Forum Topic

According to an article by Michael Deacon in the ‘Telegraph’ today, Gus O’ Donnell, former Permanent Secretary at the Treasury (2002-2005) , has ad admitted that he actively promoted immigration because he believed it was his job ‘to maximise, not national welfare, but global welfare’.This mindset, which is not uncommon among left wing politicians and civil servants, sees Britain, not as a country, but as a charity to whose assets foreigners are just as much entitled as native born citizens. This helps to explain why there are now more than one million foreign born people in this country claiming Universal Credit, why Britain has agreed to pay Mauritius £30 billion to take over the Chagos Islands (a vital strategic asset), why immigration judges make it virtually impossible to deport foreign criminals, why almost half of social housing in London has a foreign born head of household.Obviously a certain level of immigration is necessary. The bien pensants souls on the Forum never tire of emphasising how dependent the NHS is on foreign doctors, nurses, porters and so on, all of which is true. But not all immigrants work in vital sectors. Some are in low paid jobs where the tax they pay does not cover the cost of the houses, schools and hospitals which need to be built to accommodate them. And some are on benefits and pay no tax at all.The cause of the problem in my view is secular religion. In the Victorian era high minded individuals like Gus O’ Donnell would perhaps have embraced Christian socialism. But nowadays the number of people who believe either in Christianity or socialism has sharply declined. The ideological void has been replaced by a new age religion, anti-racism, which resembles traditional religion in a number of ways. It has got an original sin, colonial exploitation. It has got a sin for which there is no forgiveness, making disobliging remarks about ethnicities and nations other than white British (or Jewish). It has got a priestly class, immigration judges, whose word is (literally) law. It has got penance for sins, paying billions to people from abroad.As Michael Deacon argues, Britain is being destroyed from within by people who solemnly believe they are doing good, who think they are tackling global poverty, fighting racism, promoting inclusivity and atoning for historic injustices. But it is thanks to them that we have grooming gangs, hate marches by Hamas sympathisers and rocketing immigration from wildly different and sometimes hostile cultures. The mindset of the well meaning is making us poorer, less safe and more divided.

Steven Rose ● 27d

Mr Hawkes. this appears as a facile post trolling me to be annoying; although, from your previous comments on the matter, I suppose it's possible that you don't understand the difference between weather and climate? (Mr Google can help with that.)Is there really any reason I should want to comment on whether you're upset or not by the heat - surely that's your concern not mine? Anyway, you're more likely to get a response if you exhibit the manners most of us were taught as children; the magic word "please", rather than just asking me to remind you when I've obviously wasted time posting detailed links from authorative sources previously. I won't bother reposting them, if you want you can search for them on the forum. The real issue in the UK at present isn't necessarily the heat (I quite appreciated it a few weeks ago myself when I was on a canal boat with some mates from my uni days) but the current lack of rain. Still, I suppose you're prepared for the hosepipe ban that Thames Water inevitably will introduce soon (just announced)? (Interesting when the long term trend towards weather extremes seems to be more rain!)Anyway, before his retirement, one of my uni friends was a director of some overseas subsidiaries of a large oil company, but now he understands the reality of the climate crisis issues he's accepted a non exec Chair of a solar energy company. I've a lot more confidence in his knowledge of the science, business and economic aspects of climate change than the views of some random skeptics on this forum.Looking at your recent exchange with Mr Brigo there also seems to be a repeat of discussions that took place a while ago about personal mitigating actions. Hence, I don't see any reason to discuss this further with you as it's obviously a waste of my time!But if you want some advice, going vegan (or, second best, veggie but at least flexitarian), would, as indicated by some research, make a significant difference in reducing greenhouse emissions - and might be good for your health too :-)https://www.bbc.co.uk/future/article/20220429-the-climate-benefits-of-veganism-and-vegetarianismhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/food/articles/vegan_vs_flexitarian

Michael Ixer ● 30d

Mr Carter'"A boast by a Reform UK councillor [in Kent] that he ensured the removal of 'trans-ideological material and books' from the children’s section of his county’s libraries has fallen flat after it emerged that no such material ever existed there.""Engage brain before opening mouth" obviously.But on the other hand I think it perfectly right and proper that the distribution of such contentious material is closely managed and kept away from young children until they are old enough to assess whether it has value or is just propaganda from a political activist group.The Telegraph reports -'When Marion Harding contacted the chief executive of Surrey County Council in 2021 to raise safeguarding concerns about her local Pride organisation, she expected a speedy response.After all, the council itself had given Pride in Surrey tens of thousands of pounds in funding, and her concerns were about the protection of potentially vulnerable young people who came into contact with the LGBTQ organisation, which was set up in 2018 by local activist, Stephen Ireland.Harding, 62, and her wife, Cathy, 59, had volunteered for Pride in Surrey, but both had a number of worries about Ireland’s conduct, not least that he had appointed himself head of safeguarding – a role that, according to guidance for voluntary bodies, should “not be the most senior person in the organisation”.Ireland had sole responsibility for the group’s LGBTQ “helpline” for young people – meaning he had direct access to vulnerable children. In March this year, Stephen Ireland, 41, was convicted at Guildford Crown Court of raping a 12-year-old boy, along with additional counts of causing a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault and making indecent images.His partner David Sutton, 27, a volunteer at Pride in Surrey, was convicted of offences including making indecent photographs and possessing extreme pornographic images.On Monday, Ireland was sentenced to 30 years in prison and Sutton received a minimum 54-month sentence.I am NOT at all suggesting that all gay or even 'trans' activists are a danger to children.But as was learnt from the rape gang scandals in northern towns, a child's welfare should come before the political activism of certain adult groups.

John Hawkes ● 39d