School Funding Cuts - (Re: Today's "Newsletter")
Why include Councillor Sweet's "rebuttal" to the claim of per pupil buget cuts? The numbers in the claim might be twisted and manipulated as he says. However, those figures in his "rebuttal" are barely relevant, lacking adjustment for the changing size of school populations, non discretionary influences such as salary increases granted by central government, capital expenditure elements etc. etc. Why let him get away with it? Does he not have a sufficient command of his brief? Does the Councillor consider the electorate too stupid to grasp what he might have to say? I have no political axe to grind, just a general distaste for the quality of political discourse these days.
Tony Howells ● 2595d0 Comments