Forum Topic

Hi IvonneI’m afraid I don’t remember Survivors.  From my point of view, I expect our politicians to demonstrate good leadership skills.  I don’t, however, expect them to be experts in every field, but I do expect them to pull in appropriate expertise.  One of the issues here is around which experts to believe.  The government seem to have relied upon recommendations from Imperial College, although numerous academics have presented vastly different views and models.  There has also been conflicting advice around how best to treat Covid patients (to ventilate or not to ventilate) and how best to treat the elderly or vulnerable (is moving them to hospital a bigger risk than not doing so?)  The government eventually followed most other countries in introducing a partial lockdown, but as I’ve said before, we don’t know whether delays in diagnosis and treatment to cancer, heart disease and strokes, let alone the effects on public health that recessions always bring, will ultimately prove a greater cost than unfettered Covid-19. I think that anyone who suggests that the decisions that had to be made were straight-forward is naive or simply blinkered by political bias - it’s been boringly predictable, in recent days watching Conservative & SNP supporters criticise each others party’s for the very actions which they defended last week. I agree with you, however, that we need to have a national debate about what we expect from the NHS and how we fund it.  Sadly, I expect it will be dominated by the usual loud biased voices who prefer to score cheap political  points rather than actually work constructively for a better future.

Craig Fordham ● 2151d

Hello Craig, Why do we always have to find someone to blame?  Under different circumstances, I would agree with you but it is a sign of our times, the anonymity of social media and all that.  We are in the middle of a horrible pandemic — at least I hope we are — and not just at the end of the first phase dreading if  a second wave comes along. We seem to have yearly panics in winter with the flu and the NHS cannot cope because of reduced funding year-after-year.  Some lessons must have been learnt about these already.  While they may be  manageable, it is true that the world has had a few pandemics in the 20th and 21st centuries.  I think a lot of lessons were learnt by many then.  Ebola comes to mind, albeit in far away lands, as well as the British nurse who contracted it, twice.  The PPE doctors and nurses wore at the time were akin to space travel outfits. Imagine somebody in government telling us that they cannot deal with a foot and mouth outbreak in the UK?  
It is also true to say governments must prepare themselves for a pandemic because these come out of the blue.  If this was not so, why would the World Health Organization exist? It implements agreements and convention agreed and adopted by the Member States and the WHO is governed by these — not the other way around. And yes, we do point fingers because we believe our elected representatives are responsible for looking after us, regardless of which party is in charge, and their responsibility is to prepare for every single eventuality, be it a pandemic or a terrorist attack.  In this instance, I am very sorry to say, that herd immunity was a foul way to proceed and the statement "many loved ones will die" rang alarming bells in me. Natural selection?  Perhaps.  But, hand in heart, dispensing with the elderly was considered, by some, to be beneficial. On a totally different matter though not unrelated, do you remember, by any chance, the TV programme called Survivors?

Ivonne Holliday ● 2151d