Forum Topic

Oh, dear, Ed. I hope you've recovered and the mobile coronary unit didn't have to be called? I've collected a number of different friends over the years from attending several places of education and working in a number of organisations. Sadly, not managed to keep in touch with everyone thanks to sometimes being too busy. You don't have to agree with people on everything to socialise with them (and evenif one disagrees it's useful to understand why); aside from my Reform acqaintance, as I've said elsewhere, listened to Piers Corbyn's views on climate change and even discussed it briefly, I've a friend who's now a priest in Opus Dei - he asked if he could pray for me on realising I was an atheist (no worries, sort of form of Pascal's Wager?), and an Iraqi friend once attempted to explain Sunni versus Shia Muslims to me - that got a little confusing after the fourth pint ...Anyway, I'd agree stating afresh with new IT should be an advantage - and why wouldn't one use so called "cloud" services. Yes, selecting candidates is different to membership management but this was a failure in communications, something necessary to both activities. I can't see the need for a new left party. I know people dissatisfied with Labour who feel comfortable migrating to the Greens or LibDems, and for the more radical there's also the Workers Party who were at this year's Putney hustings at St Mary's (with audience support from Piers Corbyn), and possibly for some, the rejoin EU party?

Michael Ixer ● 70d

Mr Hawkes, yes, that minute from the Reading Uni Debate corresponds with what I've heard Piers say at a couple of RCSA dinners - once when he was invited as the guest speaker and another time when he spontaneously gave us an after dinner lecture. I and others have also discussed it with him in the bar afterwards and on one occasion the RCSA President and I suggested setting up a debate between him and his brother Jeremy (who takes the more mainstream view of man made change) or, if that wasn't possible, a debate with Joanna Haigh, a climatologist and at one time head of Imperial College physics department, but both suggestions were declined. Some of us were happy to listen to Piers - perhaps in the hope that humans weren't guilty of causing climate change and as a fellow IC alumnus he was correct but from what I've seen at more recent lectures and seminars elsewhere the evidence points to CO2 production being responsible for rising gobal temperatures as result of human activities - for me, the rise in CO2 from the start of the industrial revolution is one piece of good evidence.I have two issues with Piers's theory. The first is that I've not seen any paper that can be peer reviewed detailing his theory, particularly the mechanism that generates the additional and increasing CO2 from solar activity. I briefly discussed this with Joanna Haigh after she'd given a lecture on climate change at an SPA astronomy conference in Cambridge several years ago. She fortunately confirmed my and others' conclusion that it's difficult to discuss this with Piers as he uses the same science for the weather predictions produced by his company Weather Action and considers it proprietary information. Hence, it's not published information. (Some other IC physicists told be he based his long-term weather forecasts on predicted changes in the jet stream but it seems they can be caused both by global temperature changes as well as solar activity, and weather is considered relatively short term atmospheric variations not long term climatic changes.)Secondly, I believe Piers has indicated that he believes man made climate change is a western capitalist conspiracy that is intended to benefit western economies to the detriment of developing ones that want to use fossil fuels, so perhaps there's a politcal motivation from his Marxist days? He may be correct that western companies may want to dominate those in developing countries but I'm also concerned that might detract from his scientific objectivity. It might also explain his views on Mr Farage?I'd admit I'm not a climate expert so all I can do is form my own opinion from the evidence I see presented and assess with the maths and general science background that I have to determine what I consider is plausible.

Michael Ixer ● 71d

They know that the best time for difficult and unpopular changes is going to be the start of their period of government.  They were very unlucky that with the more changeable weather we are having that there was a sudden steep drop in temperature just after they won the election and that the country is still recovering from the pandemic during which many people had very generous handouts for heating fuel costs following the invasion of Ukraine and huge rise in fuel costs.There are a lot of homes in this country which are inadequately insulated and ventilated for the changes in temperature that are expect with climate change.  If we hadn't had to suffer years of climate change denial think tanks with so much funding coming from fossil fuel companies trying to retain and maintain their wealth and business-as-usual modus operandi - companies which have known for the last 50 - yes FIFTY YEARS - that there was a problem then perhaps a lot more homes would have been updated to be in a better position/condition.  Adaptation is key to success.The lack of discussion and decision over the provision and funding of elderly care for so very many years has meant that many of those who would and could have spent money on improving their homes have failed to do so.  Instead they have worried out whether they would have enough money to make sure they would comfortable until the end of their lives - particularly when they can see how the NHS and social care has been run down.  Now we have a shortage of care workers - both for care homes where they exist AND for the carers who visit people at home.

Philippa Bond ● 73d

Fantastic post Steven! @00.41Once elected the first thing Rache from customer complaints did was to cancel pensioners' winter fuel payments, (her bum was hardly warming the seat), she was that eager!  Perhaps her cunning, covert plan is to freeze millions of pensioners to death! Well, why not?  Oldies tend not to vote Labour so they are largely expendable, and quite frankly, collectively, an extremely expensive nuisance. Culling them by hypothermia would drastically reduce the state pension budget, the NHS budget and slash the NHS waiting lists - wow what a fantastic triple whammy!👏🏻This punitive attack on pensioners which would save untold £billions and fully fund and rejuvenate the NHS. Best of all it would prove that Rache from Customer Complaints is an economic genius after all!Yvette Cooper has gone strangely silent about the small boats crisis which is odd because when in opposition she was VERY vocal about the issue, ergo it wasn't Labour's problem to solve. She criticised the Tories Rwanda plan at every opportunity but she (and Starmer) never came up with any alternative plan. Proving once again that carping from the safety of the sidelines is easy but actually doing the job is another matter. Data from 1st December showed that over 20,000 migrants had crossed the Channel in small boats since Labour won the election: and almost 1500 in the last 4 days! Cooper/Labour have still not published what the Government target is. In other words they don't have a clue what they are doing!P.S. Only joking about culling the oldies ...👺P.P.S. Before anyone asks, Reform say that anybody who arrives here illegally in small boats will be returned and will never be granted leave to stay, regardless of their circumstances.

