Forum Topic

Trump as usual supports the ethnic cleansers - Netanyahu and Putin

Land grabber and gangster "The Don".BBC 5 March 2025US President Donald Trump has issued what he called a "last warning" to Hamas to release the hostages being held in Gaza."I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don't do as I say," Trump said in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform.Hamas accused the US president of encouraging Israel to break the ceasefire deal currently in effect between the two sides.Trump's statement came just hours after the White House confirmed it was holding direct talks with Hamas over the remaining hostages.Washington has until now avoided direct engagement with the group, and there is a longstanding US policy against having direct contact with entities it lists as terrorist organisations.In his social media post, Trump said there would be "hell to pay" if the hostages were not released, while not specifying the nature of the support he was sending Israel."Release all of the hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered, or it is OVER for you," he added."For the leadership, now is the time to leave Gaza, while you still have a chance."He also appeared to issue a wider threat: "Also, to the People of Gaza: A beautiful Future awaits, but not if you hold Hostages. If you do, you are DEAD!"Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said in a statement that such threats "complicate matters regarding the ceasefire agreement and encourage the occupation [Israel] to avoid implementing its terms".It's not the first time Trump has threatened Hamas. In December, he said there would be "all hell to pay" if hostages were not released by the time he took office."Of course, Trump supports the big guys, as ever. He stops the arms supply and intelligence cooperation with Ukraine, but for Israel rather different treatment:"Feb 7 2025 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration announced on Friday that it had approved military sales to Israel worth some $7.4 billion, despite a Democratic lawmakers' request that the sale be paused until he received more information.The Department of Defense announced that the State Department had approved a package for Israel worth an estimated $6.75 billion that included munitions, guidance kits and fuses with Boeing Co (BA.N), opens new tab among the principal contractors.It also detailed a deal estimated at $660 million to sell Hellfire Missiles to Israel in which Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), opens new tab would be the principal contractor."Producing the rubble foundations for TrumpGazaWorld and golf course. Must make poor little Israel safe.

David Ainsworth ● 57d71 Comments

I have read the article in 'Nature', Michael, and I disagree. It does come across as woke. Quoting the Head of Mathematics at Durham University, John Parker, the author that the theorems studied in mathematics courses all have the names of white men attached them such as Gauss and Cantor, 'which means that the accomplishments of other genders and races have often been pushed aside, preventing a level playing field'. What 'accomplishments' is he talking about? It is well known that over the last three thousand years different cultures have contributed to mathematics: the Egyptians, the Babylonians, the Greeks, the Arabs and so on.  The achievements of these mathematicians form the basis of every History of Mathematics course in the country and have never been 'pushed aside'. But the greatest advances over the last four hundred years have been made in Europe, America and more recently Japan and China. Other parts of the world, whether Africa or Polynesia, have not so far made a significant contribution, though they may do in the future. To pretend otherwise, to suggest that their achievements have been obscured by racism, is simply untrue. It is a fact that black students are under-represented on mathematics courses but it is naive to believe that their numbers can be increased decolonising the curriculum (eg by focusing on the counting systems among First Nation tribes in Canada). The task of every university mathematics department is to teach every student  whether black or white or Asian, the most important theorems, wherever they were discovered.

