Forum Topic

Yet another thread....I'm just a bit fed up with all the negativity, and signs and leaflets going up without anyone putting their name to them. Who are you?  Don't assume every person is against this application completely. You don't speak for us all. Having read the statement from Blackrock on the front page, and having spoken to several businesses in Putney, and having visited the site at Olympia (how many of YOU have been to one??) I think we have to be a bit wary of being quite so negative about this application. If, and yes it's an if at this stage, the site is well managed, is more of an upmarket food court, with a bar, isn't aimed at drinkers or dancers (which I'm assured it won't be), will mostly have visitors coming by public transport, is not going to be treated like a bar only, will bring more visitors during the opening hours during the day (from 12noon onwards) who could well shop locally whilst here, then there will certainly be positives for Putney. We can't assume it'll be empty until 8pm and will then be full of drinkers. That's ridiculous. The High St is struggling. There are fewer people parking and more people shopping online. I wonder how many evenings it would actually have 700 people in? And if it did, and they all ate rather than just drank, caught public transport, with a small percentage using Uber, then it might just work. The 2am cut off is only for 25 evenings a year, and already all the pubs and bars have that time so that's not new. They have to have security on the door given that the only access is through the Exchange when all the shops are shut in the evening. It seems to me that having been travelling around the UK recently there are a lot of High Streets that are in REAL trouble, and we're lucky to have a team of people trying to get businesses in to Putney. If it was that easy we wouldn't have any empty shops. I am cautious, want a bit more input from Incipio about their plans, given that we are a more residential area than their other sites, but it could, repeat could, be good for us. It's not always doom and gloom.  I note that support vs objections on the application site is roughly 200:150 - and no, I haven't read many of them as I just haven't got time at the moment. I didn't count the neutral comments. Yes there need to be assurances from the Company, and the Council need to be prompt to act should it go through and there be complaints. But Incipio is going to be putting a lot of money into this, and the last thing they'll want will be complaints and problems. I expect I'll be shot down in flames now, .

Alison Fraser ● 2834d

Agree with this post wholeheartedly from Alison. Let me paint a picture. I regularly go to Pergola and similar type venues after work. I am a 32 year old, married finance professional and responsible home owner living close to the High Street in Putney. I also am on my company's social committee dealing with arranging the summer and xmas parties on the company's behalf. Pergola is the type of venue I might arrange to host my corporate summer party in, and yes I would do so on the basis that I would look for a late licence and a dance floor. The type of people who would attend this event ? Finance professionals ranging from the ages of 22 through to 60 years old, with the majority being in their 30s and 40s. There appears to be an assumption that this venue is going to attract 18 year old ravers and clubbers because they want the ability to host late night private events with a dance floor on selected evenings throughout the year. This assumption is unfounded. Being a regular at Market Halls in Fulham and Victoria, and Pergola at Olympia and Paddington, I very much doubt this is going to be a venue full of 18 year old ravers at night (we have the Fez for this!). Please go and visit the other venues to see what pleasant places they are to spend an evening with friends eating good food with a glass of wine before writing it off. You will most likely find them full of local work professionals such as myself. I personally believe this will be a great addition to our local community.

Stephanie Geary ● 2834d

A genuine question I have that is not meant to antagonise anyone (so please don’t interpret it that way), is why do some have this mentality that putney is ‘too good’ for this type of establishment but it’s ok in Kensington, Paddington and Fulham? Why are we so different so those three very high end areas ? Re the comment below on Uber’s backing up at Paddington, it’s in the middle of shiny new office and apartment buildings and the roads are unfortunately very confusing with barrier systems; I managed to get lost on foot when visiting, so that’s not an issue specific to the venue or drivers but due to the unfortunate road layout of where it is. Additional footfall in the exchange at whatever time can only be a good thing in my opinion, as someone pointed out it doesn’t just open at 6. Most people leave work at 5, so there’s a 1 hour peak crossover of opening times right there that the shops would benefit from local workers. When Waitrose stops acting as a good enough anchor to attract people you’ve got problems! Don’t also forget the local business INSIDE the establishment selling their food. Perhaps some local restaurants such as Putney Pies might turn up inside like Patty and Bun, who knows for sure. This concept allows start up food businesses a shot at making it whilst sharing in the costs with other start ups. With regards to other businesses suffering, well my answer is that competition makes markets more efficient; to survive you have to be better than the rest which leads to general improvement across the board. Would anyone really mind if 5 Guys, KFC, McDonalds or Waggas (owned by the same chain as Frankie and Bennys FYI) lost market share to this??? The good local restaurants will survive if they are good enough. I’m not about to stop going to Roxie and Gazette or wherever because I want a good meal for a tennner after work occasionally. My point wasn’t that 22 or 30 year olds do not make as much noise as 18 years, but honestly the way some people think that there is going to be 700 anti social people screaming and shouting in this place is just ridiculous. We have just built hundreds of shiny new build apartments on upper Richmond road in the last few years that no doubt house many 30 something professionals who would quite probably enjoy having something like this locally that I am sure know how to behave themselves. To address the people who say, would you like it behind your house.... I live on a busy through road near the high street, I have a mini cab office just over the street, Uber’s seem to pick up regularly outside my house and I have two very popular pubs close by. On the weekends in the middle of the night yes I do hear people from the high street and the pubs in the streets being anti social, but it’s a few people, not the majority. It doesn’t actually bother me that much; the main noise issues I have relate to school traffic and articulated lorries/skip lorries cutting through at anti social hours, but that is for another thread. Did I know that living on a busy road near schools, pubs and a high street would be noisy when I bought my house? Of course I did. That’s London life if you choose to live near a high street sadly.

Stephanie Geary ● 2834d

there is one issue in all of the comments on this forum about the Incipio proposal, whether for or against, that has not been raised.  That is, the issue of trust.Do you trust a business that will publicly claim the endorsement of a venerated institution like the Royal Horticultural Society, without having actually asked for and been granted the endorsement?  To do so, as a business, demonstrates either a breathtaking lack of honesty, or a breathtaking lack of maturity as a business, probably both.  Would you do business with someone like that?  Would you trust them to run an operation that would seriously and negatively impact the local stakeholders?  I'm thinking probably not.  I wouldn't.Add on top of that their constantly changing marketing strategy, first promoting an RHS-endorsed venue that will help offset the strangling air pollution on the High Street (obvious lie - all the plants are indoors), then shifting to a strategy of capturing the mindless vote by promoting a venue with a pretty picture and no other information on Instagram to drum up support.  Then moving on to collusion with their potential landlord Putney Exchange to promote an image and a false statement of what is being requested in the actual planning documents, to try and gain local support by lying. They have to keep shifting their marketing efforts, because what they have submitted is in violation of quite a lot of planning law and policy for a residential area.Would you do business with someone like that?  I wouldn't.The only "marketing material" that is relevant to any discussion of this proposal is the actual planning documentation.  Anyone who has actually read it, and then compared it to what Incipio is marketing, I'm happy to hear from. And what I'd be most interested in hearing about is not whether you think it might save the High Street (a fairly complex issue), but having read the planning application in full, and compared that which they are actually proposing to what they are describing in their marketing efforts - would you trust that business?  would you do business with them?  That's what I'd be interested in hearing.

Mary McCue ● 2832d