I've been racking my brains trying to work out why the majority of the candidates live near Wimbledon and not near Putney. After exhaustive analysis I've determined:(i) They all live near both.(ii) It's largely a result of people deciding to run - like - hardly anyone from Putney did.Then I've been wondering whether it matters. Wimbledon Common is the biggest area, Putney Heath 2nd. Then Putney Common is the smallest area the Conservators have to look after. I'll be honest, I live near PC, but only ever travel across it - if I want a good walk/cycle, I'll head for WC.Now looking at the map, and considering the electorate and who lives closest to the various bits of common, the really unrepresented area is Roehampton. What a shame no-one from Roehampton is standing. Because living in a slightly different place would make all the difference to how someone did the job right?If I lived on Commondale, I'd certainly treat matters differently to if I lived on Wimbledon Parkside. Is that in the public interest though? Just thinking out loud.Couldn't make the hustings. Maybe I'll watch the Wimbledon ones. But apparently, all that matters is Donald Roy's address.Look, if Adam Ant lived in Putney and he stood as a Conservator, and he was the only one from Putney, we should all vote for him, right? Regardless of his statement, speech at hustings, experience, track record, ability.
Michael Winstanley ● 1892d