Steven Rose ● 37d

Mr IxerA long but interesting post.Would you mind if I don't address it holistically as you did but instead pick out a few points.'Woke' has taken on a negative connotation because those who might claim to espouse its 'beliefs' (whatever they are) do tend to use them as a basis to patronisingly dismiss those that disagree with them and see such people as prejudiced and backward.Little if any belief in the equality of differing beliefs.And wokism is patronising towards and counterproductive with regard to public opinion for those it claims to champion, when 'affirmative action' to define quotas in employment and education, overrides placement based on absolute levels of ability.That of course does not excuse discrimination towards any minority group of  people and the UK and I would expect the US have laws to prevent this.As regards 'resolving inequalities' some inequalities cannot be resolved for we are not all equal.Equality of opportunity of course; enforced by law.Which group in the UK has a societally imposed lack of opportunity in our state school and higher systems of education ?Do they not have equal funding and are not student grants available ?They seem to be for Romanians !On a personal note, I passed my 11+ in the early '60s to get into a brand new Grammar School.In this I was fully supported by my parents (which I concede  some do not have the benefit of) and thence to the best university in the country.Again like you the old cliche "The first in my family to go to university" prevails.I credit myself for this though I do concede I benefited from an Essex CC grant which no longer exists.However as I said above, the student loan scheme is available. Equality of attainment is in the hands of the individual.Both equalities I admit are also somewhat in the hands of the gods or depend on religious (rights for women ?), family or wider social support and attitudes.Again 'the fickle finger of fate' can never be eliminated. On the topic of gender, I think common sense should prevail.Obviously no discrimination against those who claim a different gender from that presupposed by their biological sex.In normal social interaction "wear what you like ducky".Doesn't bother me.But recognise there are two sexes.Here I can only proffer an opinion and that is that most women would not like biological males to encroach on their privacy in the most obvious of private spaces nor compete with them in sports where physicality is key.One wonders why male transexuals should even think otherwise is the case, unless they are just trying to make a point and yes let's say it, are determined to be 'woke'.  BTW are you really saying veganism is a legally protected belief ?In which case would you support me in extending protection to people who on occasion like a nice juicy steak or fish 'n chips ?

John Hawkes ● 38d

Ms CarterThe original meaning of the term woke was laudable needed in  the African-American community that had suffered so much discrimination and worse.'Woke is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English (AAVE), originally meaning alertness to racial prejudice and discrimination. It is synonymous with the General American English word awake.The phrase stay woke has been used in African American English since the 1930s. The term acquired political connotations by the 1970s and gained further popularity in the 2010s with the hashtag #staywoke. Over time, woke came to be used to refer to a broader awareness of social inequalities such as racial injustice, sexism, and denial of LGBTQ rights. Woke has also been used as shorthand for some ideas of the American Left involving identity politics and social justice, such as white privilege and reparations for slavery in the United States'. WikipediaIt became a derogatory term and one of ridicule when so many other minority groups claimed to be similarly discriminated against and raised their grievances in a like manner.This has certainly influenced today's social discourse and free speech: not usually for the better.Being 'anti-woke' should not be seen as 'anti-minority' which on the whole the British people are not.However wokism can throw up some ridiculous situations.Such as men claiming to be women and demanding access to female spaces or claims that British society is 'institutionally racist' and should pay for this through 'slavery reparations'.Any rebuttal of such is more than likely to bring down on the perpetrator the ire of woke.And I know it has become somewhat of a Daily Mail cliché, but the only group that seems not to be a beneficiary of woke sympathy are white males ! The left and the Labour Party of course find wokism a political differentiating godsend, for whatever economic policy they might have coincides so much with those having 'right wing views'.WFA or benefit cuts anyone or the cutting back of much state apparatus and its tens of thousands of staff ?

