Forum Topic

Brexit litivation

Interesting that Mr Banks lawyers are taking action against possible libel or defamation rather than actual statements made. Suggests to me that someone is getting very close to the truth? Perhaps picking on Netflix, who come from a country where litigation is everyday business (think, Donald Trump?), isn't the best strategy. Still, it could be fun if something blows up as Boris takes over! Sorry for those allergic to the Guardian, but at least it's not behind a paywall ....https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/20/arron-banks-netflix-threat-great-hack-documentaryPS - just have to find a reason to sue Netflix so I get invited to viewings for free, or will they charge Mr Banks if he turns up?

Michael Ixer ● 2670d2 Comments

How absolutely ridiculous if not altogether corrupt!"...London law firm Kingsley Napley, acting on behalf of Banks, his company Eldon Insurance, and Leave.EU, said in a letter on 16 July that their clients were concerned it [the Netflix programme] would include “false and defamatory allegations” about their clients made by Cadwalladr and others. …"Would include as opposed to did included? A very nasty whiff of foul play by Banks and co. without a doubt.How does the saying go?  It takes one to know one?  What an incredibly admission by Banks of making "false and defamatory allegations"!!!

Ivonne Holliday ● 2670d

And it's  worrying what his, Farage, Rees Mogg and Johnson's chum Bannon has supposedly been up to:https://thinkprogress.org/exclusive-steve-bannon-geofencing-data-collection-catholic-church-4aaeacd5c182/

Michael Ixer ● 2670d