Forum Topic

Anyone noticed that since our TV news screens were dominated by the migrant crisis in Europe a few years ago suddenly everything is now quiet and you would think everything is fine. Well believe me it is not and it is getting alot worse.The reason there is a blackout of the migrant crisis in France and Germany by our MSM is because Remain corporations are protecting the EU project and don't want to portray the truth about what impact the migrant crisis is having on local communities in mainland Europe.As soon as the clips go viral on twitter or youtube they get taken down by the Remain supporting administrators.The truth is being obstructed.Some of the alternative news video clips i have watched from Germany and France before they get deleted is heart wrenching stuff. There are gangs of migrants on the streets, lots of crime, almost no go area for the Police. Recently watched a video of a tourist coach stopping at traffic lights in Paris and a gang of migrants forced open the undercarriage of the coach and started taking off with the cases. The bus driver couldn't do anything about it and so the migrants got away with much of the luggage. Other clips of Police being beaten up and old local people being hassled all the time.Merkel and the EU project have got alot to answer for with their open border policies.Luckily the UK is protected to a degree as we are an Island and we have reasonable border restrictions on non EU citizens so hopefully this won't be happening here.Youtube the stories and see for yourself.Open borders is a massive failed policy and will bring down the EU project soon. There is an uprising in Germany, France and Italy, people want change.Richard of course the Guardian doesn't cover this sort of stuff.You absolutely live in cloud cuckoo land and haven't got a clue what is happening away from your Putney bubble and because it doesn't affect you you probably don't care.

Paul Game ● 2862d

This is right. The supercilious attitude of some remainers exemplified by Richard Carter is enough to encourage even the most ardent pro-European to consider their position.Mike asks a reasonable question - why is the head of the port at Calais saying he doesn't anticipate any problems from the French side? What he actually said in the interview is a bit vague and, as he doesn't know what the actual trading arrangements will be he can't really give such a reassurance. What he will be worried about is the alternative routes that are being opened up in anticipation of no deal. He is probably assuming no deal will not happen but these routes will continue to be developed paid for by the British taxpayer and therefore reducing the competitiveness of his port. The chairman of Eurotunnel wrote to Chris Grayling yesterday complaining about the impact of government plans on his business. In this environment it is very much in the interest of Calais port's owner to downplay the problems that might happen.On the matter of the so-called bias of the mainstream media, it is indisputable that reporting standards have fallen over the last decade, including at the BBC but the idea that there is some sort of over-arching conspiracy to suppress the truth is deluded. If you want to properly understand in detail what is happening with Brexit read the Financial Times and the Economist which still devote significant resources to reporting and, if they have any bias it is pro-business. Paul's assertion that there is a migrant driven crime crisis on the continent of Europe that we are not being told about also doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. I've seen some of the videos that he is referring to and some are quite shocking. There is no question that sometimes people from ethnic minorities are involved in crime however in most of the videos that have been shown the majority of perpetrators proved to be second or third generation nationals of their countries. Crime by relatively recently arrived migrants tends to be well below average national crime rates.Overall if you look at the numbers some ethnic minorities are over represented in the crime figures for many European countries. However, if you factor in age (as a much higher proportion tend to be young men) there isn't really any higher propensity for immigrant communities to commit crime than for the general population. You can create the impression there is by showing carefully selected videos of young black men causing trouble but it doesn't represent the true picture of what is going on.In any case, how this relates to Brexit is unclear. The proportion of crimes committed by EU citizens who came to work in the UK under freedom of movement is way, way below that for the general population.

David Parker ● 2861d

Paul, I'm interested in what you consider to be the Main Stream Media and what the consensus is.To me, to take the daily papers as a starting point, they seem to hold a variety of different editorial lines. All except The Guardian, maybe the FT (and intermittently, perhaps The Evening Standard) seem to be pretty solidly supportive of the referendum result.But within that 'leaver' camp of papers, The Express and The Telegraph seem to be broadly against the Prime Minister's deal and in favour of exit without a deal. The Mail was maybe also in that place until Paul Dacre left as editor, but now seems to be a bit more supportive of the Prime Minister. The Times' position doesn't quite leap out at me but I think maybe also supportive of the PM's deal?The Guardian is fundamentally sceptical that leave is a good thing and sometimes has comment pieces advocating a second referendum, but failing that seems to think that the Prime Minister's deal is the 'least worst' option. I think the FT is perhaps also roughly in that place?So, quite a variety of positions there.I'm also interested what alternative outlets you advocate.I subscribe to the digital editions of a number of magazines (and to Readly, which gives me access to a lot more) and that gives me a variety of perspectives.I also find that twitter can flag up really helpful articles by experts (e.g. this week Dr Catherine Haddon of the Institute for Government has been a godsend explaining the goings on in the House of Commons; George Peretz QC is great on trade law and regulation etc etc).And I like podcasts e.g. Talking Politics, presented by a bunch of Cambridge University politics, economics and history academics is often very educational.