John Hawkes ● 38d

Steven. You may not consider or use the term "woke" as an insult but many (most?) do seem to use it in a derogatory way to demean their opponents and avoid the real arguments. (I really don't think the Regan Airport crash had anything to do with woke recruitment of ATC staff.) I personally don't see "woke" as a "quasi religion", party because I don't consider a rigorous enough term to define a disperate group of ideas and values; further, I'd see it more as an analysis of a situation and a way in which one might have an opinion on ways to resolving inequalities - it's perhaps more of an attitude rather than, for example, a way of life like veganism, which is a legally "protected belief" but not a religion. Actually, I didn't think you'd asked a question, thanks for confirming that! Sometimes if I'm busy or tired I just skim long responses and consider going back to them later, as in this case. The main thing about addressing injustices is ensuring equal opportunities are available, which may sometimes mean redirecting funds so that underprivileged sectors get adequate, sometimes additional, education and training to take advantage of their skills and abilities. (I think a while back it appeared that both Mr Hawkes and I had benefited from a comprehensive school education and University grant in the 60s or 70s? In my own case I don't think I'd ever considered university until after my O level results my maths teachers and headmaster encouraged me to take A levels with a view to taking a degree - it wasn't something anyone else in my family had even done or had aspirations to do - but without a grant it's unlikely it would have seen feasible;  I'm sure I've paid - in fact, am still paying - my share of taxes to compensate for my grant)Transgender is a complex issue. Some of the treatment of trans people appears spiteful to me; I find it a bit sad sometimes that it just focuses on which bathroom they use. The few transgender people my wife or I have met have been amiable and not threatening in any way - they've been more fearful of prejudice or threats against themselves. Those who have had surgery and legally changed sex need special consideration as although their chromosomes haven't changed their physical attributes and body chemistry will have - and remember, transgender happens in two directions. Many cafes, restaurants, theatres, gallaries, etc have now have addressed the "loo issue" with unisex cubicles with integral wash basins - although in busy places the lack of urinals can sometimes exacerbate queuing!The sports issue needs additional thought, perhaps different categories? But hasn't that been a longer term issues with intersex competitors and drugs, etc? I'm not attempting to provide a solution just to point out generalisation aren't always helpful and it's an area needing sympathetic treatment not uninformed dogma? Your later example of "policies such as defunding the police, lowering university entry requirements for black students, allowing biological males to enter female spaces, etc" just emphasises the ridiculousness of using a term such as "woke" to describe DEI policies. Many of us would not agree with lowering standards, etc. For example, the Open University, which in my opinion has high standards, has ways of introducing people to studying who haven't previously had much formal education so there may be different entrance paths to studying but it doesn't mean a lowering of standards. Some of us see diversity as a way to enrich lives and inclusiveness as a way of bringing introducing workers with untapped abilities from areas previously excluded by providing equal opportunities. It was interesting on Sunday attending a concert based around Fanny Mendelssohn's Das Jahr. Unlike her brother Felix she was discouraged from pursuing her passion for composing but encouraged to become a wife. Image if things had been more inclusive then: we might be saying "Felix? Was he the younger brother of that famous Fanny Mendelssohn?"! Just think of all the additional great music we'd have had if Fanny, Clara Schumann and others had been given the same, equal opportunities as their make relatives. And we should not forget the influences on popular music: African-American blues and jazz introduced into rock and roll by Bill Haley, Elvis Presley, Little Richard; reggae influences from Bob Marley, Desmond Dekker; Indian ragas by the Beatles and Ravi Shankar - all enriching popular culture from diverse sources.

Michael Ixer ● 39d

Michael, I don’t think anyone is advocating that shameful episodes in British history  should be covered up, but neither should the history of this country be distorted to promote a particular agenda. For example, the view  (repeated not so long ago)by Sadiq Khan)that much of the wealth of Britain was based on the profits of slavery is a myth.  While slavery undoubtedly made certain individuals very rich,  slave based sugar plantations added just under 2.5% to the value of the British economy at its peak, less than the share of sheep farming. Britain’s wealth in the nineteenth century was created by  industrialisation, just as was Germany’s,  though Germany had no empire. It should also be noted that Britain was instrumental in ending the slave trade., both diplomatically and militarily. Between 1832 and 1870 the Royal Navy patrolled the Atlantic, intercepting hundreds of slave ships and freeing some 160 000 captives. This was at the cost of the lives of around 17 000 British sailors, some killed in action, some dying of the same diseases as the captives. The cost to the British Treasury was huge. At its peak the West Africa Squadron was using half the total budget  for the Royal Navy, equivalent to 2% of Britains GDP.  But I don’t suppose that Sadiq knows or cares much about that.As to Shakespeare, I don’t agree that ‘Othello’ ( a play which I taught for several years) is in any way racist.  Iago and Desdemona’s father make racist comments about Othello, but these characters should not be regarded as representing Shakespeare’s views. I am not even sure that ‘The Merchant of Venice’ is an antisemitic play. Shylock is a bad man, but his speech  ‘I am a Jew. Hath not  a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions,; fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer,as a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, do we not revenge?shows remarkable insigt, if not sympathy, on the part of Shakespeare. Anyway he is obviously a great writer whose reputation  will survive the  inanities of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust.There is no need for you to feel insulted by my remarks on religion. I am an atheist myself. My point is that many people with religious impulses but who do not believe in traditional religion devote themselves to a new age faith, of which wokeism is an example. And rather like the Protestant iconoclasts of the Reformation who smashed up churches to display their theological purity, woke activists attempt to parade their moral virtue by  tearing down statues, banning books and bombarding visitors to art galleries with tendentious explanations next to the paintings.

