Forum Topic

Andy - I do not normally post links -Because that gives the naysayers and nafarious discreditors apparent ammunition to disagree that is nearly always1) Blaming the link source as unreliable (when that is merely their opinion)2) Wasting the whistleblower/researcher's time by contructing strawman arguments as to why people shouldn't look at the suggested link.3) Just being fixed, narrowminded and not able to take on board any contrary information that impinges their world view on that subject.4) Confirmation bias that supports their view that the vaccination was beneficial as they have taken the vaccine and cannot accept any negative information concerning the CV jabs.From my experience people who ask for links rarely look at them if they contradict their view and often go on to say (if no link is given) that this confirms their view that they were correct in the first place.Having said that I will make an exception here because I need to be seen as helpful (but this is the last time) and I am not interested in responding or indeed reading any flaming or silly personal defamation of the sort I have seen on here and particularly on this thread. Just dismissing and cancelling people because you disagree is not acceptable.This link provides access and interpretation of the UK Government ONS data. There are many such links; if you look and use the right search engine. So if you don't like this link kindly find your own... https://sarahwestall.com/uk-gov-quietly-published-data-confirming-triple-vaccinated-account-for-91-of-covid-deaths-since-beginning-of-2022/

David Nugent ● 1061d

Sorry Ivonne. Not much here to comment on...but thanks for at least being polite and responding!Your "facts" are very wrong and misleading ... and can I just say; (trying to be kind here).... they are based on your opinion and emotional response rather than science which remember is a philosophy based upon Karl Popper's notion that..."It suggests that for a theory to be considered scientific it must be able to be tested and conceivably proven false." But please disagree with me if you like... its just that..1) Doctors wearing masks is a completely different issue from the population wearing them in public, during a pandemic (where the "virus" had never being proven or isolated according to "Koch's Postulates" the gold standard for what constitutes a "disease".) (See Dr. Andrew Kaufman) This is especially true of children who are NOT and have NEVER been "asymptomatic carriers" of and rarely show any effects of so called CV19 and should NEVER have been asked to wear "masks for granny". I am told by a reliable legal source that individuals who mask wear should all have required a risk assessment for each mask user a propos its health benefits/risks (There is no risk assessment that has been done!). It is totally inappropriate for people to be wearing something that not only not proven to stop a "disease" or toxicity but the WHO (Dr Fauci of NIH actually admitted in April 2021) that a mask "could not filter fragments as small as a virus." There is considerable evidence that masks harbour bacteria locally and also decrease the amount of Oxygen/CO2 that can be respirated, causing possible brain damage. Please research!2) The CV19 jab is under review from multiple non MSM sources especially a Spanish group of doctors that have found considerable nanoparticles and negative effects of the spike protiens produced by the jab. They and many independent non MSM or Pharma tainted research conclude that the CV jab has NEGATIVE efficacy (ie kills more than it protects) and could indeed be causing new previously unheard of effects and spikes in the deathrate especially in young men from Myocarditus; this from a group who never suffer from the "disease" anyway. There are morticians such as Richard Hirchman that have found huge fibrous blockages in dead young people after the jab. There are a huge number of babies that are being stillborn to vaxxed women that is being surpressed from MSM. Please research! The MSM press is dominated by big-pharma propaganda please please beware!3) - "Perhaps the evidence of doctors and nurses getting really angry that the COVID cases they were dealing after the vaccines were of people who had not had a single vaccine." Ivonne - thats not true and is dangerous nonsense imo.There is considerable evidence that many good doctors and nurses have been mislead into agreeing with the vaccine government dialogue due to "groupthink" pressure to conform using carrot (financial payments) and stick (no job prospects if they decline) That many whistleblowing doctors are going public in pointing out that many of the hospital protocols are requiring nurses to administer inappropriate and life-ending drugs in high and inappropriate quantities (such as Remdesivir or Madazolam) also in wrongly putting patients on Ventilators after the patients have been incorrectly "diagnosed" as having CV (which inevitably causes death). And are therefore under intruction, putting patients into end-of-life care wrongly and prematurely. Believe me Ivonne; this happened to my Mum!Doubt me if you want.. but also doubt anyone who cannot argue sensibly and politely, if they are rude and call people "nutters" it just shows ignorance and defensiveness... I think I have given your questions respect and have tried to answer them honestly and to the best of my ability, based upon my and my group's research. Please do not react with emotion, try to understand that I am trying to portray what many videos on Rumble, Brighteon and Bitchute are saying...Please disagree if you like... but please understand my comments are genuine even if you can't accept them. Please research!

David Nugent ● 1063d