Forum Topic

Prince Andrew ~ Persona Non Grata

A statement has just been issued from King Charles and Buck House to say that Andrew will no longer use any of his titles including the Duke of York.  

Sue Hammond ● 1d17 Comments

Hello Richard,I am not too sure he has no means of support.  He is still Prince Andrew.

Ivonne Holliday ● 9h

Doesn't matter if Donald Trump want's the files to go public, Epstein is dead and Prince Andrew has stood down. Trump obviously would not want this if he was involved, he obviously wants to clear is name.

Barbara Stevens ● 10h

You have to wonder what this arrogant little parasite will be able to live on, since he doesn't seem to have any means of support.However, I don't think we need to worry overmuch: he could, I'm sure, get a job working at Pizza Exoress in Woking...

Richard Carter ● 19h

Yes, I can see what you’re doing Steve; you’re getting your knickers in a twist. Let me clarify; I think any right minded person would support the families of alleged victims in their call for full disclosure of the Epstein documents. That’s it!  Whatever follows from that, let’s hope that justice prevails and that it is blind to power, position and influence.

Gerry Boyce ● 1d

I really do not understand the logic of many of these posts.We know that both the US and UK states were complicit in Epstein/Maxwell activities and the cover ups.Until everything both sides of the pond is made public it seems rather nieve to  believe someone wasn't or was.The only certainty is that the US are likely to be more open than the UK.

Ed Robinson ● 1d

The logic of your post seems to be as follows:1) Trump is a bad guy2) Trump associated with Epstein3) So Trump must be guilty of the same crimes as Epstein4) Anyone who declines to convict Trump on this evidence  therefore condones his crimes5) People who condone the sexual exploitation of minors are lacking in humanity6) My strength of feeling on this issue demonstrates that I am a good guy.The fallacies in your logic lie at 3) - the fact that Trump associated with Epstein does not prove that he is guilty of the same crimes4) the fact that people are unwilling to convict Trump on pure conjecture does not imply that they condone sexual exploitation or even that that they like Trump6) your denunciation of sexual exploitation does not mean that you have the right to judge others from a position of suppposed virtue.

Steven Rose ● 1d

No Steven, that’s just your ham-fisted misunderstanding of what I said.

Gerry Boyce ● 1d

A typically sanctimonious post, Gerry. You assert that anyone who declines to convict Trump of the sexual exploitation of minors without evidence is a hypocrite lacking in 'integrity' and 'humanity' (virtues which no doubt you possess in abundance).

Steven Rose ● 1d

I assume that anyone here with a shred of integrity and humanity would support the group of Epstein victims and their families in their call for full disclosure in the Epstein case. I imagine any hot-heated hypocrites without a scintilla of concern for victims of sexual predators will continue to chose to believe Trump. THAT, is TDS, Sue.

Gerry Boyce ● 1d

@BoyceWhen you’ve stopped your hysterical laughter🙄please point me to the allegations of child abuse that have been made against Trump.  Sleazy adult porn ‘stars’ or gorgeous models are his choices.  And any attractive female in between, but never underage girls.  Unless you know better …?

Sue Hammond ● 1d

Can we also just get right of the lot of them please. Cut them off from our finances, let them live on their own wealth.

Michael Brigo ● 1d

"Trump actually wants the Epstein files to be made public"Slightly odd then that the Republicans are going all-out to not make them public. The Donald must be furious with them.

Michael Brigo ● 1d

Haha! 🤣🤣 Yes, sure thing, Sue.I hear you loud and clear.

Gerry Boyce ● 1d

Well of course you would because you’re so predictable with your TDS affliction.  There is no doubt that Trump knew Epstein and he has never denied it, but guess what…multi-millionaires tend to hang out with other multi-millionaires but it doesn’t mean they all have the same sexual proclivities.  Epstein may have shared rounds of golf with Trump but there have never been any accusations that he shared young girls with him.  Trump actually wants the Epstein files to be made public and I’m sure he wouldn’t if there could be any mention of him being involved in having sex with underage girls.

Sue Hammond ● 1d

I’m guessing everyone here wholeheartedly supports this decision. I’m assuming everyone is appalled by Andrews relationship with Epstein and the abuse of young girls involved. I hope that everyone here would consider ANYONE involved with Epstein’s circle of abuse of young girls should be tried and prosecuted, if found guilty, irrespective of position, power or wealth. Yes, of course, I’m referring to Donald Trump.

Gerry Boyce ● 1d

Good!  I have yet to read anyone saying a good word about him.

Martine Guy ● 1d

Hi Sue, yes I read the same.

Barbara Stevens ● 1d