James Elder ● 2861d

I share the bafflement of many that the 'mainstream media' is acting together in some sort of conspiracy to deny the 'truth' to the population.  Where is this 'truth' to be found?  Well, the internet of course, where you can quickly find anything that will support whatever your views happen to be.  But how reliable are these other outlets, how much is assertion rather than fact?The press have always been very open about their political allegiances and most tell us on election day exactly who to vote for.  The same with Brexit - it was prefectly clear which papers were for and which against Brexit.  But look further - all the papers, from the Telegraph to the FT to the Guardian, carry a range of comment and often allow columnists space to argue cases well against the editorial line.  But you only see this if you actually read a cross-section of the press on a regular basis.The broadcast media is different.  The BBC charter requires them to be neutral and by and large the other news programmes, eg ITN, C4, Sky, follow that approach.In my view, the BBC have bent over backwards to achieve what they call 'balance' but I also think this has prevented them from truly challenging a lot of political position-taking.  This was at its worst in the run-up to the referendum when they conspicuously failed to challenge the Leave slogans such as the £350mn per week on the side of the bus, just as they failed to challenge the more outlandish predictions of disaster and armageddon by the Remain side.So, many of their debates had expert analysis of the risks of Brexit being put up against a set of unchallenged slogans and assertions.  And yet the BBC still gets accused of anti-Brexit bias, with no evidence offered by its many accusers.The BBC has been accused of bias - by Labour (for reporting comment critical of Corbyn - remember the police guard for Laura Kuenssberg at the last Labour Conf)- by the Tories (for being a bunch of leftwing luvvies and members of the 'metropolitan elite', another phrase now used pejoratively even by people who live in one of our metropolitan cities)- by UKIP (for treating them, as David Cameron said once, as "fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists" - and so denying them a voice on TV debates etc)- by the SNP (for being pro-Establishment and anti-Scottish independence)- by the Lib Dems (for ignoring them)- by Brexiteers (for being pro-Remain) and - by Remainers (for being too soft on the Leave campaign - here I think there is a case!).  So, the argument runs, if they are upsetting politicians across the spectrum they must be doing something right.  I think they do their best to be neutral but have taken this too far, been worn down by the ever more virulent criticism to the extent that they have all too often neutered themselves.  That does none of us a service and does not bode well for balanced and informed debate in the future.  I listen to the BBC a lot, esp Radio 4 so I'm probably hopelessly biased too.  I hear plenty I don't like and write to the Today programme when I think they have let some waffling or lying politician off the hook far too lightly.  But I will keep listening.

