Forum Topic

A sensible approach, Adam. I've watched AV product ratings over the years and the #1 one selects today may be the #2, 3, or lower in six months time, or even in a different rating tomorrow! This is another Interesting view from PC Mag:
https://uk.pcmag.com/antivirus/8141/the-best-antivirus-protection Which I think sensibly doesn't give a top ten list but has editor's choices based on different factors. In practice what suits one person may not another depending what add ons one wants, eg VPNs, or features - perhaps speed of scanning is important or ease of configuration. (As I say, In my experience the chart lists aren't always that helpful as they can change every few months or differ between evaluations and you're not going to swap products every couple of month!) Remember, no AV scanner finds or removes 100% of malware. (When Message Labs, the original internet email scanning service, now part of Symantec, started they used four different AV products in parallel.) So whatever AV you use make sure it's software and signatures are kept up-to-date and scans regularly - but also  keep your OS and other software updated with security patches, use strong passwords - a password safe is advisable and use two factor authentication on important services (eg banking) where it's available, using a VPN on public WiFi if using services such as on-line banking is recommended (but check the T&Cs of free ones), keep devices secured physically so they can't be tampered with, delete suspicious looking emails.

Michael Ixer ● 1353d

I think I'd now have to agree with Matt regarding Kaspersky because their senior software engineers and owners are based in Moscow. This is unfortunate as Eugene Kaspersky is a supporter of a security information industry group I've been associated with over the years and is also a personal friend of the leader of that group (who happens to be ex RAF and an MBE) - although I can't claim to know Mr Kaspersky better than having said hello to him on one occasion. (I also know someone else who has done business with him in the past.)He tried to make a conciliatory statement at the beginning of the war but was criticised because he was constrained in his use of language owing to his physical location in Moscow (he didn't use the term "war" if I remember correctly). Similarly,  although I don't believe there is any direct evidence that Kaspersky software contains malware we unfortunately don't know what pressure he, other directors or senior staff are subject to in Moscow. I drafted the following early on in the conflict for someone - it's based around a PC Mag article to try and give a balanced view; you'll have to make your own judgement whether you wish to continue using Kaspersky products:https://uk.pcmag.com/security/139244/should-you-buy-kaspersky-security-products Kaspersky is a global company with its holding company, Kaspersky Lab Ltd, registered as a private company in the UK. Its HQ is in Moscow and all directors of the holding company seem to be Russian. Eugene Kaspersky is the senior director and  has kept the company private to retain control and quick decision making. The servers for the company's operations are now located in Switzerland because of their independence and data protection laws. (I know of one other US security company that also chose Switzerland as an operational location for similar reasons.) I understand that corporate customers can scrutinise Kaspersky source code under NDA to satisfy themselves of its integrity although I don't have personal experience of that. Some others as well as the US government have definitely taken against Kaspersky already: https://www.pcmag.com/news/hackerone-blocks-kaspersky-from-using-its-bug-bounty-platform

Michael Ixer ● 1363d