Forum Topic

Oh I've upset Richard again with the tamest - and entirely justified - criticism of our incompetent, unprincipled, self-serving, disastrous, wrecking mayor. Did Richard feel Michael Howard was entirely blameless when refusing to take political responsibility for the failings of the  prison service (after some very dangerous criminals escaped) on that infamous Newsnight interview when he was Home Secretary? I suspect he was baying for his resignation, along with the rest of us. This is called hypocrisy, Richard.It is not a radical concept that politicians take responsibility for operational failings that they are not personally responsible for: Lord Agnew for example has just resigned over the failure of the government to pursue Covid grant fraud. He's not personally culpable for that failure. But he's taken responsibility for it. It's called leadership.All of Sadiq's partisan cheerleaders on this forum blame Priti Patel not because they think she's actually responsible but because they have a pathological hatred of a Leave-backing Conservative far closer to mainstream public opinion on law and order (and immigration) than they'll ever get. All bar Jean Charles de Menezes of Dick's epic failures have come from the London-side of her responsibilities (as opposed to the Met's national responsibilities).Cressida Dick is responsible operationally. Sadiq Khan is responsible politically. This is not a slur, nasty or otherwise. It's just a fact. The next time Sadiq takes responsibility for anything consequential will be the first.

Adam Gray ● 1213d

We're getting off topic now, but the issue of neophyte politicians runs throughout politics these days. If you think back to any era until Major, politicians who reached the top had usually been in parliament for decades and held serious offices of state for years. Healey, Callaghan, Wilson, Jenkins, Thatcher, Whitelaw, Butler, Heath and so on.It changed with Kinnock - who'd been an MP for less than a decade and without any ministerial experience when elected Labour leader in 1983. Major, elected 1979 - PM 1990, with more ministerial experience but only very brief cabinet experience before Mrs Thatcher fell. Starmer was only elected  in 2015 and is already leader of the Opposition. Sunak also 2015.  These people could have their political career behind them in less than 15 years in the Commons.Interestingly, given our political systems tend to run broadly parallel, this is the opposite problem to that of the US, where those at the top of the parties are (very) old: Biden and Trump late 70s, Nancy Pelosi 81, Chuck Shumer (Senate Maj leader) over 70; Mitch McConnell (Senate Min leader) over 80, Steny Hoyer (House Maj leader) 82. To bring it back to Sadiq, I think a major part of his problem is that his political "upbringing" was in opposition on Wandsworth council. He had a very short period in govt, but essentially came to the mayoralty steeped in not having had responsibility for anything and therefore not having to take responsibility for anything. I don't think he's ever managed to escape that mindset: it's always someone else's fault.

Adam Gray ● 1216d

In addition, what was it that pushed Sadiq over the edge?  Was it the accidental assassination of Jean Charles de Menezes? Nope. Was it the ongoing, out-of-control stabbings of London teenagers? Nope. Was it the axing of our safer neighbourhood police teams (which we were promised by Mayor Livingstone were ringfenced to our local council wards, and which we paid for with a whopping Council Tax precept increase that hasn't been refunded to us)? Nope. Was it the fact that criminals can almost always guarantee to get away with so-called "minor" crimes like burglary and theft because the Met don't even bother to investigate any more? Nope. Was it the horrific murder of Sarah Everard by a serving policeman? Nope. Was it police officers joining in with and failing to break up unlawful protests instead of enforcing the law? Nope.It was an "unacceptable response" to disrespectful behaviour by a few police officers in one central London police station. Their behaviour was utterly unacceptable and they need weeding out, but against those really serious failings that result in deaths and misery? He is a failure of a mayor with no perspective or judgement.BTW, now's an excellent time to split the Met in two: a police force for London (preferably with the mayor removed from meddling with it entirely - give London councils oversight of policing in their boroughs) and with its national  responsibilities merged with the National Crime Agency. It'd be far easier to see exactly where London council taxpayers' money was going measured against where we want it to go - and where politicians pledge it will go - if it wasn't absorbed into the blob of national policing priorities that are funded by national taxation.

Adam Gray ● 1220d