Forum Topic

It only took 6 posts on this thread before someone compared Putin to Hitler. First, a reality check; Russia is the preeminent military power in the world. China is the preeminent economic power in the world.Russia has hundreds of billions in foreign currency reserves and hundreds of billions more in gold. The UK is bankrupt as is the EU and the debased US$ can no longer be considered the world's reserve currency. Economic collapse, far bigger than 2008/9, may only be a matter of months away.The Russian military is financed by the Russian national budget, not by banks. Western economic sanctions have an extremely poor record of achieving their stated objectives. Any Russian official of sufficiently high rank to have participated in a decision of the Russian Security Council who still trusts the West to have money abroad is so stupid that he deserves for it to be confiscated.Russia and China have been subjected to psyop operations that makes them think that they need the West. This delusion is the greatest threat that they face, indeed, that the whole world faces. The chances for World War III are enhanced by their contacts with the West. These contacts result in constant accusations, constant provocations, which are dangerous because they can explode into conflict. By now, Russia and China should know that negotiations with the West are not only pointless but dangerous.  Russia and China have their own goals. These goals are the development of their countries and the creation of their own trading blocs. There is no reason whatsoever to contaminate this project with Western corruption. The Western World will not be a problem for Russia much longer. The West is collapsing in its own degeneracy, dying from self-hate. The West dishonours its founders and its heroes. The West tears down its own historical monuments, black-lists its own classic literature, teaches hatred of itself in its own universities and state schools and now has created two powerful enemies. The West has no morals, no respect for truth. The US government has trampled its Constitution into the dirt.  As the US is the Constitution, the US has trampled itself into the dirt. As the rest of the West is part of the American empire, all goes down with the US.The US and NATO recognizes that it cannot stand up to Russia. The White House claims “The latest US Sanctions are not designed to cause any disruption to the current flow of energy from Russia to The World” What absolute ignorance!“President Zelensky has declared General Mobilization in Ukraine within the next 90 days”. Within 90 days Ukraine will not exist. Moreover, the neo-Nazis who have kept Zelensky in power will be dead by then and few if any Ukrainians will mobilize.The American Speaker of the House of Representatives must not have heard Putin’s warnings. Pelosi says she wants to provide Ukraine with $600 Million in lethal defense weapons as Boris doubles down on UK military shipments. NATO is unravelling: NATO members dependent upon Russian energy object to cutting Russia from the SWIFT payments system; otherwise the cartoon that used to introduce Have I Got News For You will be their reality.Idiot European leaders are learning what it means to be US puppet states; death, destruction, and financial harm. The UK with its destroyed economy wants to destroy Russia’s? Our Foreign Office announced that the UK is working with allies to disconnect Russia from SWIFT and will not rest until the Russian Economy is destroyed! Who do they think they are fooling? The major problem the world faces is that Western governments have zero contact with reality.  The world has reached the point in its history when the Western part of it has totally failed in its leadership. The United States has abandoned all principles of its founding, all allegiance to law and has attempted to impose its will on the world. Russia objects, and so does China.Ukraine diverts attention away from the UK and Western Governments catastrophic handling of Covid. After 5 days of comprehensive evidence, tomorrow we can hear evidence of eugenics and closing statements at  The Court Of Public Opinion https://www.grand-jury.net/ Videos of the hearings are on Odysee.

