Forum Topic

Ms Carter'Of course immigration has to be controlled.'1) How ?2) Why ?3) What do you think is an appropriate number of allowed immigrants ?Apparently (accoording to BBC News) 'net migration - the number of people coming to the UK, minus the number leaving - was 728,000 in the year to June 2024, according to provisional figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).That was a 20% drop from the number of people who came in the 12 months to June 2023. The newly revised total for that period was 906,000, far higher than the previous estimate of 740,000'.4) Do you think such numbers place a strain on our social and housing services to who have to cope with the ongoing effect to the detriment of the indigenous population ?5) Do you believe all immigrants are working for our common good in the NHS and Social Care services  ?6) Do you think mass immigration of those from cultures and religions that differ, sometimes widely, from those of the mass of the indigenous UK population might change the nature, possibly for the worse, of our society ?Oldham, Rotherham ? 7) Do you care ?8) Do you think that the majority of immigrants are here seeking sanctuary from some form of oppression ?9) Do you think that a nation state has a right to decide who enters it ?10) In one respect was Powell right. Have you read the BBC News item - "Leicester: Why the violent unrest was surprising to many" 24 September 2022.'For decades, Leicester had a reputation as a model for cohesion - but the recent unprecedented unrest between groups of Hindu and Muslim men has raised difficult questions for a place that prided itself on its multiculturalism.In the 1951 census, just 624 people with South Asian heritage were recorded as living in Leicester. Now, 70 years on, the city has one of the highest proportions of British South Asians'.I am sure many sometimes find themselves in situations that cause them to think of themselves '"strangers in their own country" as a result of migration'.Reference to a speech in 1968 on the issue by Powell (a politician I have no doubt the majority in this country cannot recall and know nothing about) is pure gaslighting.And please, let's not go on about the medical care given to Rosen as if all the NHS staff involved were non-white immigrants.Bit of a slap in the face for those that just happened to be white British.And I repeat - the poem is sentimental rubbish.

John Hawkes ● 47d

Some extracts from Keir Starmer's speech:'In 2023 (net immigration) reached nearly 1 million which is about the population of Birmingham, our second largest city. That's not control, it's chaos.''So when you have an immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse , that encourages businesses to bring in lower-paid workers rather than invest in our young people,  you're not championing growth,  you're not championing justice... You're actually contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart.''Migration is part of Britain's national identity ... I celebrate that ... But when people come to our country, they should also commit to integrate, to learning our language.'Can someone please explain what is wrong with Keir Starmer's speech. If, like Jane, you are 'appalled'by his words, do you think that net annual immigration of 1 million is sustainable? Do you think that businesses should continue to bring in pow paid workers from overseas rather than employing the millions of fit but economically inactive British citizens? Are you happy that 1 million immigrants to this country can't speak English?Michael Rosen's sentimental poem entirely misses the point. No one is denigrating the contribution made by immigrants to the NHS and other sectors of the economy. I am no fan of Keir Starmer, but what he is saying is that uncontrolled immigration puts undue strain on the infrastructure and undermines social cohesion. He is right, but it remains to be seen whether Labour can fix the problem.

Steven Rose ● 47d

Ms CarterThis sentimentalism is not the basis for governing the country in a manner that satisfies both people like you who seem to have an 'open border' attitude to immigration and the effect it has on our society and traditional way of life, and those that do not.It begs the question that many immigrants, especially those arriving illegally in small boats, are not heart specialists, nurses or care workers but young males with no particular skills who just disappear into the fringes of society.Some home delivering Big Macs, others working for traffickers in the 'vital' nail bar, car wash  and cannabis growing sectors of our economy.Meanwhile we have millions of British people perfectly capable of taking on other menial work the immigrants do but would rather live on benefits.Those that do carry out tasks the British are unwilling or not skilled enough to take on are of course paid for what they do.And many immigrants, legal or not, come from countries that differ from ours in terms of language, religion and social norms making little or no effort to 'become British' in these respects but preferring to live in a micro-culture of their own.Hence at the extreme we have the Oldham child abuse scandals, ignored even now by the Labour Government for fear of causing 'racial offence'.So we end up with the much lauded by some 'multiculturalism' of Livingston and now Mayor Khan.This will radically change the country as we know it.And its good to see that Starmer has the guts to point it out as well as the fact that this societal change is not what many people want and are fearful of.You may think them bigoted but they have a right to hold such views and Starmer is wise to warn of the conflict these opposing views might generate. Oh and Rosen is a better leftist activist than he is a poet.

John Hawkes ● 48d