Jonathan Callaway ● 2861d

The much wider issue of food security post Brexit is a huge issue and not just due to what might or might not happen at Dover and Calais.  I have just seen a detailed analysis from Chatham House, (WARNING: written by experts).  They see change as inevitable (and essential) whatever new regulatory regime we end up accepting, or having to accept.  And they believe it will require the development of carefully considered and implemented new policies to cope with the new reality - all of which will come at potentially a huge cost, possibly not a cost ever considered ruring the Brexit debate.  They see opportunities too, but only if good government prevails and there is more and better long term planning.  We are (for the time being at least) in Mr Gove's hands.The link is here https://reader.chathamhouse.org/food-politics-and-policies-post-brexit-britain#The summary of the article is here (it's quite long in itself):    For almost half a century, the UK’s food system – comprising the totality of food production, transport, manufacturing, retailing and consumption – has been intrinsically and intricately linked to its membership of the European Community and, subsequently, the EU. Arguably, for no other sectors are the challenges and opportunities of Brexit as extensive as they are for UK food and agriculture.    Reforming the UK’s food system won’t be easy. The 21st century economic, market, regulatory and political systems are exceedingly resistant to change, locked into the way they have evolved over decades. The tight Brexit timeline, the complexities of negotiations and the political pressure to secure new trade deals could easily lead to hasty decisions that are poorly conceived and become near impossible to correct.    There is a risk of a two-tier regulatory system emerging whereby, after its withdrawal from the EU, the UK produces food at higher standards but imports cheaper and potentially lower-quality food from countries with reduced welfare or environmental standards. These developments could affect consumer confidence and cause public distrust.    Meanwhile, new market conditions could incentivize greater intensification and/or reduce the number of small farms, affecting the profitability and structure of the UK farming sector. This should be managed carefully to ensure that the cultural link between British citizens and their rural environment is not negatively affected.    The UK will also need to invest in more reliable supply chains and develop resilience in prospective partner countries to help them respond to the combined threats of climate change and global environmental degradation, as this could impact the resilience of the UK’s food system, food prices and availability.    Currently, the UK operates on a ‘just in time’ food system, maintaining five to 10 days’ worth of groceries in the country (often less in the case of fresh produce). Once the UK is outside the EU, its food industry will need to factor in time for longer inspections of food imports at its borders, and build the necessary infrastructure to conduct these checks.    The UK has an unprecedented opportunity, in the context of Brexit, to equip its food system to withstand these challenges, but the transition will need to be managed carefully. Any reconfiguration will first need to understand and take account of what citizens and consumers value most about the food system. Second, a UK-wide and cross-government approach will be necessary to foster a holistic, profitable, healthy and sustainable food system for all. Processing, supply chains and labelling must be transparent, and must take full advantage of new technologies available.

Jonathan Callaway ● 2861d

It does indeed give me a metropolitan view but I have travelled through France too and most of my French friends gravitated to Paris from all over the country. My partner's sister retains a home in the Auvergne (where they lived for generations before their grandparents came to Paris.) My partner's flat is in the 12th - very residential with few tourists - between Bastille and Nation. Rue Vielle du Temple is lovely and now one of the most expensive parts of Paris as you know.I'm not sure the standard of living has fallen in France any more than it has done in UK. When I visit French markets outside of Paris food is fresh, local and plentiful. Incidentally the French will always have the means to feed themselves without need of imports, unlike us Brits.The financial problems the rural French face are little different to Brits in poorer parts of the UK eg lack of public transport meaning they have to own a car just to go to the nearest village or town to buy their daily bread. Having said that, many villages including the tiny one my other half grew up in, now have a baguette machine which produces very good bread. I don't know where the money goes but as you are aware they have better facilities than we do in many cases, which have to be paid for eg their health service (if a blood test is done, for example, the results come through within 24 hours not like the week it takes for us) If a mother needs to return to paid work after having a baby the nursery fees are paid for (unlike here where  15 hours is paid for only after a child reaches his third birthday)The Gilets Jaunes want this to continue and more besides but demand lower taxes -  it makes no sense. Today so far they are marching peacefully while a massive gas  explosion nearby has already taken the lives of four people including a fireman :-(

Lucille Grant ● 2860d

Well, I mentioned the problems Brexit will creat for our expats several times but it was ignored.  A lot of UK expats didn't even get a vote even though they will be more directly affected by Brexit than any of the rest of us.  Since the vote they have had to live with uncertainty about both their residence and work permit status.  Some countries, at this very late stage, have started to clarify what they will offer (eg Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Italy and (I think) France) but others have yet to pronounce.As for job opportunities in the EU (and beyond) for young people I think we have to consider what an intense international market there is for top talent.  I mentor a couple of students a year from my old Uni, Exeter.  Some are UK nationals, others from elsewhere in or beyond the EU.  Work permit uncertainties are a huge issue for them already.  For the language graduate who gets a good job in industry in Germany but doesn't know if they can keep it post Brexit, to the Korean business studies grad who wants a job in the City but can't find a sponsor to support his visa application, they need to be able to travel even to get that all-important first career job.For our kids, if they want to compete in a global market place they need international experience whether or not they can speak a second language.  They have to be able to compete with French, German, Indian, Chinese and other foreign grads who not only speak fluent English but have another language as a mother tongue.  In short, anything that makes it harder for our kids to work abroad and gain essential horizon-expanding experience, will harm their longterm prospects.And even if they never leave these shores to work elsewhere, or never want to, they have to compete with these same foreign grads in this country, always assuming "Global Britain" means anything and we continue to allow companies to move their international staff into and out of this country.Global industries, such as finance, pharma, engineering, oil & gas, consulting, telecoms, tech (especially tech!) all need to be able to move their staff around.  If the barriers come down here in line with the government's determination to restrict immigration, then those same barriers will come down and prevent our kids getting the sort of international experience they will need in their careers.  It will be to their longterm detriment.  And if the barriers come down here it will force some companies to move their operations - and the jobs they generate - overseas.  It's already happening in the City and London's previously undisputed position as the financial centre of Europe is now under real threat.  You may be anti-globalisation, anti-bankers and anti-capitalism itself, but what will our best and brightest do if the best jobs migrate abroad and they can't follow them?