Roland Willis Gilmore ● 1438d

Hello Adam,I am afraid I disagree with you on some points.One, Michael Ixer did not say that Brexit enabled Putin to invade Ukraine.  This is a conclusion you reached on a comment that did not mean that in the slightest.When talking about Ukraine and Barack Obama, you forgot to mention that the PM at the time was David Cameron, who, as far as I am aware, is a conservative who also said "we are staying out of Syria".During Trump's term of office, Russia made no attempts to invade anyone.  Well, since Trump called him a "good chap" plus weakening NATO at the same time, I am not surprised Putin was purring like a Cheshire cat.While I could sympathize with Trump saying some European countries were not contributing enough (meaning less than 2% of their GDP), this was rectified not long after Trump became President.  But, at the same time, he also left the WHO because, and this is me speaking from experience, it was not following the policies Trump wanted.....  I would rather not expand on this, if you do not mind.You may not like Biden, perhaps in the same measure that I detest Trump, but Biden did not withdraw unilaterally, that was the agreement Trump had concluded.  I would agree that Biden should not have followed that agreement, though.Biden does not have an obsession with trying to turn Europe into a replica of the US; sadly it is mostly the conservative party.  Please, consider the record privatisation that has happened under the conservatives. (As an explanation, I was a conservative voter until this lot came up for election....)Britain leaving the EU has weaken it and itself.  Please, could you answer this?  Why do you think Russia considered it safe to send submarines to cut the communications cables under the North Sea recently? France was not trying to establish the EU army, the Commission was.  Does this ring a bell?  The UK built an aircraft carrier that was going to be "populated" with French aircraft....  I wonder why? Ukraine's non-membership of NATO was not necessarily EU's memberships stance but:" [Ukraine's] Plans for NATO membership were shelved by Ukraine following the 2010 presidential election in which Viktor Yanukovych, who preferred to keep the country non-aligned, was elected President. Amid the Euromaidan unrest, Yanukovych fled Ukraine in February 2014." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine%E2%80%93NATO_relationsI thought the Minsk Agreement was signed by:- Swiss diplomat and OSCE representative Heidi Tagliavini- Former president of Ukraine (July 1994 to January 2005) and Ukrainian representative Leonid Kuchma- ussian Ambassador to Ukraine and Russian representative Mikhail Zurabov- Rebel heads Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor PlotnitskyIn 1989 the Berlin Wall came down but the end of the Cold War came in 1991 when the USSR ceased to exist.  As far as I remember, perhaps incorrectly, it was Gorbachov's time when he was famous for his terms "peristroika" and "glasnost".I will never forget 9 November 1989 when the wall came down.  We had just come back from a trip in France, turned the TV on and were absolutely gobsmacked to see the news!Perhaps you are correct in saying the West became complacent after the end of the Cold War.  As the saying goes, the victors write history....But is also very true to say that, thanks to the EEC, the EC and the EU, Europe enjoyed over 70 years of peace....  Not an achievement to be poo pooed....  Having a European market was, as far as I am aware, something that both Churchill and Thatcher encouraged and praised... You say:  "There is no difference whatsoever between Soviet-apologist Corbynites blaming "the West" for Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and Remainers blaming Brexit or Trump. To describe these assertions as tenuous would be an affront to tenuousness. You are useful idiots for Putin."  I am not too sure where you got this from (perhaps of the historical conservative vs labour???).  Remainers and Brexiteers are an illusion of your imagination.  Perhaps the idiots that are useful for Putin are those who have no idea of British history?

