"All the more reason why a prison sentence probably inappropriate and no use to anybody?"I am sure that that is true in very many cases. But blowing £38 million?"Becker had told the jury his career earnings of $50m (about £38 million) were spent on an expensive divorce from his first wife in 2001, child maintenance payments, and "expensive lifestyle commitments", including his £22,000-a-month rented house in Wimbledon, south-west London.The trial also revealed Becker's taste for designer clothes, shopping in Harrods and that he was spending thousands on his children's school fees. He said his income had "reduced dramatically" following his retirement in 1999." (BBC)Is that a case for mitigation or is it an aggravating feature?
David Ainsworth ● 1374d