Steven Rose ● 40d

Mr Rose'the woke are not awake to reality - they are awake to a distorted view of reality, one in which, for example,  Britain is uniquely responsible for the original sin of slavery which has supposedly created all the ills of the world and for which the present generation must do penance'.Absolutely true as proven by many posters on this Forum.George Orwell, probably the writer who has produced the best analysis of his country and leftist 'progressive' thought, summed up much of this in fiction or commentary.It has stood the test of time. He wrote in '1984' -"Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct; nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary'.Under 'transferred nationalism', Orwell cites 'the English intellectual’s tendency for ‘colour feeling’ and ‘class feeling’. For instance, the belief that people of colour, and the working classes, are in some way superior. This isn’t as enlightened as it sounds. Such beliefs are mired in fetishisation and exoticism'He also writes "In our time political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible".At the time he was referring to Russian Communist fellow travellers.But it was a prescient view that has come to pass with the current support for Hamas amongst so many, especially the young.Again, looking at the current trend to denigrate Britain.'The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history'.'So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot'.But this is the best encapsulation of much current and yes 'wokish' thought on our country and its history.“In intention, at any rate, the English intelligentsia are Europeanized. 
They take their cookery from Paris and their opinions from Moscow. In the 
general patriotism of the country they form a sort of island of dissident thought. England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals 
are ashamed of their own nationality. In left-wing circles it is always
felt that there is something slightly disgraceful in being an Englishman and that it is a duty to snigger at every English institution, from horse 
racing to suet puddings. It is a strange fact, but it is unquestionably
true that almost any English intellectual would feel more ashamed of 
standing to attention during ‘God save the King’ than of stealing from a poor box. All through the critical years many left-wingers were chipping 
away at English morale, trying to spread an outlook that was sometimes squashily pacifist, sometimes violently pro-Russian, but always 
anti-British.”

John Hawkes ● 40d

Steven. I'm slightly confused by your post. Yes, I think we agree, the UK was instrumental in driving the European slave trade which much UK and western wealth was based on because of near zero labour costs - and, yes, others colluded in that including other Africans. Surely, one should be honest and aware of that and how it has influenced the development of civilisation up to modern times?Yes, Shakespeare was a great playright but of his time - I hope you'd agree that the Merchant of Venice, Othello and Taming of the Shrew contained respectively antisemitic, racist, and sexisist or misogynistic comments? That doesn't detract from their artistic quality or message, or mean we should ban them. Surely, we instead recognise that Shakespeare was reflecting views of his time and be aware that civilisation has moved on to higher standards of equality and diversity of the present time? We should also recognise we have great playrights of our own times: Beckett, Pinter, Stoppard, Orton, etc expressing different views - I wouldn't like to say which was the greatest, English literature is so subjective compared to Mathematics! (And, of course, some modern productions will approach Shakespeare's plays in different and innovative ways to his original intentions.) As an atheist, I find your comment rather insulting. In my view many wars are caused by those in authority misusing religion (and I'd stress the misuse) to give them so called divine rights based on historic books that in my opinion seem to have been written by men and often mistranslated and are often used just to control or subjugate people - look at the way Putin, a former communist uses religion in Russia; the Ukraine and Russian Orthodox Christians seem to be on different sides ... However, provided it's done peacefully without interfering with others' rights I'd defend the right of anyone to practice any religion. (And I have friend/acquaintances actoss a range of religious views.)