Jonathan Callaway ● 2858d

I am posting this at the end of the thread as the original will probably get lost in the middle of it somewhere.Re the problems Brexit will create for our expats.  A lot of UK expats didn't even get a vote even though they will be more directly affected by Brexit than any of the rest of us.  Since the vote they have had to live with uncertainty about both their residence and work permit status.  Some countries, at this very late stage, have started to clarify what they will offer (eg Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Italy and (I think) France) but others have yet to pronounce.As for job opportunities in the EU (and beyond) for young people I think we have to consider what an intense international market there is for top talent.  I mentor a couple of students a year from my old Uni, Exeter.  Some are UK nationals, others from elsewhere in or beyond the EU.  Work permit uncertainties are a huge issue for them already.  For the language graduate who gets a good job in industry in Germany but doesn't know if they can keep it post Brexit, to the Korean business studies grad who wants a job in the City but can't find a sponsor to support his visa application, they need to be able to travel even to get that all-important first career job.For our kids, if they want to compete in a global market place they need international experience whether or not they can speak a second language.  They have to be able to compete with French, German, Indian, Chinese and other foreign grads who not only speak fluent English but have another language as a mother tongue.  In short, anything that makes it harder for our kids to work abroad and gain essential horizon-expanding experience, will harm their longterm prospects.And even if they never leave these shores to work elsewhere, or never want to, they have to compete with these same foreign grads in this country, always assuming "Global Britain" means anything and we continue to allow companies to move their international staff into and out of this country.Global industries, such as finance, pharma, engineering, oil & gas, consulting, telecoms, tech (especially tech!) all need to be able to move their staff around.  If the barriers come down here in line with the government's determination to restrict immigration, then those same barriers will come down and prevent our kids getting the sort of international experience they will need in their careers.  It will be to their longterm detriment.  And if the barriers come down here it will force some companies to move their operations - and the jobs they generate - overseas.  It's already happening in the City and London's previously undisputed position as the financial centre of Europe is now under real threat.  You may be anti-globalisation, anti-bankers and anti-capitalism itself, but what will our best and brightest do if the best jobs migrate abroad and they can't follow them?

Jonathan Callaway ● 2858d

Martine, the reason I care about the futures for the best and brightest is that their futures are crucial to the success of the country as a whole.  Remember all that agonising about the brain drain back in the 1970s?  A lot of our best scientists went to the US and some of them did very well there. But their departure contributed to the economic stagnation we suffered in the UK.  I also escaped by going off to work abroad (not I hasten to add as part of the brain drain). In my case I went to Hong Kong, then New York and then Germany. I’m very glad I did it but it wasn’t easy even though I first broke away when I was still in my 20s and single. We had joined the EU/Common Market by the time I got to Germany and apart from the form filling it was a lot easier than when I went there as a student for a summer job pre 1973. What I am saying is that today we may well see reduced opportunities for many grads if we return to a world or work permits and visa difficulties. That won’t be good for the economy even if we probably won’t have to worry about the best and the brightest who usually find a way.  There are far more grads around today and they have something I never had - student loan debt. So why make their start in life even tougher?  None of my mentees has been under any illusion the world owes them a living but then most of them are “normal” kids not the public school and Oxbridge types. Leaving the EU will affect students in another way - our participation in the Erasmus scheme is likely to come to an end. This was a great way to get to study abroad and of course is reciprocal so foreign students could come here. They are now more likely to go to other English speaking countries, again to our detriment. On your point about the effects of Brexit on non grads I think that may be more indirect in that if the economy slips into recession then there will be fewer jobs around. Retail has its own problems of course and the gig economy is not a source of secure income for most. And if the highest earners also struggle then there will be fewer house extensions and makeovers which keep a lot of painters and decorators busy. I know a lot of them feel worse off thanks to all those hardworking Poles but I am really not convinced that is the case. And the Poles pay taxes and have disproportionately fewer benefit claimants than the general population.

Jonathan Callaway ● 2857d