Michael the below seems to fit "push through his own agenda whether the methods he uses are legitimate or not, and irrespective of what the adverse effects are...""2.Many Members of Parliament who voted in support of the invasion have since denounced their decision, as it was based on the false assertion that the then President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was in possession of weapons of mass destruction. Many have said that if they had known then what is known now, they would have voted differently. The Government of the day has been widely accused of failing to be open and frank with both Parliament and the public at the time. The Iraq Inquiry (the Chilcot Inquiry) was set up in order to provide some closure to the controversy, but for many, it has failed to do so."https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubadm/656/65604.htm
Ed Robinson ● 1285d