald Trump's speeches worldwide.Then there is the leaked and revealing Prescott report which  criticises BBC on many fronts.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/report-bbc-had-to-correct-2-biased-inaccurate-or-misleading-gaza-stories-a-week/ar-AA1Q8f3w?ocid=BingNewsSerp'The leaked memo that sparked last night’s resignations was not only critical of one edit in a Panorama documentary about Donald Trump.In the full dossier, published by the Telegraph, former independent adviser Michael Prescott highlights several - in his words - "troubling matters".Here’s a summary of the main claims written by Prescott in the memo:"Anti-Trump" bias: Prescott says the BBC’s coverage of the 2024 US election was more critical of Donald Trump than of his opponent, Kamala Harris - including a misleading edit of a speech Trump delivered on 6 January 2021"Ill-researched" stories on racism: He says the BBC had published "ill-researched material that suggested issues of racism when there were none", including in a now-removed BBC Verify story about car insurance.Too few push alerts on migration and asylum seekers: There was a "selection bias" against sending stories about migration and asylum seekers to BBC News app users as push notifications, Prescott says."One-sided" transgender coverage: He says the BBC had often published stories "celebrating the trans experience without adequate balance or objectivity" and had ignored certain voices.Anti-Israel bias in BBC Arabic: Several contributors to the BBC’s Arabic service selectively covered stories that were critical of Israel, Prescott writes.Broader issues in Gaza coverage: His other criticisms include misrepresenting the percentage of Palestinian women and children who have been killed by Israel’s military, and misrepresenting the likelihood of children starving under Israel's aid blockade.The BBC has corrected on average of two stories a week reporting on Israel’s war on Hamas in Gaza, The Telegraph reports, citing research by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA), a pro-Israel media watchdog.BBC Arabic has had to make 215 corrections and clarifications since October 7, 2023, the report says, on stories “found to be biased, inaccurate or misleading.”

John Hawkes ● 4d