Forum Topic

Richard, I agree this is a concern. I'm not sure I'd lay the blame entirely on the internet. I remember the days of CompuServe and Cix which were private networks providing forums, email and information services. The difference is they cost money, were managed and moderated and I suppose if users breached term of use their contract could be terminated. For a start the internet is really just a communications systems (and one does have to pay an ISP to access it) but I'm being pedantic, it's the free services that are the problem: social media mainly but also websites of extreme organisations - the KKK have one in the land of free speech -but let's face it anyone can set up a website and provided you don't put child porn or terrorist information on it or steal money then in the UK you'll probably get away with most things.What one sees on social media is often very much up to the company one keeps so if one's friends are looking for conspiracies then you'll get bombarded with them as well. Surely, though, the problem is people's education: not being taught to be critical, poor understanding of science, etc, or just being gullible? The other problem is the establishment itself. Is if surprising they there's concern  about the US drugs regulator fast tracking Covid vaccines; its aviation counterpart didn't do as great job with the 737 Max, did it? During the week we heard that a construction company had cheated to pass a cladding test, the US President is lying about the election result, and today the UK PM refuses to accept an official report concerning a cabinet member accused of bullying.I'm not sure that's all down to the internet although it certainly does allows faster distribution of disinformation than a paper pamphlet. More efficient garbage in and garbage out? I just think the garbage has always been there.

Michael Ixer ● 1959d

On this issue, I thought back 65 odd years to when I was about 10 ("thank you dear, I know I dont look that old"), when I personally knew other children who had contacted polio.And it was rampant long after around the world.The 'sugar cube' vaccine was developed and polio was eradicated in the UK and elsewhere.I recall that when called upon by the Government and health authorities to have their child inoculated, parents did just that - to protect their own children and others.Now we have another rampant pandemic yet also many vaccines that Governments, even Trump, and medical specialists state will be beneficial in protecting individuals and combating the spread of the virus.All this at a time when our understanding of disease and medical science in general is surely far advanced over that a long time ago.Yet somehow the whole issue has become controversial.Now I am not saying that individuals do not have the right to decline inoculation, though per se it is a selfish act as if levels of inoculation are not high enough, eradication of the disease will fail (as was not the case with polio).But now every one is an expert, dredging up obscure papers and listening to comments from the likes of David Icke and Piers Corbyn whose views are put up against, yes, the true experts.All of this driven by publicity seeking journalists and commentators and sucked up by suckers from the internet.Why has our confidence in established Government and health and scientific expertise declined, causing 'us' to act in this fashion ?Though we might have advanced in many ways, we seem to have regressed drastically when it comes to common sense.

John Hawkes ● 1959d