Ivonne Holliday ● 1439d

Congratulations, Michael, on being the first on this forum to blame Putin's invasion of Ukraine on Brexit. How inventive of you.Putin first invaded Ukraine when Barack Obama was President, due to that man's catastrophic foreign policy that, among other tragedies, encouraged democratic uprisings in the Middle East only to stand aside while their regimes cracked down on the protesters. That did doing absolutely nothing while Syria used chemical weapons on its own people. If you want the first example of when Putin realised that western concepts of International Law (always a fictitious concoction) would never be enforced other than on the occasional weak African crook, that was it. Who sided with, and has kept the criminal Syrian regime in power? Putin.During President Trump's term of office, Russia made no attempts to invade anywhere. That will no doubt be ascribed by Trump haters as him being in Putin's pocket (though surely Putin could've done anything he liked if that were so?) But perhaps the fact Trump was unpredictable and gave the impression at least of being willing to wield America's military might disproportionately, prevented Russian aggression?And now, again, we have another useless Democrat President in the US - and lo, Putin's up to his old manoeuvres, encouraged by Biden's disastrous unilateral withdrawal from Afghanistan. It's Biden who failed to consult his NATO allies over Afghanistan, it's Biden who has shown he's not got the stomach for fighting "foreign wars" and it's Biden that has clung to the US obsession with trying to turn Europe into a replica of the United States even though the pitiful, corrupt and undemocratic EU is utterly useless at pretty much everything it turns its hand to.Britain leaving the EU hasn't weakened it - because that would imply that the EU was "strong" beforehand. The EU is not, and never has been a player in defence or geopolitics. Thank goodness - those would be further areas for it to fail at, while further asset-stripping its member states of sovereignty and accountability. France has, however, weakened NATO by trying to establish the ludicrous "euro army". If NATO has been "brain dead" (it wasn't) look to grotesque egotistical nightmares like Putin's bitch Macron.Which European NATO members fail to spend 2% of their GDP on defence (a figure in itself that looks woefully small all of a sudden)? Not the UK. Where's Germany (other than on the board of Gasprom, that is)? Where's Italy, Spain, Portugal and Denmark? All dramatically below 2%. You may loathe Trump - so do I, for the record - but that doesn't make him wrong in asking why Europe expected the US to pay for its protection when its own member states refuse to stump up.Was it the UK that has consistently prevented Ukraine arming itself? No, again Germany. Which countries would veto Ukraine joining NATO? Again, not the UK. Look to your beloved EU.Was it the UK that tried to impose upon sovereign Ukraine the Minsk accords that would have given Russia direct control over the country through its grip on those so-called breakaway areas in the east? Nope - again, France and Germany.Ever since 1989, the West (collectively - this isn't about remainers and leavers, Tories or Labour, Europeans or non Europeans) has been ludicrously complacent in assuming that it had won the Cold War, that Russia's leadership would not be seething with humiliation at its loss of territory almost overnight, that the failure to embed democracy there would create despots like Putin, that democracy and freedom were universally established values we no longer had to fight for and that the arrow of history arced towards us.Well, we've enjoyed thirty years of that misapprehension. It's over now.There is no difference whatsoever between Soviet-apologist Corbynites blaming "the West" for Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and Remainers blaming Brexit or Trump. To describe these assertions as tenuous would be an affront to tenuousness. You are useful idiots for Putin.

Adam Gray ● 1439d

Yes, I took him to be saying he's prepared to use nuclear weapons.I watched much of his speech on Sky and noted his repeated mention of Lenin and Stalin, and how Ukraine is part of Russia. Odd that he didn't mention the collectivisation of the kulaks and the resulting famine. I didn't think he came over as totally sane, but neither were Stalin and Hitler.About six years ago a friend and I took a trip to the Baltic capitals. A travel agent booked our flights, hotels and bus transfers between the towns, and then we did our own thing.In Tallinn we visited the town museum and had an interesting conversation with the pleasant woman selling entrance tickets. She said she had joined the human chain in 1991. She was working for a hotel at the time and staff were given time off to participate.Then we walked through the town, reading all the plaques on merchants' houses. We came to the town square and read a plaque saying that in April 1944 the Soviets bombed the town  causing devastation and killing however many people, I forget the numberSuddenly I became aware that someone was beside me and bawling over and over in my ear "ne pravda".  I know 3 words in Russian, one of which is pravda. I turned and saw a little old woman, incandescent, shouting repeatedly.  I thought she was going to deck me out.  Eventually she retreated across the square, still shouting.I suppose she lurked in the square, waiting for hapless tourists to pass by.  My friend and I were quite shaken. I thought she looked early 80s, in which case she would have remembered it. My friend thought early 70s, in which case she would have heard it from her parents, as I heard about the bombing of my home town from my and friends' parents.I think the Russian heritage population of Estonia is about 25%, so I wonder if there could be Putin's next move in his drive to restore the Soviet Union.  As they say, you can take the man out of the KGB but you can't take the KGB out of the man.

Elizabeth Balsom ● 1439d