Sue Hammond ● 74d

' i simply mentioned that some of their members have a history of holocaust denial.You did not understand the point of my response.Doubtless some members of the AfD have a stupid tendency to deny the Holocaust.I was simply pointing out that in the just recent past the then Labour Party leadership was accused of antisemitism which was accepted as being close to the truth by its current leadership.Not quite Holocaust denial but.....Anyway, I am pleased to see your expression of detestation of Holocaust denial which I share.On my part it leads to a determination to support Israel in its war against neighbouring Islamic states who seek its destruction and facilitated the pogrom of October last year.Doubtless this is true of you as well ?Further do you find it right and proper that -"MUENSTER, Germany, May 13 (Reuters) - A German high court on Monday ruled that domestic security services could continue to treat the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) as a potentially extremist party, meaning they retain the right to keep it under surveillance.The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), charged with protecting Germany's democratic order from extremist threats, has classified the AfD as potentially extreme since 2021.Judges at the higher administrative court in Muenster upheld a lower court's 2022 finding that the designation was proportionate and did not violate the constitution, or European or domestic civil law."The court finds there is sufficient evidence that the AfD pursues goals that run against the human dignity of certain groups and against democracy," the judges wrote."There are grounds to suspect at least part of the party wants to accord second-rank status to German citizens with a migration background."Judges deciding what policies a democratic Party can promote it seems.Do you think the UK High Court should allow MI5 to investigate Reform ?

John Hawkes ● 74d

The poll results are astonishing, Richard. From a landslide victory in July Labour would now only win a few more seats than the Conservatives. This poll can only be regarded as a devastating judgment on Labour’s record in government since the election. The truth is that the problems facing the country are so grave that no government could possibly solve them in five months, nor even in five years. These problems include 7 million people on NHS waiting lists, 3 million people on sickness benefits, a shortage of 1.5 million homes, the annual arrival of over 1 million immigrants, of whom over 30 000 enter the country illegally, and maybe 150 000 children absent from school for extended periods each year. Ideologues of the left like to pretend that all these problems are attributable to fourteen years of Conservative rule. This presupposes that everything was fine before 2010 but let us assume for the sake of argument that it is all the fault of the Conservatives. Then what are  the solutions proposed by Labour? As far as the NHS is concerned, Wes Streeting has travelled widely to see how other countries manage health care, but he has still not published a plan. If he does, it is unlikely to address the underlying problem, which is that millions of people are surviving into old age, when they require ever more expensive care and treatment. The country simply cannot afford to spend an ever increasing proportion of the budget on health care , which is now approaching an annual cost of £200 billion. The only solution is some kind of private insurance system for the majority. But Labour will never do this, wedded as they are with almost religious zeal to the notion of a health service free at the point of delivery.On sickness benefits Liz Kendall has talked tough but she is unlikely to find a solution to the benefit trap whereby many people fit to work get more in benefits than they would earn if they found a job. This would involve reducing the level of  benefits so that it always pays to work. She would never get that through her own party, let alone Parliament where the Opposition would cynically be happy to vote it down.Angela Rayner has promised to build 300 000 new homes per year. Even if she were able to to achieve this, it would not solve the housing crisis given that a a million immigrants are arriving each year. But no one believes this figure is attainable. Firstly there are not enough people in the building trade with the requisite skills and it is doubtful whether there are 300 000 people with the money to buy these homes.On schools, will they fine parents who fail to send their children to school? Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper promised to smash the people smuggling gangs but in fact 20 000 people have entered the country illegally since the election. It is obvious that there has to be some form of deterrent to destroy the smugglers’ business model, but Labour abandoned the Rwanda scheme which might have fulfilled this purpose.So what have Labour done for a country ‘crying out for change’? They have given inflationary pay awards to state sector employees, removed winter fuel allowance from millions of pensioners, undermined family farms and increased employers’ costs, which has slowed growth. No wonder voters are turning away.

Steven Rose ● 74d

I think I actually used the term neo-facist, which is described by Wikipedia as this:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-fascism(I use the word "describe" as I personally think such terms are too amorphous to use the term "define" which my maths background would imply it to be more rigorous and without any ambiguities.)Yes, in practice the term "facist" is used casually to describe people showing, perhaps, xenophobic or sexist tendencies in the same way many misuse the word "woke" for those trying, for example, to support or assist unpopular minorities?I'd agree that countries such as Iran and Afghanistan must fall into the facist description but I'm not sure Lebanon does (it's approximately a third Christian and has, I believe, a handful of Jewish people living there alongside its Muslim majority?) and Syria would qualify under the Assad regime but we'll need to wait and see what happens now.My perception is that the AfD seem to be rowing back on some of their more extreme views to appeal to a wider electorate so although I think they've been described previously as extremists by the Germany judiciary they're trying to shake off that description.That does raise the difficult question of when do extreme right wing tendencies become "facist" or "neo-facist" (or for that matter, left wing views "socialist" or "communist")? We're getting into the realms of the philosophical/mathematical realm of vagueness theory then ... but I guess that's another topic way off this thread that might upset Ms Hammond :-)

Michael Ixer ● 75d