Michael Ixer ● 41d

Mr Robinson'I assume you decide who is a "terrorist" and who is a "freedom fighter"?'This is a valid philosophic point but one which should be considered in context and not used to delay actions that would reduce the protection by the state of innocent citizens from lethal activities.Abdallah Makki Muslih al-Rifai, also known as “Abu Khadijah was the leader of the Islamic terrorist group ISIS with avowed aims for the killing not only of Jews but other Arabs who disagreed with him.ISIS also wanted to place Arabs under Sharia law which was not only racist but misogynistic.He was responsible for many extra-judicial murders and thus in my view it was perfectly right for him to be dispatched similarly as he was in a terrorist driven war of competing views of civilisation.Would have been nice to arrest him, give him bail and ask him to turn up at the Bailey in two weeks time but.....!However such a civilised approach I would certainly expect to be taken as regard this country's own citizens that resort to terrorism rather than political persuasion.As regard Ireland, I saw the actions of the IRA as terrorism  as they forewent the opportunity to become involved in political dialogue involving the British and Irish governments and were quite happy to move onto the killing stage.Don't forget the majority of the Northern Irish people did not want a united Ireland and rather than persuade them the IRA were happy to kill them and others in England and not to sit down and talk.Israel ?There is a state of Israel and a proto-state of Palestine but yet again terrorists namely Hamas do not recognise this fact and would rather fight over tired old arguments than negotiate a settlement.(BTW how many women rather than men in balaclavas would you say were involved with Hamas or the IRA ? Boys and their toys !)And as regards South Africa one could say terrorist attacks were unnecessary as it was soon obvious that economic forces and world opinion would bring about change.Syria ?Not on top of this I'm afraid but is the situation not one of conflict between a despotic dictatorship and a vast mass of its own people it subjugated ?

John Hawkes ● 46d

Mr AinsworthBut surely you give him credit for this ?"Islamic State leader in Iraq and Syria killed, US says" - BBC News.'A senior Islamic State (IS) group leader in Iraq and Syria has been killed in an operation by members of the Iraqi national intelligence service along with US-led coalition forces, the Iraqi prime minister has said.Abdallah Makki Muslih al-Rifai, also known as Abu Khadijah, "was considered one of the most dangerous terrorists in Iraq and the world", according to Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani.US President Donald Trump said "he was relentlessly hunted down by our intrepid warfighters".The US Central Command (Centcom) said it conducted a "precision airstrike" in Iraq's western Al Anbar province, which killed "one of the most important" IS members on Thursday.Rifai was the head of IS's most senior decision-making body and was responsible for operations, logistics, and planning conducted by IS globally, the US Central Command said.He also directed a large portion of finance for the group's global organisation, Centcom added.Posting on his Truth Social platform, President Trump said: "His miserable life was terminated, along with another member of ISIS, in coordination with the Iraqi Government and the Kurdish Regional Government. PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!"Let's all join in - 🎼🎶🎵'Another One Bites the Dust'"Are you ready? HeyAre you ready for this?Are you hanging on the edge of your seat?Out of the doorway the bullets ripTo the sound of the beat, yeahAnother one bites the dustAnother one bites the dustAnd another one gone, and another one goneAnother one bites the dust (yeah)Hey, I'm gonna get you tooAnother one bites the dust".Acknowledgement to 'Queen'.

John Hawkes ● 48d