Forum Topic

Grooming Gang Rapist Defies Deportation

Unbelievable!!🤬How has this been allowed to happen?  Qari Abdul Rauf has been represented by tax-funded human rights lawyers (that we all pay for) who subsequently took the case to the ECHR.His lawyers argued that Rauf is stateless' having renounced his Pakistani citizenship and deportation would breach his right to private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.'Rochdale rape gang ringleader's VERY comfortable life in Britain a decade after he was released and told he'd be deportedThe ringleader of an Asian grooming gang is still living in the town where he committed his horrific crimes - almost a decade after he was released from jail and told he would be deported.MailOnline can reveal the 55-year-old has been working for a takeaway delivery app, prompting fears he might meet one of his victims during the course of his work.He is among nine members of the Rochdale grooming gang who were jailed for raping and trafficking young children across England in 2012.Rauf was told he would be deported to Pakistan in 2014 after serving two and half years of a six-year prison sentence.The presence of the former taxi driver adds fuel to the fire over demands that the Government hold a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal.Rauf, who was stripped of his UK citizenship, was told he would be sent back to Pakistan following his release in November 2014.Immigration Tribunal judges have twice rejected his appeal against deportation in 2020 and 2022.However his lawyers argued Rauf is 'stateless' after him having renounced his Pakistani citizenship (crafty and effective), and deportation would breach his right to private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights.'https://mol.im/a/14258565

Sue Hammond ● 64d7 Comments

"He is among nine members of the Rochdale grooming gang who were jailed for raping and trafficking young children across England in 2012.Rauf was told he would be deported to Pakistan in 2014 after serving two and half years of a six-year prison sentence.""In 2008 Starmer became Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and Head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), holding these positions until 2013." NOTE 2013So, you show Rauf was jailed in 2012 (so under Starmer as you write), and not deported to Pakistan in 2014 (so NOT under Starmer as you tell me). ------------------------------"Mr Starmer was head of the CPS when the decision was made not to prosecute Savile but he was not the reviewing lawyer for the case. An official investigation commissioned later by Starmer criticised both prosecutors and police for their handling of the allegations."https://fullfact.org/online/keir-starmer-prosecute-jimmy-savile/Munira Mirza: Boris Johnson's policy chief quits over PM's use of Jimmy Savile 'slur' against Sir Keir StarmerIn her resignation letter to Boris Johnson, Munira Mirza writes: "I believe it was wrong for you to imply this week that Keir Starmer was personally responsible for allowing Jimmy Savile to escape justice. There was no fair or reasonable basis for that assertion."Greg Heffer Sky NewsPolitical reporter @GregHefferThursday 3 February 2022 18:36, UK---------BBC Jimmy Savile scandal: Chances to prosecute 'were missed'Published11 January 2013  (Twelve years ago)"Sussex Police received a complaint in March 2008 that Savile had sexually assaulted a woman in a caravan in Sussex in 1970.This was passed on to Surrey Police, who consulted with the CPS about all four allegations but decided in October 2009 no prosecution could be brought because the victims would not support police action.Ms Levitt found Surrey Police did not tell the victims other complaints had been made.The victims told Ms Levitt that if they had known others were making complaints they probably would have been prepared to give evidence in court.Surrey Police Assistant Chief Constable Jerry Kirkby said: "At the time, there was nothing to suggest the level of offending now being reported on a national scale."""no prosecution could be brought because the victims would not support police action."

David Ainsworth ● 64d