Forum Topic

Michael,"Putin is helped by having a stranglehold over both mainstream and social media"Agreed but it doesn't help that some UK politicians are verging on Russophobia and institutions are targeting ordinary Russians. The message that the Russian government is our enemy not the Russian people seems to have gotten lost."are the Chinese hedging their bets, they've a lot of links with the US and EU?"Chinese foreign policy is quite clear and consistent on sovereign states for several reasons I guess. German and the US car companies sell a huge number of cars in China mainly through joint ventures - which has mutual benefits.I have to take issue with the no choice stance - sounds similar to saying shooting yourself in the foot is better than letting the enemy shoot your foot. Let's hope that Europe is not weakened economically to such an extent it can't respond adequately to future threats.The oligarchs will not be going cold this winter or losing their only home. I doubt even the ordinary Russians would feel sorry for them if the sanctions were targeted."Perhaps the energy crisis could be good longer term.."I'm not seeing any positives Europe will likely burn more imported coal and gas leading to an increase in transportation emissions.As with covid one wonders if there is a concealed heard immunity agenda amongst the government's thinking - (the infamous Lord Farquaad covid speech springs to mind)??"Still, at least we'll be able to hold our politicians to account at the next election"Only the living get to vote and even then you need to be registered, not to mention  opposition policies are likely to be 99 percent the same possibly perhaps even worse??

Ed Robinson ● 1343d

Ed. There does seem to be an underestimation of the resilience of the Russian economy and its people to accept a level of reduced living standards more than thos in the west; however, Putin is helped by having a stranglehold over both mainstream and social media. Word on the street is that those Russians who do have access to western media aren't so keen on the war.What is difficult to predict is long term outcomes. Russia and China appear to be closer but the Chinese at present don't seem too keen on providing much direct assistance to Putin, it seems an uncomfortable relationship - are the Chinese hedging their bets, they've a lot of links with the US and EU?Russian technology doesn't seem up to the standard of the US's - I doubt it could compete with the US (with some ESA help) Artemis Moon project scheduled for a test launch today? Rumours are the Russian arms manufacturers are short of computer chips they need to produce weapons such as cruise missiles, although there's a lot of disinformation from western intelligence sources as well as Russia so perhaps that's not true ...Perhaps the energy crisis could be good longer term if it weans us off damaging hydrocarbon fuels in favour of greener, renewable energy sources, and restricts cheap air travel? Perhaps a positive aspect emerging from the chaos?The main people who should be held to account are Putin and his advisers for the unjustifiable and murderous attack on Ukraine, although they probably won't be. The response of sanctions may have been a knee jerk reaction with undesirable consequences but I'm not sure thee was much alternative; Putin would probably have squeezed the west with energy restrictions just for supplying effective arms, training, economic assistance and (I assume), intelligence to Ukraine. Sanctions are always going to have repercussions but if it makes a few oligarchs squeal is it all bad? Still, at least we'll be able to hold our politicians to account at the next election, I suspect that won't happen in Russia?

Michael Ixer ● 1343d

I think my only criticism (was it a complaint?) was people making wild statements on subjects they seemingly aren't expert in? There's several aspects to this:Firstly, one can look back on the spread of the Sars virus, the statistics related to Covid illness and deaths, and the projections made (particularly before vaccines and drugs were available) to mitigate it and say they were over the top. However, they were the best scientific and mathematical estimates at the time, and the lockdown decisions were made by politicians with a dislike (supposedly) for regulation and control. I bet if Corbyn had been in power making the decisions you'd have called it a Stalinist, Soviet revolution, and out in the streets protesting then?Secondly, I've made complaints elsewhere about what I consider the lack of competence of this government and unfairness of this government's policies. The capitalist system seems to break down in these extreme economic crises requiring a more socialist approach to protect the poorest and most vulnerable. Difficult to compare but Gordon Brown seemed to cope better with the 2008 financial crisis? I don't remember being so concerned then, if only because there were more positive, expeditious decisions being made to protect the finances of most people, not the vague uncertainty we have at present?Thirdly, slightly off beat, but I find it interesting that people trust the science and mathematics that underpins the technology that allows them to create and distribute their own theories but don't believe it when the same basic science and maths knowledge and methodologies underpins the statistics, biological and medicines used to measure and fight pandemics? It seems a somewhat selective acceptance based on prejudices? After all the same quantum mechanics underlines atomic theory whether that's applied to the fibre optics transmitting your posts over the internet and the analysis of how atoms form chemical compounds and biological structures to create vaccines and drugs?

Michael Ixer ● 1345d