Forum Topic

Mr BrigoYour attacks on those concerned by illegal immigration, and especially immigrants that have committed violent acts against British women and children is at least consistent but not to me at least admirable. We may get to determine the right to abide here of some of them, but I would assume most just disappear into the less savoury parts of the country to emerge as workers in the black economy or as criminals.'Regarding the numbers who are criminals - 312 out of a hundred thousand, what percentage is that? Pretty tiny right?'I do not know if you are married or in any sort of relationship with a woman nor whether you have children.But those that are or do might be upset and angry were they to have been one of the 312 sexually attacked or molested.'Are you not just as bothered that nearly 50% of the people arrested during last years riots outside asylum centres had convictions for domestic violence?'That comment is just diversionary obfuscation and gas lighting.Nothing to do with the topic of illegal immigration.And how was this figure arrived at ?Your claim that I am a Reform voter is a little out of left field.How did you come to that conclusion ?I might make a similar comment and suggest your often peculiar comments suggest you  are obviously a member of Zack Polanski's Green Party.'Polanski has had an unconventional path to politics, previously working as an actor, hypnotherapist and mental health counsellor.A 2013 article in the Sun that still dogs him involved a reporter, who posed as a client, claiming he helped her to boost her bust through the power of thought.Asked about the piece following his win, Polanski said his time as a Harley Street hypnotherapist pre-dated any of his political ambitions and he had immediately apologised.'Am I wrong to think your line of business is in the field of women's welfare ?

John Hawkes ● 19d

Mr Brigo"Firstly the 36,000 are not coming here legally and we have a right to determine who we let abide here."Well they immediately get locked up in hotels until a decision is made on whether they can stay. So surely that is the right to determine being exercised"?But what do we do with them when the right to abide here is not given ?"Secondly most of these 36,000 are from cultures alien to those of the majority of British citizens and many display this by the crimes they commit when they arrive."Are you claiming that they do come from cultures with beliefs and norms of behaviour not much different to our own ?I don't think so and nor do I think that many of them are running from unlawful or unreasonable persecution in their country of origin.They might want 'a better life'.Fair dos but it is our decision to make as to whether we should be responsible for offering such to them, balanced against the risk some might pose.For as to crimes committed by certain individuals who arrive illegally by dinghy you might read this - https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/news/2023/01/26/horrific-murder-in-bournemouth-shows-how-illegal-asylum-abuse-threatens-your-safety/.Perhaps not a large percentage but why would they choose to behave in this dreadful manner ?And for example as reported in the Independent -"An asylum seeker who was seen dancing and laughing after stabbing a hotel worker 23 times on a railway station platform has been found guilty of murder.Deng Chol Majek, originally from Sudan, was described by prosecutors as “utterly callous” after he launched a frenzied attack on Rhiannon Whyte on 20 October last year.Whyte had finished work at 11pm at the Park Inn Hotel in Walsall, in the West Midlands, when Majek “tracked” her on foot to the nearby Bescot Stadium station. He inflicted 19 wounds to her head, including a fatal brain-stem injury". And reported in MailOnline -"An investigation by this newspaper has revealed that at least 312 asylum seekers have been charged with an astonishing 708 alleged criminal offences in just three years – including rape, sexual assault, attacking emergency workers and theft".To some, your support for illegal immigrants might be seen as compassionate and commendable. To others it is either naïve or simply shows provocative self-aggrandisement.

John Hawkes ● 20d