Forum Topic

The ULEZ, a regression tax, oddly sold in the same way as a progressive tax. Only very few people would pay it they said without looking at the people it would actually hit.A complete lack of transparency over the data used to make decisions which just so happen to protect Khan's Inner London voter base.Of course the middle classes loved it. With many even convincing themselves with the help of propaganda that their vehicles were clean and didn't cause any pollution. Some people even suggesting that they buy old vehicles that were so-called compliant. The fact that the organisation that measured real life emission wanted some of these to be banned too got lost in holly ULEZ crusade. The risks of buying any old vehicle are considerably.Labour have dug themselves a hole. A lot of non-ULEZ vehicles would automatically fall quiet quickly over time, by failing MOTs or just uneconomical to repair and hence come off the road.Non-ULEZ drivers are more likely to be unable to afford the fines. If they were rolling in money they would after all drive a newer car.It's not as if public transport services have been spread evenly across London either. The further out you go the more sparse they become. Even cycle hire is an Inner London thing.Meanwhile there are still people suggesting we spend half a billion pound on a bridge that needs to be heated and coolled. With very little transparency around what parts are being replaced by steel or other modern materials. Now with spot lights on it that are certainly not period or in anyway keeping with the rest of the bridge. What a waste of tax payers money.No plan, no policies and very little transparency. Vote them out next time!

Ed Robinson ● 2d

I would remind you that it was Boris Johnson then Mayor of London who initially announced the Congestion Charge and then ran away (he likes to be popular) and left the job of implementing it to and for his successor to take the flac.  The Govt at the time (and probably the previous one too but it wasn't then so obvious) had failed miserably to do anything/much? about the terrible air quality in the UK which they were taken to Court about and lost at least three times? over and were told to come up with better plans to deal with it - presumably because no Govt ever wants to be implement anything unpopular and lose power - especially when there are a lot of people who don't like or have difficulty (not the same thing) change! There are more people cycling and walking than before.  With cleaner cars the air is becoming cleaner.  Ambulances are much more sophisticated than they were in the past and they often sit at the side of the road with a patient while they run tests and decide which hospital perhaps with a specialism they will head for - with increasing work in this area.  They even have photovoltaic cells on their roofs nowadays for extra power.  The number of car journeys in London has dropped considerably.Is there any Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) that people can use?  There was quite a lot of this before the pandemic.I wish that there was more advertising of services like Dial-a-Ride and Car Clubs, and Lunch Clubs etc when journeys to popular places could be shared.   

Philippa Bond ● 5d

Actually I do think they smelt the coffee. They’ve obviously had a load of angry emails from residents and the mood in the room was very clear - people are genuinely very angry and frustrated. And the high turnout was almost entirely down to the traffic problems. Fleur can only do so much - forcefully bringing messages to those with the power to decide, lobbying for action etc. but she can’t make the changes herself. I thought she sounded just as frustrated as everybody else. Simon Hogg gets it too. But the problem is money, or the apparent lack of it, and the inertia and apparent indifference of TfL, who disgracefully failed to show up although they had been invited to send someone.  The council has to follow due process and that at best is going to be slow., probably painfully so. And the status quo ante is not an option - road safety considerations preclude restoring the exact previous junction layout. This will impact voting intentions next May because I doubt it will be fixed by then, even if a few baby steps are taken before then. The Putney problem is that only 2 out of 9 local councillors are Labour so if they do get voted out of the town hall it won’t be the mood in Putney alone that swings it. We’ve all got to keep up the pressure and make as much noise as possible. The Putney Action Group have made a significant start with their petition (over 1,000 respondents) and both they and the Putney Society have had meetings on the traffic issue with council officials and councillors. Incidentally another non-appearance was Cllr Jenny Yates who is the cabinet member for transport. Also, no Leonie Cooper, our elected LMA representative. She has offered to facilitate meetings with TfL, none of which has happened as far as I know.

Jonathan Callaway ● 7d