Forum Topic

"Yes Richard it is the same Met that is telling us not to use your phone in public and not to leave your car on the road. Useless advice!"Yes, it would be useless advice if that's what they were saying, but it isn't:On mobile phones in public, the advice is "Don’t leave your phone, iPad, tablet or camera unattended, out of your sight or left on a table – thieves can grab a phone from a table in seconds. Always be aware of your mobile and your whereabouts and  act accordingly. And when you’ve finished using it, put it away." Nothing at all about not using it in public.https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/personal-robbery/protect-your-phone/On cars, the advice in point 6 is the one: "Your mobile phone, coins for the car park, sunglasses, packs of medication or other items that can earn quick cash are irresistible to the opportunist thief. Remember, the cost of replacing a window is often much more than that of what’s stolen. And it should go without saying that wallets, handbags, purses and credit cards should never be left in an unattended vehicle." Again, nothing about not leaving your car but about what not to leave in it (they might have added, don't leave even an empty bag in view as it may not be obvious it has nothing in it).https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/theft-from-a-vehicle/vehicle-safe-and-sound/As for the stuff about Gibraltar, again, what on earth is that about? I'm beginning to suspect that you've been drinking at the same well as Ms Stevens...

Richard Carter ● 1955d

Good morning Richard,I am not too sure it was "a fuss about the planters blocking access for emergency vehicles"; I would say it was an outcry. Two important points to make:  1 - The use of ANPR should have been there from the outset when implementing the LTNs. (I have mentioned this many times before).As the article you placed a link for says:  "The planters used to block roads in low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) in Sutton and Croydon COULD be replaced by automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras."Ealing has already implemented this and as the article states:"So far, 99 out of every 100 penalty charge notices (PCN) handed out as part of our enforcement of the trial schemes during December 2020 were issued to drivers who live outside of that LTN. To date, 60% of PCNs have been issued to drivers who do not live in the borough."The second point, which I always maintained, is that it is very important to make a differentiation between local traffic and people coming from outside the borough.The paragraph relating the Ealing clearly states that 60% of PCNs were issued to drivers who do not live in the borough.  Quite a statistic!!An observation I would like to make is that special permits should be issued to residents in an LTN, just in the same way they do for CPZs. They are called visitor's parking permits which are also used for trades people working on your property.  Very important indeed!  In the case of ANPR, the number plate of the vehicle should be declared before they visit of course.On the whole, delighted to hear that common sense is prevailing regarding the LTNs and the use of ANPR. Another observation would be the need to look into/study is on how to keep the volume of traffic on authorized roads moving.  The volume of cars is very important, but the pollution created by stationary traffic is lethal. We must keep in mind that people live on main roads, such as Roehampton Lane, which also has a hospital, various schools and at least one nursery among others and they need protection from pollution too.Thank you.

Ivonne Holliday ● 1955d

I'm not so sure Richard.Yesterday I witnessed my first, what I call the Gibraltar wave, in 10 months.The green man came on at a pedestrian crossing and a woman with a child in a pram proceeded to cross only to reverse rapidly as a woman cyclist failed to stop. The cyclists continued to cycle without a pause but she did wave and shouted an apology.Gibraltar is a very safe place apart from crossing the road. But if you are on a zebra crossing and someone almost runs you over they will wave and shout an apology without stopping of course!Consequences of collisions are of course far greater the larger the mass. I can understand police concentrating on behavior that causes the worse outcomes - but as a society we need to get to zero tolerance! Where society deems it all unacceptable. That is hard to do when cyclists have lost the support of a large percentage of pedestrians due to a large percentage of cyclists not obeying the law.It doesn't need to be all fines but it does mean police should be pulling over offenders of all types - and yes fines for those that repeat.It was always strange crossing the border from Gibraltar to Spain because cars stopped at zebra crossings. Why because the Spanish fine very heavily as a deterrent! I think we need to look at how other countries have tackled this issue.Lastly it should be obvious to the cycle lobby but doesn't appear to be the case that you can only cycle with a bicycle. The cycle lobby should be campaigning for zero tolerance concerning bicycle theft but it isn't. Why?Many cyclists give up after having a bicycle stolen. I myself stopped for several years. When I started again the advice from cyclists forums etc about security was to lock your bike next to a better one because thieves would steal that one rather than yours. You couldn't make it up!

Ed Robinson ● 1955d